independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Red Hot Chili Peppers and Prince
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 05/14/06 11:18am

reneGade20

avatar

alxndrstff said:

I really like the RHCP myself, funnily enough I was listening to Blood Sex Sugar Magik yesterday.

But I do feel they aint tried anything new in a while. I hear the new album is a little different, so maybe thats about to change.

It seems to me that most of the biggest bands in the world are "samey". U2, RHCP, Coldplay to name just a few.

Look what happened with Radiohead, a massively popular band until Kid A came out. Most people are afraid of the change, afraid to like the different "weird" stuff, as if it would be some sort of insight into their REAL character.

Prince suffers from this as well. It's only truly brave people who are willing to be associated with someone considered strange by the general populus.


...its not that different at all...sounds pretty much the same...

...and a good point from one of the earlier posts is that RHCP's rise to the top came well after P had already ruled....and the music scene was pushing away from mainstream genres...this was the period of Nirvana and Pearl Jam as well...

..I like to think that 20 years from now we'll still be talkin bout P's music...hopefully listening to it and enjoying yet another rebirth, akin to the Stones coming out of mothballs....only we, his fanbase, can keep the "gospel" going....
He was like a cock who thought the sun had risen to hear him crow.
(George Eliot)

the video for the above...evillol
http://www.youtube.com/wa...re=related
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 05/14/06 2:06pm

ludwig

They're doing much more promotion themselves. Everytime they release a new album, I see them on several german tv shows, giving interviews, playing live, the same on german radio channels. I've also seen several concerts on tv, mostly from festivals and promogigs. They're not sitting on recorded live material like prince, they allow everyone to broadcast their stuff.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 05/15/06 1:39am

Novabreaker

Because The Red Hot Chili Peppers are a teen audience -oriented band (have always been), with a musical style that hardly can be described as sophisticated or mature to begin with, regardless of some sporadic experimentation or image alterations like the "Warped" video. However, Prince's appeal is still that his material represents CLASSIC funk/R&B/rock. The same thing with George Clinton and the P-funk phenomenon - even if they are the kings of foolishness they actually, not only represent but present that classic sound (for they were the originators of course). The RHCP sound is distinctive, but it feels just intuitively wrong to call it "classic", because it is obviously aesthetically speaking substandard compared to proper funk music or even proper rock singer / songwriter -based stuff.

It's just not music that should be taken seriously. You know, most songs on any P-funk albums are humoristic as well, they've started out often as jokes, but you know you have to take them seriously on a completely different level that the RHCP could never manage to reach.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 05/15/06 8:57am

thebige

Novabreaker said:

Because The Red Hot Chili Peppers are a teen audience -oriented band (have always been), with a musical style that hardly can be described as sophisticated or mature to begin with, regardless of some sporadic experimentation or image alterations like the "Warped" video. However, Prince's appeal is still that his material represents CLASSIC funk/R&B/rock. The same thing with George Clinton and the P-funk phenomenon - even if they are the kings of foolishness they actually, not only represent but present that classic sound (for they were the originators of course). The RHCP sound is distinctive, but it feels just intuitively wrong to call it "classic", because it is obviously aesthetically speaking substandard compared to proper funk music or even proper rock singer / songwriter -based stuff.

It's just not music that should be taken seriously. You know, most songs on any P-funk albums are humoristic as well, they've started out often as jokes, but you know you have to take them seriously on a completely different level that the RHCP could never manage to reach.



Spoken like someone who has never listened to a Chili Pepper record, especially the new one. Sorry, but you don't know what the heck you're talking about.

lol
No Sonny T?
No Michael B?
Ain't NPG!

Spider Wisdom: http://bigesayswhat.blogspot.com/

the Manipulations: http://www.myspace.com/themanipulations
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 05/15/06 9:04am

abierman

thebige said:

Novabreaker said:

Because The Red Hot Chili Peppers are a teen audience -oriented band (have always been), with a musical style that hardly can be described as sophisticated or mature to begin with, regardless of some sporadic experimentation or image alterations like the "Warped" video. However, Prince's appeal is still that his material represents CLASSIC funk/R&B/rock. The same thing with George Clinton and the P-funk phenomenon - even if they are the kings of foolishness they actually, not only represent but present that classic sound (for they were the originators of course). The RHCP sound is distinctive, but it feels just intuitively wrong to call it "classic", because it is obviously aesthetically speaking substandard compared to proper funk music or even proper rock singer / songwriter -based stuff.

It's just not music that should be taken seriously. You know, most songs on any P-funk albums are humoristic as well, they've started out often as jokes, but you know you have to take them seriously on a completely different level that the RHCP could never manage to reach.



Spoken like someone who has never listened to a Chili Pepper record, especially the new one. Sorry, but you don't know what the heck you're talking about.

lol



nod exactly, that was a load of pretentious BS!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 05/15/06 9:21am

Novabreaker

thebige said:


Spoken like someone who has never listened to a Chili Pepper record, especially the new one. Sorry, but you don't know what the heck you're talking about. lol


Ok. I obviously don't. You are one-hundred-percent right. How could I be so wrong?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 05/15/06 10:08am

abierman

Novabreaker said:

thebige said:


Spoken like someone who has never listened to a Chili Pepper record, especially the new one. Sorry, but you don't know what the heck you're talking about. lol


Ok. I obviously don't. You are one-hundred-percent right. How could I be so wrong?



well, RHCP didn't get any teen-appeal until 'Under The Bridge', which was certainly not representative for the 'Blood Sugar Sex Magik'-album.....Listen to 'Mother's Milk', maybe you'll see what I mean!
And what's wrong with goofiness in music? George Clinton/Parliament have made some awesome music, try putting a 16 piece-band on stage and make it work..... George Clinton is also the one who 'discovered' the Peppers!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 05/15/06 10:18am

pinkgirl93

avatar

I think it's becuase Prince is strange.

If it wasn't for MJ's bad publicity, Prince's symbol years would still overshadow his current successes.
His soul shall taste the sadness of her might,
And be among her cloudy trophies hung.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 05/15/06 10:30am

Novabreaker

The last RHCP album I listened to (was subjected to it really) was actually the "By The Way" album. And no, I'm sorry, Kiedis' melodic motifs,lyrics and phrasing are anything but sophisticated to my ear. Lord knows Prince isn't the pinnacle of modern art either, but really, there is a good reason why The Red Hot Chili Peppers have always been one of the most popular bands amongst teenagers who have their own bands - alongside with Metallica and such. And teenagers who play in bands always have the most terrible taste in music anyway.

It's just a completely different approach to writing music, and it gathers teenagers very effectively. They can't get rid of it, maybe Frusciante can do it on his solo albums. But as long as Kiedis fronts that band...

And it was actually The Chili Peppers who contacted George Clinton, I believe.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 05/15/06 10:37am

blackguitarist
z

avatar

Milty said:

i will admit that i have seen the Chillis three times now at different stages of their career and i found them to be a very lazy band.

i saw them just after One Hot Minute came out and i was underwhelmed.
then i saw them just a year after Californication and they seemed to be playing a rehearsal.
the last time i saw them they played Top of The Pops in London just before the last album and it was an extended set and to be honest i still was like,"these guys don't care about audiences, do they?"

i'll get the album but i wouldn't see them again.

Prince is better value for money on cd and live.

Yeah, I've seen the Peppers at different stages of their career as well. The first time being at The Whiskey in the mid 80's with their o.g. guitarist Hillel Slovak, who to me, was their best guitarist. All of the early shows, they had TONS of energy. Maybe because all of their shows that I have seen has been in So. Cali, which is their hometown, so maybe they were throwing down because they were playing here.
SynthiaRose said "I'm in love with blackguitaristz. Especially when he talks about Hendrix."
nammie "What BGZ says I believe. I have the biggest crush on him."
http://ccoshea19.googlepa...ssanctuary
http://ccoshea19.googlepages.com
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 05/15/06 10:42am

abierman

Novabreaker said:

And it was actually The Chili Peppers who contacted George Clinton, I believe.



whatever, he produced one of their early albums which wasn't, I'm sorry to say, teen-appealing.....


Novabreaker said:

The last RHCP album I listened to (was subjected to it really) was actually the "By The Way" album. And no, I'm sorry, Kiedis' melodic motifs,lyrics and phrasing are anything but sophisticated to my ear. Lord knows Prince isn't the pinnacle of modern art either, but really, there is a good reason why The Red Hot Chili Peppers have always been one of the most popular bands amongst teenagers who have their own bands - alongside with Metallica and such. And teenagers who play in bands always have the most terrible taste in music anyway.

It's just a completely different approach to writing music, and it gathers teenagers very effectively. They can't get rid of it, maybe Frusciante can do it on his solo albums. But as long as Kiedis fronts that band...



well, if you're judging on 'By The Way'..... neutral
And we all know that Keidis isn't the best vocalist, his rapping is funnier & better. I don't see how his lyrics gather teens that easily, but yes, maybe easier than Prince's.....for many times I don't know what the fuck he's singing about.....
Listen to 'Stadium Arcadium'.....it's a return to form, it's fun & good, Flea & Frusciante at their best.....I wouldn't dare to say that '3121' is a return to form of Prince.....:disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 05/15/06 12:02pm

Sdldawn

PurpleRein said:

the new song "Dani California" reminds me of a couple of songs on the "3121" cd..


Yeah I thought it sounded like shit too..

lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 05/15/06 12:53pm

PFunkjazz

avatar

Maybe.
Just maybe
3121 sucks more than STADIUM ARCADIUM?

I don't know, but I just can't get into the Prince and haven't tried to check out the RHCP.
test
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 05/15/06 12:58pm

abierman

PFunkjazz said:

Maybe.
Just maybe
3121 sucks more than STADIUM ARCADIUM?

I don't know, but I just can't get into the Prince and haven't tried to check out the RHCP.




nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 05/15/06 1:12pm

murph

abierman said:

PFunkjazz said:

Maybe.
Just maybe
3121 sucks more than STADIUM ARCADIUM?

I don't know, but I just can't get into the Prince and haven't tried to check out the RHCP.




nod



Or...maybe, just maybe, the midget just needs to start promoting 3121...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 05/15/06 1:14pm

abierman

murph said:

abierman said:





nod



Or...maybe, just maybe, the midget just needs to start promoting 3121...



could be, but 'Stadium Arcadium' is a better album.... nod ....Prince, they're called 'guitar-solo's'.....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 05/15/06 1:45pm

PFunkjazz

avatar

murph said:

abierman said:





nod



Or...maybe, just maybe, the midget just needs to start promoting 3121...



It's way too late for that. Sucka hit #1 and fell like a rock in a pond.

Fool shoulda gone on American Idol wink
test
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 05/15/06 2:58pm

SPYZFAN1

The Chili's (to me) have just lost their edge. I used to love them going back to "Freaky Stley". They're G rated family entertainment now. They're letting Frusciante write everything so he won't quit again. I think a "Jehovah worshipping" Prince has more edge than The Chili's these days.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 05/15/06 5:25pm

tane1976

avatar

No way dudes, the RHCP s rockinfreakopotamous. I have all their albums and they were stars before 91, there first album came from 1983 with classics like Get up and Jump, Real Men don't kill coyotes and then the magnificence of Freaky Styley (1985) with gems like If u want me to stay. This where they collaborated with George Clinton long before Prince rediscovered him.
87s Uplift Mofo Party Plan is great too with Fight like a brave and the secret song "Party on your Pussy " These early albums are great drug fuelled funky punky stuff. The Chilis where like White Princes on drugs.
They hit in 89 with the Mothers milk album after the death of Hillel Slovak the group gave up drugs and cleaned themselves up. Added new guitarist John Frusciante and Chad on drums they rocked. Higher ground got to number 4 and then they were stars. Blood sex sugar magik was the big breakthru it was like their Purple Rain whereas Mothers Milk was the 1999

However they went off with One Hot Minute, a very silly pop/ grunge album and alternative skits like pea and only a few gems like Aeroplane and My Friends. Also Frusciante had left and Dave Navarro was in . But then 1999 they came back with Claifornioacation and Frusicante and Chad were back. This was a great album and By the way continued it on, especailly the Zephyr song the best drug song ever made (Yes I think they are using again).
Despite the music, theyve always used gimmicks such as socks on cocks dressing up as lightbulbs on stage, funny videos, and the funny Funky Monks video where every five seconds one of then sneaks off and has a wank in the deserted mansion they are recording in.

Seriously this is a great group and you cant help but love them.
17 Years ago I made a commitment to Prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 05/15/06 6:58pm

funkpill

SPYZFAN1 said:

The Chili's (to me) have just lost their edge. I used to love them going back to "Freaky Stley". They're G rated family entertainment now. They're letting Frusciante write everything so he won't quit again. I think a "Jehovah worshipping" Prince has more edge than The Chili's these days.



Did I hear someone say 'Freaky Styley'???

headbang




And I'm proud!!! whistle

biggrin


http://www.youtube.com/wa...y%20styley
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 05/15/06 7:31pm

PFunkjazz

avatar

SPYZFAN1 said:

The Chili's (to me) have just lost their edge. I used to love them going back to "Freaky Stley". They're G rated family entertainment now. They're letting Frusciante write everything so he won't quit again. I think a "Jehovah worshipping" Prince has more edge than The Chili's these days.



I don't really know about Chilis to date cuz I'm not a keen follower, but Prince has pretty much sucked it up on TRC,MUSICOLOGY and 3121.
test
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 05/16/06 3:54pm

Isel

I just listened to Stadium Arcadium today. I thought it was only OK, and I was really excited about the cd. The Peppers are still good, but I liked their earlier work better. To me, one of the best Pepper's cd's is Mother's Milk, then Blood Sugar Sex Magic, and MoFo Party Plan.


Prince's 3121 is much better. I can listen to it non-stop. I just don't think he's into promoting stuff as much anymore except for touring a few tv performances. Prince is a legend. There's is just no comparison even though I love the Peppers and admire Flea, John, and Chad. Anthony is a good frontman and lyricist, but the other three are much more talented.

But Prince well...He's up there with the greats.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 05/16/06 4:02pm

SPYZFAN1

"Party On Your Pussy"..One of my faves! Just a nasty ass song through and through. The solo by Mr. Slovak is straight out of the "Eddie Hazel Handbook".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 05/16/06 7:09pm

POOK

avatar

sneadhearn said:

That being said-Flea is THE MOST BADASS BASS PLAYER ever. Period. End of story. Hands freakin down. Don't even front. Take all of Prince's bass players and together they cannot hold a candle in the same ballpark as Flea. Larry too.


UM

PRINCE COULD HANG

P o o |/,
P o o |\
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Red Hot Chili Peppers and Prince