calldapplwondery83 said:

All in one fell swoop, huh? Yep, vitiligo suddenly made his skin all neatly white.

I don't know what's more pathetic; the fact that MJ looks hideous beyond imagination, or that his fans try to delude themselves into believing he looks good.

[img]

Vitiligo doesn't go away, if that's how bad is was then, than of course its worse now, ppl can just put 2 and 2 together. Besides I don't think I have those other pictures but I'll look...

I heard it was lupus that made his hands swell.

He looks great.

murph said:

theres no getting through to you is there? lol. whenever i say my opnion you always come on and say the opposite to what i said and then say no one can deny it. but i just did. im sorry i dont think michael has looked grotesque since dangerous. he did for a little while in 2001, and a few more times over the years, but in my honest opinon no other time. im not saying this to be a 'good' fan, i just honestly think this.if i think badly about somehting of michael im not afraid to say it. i always state my true opinons. i honestly do think he looks 'basically' the same since that picture i posted, obviously aside from the skin colour and the hair, oh and an added cleft to the chin. i know its hard to understand as your not a fan, i would of thought the same as you if someone tried to tell me that if i hadnt of been a fan.

BEFORE IT ALL WENT WRONG.....


[Edited 11/16/05 15:23pm]

hellomoto said:

Come on Katty (LOL)...there are plenty of things we agree on...Like the fact that MJ's late 70s albums with the Jacksons are criminally underrated; like the fact that the Triumph album should be ranked as the best Jacksons album...Like the fact that Dangerous is also vastly underrated and "Stranger In Moscow" deserves to be ranked among his greatest compositions...I just stop short at saying that the man looks normal, that's all...You can be a fan and a supporter of MJ and come to the realization that he has far too much plastic sugery and the damage has been tragic...But I can still listen to the man and know that he ranks among the greatest performers of his generation...
[Edited 11/19/05 18:29pm]

murph said:

Peak in America sales wise, yes. Discount the USA and Bad and Dangerous weren't far off elsewhere - it was just the US that the big sales dip happened. Since he never toured outside America during the Thriller era, it can't be measured. Bad outsold Thriller in my country anyway. It was the aftermath of Thriller and the Bad tour that the whole "megastar" thing really first emerged.

Oh, and I'm female! And for some seriously strange reason, and I can't put my finger on why... I find MJ attractive Not ALL the time, and obviously more in the past than the present - although I wouldn't say no these days (but definitely not in the freakish 2001-2002 period). Honestly, I can't explain it.
[Edited 11/18/05 14:47pm]

What's up with his hairline??

I don´t know why, some of you guys, expect a man in his late 40´s to look the way he did in his early 20´s. Nobody looks the same, plactis surgery or not.

And why whenever it comes to MJ and his looks, the worst pictures are posted - like the below? I am sure that none of us would like our appearance to be judged by our worst shots.


[/img]http://www.histar.com/mornings/starchive/2002/11/images/michael_jackson.jpg[img]

Michael does look good in the latest shots. Relaxed, happy and much healthier than he did during the allegations or past few years I don´t expect him to turn black again into his georgeous 20´s.

I don´t know why, some of you guys, expect a man in his late 40´s to look the way he did in his early 20´s. Nobody looks the same, plactis surgery or not.

And why whenever it comes to MJ and his looks, the worst pictures are posted - like the below? I am sure that none of us would like our appearance to be judged by our worst shots.




Michael does look good in the latest shots. Relaxed, happy and much healthier than he did during the allegations or past few years I don´t expect him to turn black again into his georgeous 20´s.

Judging from that picture of his leg, Mike definitely has vitilligo. I have a relative who suffers from the same ailment and that's how it looks. That's obviously, why he used makeup all those years....to cover up the splotches. Vitilligo is never neat and uniform. It's similar to a palomino or dalmatian's coat. There's dark patches here on there all over your body. it has absolutely nothing to do with plastic surgery. Speaking of which, is Mike's nose really beyond repair? Is he cursed with that straw for the remainder of his life?

Cloudbuster said:

Lupus? Or Lupe?

brothaluv said:

What's lupe?

MichaelsLight said:

Yes he does, doesn't he?

Yeah nothing you can do now, once you cut it theres no going back. So its wishful thinking, but compare his nose now to how it looked during Invincible. It looks different he had it repaired it seems, its abit bigger. Now Mike looks ok depending on the angle shots, sometimes he looks good sometimes he doesnt.