I believe that story was planted & paid for - that bitch got some jewels outta that comment

oh, c´mon Calhoun. You may get the feeling that I am blindly defending him no matter what, but I get the feeling that you are blindly disparaging him. Why would and heiress of one of the biggest fortunes wanna do anything for money especially when it´s making her look like a fool in the publics eyes? You know, most ppl are like you - feeling she must be mad, sick whatever to have sex with him and she KNOWS that. Why would she wanna do that if it wasn´t the truth?

So Michael had sex with a woman. What a big deal! It´s interesting that ppl find it easy to believe he could rape lil´ boys, but cannot believe he could have sex with a woman.

And just to humor you, I don't believe he fucked/penetrated those boys necessarily. I don't find it hard to believe that he had some sexual contact with them though

I knew some trick ass muuuu was gonna come w/ that Didn't I follow it up by saying, "Nah, I know they supposedly fucked..." I know she's beyond rich & don't need his money. Take a joke man... you might wanna take your tongue outta MJ's ass just long enough to read shit accurately

And just to humor you, I don't believe he fucked/penetrated those boys necessarily. I don't find it hard to believe that he had some sexual contact with them though

CalhounSq said:

your just mad because he is white and can dance

And the award for most interesting thread goes to the person who started this thread.

MikeMatronik said:

Eh how old are you now? dont you think its about time to come out of the closet now? well i mean if you still feel uncomfortable about it thats too bad up to you i guess, its a shame tho.

My brother use to be a Mike fan when he was young, but i never was! untill recently but now when his older his embaressed...his a closet i know he likes Mike but doesnt proclaim or anything.

@CalhounSq - Never - that muufucka STILL a virgin LOL

MJ has had a long and sordid sexual life, don't mistake damage for asexuality.

jasonstar said:

I don't get that phrase...

I jsut want mike 2 get into a studio alone (without an outside producer like Rodney Jerkins...) and write and produce some tunes...Exposing his soul! Just like
the Bad album

What do you mean by sordid? )

"....because you haven´t been where I´ve been, mentally...." - Michael Jackson

dag said:


What do you mean by sordid? )


The best way I can answer you is by telling you to re-read your signature.



"....because you haven´t been where I´ve been, mentally...." - Michael Jackson

lilgish tells the truth

He hasn´t lost anything. Mike´s just one of those artist who don´t realease albums one every year like Madonna and stuff. He´s like Sade. (It´s interesting that ppl don´t bother Sade the way they do MJ for not releasing that much stuff) He just comes when he feels he´s ready to present something he believes in. History was a huge success, Invincible not for several reasons and his break since than has been longer for 2 main reasons - his fatherhood AND f*****g allegations. I believe he´s put himself together and release at least one more album. His dignity won´t let him to let his career end with allegations. I believe he will surprise us with more work, let´s be patient, and let him rest for now, he deserves it after all that hell he´s been through.

dag said:

Who is Sade?

what the hell do you know guys that I don´t. I wanna know. Tell me.

Who is Sade?

I don't see why anyone should want or expect a new age of him as the "King of Pop" anyway, especially at the age of 47. 5 years ago did people want or expect Lionel Richie to recapture his 1984 success? Is Stevie Wonder criticised for not releasing a Grammy winning album every year?

And the award for most interesting thread goes to the person who started this thread.

That out of the way, I think Michael mentally lost it around the Dangerous era. He had some great advisors (People like Frank DiLeo) and then he cleaned house, got rid of them, basically blaming them for "Bad" not topping "Thriller" saleswise. (Which is just a nutty notion in itself. I mean a goal is nice..but come on.)

Yeah he did the AWESOME "Dangerous" album and the AMAZING HBO concert from the Dangerous tour, which did big numbers for HBO's ratings at the time, but
beyond that, his decisions "on his own" have been kind of off.

Fast forward a decade....When he did LWMJ (With Bashir) with the notion of Bashir following Michael around for that long being a bad idea all together, Michael's "advisors" at the time, didn't even know about it, till it was "too late."

Michael needs to put people around him who are as good as business as he is at dancing. I think he had that with Frank DiLeo. It is a shame he let the man go. From what I've read in Michael biographies..John Branca is also one of Michael's "best advisors." However, Michael fires and re-hires him like he is playing tag.

As far as music wise..I think Michael didn't "lose" it with "Invincible." I think he just put his managers in charge of controlling the album's contents, or he picked weak content, either way, look at the credits of the album's liner notes. It seems more like a Rodney Jenkins album than a Michael Jackson album. It is like he lost the fire in his belly to make good music as one author put it. I mean "Speechless" is a great song, as sappy as some people say it is, it isn't that bad compared to some of the crap on "Invincible." One is left to wonder if Michael really wrote and produced an ENTIRE disc himself, what would happen.

Maybe one day..we will know. Then maybe (and this a big maybe) he will get back to "Bad" sales, and that would be a Thriller for Michael's fans!
[Edited 12/29/05 9:19am]

jasonstar said:

I agree with this 110%. After he let DiLeo go, it was downhill from there. I think Michael has control issues. If it doesn't tickle his fancy, you can kiss it goodbye.

I think he really lost it after he severed ties with Qunicy Jones. As much as I love Michael's music, he just never had the same soul he had when he was with Q. I was listening to the "Bad" CD last night and even his voice has changed since that CD. "Dangerous" was mediocre in my opinion. "HIStory" just didn't capture my attention and "Invincible" was unlistenable. If he would just get some producers who desire to bring his soul back. Rodney Jerkins was a joke! He just had to say "Darkchild" on the album, huh?

Mike needs to just chill and come on with it. Point blank.

Ok now I know who Slade is and I know some of the songs but it now begs the question why they were brought up? Nobody bothers them about album releases because nobody cares, nobody remembers them, they have not had a chart hit since 1984. I think you should have thought this one out a bit better mate

Ellie said:

I've said this before, Invincible is his only mistake on wax, the only really unlistenable thing he's ever done. If he makes an album on par with History Disc 2 that would more than die-hard or causal fans could ask for.
[Edited 12/30/05 8:03am]

poeticrockstar said:

Interesting, I've always considered Dangerous his best work and I also believe critics rated it some of his best work too. What do you not like about it?

FUNKitUP said:

Sade, not Slade