I remember this rumor from a looonnnggg time ago. The girls name is Yashi (?). I have a picture of her and Rebbie but it is really small It would be intresting to see how this plays out. I do remember that Janet left the show Fame under suspicious circumstances and that she was being filmed from the neck up right before her exodus. She also stopped dancing on the show. I feel thet there is a lot to this that is gonna remain a secret.....The Jackson's are good preserving their indiscretions. :$$: :$$:


Ex-Brother In Law Reveals...e Daughter

This rumor has been circulating for years.If it's true,I never understood why Janet felt the need to hide it from the public.Ditto for her marriage to Rene.

DavidEye said:

well it is the jackson family.

Christopher said:[quote]

DavidEye said:

That's none of our business!

Krytonite said:[quote]

Christopher said:

But you read the thread?

sharlstok said:

I don't know how much or how long it can remain a secret now that James's brother dropped the bomb on Jones's Hot 97 show in NEW YORK??? Good Lordy, I never thought much that the rumour had resurfaced until I listened to the interview . I had heard the rumour before, but I was actually shocked to hear a family member admit it on the radio

I knew there was SOME reason for him to tell it now. Yeah right, he loves his neice! His album comes out tomorrow and he knew no one would care unless he gave them something to talk about!

I don't know what's worse, Janet keeping the girl a secret all this time. Or Young DeBarge outing her just to promote his album! I'd sue all of them if I was her!!

This is old news. And the child is would have to be 19 going on 20 if she was born in 1985.

quote]This rumor has been circulating for years.If it's true,I never understood why Janet felt the need to hide it from the public.Ditto for her marriage to Rene.[/quote]

u really cant get why she would hide it?

think about it. shes a high profile celeb, her along with her kid would probly be hounded by paparazzi, she probly didnt want that life for her child - i dont blame her.

what i dont understand is why she's auntie janet, and not mommy. religious beliefs aside i just think thats horrible

Moonwalkbjrain said:

u really cant get why she would hide it?

think about it. shes a high profile celeb, her along with her kid would probly be hounded by paparazzi, she probly didnt want that life for her child - i dont blame her.

what i dont understand is why she's auntie janet, and not mommy. religious beliefs aside i just think thats horrible[/quote]
wow,i cant believe ur feeding in2 this.

Krytonite said:[quote]

Christopher said:

No,it's none of our business,but I just think it's odd to hide this from the public.Alot of famous celebrities get married and have children,and they don't feel the need to hide it from their fans.I just don't see the point,and it only makes people think that maybe Janet is ashamed/embarassed about this.

DavidEye said:

I think Young DeBarge is doing this publicity stunt to promote his new album.

Krytonite said:

Most definitely.But if it's untrue,Janet should issue a statement.

the child would be older than 18 if it was James' child.....unless my math sucks.....

who knows...this is the jacksons....they can't just have children like the rest of us.

Rhondab said:

Indeed!


when it comes to having children,there is always alot of mystery and controversy surrounding this family...

***MJ's children---are they really his,or were they "bought"?
***Janet's secret child---fact or fiction?
***Joe Jackson---his secret child from his mistress


You could write a book about all the skeletons in their closets,lol.


[too many threads on the same subject...post the link in the sticky-sos]