independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > opinions on micael jackson
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 5 of 8 <12345678>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #120 posted 08/17/05 2:44am

FunkyBrotha

Fact is many MJ fans judge MJ on his record sales i.e. biggest selling artist = best, but Prince fans judge prince on how many instruments he can play, most instruments = best.

Truth is u can play all the instruments in the world and still be a crap musician. Prince simply doesnt have the same qualities that MJ has, MJ's music unites the world, everyone in every corner of the earth loves at least a few MJ songs. Prince's music is divisive/argumentative and doesnt have the same effect/power that MJ's does.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #121 posted 08/17/05 2:44am

Novabreaker

That's it. I'm going to stop shaving my legs from now on.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #122 posted 08/17/05 2:45am

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

Ellie said:

Novabreaker said:

Prince is better at applying make-up on his face, at the very least.

Better eyeliner and at he doesn't look stupid with facial hair giggle


falloff

yea he is good @ applyin make up aint he?

exibit A yall!

Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #123 posted 08/17/05 2:46am

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

FunkyBrotha said:

Fact is many MJ fans judge MJ on his record sales i.e. biggest selling artist = best, but Prince fans judge prince on how many instruments he can play, most instruments = best.

Truth is u can play all the instruments in the world and still be a crap musician. Prince simply doesnt have the same qualities that MJ has, MJ's music unites the world, everyone in every corner of the earth loves at least a few MJ songs. Prince's music is divisive/argumentative and doesnt have the same effect/power that MJ's does.


co sign especially bolded nod
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #124 posted 08/17/05 2:48am

Ellie

avatar

He's got nuffin on Pete!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #125 posted 08/17/05 2:55am

Novabreaker

Moonwalkbjrain said:




There's great difference between intentionally going overboard with make-up for a photoshoot once in a while, and walking around looking like a strangled chihuaha
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #126 posted 08/17/05 4:06am

murph

FunkyBrotha said:

Fact is many MJ fans judge MJ on his record sales i.e. biggest selling artist = best, but Prince fans judge prince on how many instruments he can play, most instruments = best.

Truth is u can play all the instruments in the world and still be a crap musician. Prince simply doesnt have the same qualities that MJ has, MJ's music unites the world, everyone in every corner of the earth loves at least a few MJ songs. Prince's music is divisive/argumentative and doesnt have the same effect/power that MJ's does.



The fact is, there are a lot of fans of both MJ and Prince that argue on their behalf for lame ass reasons...And this was one of the more shaky posts (sorry funkbrotha..you still cool)...I agree that just as Mike is not simply greater than other artists because of his mammoth, record breaking record sales, Prince is not greater than other artists just because he plays 100 instruments.

But without turning this into another MJ vs. Prince thread (Hey, wasn't this orginally supposed to be a MJ discussion???), the reason why MJ's music unites the world is because he caters to the WORLD...DUH???? He's a pop artist...that's his M.O....The dude makes songs like "Heal The World.." He is an overtly commercial artist...And there's nothing wrong with that..But to use this as a reason why MJ is greater than Prince is laughable and a bit naive, even childlike...Mike is the greatest entertainer of all time (damn, I sound like a broken record...); I've stated my love for the man's past work, and i believe when it's all said and done he will go down as the greatest song and dance man of his era...However, uniting all the people in the world don't mean shit, unless you're a politician....

No, Prince is simply better than MJ because he's the more complete artist who took chances and still managed to sell a shit load of albums...Understand...Prince was essentially an underground artist who just happened to cross over...I always judge MJ and Prince (yes, I'm an oldschool MJ fan who also is registered to MJboard.com) at there respective artistic peaks...But when you've only released two albums in a decade (MJ), I have a problem saying that you are the best of any era...Hell, even Madonna released more albums than MJ...Give me three albums at least and then we can start talking...And please, don't give me that crap about Thriller being such a monster album that MJ didn't have to release anymore product...The fact is, dude was simply afraid to follow it up..He sat on that album because he was obsessed with beating Thriller, not artistically, but commercially...He took five years to release Bad, which sold an insane amount of albums. However, except for three tracks ("Liberian Girl," The Way You Make Me Feel," and Man In The Mirror") that album was substandard for Mike..just sleepwalking pop music that at times was embarrasing ("Bad" anyone?)

Hey, I understand...It's easy to say that MJ is better than his peers because he is biggest commercial icon of his era (this cannot be disputed; and if it is find out what kind of drugs MJ detractors are using and where I can cop)...But Prince simply made his peers look silly for much of the '80s....To me, the only thing that made P look in his rear view mirror was hip-hop...Who cares how many instruments the man plays (this tired argument has been used by Prince fans a little too often...)..I judge it on the music...in that important department MJ, who I still listen to to this day (Destiny, Off The Wall, Triumph, Thriller ect...great shit), would be hard pressed to catch up to Prince...To me, it's kind of like comparing Elton John to Stevie Wonder during the '70s...Both artists were great musical figures...But Stevie simply went the extra mile artistically...Ditto for Prince...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #127 posted 08/17/05 4:22am

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

Novabreaker said:

Moonwalkbjrain said:




There's great difference between intentionally going overboard with make-up for a photoshoot once in a while, and walking around looking like a strangled chihuaha


yea well..i'd like to see u try and explain this shit then



and i believe THIS is the strangled chihuahua in quesiton lol

Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #128 posted 08/17/05 5:10am

hellomoto

thats something im so sick of people saying, that he hasnt made great music since thriller, i hate how people make that out as a fact when its only peoples opinons. in MY opnion and in alot of other peoples opinions, michaels latter work far outweighs his past. 'history' and 'blood on the dancefloor' is his best album to me and his most artistic and greatest work and of course absolutely genius. of course thats just my opinion, and im not acting like its fact, it just bothers me when people act like he hasnt had one good song and hasnt done anything with his life since thriller. 'off the wall' in my opinion is actually my least favourite and least listened to album of his, i dont see genius in it whatsoever except for 'dont stop till you get enough' and thats michaels writing and compsoing.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #129 posted 08/17/05 5:19am

Cloudbuster

avatar

hellomoto said:

thats something im so sick of people saying, that he hasnt made great music since thriller, i hate how people make that out as a fact when its only peoples opinons. in MY opnion and in alot of other peoples opinions, michaels latter work far outweighs his past. 'history' and 'blood on the dancefloor' is his best album to me and his most artistic and greatest work and of course absolutely genius. of course thats just my opinion, and im not acting like its fact, it just bothers me when people act like he hasnt had one good song and hasnt done anything with his life since thriller. 'off the wall' in my opinion is actually my least favourite and least listened to album of his, i dont see genius in it whatsoever except for 'dont stop till you get enough' and thats michaels writing and compsoing.


Off The Wall is actually my fave MJ album, but sure, I hear what you're saying. How people can think the likes of Man In The Mirror, Smooth Criminal, Who Is It, Will You Be There, Remember The Time, In The Closet, Stranger In Moscow, They Don't Care About Us, Morphine, Butterflies, You Rock My World, Whatever Happens... etc aren't up there with the best of his earlier stuff is beyond me.
It's like saying Prince hasn't made a decent song since Purple Rain. Utter bollocks.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #130 posted 08/17/05 6:35am

terryfrancis

"He's hardly the greatest performer of all time.. not only is he a shameless, overly rehearsed lip-syncher and old-hat dancer, but since the "Victory" tour with his brothers, he's done almost nothing but feed his audiences the same old cheap, rehashed shit, topped off with some unimpressive pyrotechnics and showy stunts."

i suppose you got the talent to dance better, sing better, write better songs too,

fucking retard

rehashed shit?

who the fuck are you to call rehashed?

you are full of shit

fuck the face, nose jobs, etc

end of the day

the music is the shit

off the wall, thriller etc are the dogs nuts

if you cant accept it,

stick a dildo up your arse or fanny depending on which you like

you are an insult to retards
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #131 posted 08/17/05 7:28am

squiddyren

terryfrancis said:

"He's hardly the greatest performer of all time.. not only is he a shameless, overly rehearsed lip-syncher and old-hat dancer, but since the "Victory" tour with his brothers, he's done almost nothing but feed his audiences the same old cheap, rehashed shit, topped off with some unimpressive pyrotechnics and showy stunts."

i suppose you got the talent to dance better, sing better, write better songs too,

fucking retard

rehashed shit?

who the fuck are you to call rehashed?

you are full of shit

fuck the face, nose jobs, etc

end of the day

the music is the shit

off the wall, thriller etc are the dogs nuts

if you cant accept it,

stick a dildo up your arse or fanny depending on which you like

you are an insult to retards


hug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #132 posted 08/17/05 7:32am

Ellie

avatar

Cloudbuster said:



Off The Wall is actually my fave MJ album, but sure, I hear what you're saying. How people can think the likes of Man In The Mirror, Smooth Criminal, Who Is It, Will You Be There, Remember The Time, In The Closet, Stranger In Moscow, They Don't Care About Us, Morphine, Butterflies, You Rock My World, Whatever Happens... etc aren't up there with the best of his earlier stuff is beyond me.
It's like saying Prince hasn't made a decent song since Purple Rain. Utter bollocks.

nod I can't even say any particular era I like more than others. It's a total mixed bag with me.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #133 posted 08/17/05 8:43am

dag

avatar

*cough* I'm in a select few group of people who know what he's planning - I have friends working for a fanclub who have been in contact with him for a while...

Agh, you'll never believe me because I've been sworn to secrecy and I can't hint. I shouldn't even know.


ooooohhhhh TELL MEEEEE PLEEEEEASSSSSEEEEE!!!!!



As for my opinion.....I don' t have an opinion about him - I have an unconditional love for him both as an artist and a person(ality).



cool picture. biggrin
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #134 posted 08/17/05 8:49am

Cloudbuster

avatar

Ellie said:

nod I can't even say any particular era I like more than others. It's a total mixed bag with me.


Yes indeed.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #135 posted 08/17/05 9:03am

skywalker

avatar

Prince and Michael Jackson are my 2 favorite musicians/artists/performers. As a huge fan of both, let me give you 10 reasons that I like Prince better.

1. Prince has more music. Prince simply has a ton more music than MJ for his fans to listen to. Some will argue that MJ has less "crappy music" and that he has a better filter however, besides being a totally subjective statement, this is simply not true. Pound for pound, MJ has made just as much "average" music as PRince has. As a fan of both, I am happy to have stacks of Prince albums and sad to have roughly 6 legit MJ albums since 1979. Waiting 5+ years between MJ albums sucks and lately it hasn't been worth the wait. If I don't like Prince's latest album, within a year or so I'll have a new one.

2. It is arguable who is a better live performer. Critics and fans alike both herald Prince and MJ as two of the best showman ever. Take your pick. That being said, Prince concerts are more "live" than MJ. Prince's shows are not as rehearesed and are more spontaneous-the energy is different. Plus, Prince's live show is not the same as it has been since 1988. The fact is that, they are both great and you cannot definitively say one is head and shoulders above the other in this regard. MJ cannot work an audience like Prince. Prince's shows are more audience involving than MJ. MJ's show are like going to a movie. It's a performance that could happen the same no matter the audience. Because of the nature of his concerts, Prince always takes the crowd into account and his concerts change based on the crowd. When did MJ last let audience members (who weren't planted groupies) up onstage to dance? Prince has an actual band that he leads, guides, and plays with. MJ just has hired musicians put together for a tour. Sheryl Crow used to play in MJ's "band" and was quoted as saying that MJ didn't know her name. I assure you, Prince knows his band.

3. It is easier to defend Prince's actions. Hey Prince changed his name to an unpronouncable symbol-super weird right? However, it is rockstar weird. MJ used to just be rockstar weird, now he is scary and creepy weird. MJ's personal life has overshadowed his art, and forced his music to take a back seat to his circus and court appearances.

4. Prince evolves. Don't get me wrong, as a fan of Mj I realize he has grown as an artist. However, every one of his albums is chasing after "Thriller", both in style, and in sales figures. Prince is not constantly trying to top, redo, outdo, or copy "Purple Rain". MJ got himself in a rut.

5. Prince has more variety to his music. Sure, MJ's pop sweeps over different genres, but not as aggressively as Prince does it. When was the last time MJ did a solo acoustic guitar album? A solo piano album? An instrumental album? A blues rock album? A jazz/funk album? Not only does Prince do different types of music from album to album. Often, he'll do it from song to song on one album. Hardly anyone crosses genres as effectively as Prince. MJ definitely does not.

6. Prince is more true to himself musically. Lately, MJ has gotten into the habit of hiring a load of "hot" producers to give him the latest sound, but it makes MJ's music seem contrived, forced, and not authentic. Even, when Prince is biting new trends he still sounds like Prince. He sounds authentic. You might not like Prince's rapping, but "pussy control" is a club anthem whether you like it or not. MJ singing things like "2000 Watts" seems artificial and forced-it's hard to believe MJ feels what he is singing.

7. Prince is more accessable to his fans. I know this sounds weird, but Prince often opens up his recording studios for his fans to tour (as MJ does with Neverland. However, the difference is the fact that Prince will often do intimate late night shows at his place with a few hundred fans. These gigs used to cost maybe $7. Often they were free. Prince casually walks amongst the crowd at these shows and just hangs out. I bet you'd be hard pressed to name another "reclusive" superstar of Prince's magnitude that allows his hardcore fans to get so close.

8. Prince's lyrical themes are more varied and more mature. How many monster and ghost songs can MJ do? How many of us still relate to that? Prince's music is often accused of being all sexual, but the fact is that his relationship based lyrics are more complex than MJ, more sincere, and more believable. Love, romance, sex, and God are questions and themes that all humans ask and deal with. Prince explores these themes with authenticity and an undertsanding that MJ has rarely, if ever, been able to capture. Prince also can do the fantastical, kid's stuff-look at the "batman" album. That album was fairly complex and mature for a superhero album.

9. Onstage- Prince sings.Prince dances. Prince plays guitar. Prince plays piano/keyboard. Prince plays drums. Prince plays bass guitar.

Onstage-MJ dances, MJ sings. We MJ fans often argue that he does these better than anyone else. That is opinion.

Fact is, Prince does more onstage than MJ. He does all of these really really well. Better singer and dancer than MJ? Some think so. However, without a doubt Prince is more varied onstage than MJ.

10. Prince has hot female backup dancers. MJ's back up dancers seem like Madonna's leftovers.
[Edited 8/17/05 9:06am]
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #136 posted 08/17/05 9:08am

dag

avatar

7. Prince is more accessable to his fans. I know this sounds weird, but Prince often opens up his recording studios for his fans to tour (as MJ does with Neverland. However, the difference is the fact that Prince will often do intimate late night shows at his place with a few hundred fans. These gigs used to cost maybe $7. Often they were free. Prince casually walks amongst the crowd at these shows and just hangs out. I bet you'd be hard pressed to name another "reclusive" superstar of Prince's magnitude that allows his hardcore fans to get so close.


Mike wouldn' t survive that. lol his fans are crazier.
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #137 posted 08/17/05 9:15am

JackieBlue

avatar

skywalker said:

Prince and Michael Jackson are my 2 favorite musicians/artists/performers. As a huge fan of both, let me give you 10 reasons that I like Prince better.

1. Prince has more music. Prince simply has a ton more music than MJ for his fans to listen to. Some will argue that MJ has less "crappy music" and that he has a better filter however, besides being a totally subjective statement, this is simply not true. Pound for pound, MJ has made just as much "average" music as PRince has. As a fan of both, I am happy to have stacks of Prince albums and sad to have roughly 6 legit MJ albums since 1979. Waiting 5+ years between MJ albums sucks and lately it hasn't been worth the wait. If I don't like Prince's latest album, within a year or so I'll have a new one.

2. It is arguable who is a better live performer. Critics and fans alike both herald Prince and MJ as two of the best showman ever. Take your pick. That being said, Prince concerts are more "live" than MJ. Prince's shows are not as rehearesed and are more spontaneous-the energy is different. Plus, Prince's live show is not the same as it has been since 1988. The fact is that, they are both great and you cannot definitively say one is head and shoulders above the other in this regard. MJ cannot work an audience like Prince. Prince's shows are more audience involving than MJ. MJ's show are like going to a movie. It's a performance that could happen the same no matter the audience. Because of the nature of his concerts, Prince always takes the crowd into account and his concerts change based on the crowd. When did MJ last let audience members (who weren't planted groupies) up onstage to dance? Prince has an actual band that he leads, guides, and plays with. MJ just has hired musicians put together for a tour. Sheryl Crow used to play in MJ's "band" and was quoted as saying that MJ didn't know her name. I assure you, Prince knows his band.

3. It is easier to defend Prince's actions. Hey Prince changed his name to an unpronouncable symbol-super weird right? However, it is rockstar weird. MJ used to just be rockstar weird, now he is scary and creepy weird. MJ's personal life has overshadowed his art, and forced his music to take a back seat to his circus and court appearances.

4. Prince evolves. Don't get me wrong, as a fan of Mj I realize he has grown as an artist. However, every one of his albums is chasing after "Thriller", both in style, and in sales figures. Prince is not constantly trying to top, redo, outdo, or copy "Purple Rain". MJ got himself in a rut.

5. Prince has more variety to his music. Sure, MJ's pop sweeps over different genres, but not as aggressively as Prince does it. When was the last time MJ did a solo acoustic guitar album? A solo piano album? An instrumental album? A blues rock album? A jazz/funk album? Not only does Prince do different types of music from album to album. Often, he'll do it from song to song on one album. Hardly anyone crosses genres as effectively as Prince. MJ definitely does not.

6. Prince is more true to himself musically. Lately, MJ has gotten into the habit of hiring a load of "hot" producers to give him the latest sound, but it makes MJ's music seem contrived, forced, and not authentic. Even, when Prince is biting new trends he still sounds like Prince. He sounds authentic. You might not like Prince's rapping, but "pussy control" is a club anthem whether you like it or not. MJ singing things like "2000 Watts" seems artificial and forced-it's hard to believe MJ feels what he is singing.

7. Prince is more accessable to his fans. I know this sounds weird, but Prince often opens up his recording studios for his fans to tour (as MJ does with Neverland. However, the difference is the fact that Prince will often do intimate late night shows at his place with a few hundred fans. These gigs used to cost maybe $7. Often they were free. Prince casually walks amongst the crowd at these shows and just hangs out. I bet you'd be hard pressed to name another "reclusive" superstar of Prince's magnitude that allows his hardcore fans to get so close.

8. Prince's lyrical themes are more varied and more mature. How many monster and ghost songs can MJ do? How many of us still relate to that? Prince's music is often accused of being all sexual, but the fact is that his relationship based lyrics are more complex than MJ, more sincere, and more believable. Love, romance, sex, and God are questions and themes that all humans ask and deal with. Prince explores these themes with authenticity and an undertsanding that MJ has rarely, if ever, been able to capture. Prince also can do the fantastical, kid's stuff-look at the "batman" album. That album was fairly complex and mature for a superhero album.

9. Onstage- Prince sings.Prince dances. Prince plays guitar. Prince plays piano/keyboard. Prince plays drums. Prince plays bass guitar.

Onstage-MJ dances, MJ sings. We MJ fans often argue that he does these better than anyone else. That is opinion.

Fact is, Prince does more onstage than MJ. He does all of these really really well. Better singer and dancer than MJ? Some think so. However, without a doubt Prince is more varied onstage than MJ.

10. Prince has hot female backup dancers. MJ's back up dancers seem like Madonna's leftovers.
[Edited 8/17/05 9:06am]



I really hate Prince vs. MJ discussions but I gotta say I really feel you on 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9 and 10. You put it succinct and to the point and weren't insulting. I love that I can go to my Prince collection and really ponder over what I want to hear that suits my mood. I love that it's basically a library. I can play an assortment of Prince and a person can walk in the room on several different songs and not know it was the same artist. Even some of the music that may be considered average is still better quality than a lot of music out here today.

I always wondered why MJ doesn't use more female back up dancers and when he does there doesn't seem much connection to them (which isn't surprising, really).
[Edited 8/17/05 9:17am]
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #138 posted 08/17/05 10:15am

BoOTyLiCioUs

And of the 3...Madonna is probably the MOST influential of all of them. Sorry to say it, but it's true. For Girl Music, Dance Music, & Pop Music, she's had it down from the start. Not to mention MANY fashion trends (Oh yeah MJ had them clamouring for that glove).


Hell no. What by being a skank? That was the only way she was influentical. She influentened female pop stars today by being skanky. They all are skanky today because of her. Because they know and she knows that they don't have a lot of talent so they have to be a skank in order to sell records. Michael was the first to have line dancing in his music videos, he revolutionized the music videos, choregraphy, and was the first BLACK man to have his music played on Mtv which opened the doors to have other blacks be on MTV. And you say he had no influence what so ever.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #139 posted 08/17/05 10:31am

Abdul

skywalker said:

Prince and Michael Jackson are my 2 favorite musicians/artists/performers. As a huge fan of both, let me give you 10 reasons that I like Prince better.

1. Prince has more music. Prince simply has a ton more music than MJ for his fans to listen to. Some will argue that MJ has less "crappy music" and that he has a better filter however, besides being a totally subjective statement, this is simply not true. Pound for pound, MJ has made just as much "average" music as PRince has. As a fan of both, I am happy to have stacks of Prince albums and sad to have roughly 6 legit MJ albums since 1979. Waiting 5+ years between MJ albums sucks and lately it hasn't been worth the wait. If I don't like Prince's latest album, within a year or so I'll have a new one.

2. It is arguable who is a better live performer. Critics and fans alike both herald Prince and MJ as two of the best showman ever. Take your pick. That being said, Prince concerts are more "live" than MJ. Prince's shows are not as rehearesed and are more spontaneous-the energy is different. Plus, Prince's live show is not the same as it has been since 1988. The fact is that, they are both great and you cannot definitively say one is head and shoulders above the other in this regard. MJ cannot work an audience like Prince. Prince's shows are more audience involving than MJ. MJ's show are like going to a movie. It's a performance that could happen the same no matter the audience. Because of the nature of his concerts, Prince always takes the crowd into account and his concerts change based on the crowd. When did MJ last let audience members (who weren't planted groupies) up onstage to dance? Prince has an actual band that he leads, guides, and plays with. MJ just has hired musicians put together for a tour. Sheryl Crow used to play in MJ's "band" and was quoted as saying that MJ didn't know her name. I assure you, Prince knows his band.

3. It is easier to defend Prince's actions. Hey Prince changed his name to an unpronouncable symbol-super weird right? However, it is rockstar weird. MJ used to just be rockstar weird, now he is scary and creepy weird. MJ's personal life has overshadowed his art, and forced his music to take a back seat to his circus and court appearances.

4. Prince evolves. Don't get me wrong, as a fan of Mj I realize he has grown as an artist. However, every one of his albums is chasing after "Thriller", both in style, and in sales figures. Prince is not constantly trying to top, redo, outdo, or copy "Purple Rain". MJ got himself in a rut.

5. Prince has more variety to his music. Sure, MJ's pop sweeps over different genres, but not as aggressively as Prince does it. When was the last time MJ did a solo acoustic guitar album? A solo piano album? An instrumental album? A blues rock album? A jazz/funk album? Not only does Prince do different types of music from album to album. Often, he'll do it from song to song on one album. Hardly anyone crosses genres as effectively as Prince. MJ definitely does not.

6. Prince is more true to himself musically. Lately, MJ has gotten into the habit of hiring a load of "hot" producers to give him the latest sound, but it makes MJ's music seem contrived, forced, and not authentic. Even, when Prince is biting new trends he still sounds like Prince. He sounds authentic. You might not like Prince's rapping, but "pussy control" is a club anthem whether you like it or not. MJ singing things like "2000 Watts" seems artificial and forced-it's hard to believe MJ feels what he is singing.

7. Prince is more accessable to his fans. I know this sounds weird, but Prince often opens up his recording studios for his fans to tour (as MJ does with Neverland. However, the difference is the fact that Prince will often do intimate late night shows at his place with a few hundred fans. These gigs used to cost maybe $7. Often they were free. Prince casually walks amongst the crowd at these shows and just hangs out. I bet you'd be hard pressed to name another "reclusive" superstar of Prince's magnitude that allows his hardcore fans to get so close.

8. Prince's lyrical themes are more varied and more mature. How many monster and ghost songs can MJ do? How many of us still relate to that? Prince's music is often accused of being all sexual, but the fact is that his relationship based lyrics are more complex than MJ, more sincere, and more believable. Love, romance, sex, and God are questions and themes that all humans ask and deal with. Prince explores these themes with authenticity and an undertsanding that MJ has rarely, if ever, been able to capture. Prince also can do the fantastical, kid's stuff-look at the "batman" album. That album was fairly complex and mature for a superhero album.

9. Onstage- Prince sings.Prince dances. Prince plays guitar. Prince plays piano/keyboard. Prince plays drums. Prince plays bass guitar.

Onstage-MJ dances, MJ sings. We MJ fans often argue that he does these better than anyone else. That is opinion.

Fact is, Prince does more onstage than MJ. He does all of these really really well. Better singer and dancer than MJ? Some think so. However, without a doubt Prince is more varied onstage than MJ.

10. Prince has hot female backup dancers. MJ's back up dancers seem like Madonna's leftovers.
[Edited 8/17/05 9:06am]



CO-SIGN!!!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #140 posted 08/17/05 10:38am

murph

skywalker said:

Prince and Michael Jackson are my 2 favorite musicians/artists/performers. As a huge fan of both, let me give you 10 reasons that I like Prince better.

1. Prince has more music. Prince simply has a ton more music than MJ for his fans to listen to. Some will argue that MJ has less "crappy music" and that he has a better filter however, besides being a totally subjective statement, this is simply not true. Pound for pound, MJ has made just as much "average" music as PRince has. As a fan of both, I am happy to have stacks of Prince albums and sad to have roughly 6 legit MJ albums since 1979. Waiting 5+ years between MJ albums sucks and lately it hasn't been worth the wait. If I don't like Prince's latest album, within a year or so I'll have a new one.

2. It is arguable who is a better live performer. Critics and fans alike both herald Prince and MJ as two of the best showman ever. Take your pick. That being said, Prince concerts are more "live" than MJ. Prince's shows are not as rehearesed and are more spontaneous-the energy is different. Plus, Prince's live show is not the same as it has been since 1988. The fact is that, they are both great and you cannot definitively say one is head and shoulders above the other in this regard. MJ cannot work an audience like Prince. Prince's shows are more audience involving than MJ. MJ's show are like going to a movie. It's a performance that could happen the same no matter the audience. Because of the nature of his concerts, Prince always takes the crowd into account and his concerts change based on the crowd. When did MJ last let audience members (who weren't planted groupies) up onstage to dance? Prince has an actual band that he leads, guides, and plays with. MJ just has hired musicians put together for a tour. Sheryl Crow used to play in MJ's "band" and was quoted as saying that MJ didn't know her name. I assure you, Prince knows his band.

3. It is easier to defend Prince's actions. Hey Prince changed his name to an unpronouncable symbol-super weird right? However, it is rockstar weird. MJ used to just be rockstar weird, now he is scary and creepy weird. MJ's personal life has overshadowed his art, and forced his music to take a back seat to his circus and court appearances.

4. Prince evolves. Don't get me wrong, as a fan of Mj I realize he has grown as an artist. However, every one of his albums is chasing after "Thriller", both in style, and in sales figures. Prince is not constantly trying to top, redo, outdo, or copy "Purple Rain". MJ got himself in a rut.

5. Prince has more variety to his music. Sure, MJ's pop sweeps over different genres, but not as aggressively as Prince does it. When was the last time MJ did a solo acoustic guitar album? A solo piano album? An instrumental album? A blues rock album? A jazz/funk album? Not only does Prince do different types of music from album to album. Often, he'll do it from song to song on one album. Hardly anyone crosses genres as effectively as Prince. MJ definitely does not.

6. Prince is more true to himself musically. Lately, MJ has gotten into the habit of hiring a load of "hot" producers to give him the latest sound, but it makes MJ's music seem contrived, forced, and not authentic. Even, when Prince is biting new trends he still sounds like Prince. He sounds authentic. You might not like Prince's rapping, but "pussy control" is a club anthem whether you like it or not. MJ singing things like "2000 Watts" seems artificial and forced-it's hard to believe MJ feels what he is singing.

7. Prince is more accessable to his fans. I know this sounds weird, but Prince often opens up his recording studios for his fans to tour (as MJ does with Neverland. However, the difference is the fact that Prince will often do intimate late night shows at his place with a few hundred fans. These gigs used to cost maybe $7. Often they were free. Prince casually walks amongst the crowd at these shows and just hangs out. I bet you'd be hard pressed to name another "reclusive" superstar of Prince's magnitude that allows his hardcore fans to get so close.

8. Prince's lyrical themes are more varied and more mature. How many monster and ghost songs can MJ do? How many of us still relate to that? Prince's music is often accused of being all sexual, but the fact is that his relationship based lyrics are more complex than MJ, more sincere, and more believable. Love, romance, sex, and God are questions and themes that all humans ask and deal with. Prince explores these themes with authenticity and an undertsanding that MJ has rarely, if ever, been able to capture. Prince also can do the fantastical, kid's stuff-look at the "batman" album. That album was fairly complex and mature for a superhero album.

9. Onstage- Prince sings.Prince dances. Prince plays guitar. Prince plays piano/keyboard. Prince plays drums. Prince plays bass guitar.

Onstage-MJ dances, MJ sings. We MJ fans often argue that he does these better than anyone else. That is opinion.

Fact is, Prince does more onstage than MJ. He does all of these really really well. Better singer and dancer than MJ? Some think so. However, without a doubt Prince is more varied onstage than MJ.

10. Prince has hot female backup dancers. MJ's back up dancers seem like Madonna's leftovers.
[Edited 8/17/05 9:06am]


You know I respect what you are saying Skywalker...And for the most part you are right...But the only problem I have with your list is number 2...I think since 1986-87 Prince has been the more sponataneous and the more exciting and the better artist onstage...But let's not go crazy here...As a hardcore Prince fan, i cannot in good conscience say that Prince was on the same level as MJ on stage from 1978 to 1984...

I liked the Dirty Mind, Controversy, 1999 and Purple Rain concert years, but he did not find his live mojo until the Parade era...He simply was not on the level of MJ "live" in his early years...But P has been kicking MJ's ass ever since...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #141 posted 08/17/05 10:41am

Ellie

avatar

Didn't Tina Landon work with Michael before Janet? I heard she was in the Smooth Criminal video, albeit dressed as a man. And Paula Abdul with The Jacksons first too, she worked on the Victory tour.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #142 posted 08/17/05 11:10am

skywalker

avatar



"You know I respect what you are saying Skywalker...And for the most part you are right...But the only problem I have with your list is number 2...I think since 1986-87 Prince has been the more sponataneous and the more exciting and the better artist onstage...But let's not go crazy here...As a hardcore Prince fan, i cannot in good conscience say that Prince was on the same level as MJ on stage from 1978 to 1984...

I liked the Dirty Mind, Controversy, 1999 and Purple Rain concert years, but he did not find his live mojo until the Parade era...He simply was not on the level of MJ "live" in his early years...But P has been kicking MJ's ass ever since..."


Everyone is entitled to their opinions. Many people are of the opinion that Prince
became "too showy" after 1984. There is something to be said about the full on rawness that is in those "dirty mind" shows. If you ask me, Prince was runnin' with MJ, as far as being an outstanding live performer, as early as then. I think Prince was unquestionably on par with MJ during the "1999" tour onwards.
[Edited 8/17/05 11:10am]
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #143 posted 08/17/05 3:17pm

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

1. Prince has more music. Prince simply has a ton more music than MJ for his fans to listen to. Some will argue that MJ has less "crappy music" and that he has a better filter however, besides being a totally subjective statement, this is simply not true. Pound for pound, MJ has made just as much "average" music as PRince has. As a fan of both, I am happy to have stacks of Prince albums and sad to have roughly 6 legit MJ albums since 1979. Waiting 5+ years between MJ albums sucks and lately it hasn't been worth the wait. If I don't like Prince's latest album, within a year or so I'll have a new one.
take a back seat to his circus and court appearances.

4. Prince evolves. Don't get me wrong, as a fan of Mj I realize he has grown as an artist. However, every one of his albums is chasing after "Thriller", both in style, and in sales figures. Prince is not constantly trying to top, redo, outdo, or copy "Purple Rain". MJ got himself in a rut.

5. Prince has more variety to his music. Sure, MJ's pop sweeps over different genres, but not as aggressively as Prince does it. When was the last time MJ did a solo acoustic guitar album? A solo piano album? An instrumental album? A blues rock album? A jazz/funk album? Not only does Prince do different types of music from album to album. Often, he'll do it from song to song on one album. Hardly anyone crosses genres as effectively as Prince. MJ definitely does not.


i definately agree wit u on these.

6. Prince is more true to himself musically. Lately, MJ has gotten into the habit of hiring a load of "hot" producers to give him the latest sound, but it makes MJ's music seem contrived, forced, and not authentic. Even, when Prince is biting new trends he still sounds like Prince. He sounds authentic. You might not like Prince's rapping, but "pussy control" is a club anthem whether you like it or not. MJ singing things like "2000 Watts" seems artificial and forced-it's hard to believe MJ feels what he is singing.


i agree with this to a certain extent

7. Prince is more accessable to his fans. I know this sounds weird, but Prince often opens up his recording studios for his fans to tour (as MJ does with Neverland. However, the difference is the fact that Prince will often do intimate late night shows at his place with a few hundred fans. These gigs used to cost maybe $7. Often they were free. Prince casually walks amongst the crowd at these shows and just hangs out. I bet you'd be hard pressed to name another "reclusive" superstar of Prince's magnitude that allows his hardcore fans to get so close.


i dont agree with this @all. prince took a fans camera, reportedly insulted a fan in a club and sues fansites left and right. mj does none of that. he stops for pictures (even when he's out trynna be a person), he signs autographs, he talks to his fans, he throws them things from his hotel window. i say thats very accesible.

8. Prince's lyrical themes are more varied and more mature. How many monster and ghost songs can MJ do? How many of us still relate to that? Prince's music is often accused of being all sexual, but the fact is that his relationship based lyrics are more complex than MJ, more sincere, and more believable. Love, romance, sex, and God are questions and themes that all humans ask and deal with. Prince explores these themes with authenticity and an undertsanding that MJ has rarely, if ever, been able to capture. Prince also can do the fantastical, kid's stuff-look at the "batman" album. That album was fairly complex and mature for a superhero album.


i totally agree with this. however, heaven can wait, break of dawn, shes out of my life, lady in my life, i just cant stop lovin u, gone too soon, keep the faith..those are beautiful mature songs. but yea he could def. have more in this vein
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #144 posted 08/17/05 3:20pm

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

dag said:

7. Prince is more accessable to his fans. I know this sounds weird, but Prince often opens up his recording studios for his fans to tour (as MJ does with Neverland. However, the difference is the fact that Prince will often do intimate late night shows at his place with a few hundred fans. These gigs used to cost maybe $7. Often they were free. Prince casually walks amongst the crowd at these shows and just hangs out. I bet you'd be hard pressed to name another "reclusive" superstar of Prince's magnitude that allows his hardcore fans to get so close.


Mike wouldn' t survive that. lol his fans are crazier.


lol so true!
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #145 posted 08/17/05 3:35pm

MrTation

avatar

...he stinx on ice... neutral
"...all you need ...is justa touch...of mojo hand....."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #146 posted 08/17/05 3:46pm

jasonstar

This person with the "sources" close to Michael..it is rude if you don't give us all a basic run down of what you know. That is unless it bs and just to get you some attention.

Sorry if that was rude sounding but I hate people who pretend to be "in the know" for attention.

As for this thread..Michael is the best in my book. No singer is better. No musician can top his. Nobody can even touch his talent.

Prince is a close second or third.

But ever since Michael recorded HIStory (Disc 2) I knew he was my favorite! music
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #147 posted 08/17/05 3:53pm

kev1n

avatar

FunkyBrotha said:

its this kinda shit that pisses me off, michael jackson is a musical genius, most musicians would put him ahead of prince in every respect except the ability to actually play instruments. And MJ is way more talented than Bowie, MJ can produce his own music, which bowie has never done.

Bowie/Madonna/Bjork yes
MJ is kinda in a league of his own
then u have ppl like Prince/Sly/Stevie


I am sorry but I have to dissagree here...Michael jackson is the greatest pop-musician ever who made some of the best pop-tracks in history.

Bowie is an artist who has created ART...no comparing the two.

You simpley can't put guys like Bowie, Reed, Jim Morrisson or Nick cave next to Michael jackson...They are modern day Poets. something completely different from what MJ has done or is doing.
It was not in vain...it was in Minneapolis!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #148 posted 08/17/05 4:00pm

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

kev1n said:

FunkyBrotha said:

its this kinda shit that pisses me off, michael jackson is a musical genius, most musicians would put him ahead of prince in every respect except the ability to actually play instruments. And MJ is way more talented than Bowie, MJ can produce his own music, which bowie has never done.

Bowie/Madonna/Bjork yes
MJ is kinda in a league of his own
then u have ppl like Prince/Sly/Stevie


I am sorry but I have to dissagree here...Michael jackson is the greatest pop-musician ever who made some of the best pop-tracks in history.

Bowie is an artist who has created ART...no comparing the two.

You simpley can't put guys like Bowie, Reed, Jim Morrisson or Nick cave next to Michael jackson...They are modern day Poets. something completely different from what MJ has done or is doing.


clapping!!! exactly!!!!!

thing is u can NEVER compare michael and prince. they do two dif things. its a bit of an insult to BOTH of them in a way. prince is a INSTRUMENTALIST, he's music first and foremost. michael is a DANCER/ENTERTAINER, entertainment comes first and formost. comparing michael to prince is like comparing miles davis or jimi hendrix to michael. it would never be done and if it is it'd be insulting. they're in two dif. categeories. and u cant compare prince to micahel thats like comparin britney spears, 50cent or public enemy to prince. they in different categories. they do different things. a more realistic comparison would be to compare prince to rick james and michael to madonna.
or prince to jimi hendrix and michael to maybe the beatles (pop version)
[Edited 8/17/05 16:02pm]
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #149 posted 08/17/05 5:14pm

skywalker

avatar

Moonwalkbjrain said:

kev1n said:



I am sorry but I have to dissagree here...Michael jackson is the greatest pop-musician ever who made some of the best pop-tracks in history.

Bowie is an artist who has created ART...no comparing the two.

You simpley can't put guys like Bowie, Reed, Jim Morrisson or Nick cave next to Michael jackson...They are modern day Poets. something completely different from what MJ has done or is doing.


clapping!!! exactly!!!!!

thing is u can NEVER compare michael and prince. they do two dif things. its a bit of an insult to BOTH of them in a way. prince is a INSTRUMENTALIST, he's music first and foremost. michael is a DANCER/ENTERTAINER, entertainment comes first and formost. comparing michael to prince is like comparing miles davis or jimi hendrix to michael. it would never be done and if it is it'd be insulting. they're in two dif. categeories. and u cant compare prince to micahel thats like comparin britney spears, 50cent or public enemy to prince. they in different categories. they do different things. a more realistic comparison would be to compare prince to rick james and michael to madonna.
or prince to jimi hendrix and michael to maybe the beatles (pop version)
[Edited 8/17/05 16:02pm]



Oh come one. Prince is a pop artist a lot of the time. I think that slamming people for comparing them it a bit much. Yeah, MJ and Prince are apples and oranges. However, the comparison isn't totally without merit or reason. I'd say don't compare Rick James to Prince-Rick never ever ever had the massive success that Prince has/had.
"New Power slide...."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 5 of 8 <12345678>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > opinions on micael jackson