sosgemini said:

I know..LMAO..That was the funniest statement on this thread. It's sooooo true.

wavesofbliss said:

Ok I'm sorry, but now you just set yourself up with that one.





I'll refrain from saying it. I will I will! Instant karma and all.

SHOCKADELICA1 said:

That's funny, because the UK Sunday Times did one last year and he was £500 million, which is about half that.

Martinelli said:

That's JUST WRONG!!!!!

calldapplwondery83 said:

I don't know of certain if Paul could lose 50% like they do it here in USA. But he would lose some money if he divorce!

booyah said:[quote]Will you still need me, will you still feed me, when I'm 64? - I guess not...

That holds true more often than not....

I have a friend involved with someone 20 years younger....the above quoted lyric is a question anyone should ask when involved with a younger person....

However Paul and Heather did ~by appearance~ seem to be a valid and "in love" (whatever the h_ll that is) married couple....

Does anyone else find her similar to Linda? I think she looks like Linda, has similar interests in philathropic work like Linda, etc....

I find it all a bit sad, really....

TonyVanDam said:

Let's just hope they both get through this. It must be a terrible situation. Sure, a lot of relationships end all the time, but when money is involved, it must be a bit harder.

Paul McCartney was married to Stephanie Mills

Her fake leg must have freaked him out.

He's annoying. She's crazy. Stella is a troll.

They should ship Paul & Heather off to an ice floe somewhere so they can commune with the seals.

I hate he didn't find love with her.. but she seemed like a big bitch

cubic61052 said:[quote]

booyah said:

I like Heather Mills Mc Cartney...I've found that the work she does on behalf of children in war torn regions is nonthing less than above reproach, and I also like the work she does on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of people losing limbs to landmine explosions in areas where we simply haven't removed them...even decades after we end conflicts with these nations...it's kind of macabre that these mines have not been removed, and in turn the people who are victims of mine tragedies have to pay upawards of several thousand dollars for limbs that cost westerners approx. $700...I'll alway dig her for this cause,in spite of the fact that she gets a bit "shrill" in the voice when she's advocating animal rights on television at times.

Even though I'm a tried and true carnivore, I still respect vegetarians and animal rights activists, and particularly those who have the courage to go out and stump for their beliefs...but in all frankness, the times that I have seen Heather go out and do press for animal rights causes she supports, she becomes nothing less than SHRILL and ANNIAHILATIVE---as much in bad tatse as this might sound, I've had moments where I would wonder if Heather, in opposition to members of discussion panels where she was guesting, was not on the verge of taking off her leg and cracking some of these guys across the head...I mean, this is a strong lady, an informed formed lady, and a verbally articulate one at that...but there are some moments when she can get PRETTY SCRAPPY, like she might pop you one in the mouth if you don't open your mind to seeing viewpoints other than what you're accustomed to ...of course, this is a characteristic that I've found somewhat appealing through the years


I do also remember though, seeing an American interviewer ask her once about her relationship with Sir Paul, and whether or not she felt inadaquate as a girlfriend or potential wife to him because of her (presumed) "disability"... she told them FLAT OUT that she didn't consider herself any less of a human being just because she was missing a limb, and that if ANY man, Sir Paul included had any misgivings about being with her because she lost a leg, then he could move the hell on and out of the way and so she could find somebody else who would see here for her heart (!) I rather liked that point of view, actually

RipHer2Shreds said:

no not them. her family made their money as entertainment attorney's as well as her(linda's) mother inheriting and good deal of money.

linda was a photographer but no relation to the film and camera company people.
[Edited 5/18/06 9:48am]

wavesofbliss said:

I'm having an Oprah moment. "I feel duped." You're right! I looked it up. All these years, I fell for the myth.

I read in the paper this morning she could get up to $376 mill in the divorce settlements.

Damn.


Someone post a picture of Eddie saying "HALF!!"

SPYZFAN1 said:

WTF was Sir P thinking????? I guess it's true that pot kills brain cells.

$376m - that's B.S. What did she do to earn it? They weren't even married that long! All Sir P owes her is child support. It's not his responsibility to provide for her lifestyle - let her go out and write some f-n songs. Same thing applies if the roles are reversed and the woman is the primary earner.

Marriage is so f-d up these days - it's all about getting paid.

Seems like he was used as a tool for her "voiced opinion".. his fame was the medium for her message.

uPtoWnNY said:

Couldnt have said it better - let her go out and write some songs!!!!

SPYZFAN1 said:

Not Half...


HIS!!!!

You know... I quite like her. When she's talking about animal rights; prosphetic limbs or land mines, I like her.

I just don't know if they're right for each other.

Anyway - it's a separation, not a divorce. They might get back together.

Ellie said:

Same here.

Justin1972UK said:

After the settlement goes thru, she'll definitely be talking more about "How I landed mine's".






Damn you, Yoko....

two questions:
why do people always assume it's primarily a money thing?

why are men(and some women in the same position) so selfish? why is it such a problem to support someone you claimed to love and promised to take care of anyway? she would still haveaccess to all his bazillions if stay married. it's so fucked up! and who wants a bastrad who cared more about his money then his family and children?


PS
i do agree that yoko is devil but she didn't break up the beatles and john wanted someone to dominate him so it's on him too. john coul've left or stayed gone.
[Edited 5/19/06 7:05am]

wavesofbliss said:

John Lennon needed Yoko, and Yoko was a creative filmmaking BABE!

I suggest you watch this DVD if you don't believe me:

minneapolisgenius said:

He.. they do, trust me

Just noticing by the amount of views/replies.. this joint loves the drama.

Sdldawn said:

Well good. My threads always die a quick death, so I feel important now.

yeah , well it looks like you killed this one, too ..

wavesofbliss said:

Yes, but you just revived it again. I now have two, count them TWO threads I created in the top ten in this forum. It's unprecedented.






Granted, they are both just articles I copied and pasted here, but still.