Author | Message |
Better Magazine Source for Music: Blender or Rolling Stone? Just curious...I don't read RS much these days but I do love Blender for CD reviews, artist interviews, etc... Let the rain come down...17 days.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Q
The best, hands down. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: Q
The best, hands down. I must have been living in the black hole. I thought Q was a magzine for homosexuals. Let the rain come down...17 days.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I quite like Uncut. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplegypsy said: lilgish said: Q
The best, hands down. I must have been living in the black hole. I thought Q was a magzine for homosexuals. Q http://www.q4music.com/nav?page=q4music | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TRON said: I quite like Uncut.
Uncut did a great piece on Fleetwood Mac two years ago.... Let the rain come down...17 days.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplegypsy said: TRON said: I quite like Uncut.
Uncut did a great piece on Fleetwood Mac two years ago.... They're just so extensive and thorough. I loved their piece on Bowie's Berlin period. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
internet "Awards are like hemorrhoids. Sooner or later, every asshole gets one." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GrayKing said: internet
I still like AMG, although they're not quite as consistent as they once were. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TRON said: purplegypsy said: Uncut did a great piece on Fleetwood Mac two years ago.... They're just so extensive and thorough. I loved their piece on Bowie's Berlin period. There too rock based. I'm not a huge pop fan, but I wanna know what's going on in every genre. Q is a populist rcok mag, like RS ought to be. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TRON said: GrayKing said: internet
I still like AMG, although they're not quite as consistent as they once were. AMG has a weak interface. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: TRON said: I still like AMG, although they're not quite as consistent as they once were. AMG has a weak interface. It is pretty terrible. And Stephen Thomas Erlewine should be on probation for all those positive J-Lo reviews. **** to Rebirth, indeed. [Edited 8/14/05 18:42pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: And Stephen Thomas Erlewine should be on probation for all those positive J-Lo reviews. **** to Rebirth, indeed.
Yeah, what's up with him lately? He used to be so trustworthy. I'd say 75% of the time I found myself agreeing with him. Especially when I first bought their book back in like '97 or whatever. I really don't know what to expect from him anymore. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: There too rock based. I'm not a huge pop fan, but I wanna know what's going on in every genre. Q is a populist rcok mag, like RS ought to be.
I don't buy Uncut for the "current events". I buy it for the specials. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: lilgish said: AMG has a weak interface. It is pretty terrible. And Stephen Thomas Erlewine should be on probation for all those positive J-Lo reviews. **** to Rebirth, indeed. Bet your bottom dollar that J.LO's next album is a greatest hits. [Edited 8/14/05 18:49pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: VoicesCarry said: It is pretty terrible. And Stephen Thomas Erlewine should be on probation for all those positive J-Lo reviews. **** to Rebirth, indeed. Bet your bottom dollar that J.LO's next album is a greatest hits. [Edited 8/14/05 18:49pm] That term being used very loosely, of course. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: That term being used very loosely, of course.
This Was Me...Back When People Cared | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TRON said: VoicesCarry said: That term being used very loosely, of course.
This Was Me...Back When People Cared | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pitchfork media for indie/alternative crap, and these days, i look at the org and a couple of other music bulletin board sites for general/pop music news.
i'm not really a fan of music reviews these days. i don't believe in them as much as i used to, though sometimes i'll read them for entertainment, if the critics are particularly bitchy and unfairly scrutinizing or judgmental. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wire. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: Q
The best, hands down. I used to buy this religiously but i stopped buying it after it went through what i saw as a bit of a dip in standards. They started throwing 4 or 5 star reviews round all the time, and the articles, columns & reviews got shorter and shorter, while the pictures got bigger. That said it was always the best all round music magazine, most balanced in its coverage. I haven't read a copy for about a year, has it changed much? Maybe I should venture out and give it another try. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: pitchfork media for indie/alternative crap, and these days, i look at the org and a couple of other music bulletin board sites for general/pop music news.
i'm not really a fan of music reviews these days. i don't believe in them as much as i used to, though sometimes i'll read them for entertainment, if the critics are particularly bitchy and unfairly scrutinizing or judgmental. So many reviewers seem to latch onto hype much more easily nowadays. Its almost like they collectively sit round a table and decide, between all the music magazines, what angle they're going to take with each album. Certain artists will always get good reviews, yet when I listen to them, I can barely associate the sound coming out of my stereo to the words written by some reviewers about it. The last Coldplay & U2 albums i found distinctly underwhelming, yet the music press all gave them 5 stars. The trouble with most music magazines is that they're afraid to give bad reviews to the big acts in case these "front cover acts" decide to withold the said mag an interview or photoshoot. I read old Q / Rolling Stone reviews and they were withering in their assesments of some records, you always felt that the reviewer was being honest about what they thought of the record. I do believe that there are very few reviewers out their that aren't working under severe editorial "guidance". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't buy any music mags regularly anymore. Uncut and Mojo are good when they're doing features on someone I like. The Uncut Stevie Wonder piece 2 months ago was brilliant. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CrozzaUK said: Anxiety said: pitchfork media for indie/alternative crap, and these days, i look at the org and a couple of other music bulletin board sites for general/pop music news.
i'm not really a fan of music reviews these days. i don't believe in them as much as i used to, though sometimes i'll read them for entertainment, if the critics are particularly bitchy and unfairly scrutinizing or judgmental. So many reviewers seem to latch onto hype much more easily nowadays. Its almost like they collectively sit round a table and decide, between all the music magazines, what angle they're going to take with each album. Certain artists will always get good reviews, yet when I listen to them, I can barely associate the sound coming out of my stereo to the words written by some reviewers about it. The last Coldplay & U2 albums i found distinctly underwhelming, yet the music press all gave them 5 stars. The trouble with most music magazines is that they're afraid to give bad reviews to the big acts in case these "front cover acts" decide to withold the said mag an interview or photoshoot. I read old Q / Rolling Stone reviews and they were withering in their assesments of some records, you always felt that the reviewer was being honest about what they thought of the record. I do believe that there are very few reviewers out their that aren't working under severe editorial "guidance". well put. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplegypsy said: Just curious...I don't read RS much these days but I do love Blender for CD reviews, artist interviews, etc...
i like blender these days. i havent gotten a copy of rollingstone in years(prolly 99')blender borrows some from Q the uk music mag.but id go with them out of the two. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplegypsy said: Just curious...I don't read RS much these days but I do love Blender for CD reviews, artist interviews, etc...
Actually, this is a really cool topic for me and I would love to hear what everyone has to say. I live overseas now and sometimes it's so hard to keep up with what's "hot" at home. I was actually thinking to suscribe to some music mags at home recently, but with import prices being what they are, I wanna be sure to get more bang for my buck if I'm going to drop close to 50 euro (I think like 60 or 65 U.S. $$$) on a subscrition.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |