New topic
Printablelaurarichardson said: Novabreaker said: I can see your point. There's so much hypocrisy behind these comments - grown men hit on underaged girls all the time, and even many parents approve of their relationships. A large percentage of "women" at clubs have entered either with fake IDs or the personnel just let them in any way (you know it happens all the time). And everybody knows they're not letting the girls in, because "younger girls should be allowed to dance to the hippest beats too!". No, they are there to attract alcohol-buying male customers. That's how the whole system works. There are loads of 15/16-year-old girls at almost every trendy disco. If I was hold criminally responsible for looking at sexually attractive females on the street (what's the difference between looking and touching, as both still presuppose a pure sexual aspect to it), who just happen to be under 18 and I'd have no way of knowing it unless I'd ask them each time "can I look at you, or are you underaged?", I'd be sent to death row each day. ----- Did you even think about this before you typed. (what's the difference between looking and touching, as both still presuppose a pure sexual aspect to it), Do you really not know the difference? I don't want to see anyone else on this board flipping out about people defending R Kelly because of a lot of you seem to be feeling sorry for this perverted freak who should have been locked up for the life the first time he got caught. i wish novabreaker was on my thread over in politics. He has a point. U go to the mall and u will see grown men gawping at girls who may look 18, but may infact be 13 or 14 (girls develop quicker it seems these days). | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
There's a humongous difference between lusting and acting out on it. You can't help whom you find attractive, but you can control what you do about it. If you can't, you should be locked up. R. Kelly, Gary Glitter, MJ and predatory clergymen -- should be behind bars where they can't hurt anyone else. Let them lust and fornicate with each other. Another thing, children can't give consent. They lack the intelligence and emotional maturity to make such a decision. It's like duping those with learning disabilities. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
brothaluv said: There's a humongous difference between lusting and acting out on it. You can't help whom you find attractive, but you can control what you do about it. If you can't, you should be locked up. R. Kelly, Gary Glitter, MJ and predatory clergymen -- should be behind bars where they can't hurt anyone else. Let them lust and fornicate with each other. Another thing, children can't give consent. They lack the intelligence and emotional maturity to make such a decision. It's like duping those with learning disabilities.
why is mj always lumped in there?  unlike the others he didnt have child porn, he wasnt caught on tape, and theres no evidence and unlike the others hes had his trial, if they had of thought he was guilty he would be in jail[Edited 11/25/05 5:19am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hey, I was on a roll | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wasnt there a 12 year old girl aswell? and if found guilty he will be shot in a firing line. hope they get him and shoot his balls off first!
gary glitter=  FUNKNROLL!  "February 2014, wow". 'dre.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WHy doesn't the idiot just sleep with dwarf women? Thye're short too. Dress them up as little girls if he wants...midget women would be happy to get the attention. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: VinnyM27 said: What a second....Fifteen year old....girl?
Seriously, someone has to kill him now! He was caught once and I guess there is no rehabiliation for that. Lock him up forever! I can see your point. There's so much hypocrisy behind these comments - grown men hit on underaged girls all the time, and even many parents approve of their relationships. A large percentage of "women" at clubs have entered either with fake IDs or the personnel just let them in any way (you know it happens all the time). And everybody knows they're not letting the girls in, because "younger girls should be allowed to dance to the hippest beats too!". No, they are there to attract alcohol-buying male customers. That's how the whole system works. There are loads of 15/16-year-old girls at almost every trendy disco. If I was hold criminally responsible for looking at sexually attractive females on the street (what's the difference between looking and touching, as both still presuppose a pure sexual aspect to it), who just happen to be under 18 and I'd have no way of knowing it unless I'd ask them each time "can I look at you, or are you underaged?", I'd be sent to death row each day. I see the point as well, unfortunately, glitter is a predatory sick fuck, who goes out of his way to find these young girls while abusing their innocence. It's been mentioned before that he molested kids (allegedly) in his house that were only 5 or 6. This guy is looking for these kids, not having sex because he 'thought' they were 18 or older. Please also remember that he has 1000's of sick images of young kids on his computer!! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Whiskas31 said: Novabreaker said: I can see your point. There's so much hypocrisy behind these comments - grown men hit on underaged girls all the time, and even many parents approve of their relationships. A large percentage of "women" at clubs have entered either with fake IDs or the personnel just let them in any way (you know it happens all the time). And everybody knows they're not letting the girls in, because "younger girls should be allowed to dance to the hippest beats too!". No, they are there to attract alcohol-buying male customers. That's how the whole system works. There are loads of 15/16-year-old girls at almost every trendy disco. If I was hold criminally responsible for looking at sexually attractive females on the street (what's the difference between looking and touching, as both still presuppose a pure sexual aspect to it), who just happen to be under 18 and I'd have no way of knowing it unless I'd ask them each time "can I look at you, or are you underaged?", I'd be sent to death row each day. I see the point as well, unfortunately, glitter is a predatory sick fuck, who goes out of his way to find these young girls while abusing their innocence. It's been mentioned before that he molested kids (allegedly) in his house that were only 5 or 6. This guy is looking for these kids, not having sex because he 'thought' they were 18 or older. Please also remember that he has 1000's of sick images of young kids on his computer!! It's also a well known fact that Glitter raped a 12 year year old girl in the UK in the 1970s. She was a friend of his daughter's. He was tried for it at the same time as he was tried for downloading the images, but the case was thrown out because the girl - now an adult - had sold her story to a tabloid before going to the police. [Edited 11/25/05 8:31am] There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thesexofit said: sad thing is, these girls are forced to do be slaves as thats their only source of income. Get rid of these pedo's, and these girls will proberly starve. Sad.
Not necessarily. In fact, not at all. You're presupposing that the only thing these girls know how to do is sell their bodies. There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
brothaluv said: WHy doesn't the idiot just sleep with dwarf women? Thye're short too. Dress them up as little girls if he wants...midget women would be happy to get the attention.
That's almost a good idea. Almost.  "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
