Brother915 said: Usuallly when an artist brings in dozens of producers on one album,,,that's a sign of trouble.
Good point. The same axiom applies in movies when you see more than 3 screenwriters. That's a sign of rewriting when the orignals have been canned or moved on. You'll find the ending has been "tacked on" and has a "inorganic" feel to the overall dramatic flow. test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NatTurner said: The album moved over 1 million units.
It did sell. Poor guy. Looks like you got overlaid by July's post test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Here's my theory... the album is a piece of shit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Clubkid said: Here's my theory... the album is a piece of shit.
LOL theories must be based on observable measurable facts. test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The album could have obviously sold more, if they had pushed "Butterflies" as the first single and put out a cool video, with a more tan Jackson. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
'Invincible...why i think it didnt sell'!!! ehhh, it sold 10million with 10% of the promotion michael jackson usually gets! i say thats damn near invincible, no other artist in history could sell that amount with that amount of promotion, michael jackson has proved that he still has an amazingly huge fanbase, 1 which i think madonna and prince could never have! im fed up of ppl critizing michael jackson constantly, when was the last time some1 said something positive about him! its so sad, ppl find it easier 2 critisize than 2 praise! if u dont think michael jackson is talented u obviously havent heard "billie jean", "beat it", "smooth criminal", "heal the world", "earth song", "who is it", dirty diana", "stranger in moscow", "speechless" and why dont u have a read at "dancing the dream" or read it from the internet, if thats not genius i dont know what is!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ZaZa said: mistermaxxx said: MJ has Peer Respect.maybe not as many as Other Artists or Acts but He gets Props from Some folks in the Biz.
Yeah he gets props from Liz Taylor, Red Buttons, Liza Minelli, Gregory Peck - past their prime with one foot in the grave showbiz folk. mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: Urbanhang22 said: mistermaxxx said: I Truly Don't Understand why Even Bother talking about Michael Jackson here? He won't get a Fair Shot here at all no matter what."Invincible" was Better than Average but Not on Par with His Best but still better than alot of Crap out now.nowadays all you need is 2-3 Songs to Blow up MJ had at least 5 Solid Songs On His Last Album.but Why even Mention Him just to Rip Into Him?what does it Prove?One thing I Gotta Say: Everybody in Show Business is a Entertainer Soem just do it Better than Others but it's all a Show in Front of Our Eyes off Stage it's all Business.Loved Or loathed You Don't Last 30 plus Years especially as a Child Artist in that Business without Having Respect.MJ has Peer Respect.maybe not as many as Other Artists or Acts but He gets Props from Some folks in the Biz.
I agree with some of your points however I have to ask what made Invincible different from the releases of the young pop artists today? The only difference I see is that it came from Michael Jackson so it has to be better when in actuality its not. The way I see it,MOST POP MUSIC IS CRAP THESE DAYS.I mean,look at the Top 40 charts and tell me how many truly great songs you will find.So,having said that,I must say that,if I buy a CD that has at least 5 or 6 strong songs on it,I'm impressed.'Invincible' has a total of 16 tracks and there are only 4 songs that totally suck ("Privacy","Don't Walk Away","You Are My Life" and the lame title track).So,personally speaking,I am impressed with the record.I honestly haven't met ANY MJ fans that DO NOT like the songs "Butterflies","Break of Dawn","Heaven Can Wait","Whatever Happens" and "Speechless". mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: I think people need to realize that,NO ARTIST STAYS ON TOP FOREVER! MJ has been in the business since he was 9 years old! It's absurd to think that,after all these years,he would still be able to sell massive amounts of records.He simply needs to accept reality.He still has a loyal,sizable fanbase but he needs to accept the fact that 5 million worldwide copies is how much he will sell these days (and that's nothing to sneeze at,you know).
Classic Post MAN.Compared to most of his former Motown peers,Mike is actually doing pretty good.When was the last Diana Ross,Smokey Robinson or Stevie Wonder sold 5 miliion copies of an album? Compared to most of the artists who were "hot" in the 80s,MJ is also doing pretty good.When was the last time Boy George,Cyndi Lauper,or Lionel Ritchie sold 5 million copies of an album? As far as record sales go,Mike has already done the impossible.He sold 50 million copies (worldwide) of a single album!! That is a record that NO ONE has been able to surpass.Whether or not 'Invincible' is brilliant or crap is besides the point.He will never sell like 'Thriller',no matter WHAT the record sounds like. mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: mistermaxxx said: but what is the Matter with OJ?
How much time you got? mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FunkyBrotha said: 'Invincible...why i think it didnt sell'!!! ehhh, it sold 10million with 10% of the promotion michael jackson usually gets! i say thats damn near invincible, no other artist in history could sell that amount with that amount of promotion, michael jackson has proved that he still has an amazingly huge fanbase, 1 which i think madonna and prince could never have! im fed up of ppl critizing michael jackson constantly, when was the last time some1 said something positive about him! its so sad, ppl find it easier 2 critisize than 2 praise! if u dont think michael jackson is talented u obviously havent heard "billie jean", "beat it", "smooth criminal", "heal the world", "earth song", "who is it", dirty diana", "stranger in moscow", "speechless" and why dont u have a read at "dancing the dream" or read it from the internet, if thats not genius i dont know what is!!
besides for the music scene chaning sooo drastically since history, mj even got a grammy nomination and still shifted more albums than paul or mick jagger. it could and would've sold more if promation was there. can u imagine how much it would have sold if the promation was the same as history??? ppl. just hate him cos he don't play no insturment on stage. ( he plays them while he is making records!) or they think he is gay,child molestor,and had too much plastic surgery. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FunkyBrotha said:[quote]'Invincible...why i think it didnt sell'!!! ehhh, it sold 10million with 10% of the promotion michael jackson usually gets! i say thats damn near invincible, no other artist in history could sell that amount with that amount of promotion.
Why are people still saying he had no promotion? A Million bands would KILL for the promotion Michael Jackson gets. Most artists have to tour their ASSES off, try and win fans with as many interviews with radio and TV as they can do in a day. And Michael? He gets a ABC special. A mega video/movie with Chris Tucker. MTV and VH1 play all sorts of old MJ specials to remind people of his greatness. What more do you want?? If MJ really wanted to break this album, he could have got off his ass and said, "I want to tour the world and show people I still have it". But he didn't. Tough shit for him. If he isn't going to do any "work himself" in promoting his own music, and think that his reputation will sell millions of records for him, then he got what he deserved. If it breaks when it bends, you better not put it in. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Brother915 said: Usuallly when an artist brings in dozens of producers on one album,,,that's a sign of trouble. not always the case.Santana had alot of Producers Involved with His Last album.MJ had alot of different Producers on "History.in fact He has always worked with a Bunch of folks&it really hasn't hurt Him.Madonna on Her "BedTime Stories" Album had quite a few folks there.and to put this into Better Perspective: check out most of the Rap Albums over the past 5 Years? you get alot of different Producers on a Project.the truth is: the days of a All JAm&Lewis,Quincy Jones,Teddy Riley,etc.. are long gone.David Foster for instance has at least always seems to do Projects with at least 3-5 other Producers on projects.it becomes a Problem when say the last SWV Album had alot of Producers&Rappers overtaken there Album&Making them Essentially Background Singers on there Own Album.now that is a Problem.but nowadays very Rarely do you get a Self-Contained Album on a Major Label.mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
giotto said: Making the record buying public wait for a period of six years before deciding to release your next album will, in a twisted kind of logic, create a lot of interest in your next record. The reality is that this has been, more or less, MJ's proven ploy for the best part of two decades - and running - and has always guaranteed MJ a hefty amount of sales.
I'd dig it if He dropped a Album this Year but He hasn't done anything like that since His Early CBS/Sony days&once He Sold a Ton of Records off One Album you get the Formula you have had since "Off The Wall" a Gap of at least 3 years.He might Sell well if He comes with the Right Stuff.but what happen with "Thriller" was a Career in One&that just doesn't happen usually at all if Ever?Would MJ sell as many records were he to release a follow up to "Invinvcible" before the end of 2002? I seriously doubt it. mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The album is not great, but it's bad either.My favorite
song off it is Speechless. My name is BISCUIT...and I am funky! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lemoncrush said: If MJ really wanted to break this album, he could have got off his ass and said, "I want to tour the world and show people I still have it". But he didn't. Tough shit for him. If he isn't going to do any "work himself" in promoting his own music, and think that his reputation will sell millions of records for him, then he got what he deserved. I agree with you. MJ did the TV special, a couple of interviews and that was it. He went back to Neverland and waited for the sales figures to come in. He has not toured the U.S. in at least 10 years. His management should have talked to him and gotten him to do at least a few dates in the U.S., hitting major cities. He could have done the same kind of tour that Madonna did: a limited tour of the U.S. and Europe hitting a few key cities. MJ still has a core audience in the U.S. Sales of Invincible in the U.S. is about 2 million, the same as Mariah Carey sells. If MJ wants big sales, he has to make people care about his music again. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Merely selling "units" is not enough. Gross sales must not only exceed production and promotion costs, but they must exceed or match projected sales to show growth. It's called "return on investment" which is, basically, the cost of doing business. SONY spent so much on a TV special and all because they expected INVINCIBLE to sell through the roof! Upon release, charts indicated that thing was dying a fast death in its headlong crash crash the charts, so they pulled the plug on expenses to MJ to stop the bleeding!. It wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't spent so much on production and promotion.
Like Prince, Michael needs to have a more sophistciated way of handling his business. This amounts to little more than a public temper tantrum. I would agree that if he had bothered to tour instead of that antiseptic soulless, celebrity-filled obnoxious TV special he would have been able to cultivate an audience for his music. And so it goes... test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PFunkjazz said: Merely selling "units" is not enough. Gross sales must not only exceed production and promotion costs, but they must exceed or match projected sales to show growth. It's called "return on investment" which is, basically, the cost of doing business. SONY spent so much on a TV special and all because they expected INVINCIBLE to sell through the roof! Upon release, charts indicated that thing was dying a fast death in its headlong crash crash the charts, so they pulled the plug on expenses to MJ to stop the bleeding!. It wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't spent so much on production and promotion.
Like Prince, Michael needs to have a more sophistciated way of handling his business. This amounts to little more than a public temper tantrum. I would agree that if he had bothered to tour instead of that antiseptic soulless, celebrity-filled obnoxious TV special he would have been able to cultivate an audience for his music. And so it goes... what u said was very interesting! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
subyduby said: PFunkjazz said: Merely selling "units" is not enough. Gross sales must not only exceed production and promotion costs, but they must exceed or match projected sales to show growth. It's called "return on investment" which is, basically, the cost of doing business. SONY spent so much on a TV special and all because they expected INVINCIBLE to sell through the roof! Upon release, charts indicated that thing was dying a fast death in its headlong crash crash the charts, so they pulled the plug on expenses to MJ to stop the bleeding!. It wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't spent so much on production and promotion.
Like Prince, Michael needs to have a more sophistciated way of handling his business. This amounts to little more than a public temper tantrum. I would agree that if he had bothered to tour instead of that antiseptic soulless, celebrity-filled obnoxious TV special he would have been able to cultivate an audience for his music. And so it goes... what u said was very interesting! mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree with you mistermaxx, SONY had nothing to do with that concert specials at all (where were all the ads)...when I watched the Celine speical their were heaps! SONY didn't spend $30 million on that album because these days labels don't want to spend that kind of money on an artist. That was spin on their part and if they were so supportive like they claimed to be why didn't they commercially release any singles in the US? So far we are only getting 1 side of the story (from SONY's point of view...this from a label that has been known in the last 25 years to rip off their artists...shit Earth, Wind and Fire are still chasing them for royalites dating back to 1975!!!) and I think there is more to this. I may be a Prince fanatic but I also like MJ and I think he is being unfairly treaded by the media, just because he had the nerve to tell it like it is (that Mottola guy tried to destroy Mariah last year and he is doing it to Micahel via the press)! Sure MJ has made it very easy for them (due to his poor judgement in people, decision making and bad PR) but I think what he is saying is of substance and after reading all the articles about how shady these record labels are towards their aritsts and the tatics they use to discredit them etc I still believe in him (like I do with Prince). [This message was edited Fri Jul 26 21:47:12 PDT 2002 by fonkywonder] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mistermaxxx said: Supernova said: mistermaxxx said: but what is the Matter with OJ?
How much time you got? Regardless of the the outome of that case, I have no use for the phoney, wife-beating fool that is OJ Simpson. And I have no sympathy for him about the backlash and pariah status he has attained since then. He made his bed, and he'll lie in it forever. [This message was edited Fri Jul 26 22:08:12 PDT 2002 by Supernova] This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Fonkywonder and mistermaxx are both probably right: Sony may not have paid for the production costs of the TV concert special, but it still amounts to promotional expenditures that MJ would expect Sony to reimburse. test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mistermaxxx said: Supernova said: mistermaxxx said: but what is the Matter with OJ?
How much time you got? I agree that O.J. just played the system something that has gone on with whites for years in the U.S., ie. Emmit Till, The bombing in B-ham, etc. etc. etc. However I'm African American and it pisses me off that Blacks are always there to take up for a person who when they gain acceptance from the mainstream try to distance themselves from the people there were there for them before they crossed over. It amazes me how we will defend OJ or excuse him to the hilt just because whites overreact to the verdict. Wrong is wrong OJ and Michael Jackson are two examples of people that did not want anything to do with being identified as black because they had been accepted by whites (only in terms of entertaining them) but when the mainstream turned on them they used the black/racism excuse to have support from someone. Af. Americans are too forgiving of people that don't give a shit about us when we are on top. Mrmax u need to read Michael Eric Dyson's Rules, or anything written by Cornel West/Bell Hooks, and maybe u would think about the people u so adamently defend. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Urbanhang22 said: mistermaxxx said: Supernova said: mistermaxxx said: but what is the Matter with OJ?
How much time you got? I agree that O.J. just played the system something that has gone on with whites for years in the U.S., ie. Emmit Till, The bombing in B-ham, etc. etc. etc. However I'm African American and it pisses me off that Blacks are always there to take up for a person who when they gain acceptance from the mainstream try to distance themselves from the people there were there for them before they crossed over. It amazes me how we will defend OJ or excuse him to the hilt just because whites overreact to the verdict. Wrong is wrong OJ and Michael Jackson are two examples of people that did not want anything to do with being identified as black because they had been accepted by whites (only in terms of entertaining them) but when the mainstream turned on them they used the black/racism excuse to have support from someone. Af. Americans are too forgiving of people that don't give a shit about us when we are on top. Mrmax u need to read Michael Eric Dyson's Rules, or anything written by Cornel West/Bell Hooks, and maybe u would think about the people u so adamently defend. Michael Eric Dyson's Race Rules | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Urbanhang22 said: mistermaxxx said: Supernova said: mistermaxxx said: but what is the Matter with OJ?
How much time you got? I agree that O.J. just played the system something that has gone on with whites for years in the U.S., ie. Emmit Till, The bombing in B-ham, etc. etc. etc. However I'm African American and it pisses me off that Blacks are always there to take up for a person who when they gain acceptance from the mainstream try to distance themselves from the people there were there for them before they crossed over. It amazes me how we will defend OJ or excuse him to the hilt just because whites overreact to the verdict. Wrong is wrong OJ and Michael Jackson are two examples of people that did not want anything to do with being identified as black because they had been accepted by whites (only in terms of entertaining them) but when the mainstream turned on them they used the black/racism excuse to have support from someone. Af. Americans are too forgiving of people that don't give a shit about us when we are on top. Mrmax u need to read Michael Eric Dyson's Rules, or anything written by Cornel West/Bell Hooks, and maybe u would think about the people u so adamently defend. mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Urbanhang22 said: mistermaxxx said: Supernova said: mistermaxxx said: but what is the Matter with OJ?
How much time you got? I agree that O.J. just played the system something that has gone on with whites for years in the U.S., ie. Emmit Till, The bombing in B-ham, etc. etc. etc. However I'm African American and it pisses me off that Blacks are always there to take up for a person who when they gain acceptance from the mainstream try to distance themselves from the people there were there for them before they crossed over. It amazes me how we will defend OJ or excuse him to the hilt just because whites overreact to the verdict. Wrong is wrong OJ and Michael Jackson are two examples of people that did not want anything to do with being identified as black because they had been accepted by whites (only in terms of entertaining them) but when the mainstream turned on them they used the black/racism excuse to have support from someone. Af. Americans are too forgiving of people that don't give a shit about us when we are on top. Mrmax u need to read Michael Eric Dyson's Rules, or anything written by Cornel West/Bell Hooks, and maybe u would think about the people u so adamently defend. mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it didn't sell coz it's poo! ----------
AND I GOTTA ALOTTA BUTTA 2 GO! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mistermaxxx said: Brother915 said: Usuallly when an artist brings in dozens of producers on one album,,,that's a sign of trouble. not always the case.Santana had alot of Producers Involved with His Last album.MJ had alot of different Producers on "History.in fact He has always worked with a Bunch of folks&it really hasn't hurt Him.Madonna on Her "BedTime Stories" Album had quite a few folks there.and to put this into Better Perspective: check out most of the Rap Albums over the past 5 Years? you get alot of different Producers on a Project.the truth is: the days of a All JAm&Lewis,Quincy Jones,Teddy Riley,etc.. are long gone.David Foster for instance has at least always seems to do Projects with at least 3-5 other Producers on projects.it becomes a Problem when say the last SWV Album had alot of Producers&Rappers overtaken there Album&Making them Essentially Background Singers on there Own Album.now that is a Problem.but nowadays very Rarely do you get a Self-Contained Album on a Major Label.Yeah, but you don't have a cohesive album that flows well. That was the point I was trying to make. When you got a whole lot of producers on one album(let's say 7 producers), you have different styles, it doesn't make for a solid cohesive statement ( sometimes the result can be a hideous mess). A lot of hardcore Santana fans hate the SUPERNATURAL album for this reason. It's an ok record IMHO. OFF THE WALL is a classic album. One producer, one artist coming up with some solid material. The album flows well very well from track to track. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NikkiDarling said: lemoncrush said: If MJ really wanted to break this album, he could have got off his ass and said, "I want to tour the world and show people I still have it". But he didn't. Tough shit for him. If he isn't going to do any "work himself" in promoting his own music, and think that his reputation will sell millions of records for him, then he got what he deserved. I agree with you. MJ did the TV special, a couple of interviews and that was it. He went back to Neverland and waited for the sales figures to come in. He has not toured the U.S. in at least 10 years. His management should have talked to him and gotten him to do at least a few dates in the U.S., hitting major cities. He could have done the same kind of tour that Madonna did: a limited tour of the U.S. and Europe hitting a few key cities. MJ still has a core audience in the U.S. Sales of Invincible in the U.S. is about 2 million, the same as Mariah Carey sells. If MJ wants big sales, he has to make people care about his music again. MJ haven't toured the entire US since 1988 (THE BAD TOUR). I saw this tour and enjoyed it alot. Michael proved himself as an ultimate showman. One of the highlights of that tour was his amazing performance of "Human Nature" and bring-the- house-down peformance of "Man In The Mirror" at the end of the concert. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PFunkjazz said: Merely selling "units" is not enough. Gross sales must not only exceed production and promotion costs, but they must exceed or match projected sales to show growth. It's called "return on investment" which is, basically, the cost of doing business. SONY spent so much on a TV special and all because they expected INVINCIBLE to sell through the roof! Upon release, charts indicated that thing was dying a fast death in its headlong crash crash the charts, so they pulled the plug on expenses to MJ to stop the bleeding!. It wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't spent so much on production and promotion.
Like Prince, Michael needs to have a more sophistciated way of handling his business. This amounts to little more than a public temper tantrum. I would agree that if he had bothered to tour instead of that antiseptic soulless, celebrity-filled obnoxious TV special he would have been able to cultivate an audience for his music. I concur with this. The anniversary special was about his ego IMHO. Yes...VERY OBNOXIOUS!!! And so it goes... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |