| Author | Message |
What happened to ROLLING STONE magazine I remember when I was in high school (mid 90's) that rollongstone didn't just let anyone on their covers
People like Janet and Mariah would be on their occasionally and that was as pop as their covers would be and even back in the 70's they use to be a cool magazine But Clay Aitkens EWWW so not cool, ugly ugly ugly he is Barry Manilow 2003 in every sense Ashton Kutcher was on the cover?? Sure he is one fine looking man, but what does he have to do with rock/pop??? Have mercy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
For real. And their reviews have gone down the tubes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Theyve thrown out more 5 star reviews over the past year than I think they ever have in the history of their publication.
People are strapped for cash these days, Rolling Stone is probabbly more than happy to compromise their integrity for a nice bribe. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
but you all continue to buy it tho | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
But they've always had movie stars on the cover, not just musicians. I'm actually pissed at RS cuz of their not having the late, great Joe Strummer on their cover after his passing. Who did they put instead? That fruitcake, Justiin Timberlake. NEW WAVE FOREVER: SLAVE TO THE WAVE FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Christopher said: but you all continue to buy it tho
Maybe YOU do (in your Hammer pants trying to emulate me). "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |