meow85 said: I've heard it said that a person's taste in music tells a lot about them. Out of idle curiosity, I thought I'd list out my CD's (not my vinyls, cassettes, or MP3's though. God, we'd be here all week!) and see what residents of the Music & More forum see my music saying for me. For a bit of background I'm 21, female, bi, and Canadian. And yes, I am massively bored right now.
[music collection] I think you have a pretty good collection. I just saw that you have Metric! I like them alot. One of my best friends lives in Oakland and she got me into them. Maybe they're from out there. Not sure. I don't understand these people who are against greatest hits cds. There have been so many people who I've gotten into initally because of their hits. Prince, in particular. The first 3 Prince cds I ever bought were The Hits 1 & 2 and The Gold Experience. The Hits helped me figure out which albums to pick up first. I had no knowledge about the Purple Rain album. I know that sounds ridiculous, but it's true. I had never even heard of Sign O the Times. Because of the Hits, I knew that I absolutely needed to have these two albums, and then all of the others followed. Also, I know some older people get down on kids for having no musical history knowledge, but how exactly are you supposed to know about Dirty Mind if you were born in 1985? Not everyone reads up on music as much as some of us do. Hits collections let people get their feet wet and figure out how much they actually like an artist. [Edited 4/16/06 16:18pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twister6 -you emoted all over my music! Does that mean we're engagaed? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: twister6 -you emoted all over my music! Does that mean we're engagaed?
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
u2prnce said: meow85 said: I've heard it said that a person's taste in music tells a lot about them. Out of idle curiosity, I thought I'd list out my CD's (not my vinyls, cassettes, or MP3's though. God, we'd be here all week!) and see what residents of the Music & More forum see my music saying for me. For a bit of background I'm 21, female, bi, and Canadian. And yes, I am massively bored right now.
[music collection] I think you have a pretty good collection. I just saw that you have Metric! I like them alot. One of my best friends lives in Oakland and she got me into them. Maybe they're from out there. Not sure. I don't understand these people who are against greatest hits cds. There have been so many people who I've gotten into initally because of their hits. Prince, in particular. The first 3 Prince cds I ever bought were The Hits 1 & 2 and The Gold Experience. The Hits helped me figure out which albums to pick up first. I had no knowledge about the Purple Rain album. I know that sounds ridiculous, but it's true. I had never even heard of Sign O the Times. Because of the Hits, I knew that I absolutely needed to have these two albums, and then all of the others followed. Also, I know some older people get down on kids for having no musical history knowledge, but how exactly are you supposed to know about Dirty Mind if you were born in 1985? Not everyone reads up on music as much as some of us do. Hits collections let people get their feet wet and figure out how much they actually like an artist. [Edited 4/16/06 16:18pm] Thanks. Metric are from Toronto as far as I know. I kinda like greatest hits packages. True, by their nature they skip out on the non-single gems from the artists' work, but they are usually a good way to get a basic overview of someone's catalogue, I think. It can be hard nowadays for a young person to get a good knowledge of music. Unless you know somebody with good taste it's rare to get into an older act or album when the culture's so focused on the flavour of the month. Like I said, if it wasn't for my dad's vinyl collection and BSB pushing their surprisingly good taste onto their fans, I'd be missing out on a lot of supreme music right now. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twister6 said: meow85 said: twister6 -you emoted all over my music! Does that mean we're engagaed?
Guess that's a no. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
why am I not liking u?
why do I not like that word? [Edited 4/16/06 16:51pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: exactly. As a Prince fan, if someone asked you what Prince album to buy first, you wouldn't tell them to buy the greatest hits. It would be PR, SOTT, a definitive album in the catalog, not a record company cash in. If I was with you her at the store I would have given her Plastic Ono Band not Legend, that album needs to be experienced. Same with the Who. I think there's usually an album or two that can take the place of a greatest hits package. With someone like Dylan who has two phases that would have been harder. If we're speaking about Lennon, the Who, Prince, people of that ilk, then I wouldn't disagree with you. You're almost better off going with a classic album, though that doesn't always hold true. Some compilations have become classics on their own - Meaty, Beaty, Big and Bouncey is probably the best example of that. Personally I still buy budget-priced compilations all the time. Just this past weekend I picked up dirt-cheap Jefferson Airplane and Gregory Isaacs comps - they serve as great summaries when you're fairly certain you only need a taste of a performer or genre. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
damosuzuki said: lilgish said: exactly. As a Prince fan, if someone asked you what Prince album to buy first, you wouldn't tell them to buy the greatest hits. It would be PR, SOTT, a definitive album in the catalog, not a record company cash in. If I was with you her at the store I would have given her Plastic Ono Band not Legend, that album needs to be experienced. Same with the Who. I think there's usually an album or two that can take the place of a greatest hits package. With someone like Dylan who has two phases that would have been harder. If we're speaking about Lennon, the Who, Prince, people of that ilk, then I wouldn't disagree with you. You're almost better off going with a classic album, though that doesn't always hold true. Some compilations have become classics on their own - Meaty, Beaty, Big and Bouncey is probably the best example of that. Personally I still buy budget-priced compilations all the time. Just this past weekend I picked up dirt-cheap Jefferson Airplane and Gregory Isaacs comps - they serve as great summaries when you're fairly certain you only need a taste of a performer or genre. yea, it depends on the artist and sometimes the availability of the Lp. I'm not gonna go digging for the original Question Mark & The Mysterians album for just for one song. Itunes would suffice. Some acts don't require more research (even though I've heard a bunch ? stuff) than a greatest hits comp. The last comps I bought were Tones on Tail and Fad Gadget, only because their Lp's and singles are out of print. Though I would buy them if the cash and oppurtunity availed itself. But there's also buyer beware with comps, theres alotta shabby comps with awful selections and inferior sound. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You do know that the Backstreet Boys are awful, right? Where's the jazz and classical, or more eclectic music, like Zappa or punk? No Van Halen or Elton John. No Elvis or more Ray Charles. No Stevie Wonder or James Brown or The Isley Brothers. No Debarge or Public Enemy or Rahsaan Patterson or Digable Planets. No Led Zeppelin or Jimi Hendrix or Culture Club. No Gary Numan or Flock Of Seagulls or XTC. No PM Dawn or LL Cool J or Living Colour or The Beastie Boys or....Shall I go on? All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2freaky4church1 said: You do know that the Backstreet Boys are awful, right? Where's the jazz and classical, or more eclectic music, like Zappa or punk? No Van Halen or Elton John. No Elvis or more Ray Charles. No Stevie Wonder or James Brown or The Isley Brothers. No Debarge or Public Enemy or Rahsaan Patterson or Digable Planets. No Led Zeppelin or Jimi Hendrix or Culture Club. No Gary Numan or Flock Of Seagulls or XTC. No PM Dawn or LL Cool J or Living Colour or The Beastie Boys or....Shall I go on?
Some of the stuff you mentioned isn't necessarily must have. You might like a song or two by PM Dawn, but probably don't need an album. And I used to own a couple of theirs. I mean, she didn't say this is the only music she'll ever have for the rest of her life. It's a work in progress. Also, it doesn't count mp3s. For some of us, that's quite a bit. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2freaky4church1 said: You do know that the Backstreet Boys are awful, right? Where's the jazz and classical, or more eclectic music, like Zappa or punk? No Van Halen or Elton John. No Elvis or more Ray Charles. No Stevie Wonder or James Brown or The Isley Brothers. No Debarge or Public Enemy or Rahsaan Patterson or Digable Planets. No Led Zeppelin or Jimi Hendrix or Culture Club. No Gary Numan or Flock Of Seagulls or XTC. No PM Dawn or LL Cool J or Living Colour or The Beastie Boys or....Shall I go on?
Oh crackers, you could spend all night listing what someone doesn't have. I don't have any Tuvan throat singing or grind-core in my collection. ...and I Want It That Way is the greatest pop single of the last ten years. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I want that sillyness stopped. Backstreet Boys were a commercial shuck and jive. All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
With the notion that you are female, your list just screams "bisexual". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: sextonseven said: I disagree. If someone asked me what Prince album to buy first I would tell them to get the Hits/B-Sides. Suppose they like one Prince era and not the other? I think it's trial and error, The Hits/The B-Sides gives little if any context of the era in which those tracks were made or how they appear on the album itself. Does one understand the context of the intro to Let's Go Crazy if they don't hear it at the begining of Purple Rain or Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough at the begining of Off The Wall. It's always best to hear an artists work chronoligically or at least the album that defined their carrer. An artists like Grace Jones, who imo had alotta weak tracks, a good collection might suffice. A good comp like Original Musiquarium still doesn't fit the bill for someone like Stevie Wonder though. To me it's like a book, I wanna read the entire book even if some parts might suck rather then selected great chapters in one anthology. [Edited 4/16/06 17:30pm] It all depends on who is asking for the recommendation. If my mom or someone else that isn't all that discerning is looking for an album, they're not gonna be concerned with the context of the intro of "Let's Go Crazy" or "Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough". I'm tell them get the hits first and then get back to me for studio albums if they are still interested. I will concede that one flaw of 'The Hits/The B-Sides' is that the tracks aren't in strict chronological order so that you can hear how Prince evolved from "Soft And Wet" to "Controversy" to "Diamonds And Pearls", but the liner notes are good enough that you can figure it out and reorder the tracks as such after reading them. Maybe I'm overly cautious in recommending albums in that I don't want someone demanding my head on a platter after I told them a particular studio album was the greatest thing since sliced bread (which has happened to me already on the org. ) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: damosuzuki said: If we're speaking about Lennon, the Who, Prince, people of that ilk, then I wouldn't disagree with you. You're almost better off going with a classic album, though that doesn't always hold true. Some compilations have become classics on their own - Meaty, Beaty, Big and Bouncey is probably the best example of that. Personally I still buy budget-priced compilations all the time. Just this past weekend I picked up dirt-cheap Jefferson Airplane and Gregory Isaacs comps - they serve as great summaries when you're fairly certain you only need a taste of a performer or genre. yea, it depends on the artist and sometimes the availability of the Lp. I'm not gonna go digging for the original Question Mark & The Mysterians album for just for one song. Itunes would suffice. Some acts don't require more research (even though I've heard a bunch ? stuff) than a greatest hits comp. The last comps I bought were Tones on Tail and Fad Gadget, only because their Lp's and singles are out of print. Though I would buy them if the cash and oppurtunity availed itself. But there's also buyer beware with comps, theres alotta shabby comps with awful selections and inferior sound. The Tones On Tail comp is a bit of an anomaly in that in includes all the band's albums and singles ever released. You are literally not missing out on anything in buying that compilation. grammar edit [Edited 4/17/06 14:45pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It would take me a good month to list my cd's. That would be a chore. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I keep loosing things, I don't remember what I used 2 have | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2freaky4church1 said: You do know that the Backstreet Boys are awful, right? Where's the jazz and classical, or more eclectic music, like Zappa or punk? No Van Halen or Elton John. No Elvis or more Ray Charles. No Stevie Wonder or James Brown or The Isley Brothers. No Debarge or Public Enemy or Rahsaan Patterson or Digable Planets. No Led Zeppelin or Jimi Hendrix or Culture Club. No Gary Numan or Flock Of Seagulls or XTC. No PM Dawn or LL Cool J or Living Colour or The Beastie Boys or....Shall I go on?
*ahem* I did mention that I didn't list my vinyls, cassettes, or MP3's right? I have music in the rest of my collection by all the artists you mentioned but these: Debarge, Rahsaan Patterson, Digable Planets, Gary Numan, and Living Colour. And yes, I do know BSB are awful. But they make me smile. That's good enough reason to like them, I think. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
u2prnce said: 2freaky4church1 said: You do know that the Backstreet Boys are awful, right? Where's the jazz and classical, or more eclectic music, like Zappa or punk? No Van Halen or Elton John. No Elvis or more Ray Charles. No Stevie Wonder or James Brown or The Isley Brothers. No Debarge or Public Enemy or Rahsaan Patterson or Digable Planets. No Led Zeppelin or Jimi Hendrix or Culture Club. No Gary Numan or Flock Of Seagulls or XTC. No PM Dawn or LL Cool J or Living Colour or The Beastie Boys or....Shall I go on?
Some of the stuff you mentioned isn't necessarily must have. You might like a song or two by PM Dawn, but probably don't need an album. And I used to own a couple of theirs. I mean, she didn't say this is the only music she'll ever have for the rest of her life. It's a work in progress. Also, it doesn't count mp3s. For some of us, that's quite a bit. Like I said, if I tried to list it all, we'd be here all week. To keep shit simple, I only posted my CD collection. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: With the notion that you are female, your list just screams "bisexual".
Explain...? "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Novabreaker said: With the notion that you are female, your list just screams "bisexual".
Explain...? Janis Joplin, Flaming Lips! Scissor Sisters! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: meow85 said: Explain...? Janis Joplin, Flaming Lips! Scissor Sisters! Never really noticed before. Good point. Not to mention Bowie, the Stones, and from what I hear, my fave BSB... [Edited 4/17/06 23:19pm] "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hm, initially I did not make clear that a GH set is surelly good for a starting point... but they should not make you think: okay, that's all I need. I would have never heard Bowies Warszawa or Be My Wife (even worse, I love that song), or Station To Station if I had stuck with his two greatest hits cds.
So, I take back my "stay away from best ofs" and say: "use them as a starting point, if you like that, go for some more..." I personally try now not to buy them anymore. But there are exceptions. Since I did not find Rick James' debut cd, I went for his greatest hits (bought the same day as street songs) to get the studio versions of mary jane and you and i. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Your collection's good, but what's up with The Backstreet Boys and John Legend? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My apologies! I scanned your list quickly, saw John Lennon-Legend and thought I saw John Legend. Good thing I'm not a witness in a murder trial. I'd probably get the wrong man convicted. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whoknows said: My apologies! I scanned your list quickly, saw John Lennon-Legend and thought I saw John Legend. Good thing I'm not a witness in a murder trial. I'd probably get the wrong man convicted.
I'm sure we're all glad. As for BSB, I've already said my bit on that. I don't think they're something I need to apologize for. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |