VanitySixx said:

I agreee 1000%...

I am a HUGE Michael fan and supporter. I realize though that some of his choices aren't the smartest. That being said, if he didn't do this, his kids would get teased and hurt and that just isn't right. If you want to diss Michael for his appearance that is one thing but people would do that to his kids, and doing that to a child is just wrong and cruel. Good going Michael.

ehuffnsd said:

I don't think mj's kids would get kidnapped or anything else. I think it makes the press MORE interested in what the kids are doing or look like covering them up. Covering them is about mj...and not about the kids. Its attention.

If you saw some kids walking down the street with a sheet over their heads...would you turn away or look even harder.....

Disguising his kids when he is with them is a very smart move and the right decision. That way they are allowed to go outside without notice when Michael isn't with them. Michael doesn't make that many public appearances with them, so wearing a scarf over your head some 5 times a year is NOT going to traumatize them for life.

Stop the fucking bitching.

Novabreaker said:

Novabreaker said:

It's an MJ thread. Folk can't help themselves.

They all need a fucking tea-break.

hellomoto said:

Madonna is just as famous as Michael Jackson is.The difference is,she at least acts "normal" most of the time.She doesn't make her children hide their faces in public.

DavidEye said:

Perhaps a small part of the difference between MJ and other popular celebs being able to walk down the street is respect, image and how they project themselves. Someone once described the relationship between MJ and his fans as 'dysfunctional co-dependency'. They may be right.

TurnItUp said:

And your answer is complete and utter nonsense. Why did he do photo sessions when his first child was born and anybody could see the kid's skin color?

calldapplwondery83 said:

Andy your comment is complete and utter bullshit! When he did photos with his Prince Michael I it was evident that the child was 100% and it was evident that Michael and Debbie went to a sperm bank with a perfect description of the biological father: WHITE. Bam Debbie gets artificially inseminated and here comes Prince Michael I, the same thing with Paris and as far as Blanket goes, Blanket mother is probably and young WHITE teen or early 20's mother who didn't want to be a mother and Michael made a deal with her to adopt/pay her inexchange for the child she didn't want. All that bullshit that Blanket's mother's black, get the hell on with that I saw the child's legs and part of his face during the shot when he was being dangled where the blanket flew up and I could see him clear through that scarf on the ABC special. That child was light-skinned alright. Light-skinned white.

You personally need to get on with the bullshit! Bottom line Michael and Debbie are just like 2 lesbians where one can't conceive and she has her partner go get impregnated because she can't produce because she's not a MAN!

I think you did not get what I meant at all.

calldapplwondery83 said:

No I didn't, what did you mean?

I meant to say that, while you said he hides his children because he doesn't want people to ask why they are white, he did in fact show his son to everyone himself back then. Why would he do a photo shoot if he didn't want people to know that his children are white?

Anyway, my "bullshit" comment was a little harsh, sorry. It's just that everyone and their mama seems to have insider knowledge of MJ.

paisleypark4 said:

:co sign

i wonder if mj is impotent due to all the hormones he took/takes...

DavidEye said:

i agree on the last bit as thats what i said in my orignal post. but no, madonna isnt as famous as she once was or as famous as michael, shes not really talked about anymore, althoigh that could change with this new album. michael still has his level of fame, just not for the same reasons as before

haha maybe they wanted to wear that shit. they didnt want people all in their shit that day.

.

.
[Edited 10/12/05 1:02am]

hellomoto said:

Nope,she is just as famous as MJ and she is talked about everywhere.But unlike MJ,she is discussed because of her music and soldout tours.Yes,MJ is still very famous,but sadly,not for his music anymore.

DavidEye said:

ehhh, thats what i just said, about michael anyway. you keep doing that, repeating what i already said. oh well, about madonna, we'll just have to agree to disagree, i just dont hear much about madonna anywhere these days, i have to find out all my info on her on the net

hellomoto said:

I'm not gonna argue with you about this,but ask anyone.Madonna is one of the most famous women on the planet.And you must be living under a rock if you don't hear about her these days.Whenever she releases a new album,it is a major media event.

Christopher said:

Shit yeah!


:shitedit:

hellomoto said:

may she needs to go be accused of child molestation and then you would hear more about her... MJ is now infamous....

Madonna is EXTREMELY famous, popular or whatever....hell even I own some of her music... and i think she is raising her children in a very balanced way. She was just all over tv this summer for the new release of her childrens book.

its a dumb ass argument.....

Rhondab said:

MartyMcFly said:

ok...as balanced as possible..is that better..

MikeMatronik said:

But truthfully, the little girl looks Biracial to me. Her arms are tan brown, and her hair is that same sandy brown that most biracial kids get. I bet her hair gets blond high lights in the sun also.

Not sure about the boy... but he sort of looks tan brown as well

MartyMcFly said:

well,let's see...


Madonna has never dangled her baby outside a hotel balcony

Madonna doesn't make her children wear silly masks when they are out in public

Madonna does not exclude her childen's fathers from being a part of their lives (isn't MJ's ex-wife suing him for visitation rights?)


Madonna's children are hers.They weren't "bought".


now you tell me....whose kids have a more stable environment?

Just the fact that Madonna's kids go to school gives them some sort of normalcy and interaction with life beyond celebrity culture.

calldapplwondery83 said:

I remember the photoshoot and the picture of him holding Prince Michael with Debbie. I think he was the proud parent and thought he could pull that stuff off about the kid being biologically his and plus maybe he didn't think or care at the time that people would critize him about his kids being white. People started asking many questions especially when Prince Michael's hair turned blond because it was black when he was a baby. In comes the scarfs, cover the children's faces up so people can stop asking questions yu doesn't want to tell the true answer to and that is the children are his by name, but not biolgically.

I apologize if I was a little harsh too.

prodigalfan said:

She does, but by her sperm donor, not by Michael. And I forgot to add before that is also bullshit about Michael saying Prince Michael's blue eyes come from Joe. I've seen Joe's eyes they are the same color as his complexion: hazel brown.