crix1313 said: CalhounSq said: PLEASE be aware that multiple surgeries DO NOT change ones GENES!! So the only reason you don't believe these are his kids is that they don't have his nose ? His nose, any variation of any of his noses, any hint of anything African American, any hint of being even slightly mixed race. Obviously some people on here don't know the difference between phenotype and genotype but at least you could have the decency to hide your ignorance in shame.
I'm not hiding shit, I DON'T know the difference between the two. What I DO know is that there's no way in hell a brown skinned Black man with a wide nose can naturally have THREE children all without even a hint of Blackness or being mixed . [Edited 7/17/05 11:52am] I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LightOfArt had a nickname for me... "Rubba" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: LightOfArt had a nickname for me... "Rubba"
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: CinisterCee said: LightOfArt had a nickname for me... "Rubba"
applehead and doo-doo head were taken. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: VoicesCarry said: applehead and doo-doo head were taken. And braceface didn't apply. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. . . . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. . . . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: I want to lick Michael's chest | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: I want to lick Michael's chest So...Is everything well with you? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I knew those weren't MJ's biological kids. Just shows what a lot of money can buy you. A not guilty verdict, kids, payoffs to young boys families, monkeys, a ferris wheel, enough slicin', dicin', and bleaching of your face to make you look like skeletor, and so on.
I wonder whose kids are gonna be more screwed up? Whitney and Bobby's daughter or MJ's "kids". Hmmm, I smell a new reality show. BTW, does anyone remember the rumor years ago that MJ had his balls cut off to keep his voice high? Can you say Castrati boys and girls? I knew that you could.(Sorry, my Fred Rogers needs work). If that wasn't a rumor then no way in hell those are his biological kids. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shygirl said: BTW, does anyone remember the rumor years ago that MJ had his balls cut off to keep his voice high? Can you say Castrati boys and girls? I knew that you could.(Sorry, my Fred Rogers needs work).
If that wasn't a rumor then no way in hell those are his biological kids. you are one fucked up person if you are actually gullible enough to believe that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said:[quote] crix1313 said: His nose, any variation of any of his noses, any hint of anything African American, any hint of being even slightly mixed race. Obviously some people on here don't know the difference between phenotype and genotype but at least you could have the decency to hide your ignorance in shame.
I'm not hiding shit, I DON'T know the difference between the two. What I DO know is that there's no way in hell a brown skinned Black man with a wide nose can naturally have THREE children all without even a hint of Blackness or being mixed . [Edited 7/17/05 11:52am] These kids aren't Black at all. Look at Maraih Carey she is only a quater black and looks alot more black than these kids that are half black. genotype is the genes like in the punnet squares when you have the big letter and the little letter. phenotype is the way the genes are expressed. if i remember correctly there are some traits that will have imcomplete dominance. like certain varites of flowers that can be either, red as the dominate trait, white as the recessive trait, and pink as the imcomplete dominate trait when you have a hetrogenous genotype. i believe skin color on people is that way. and those kids look homogenously white. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: CalhounSq said: I'm not hiding shit, I DON'T know the difference between the two. What I DO know is that there's no way in hell a brown skinned Black man with a wide nose can naturally have THREE children all without even a hint of Blackness or being mixed . [Edited 7/17/05 11:52am] These kids aren't Black at all. Look at Maraih Carey she is only a quater black and looks alot more black than these kids that are half black. genotype is the genes like in the punnet squares when you have the big letter and the little letter. phenotype is the way the genes are expressed. if i remember correctly there are some traits that will have imcomplete dominance. like certain varites of flowers that can be either, red as the dominate trait, white as the recessive trait, and pink as the imcomplete dominate trait when you have a hetrogenous genotype. i believe skin color on people is that way. and those kids look homogenously white. Skin color is by polygenic inheritance. Terms like homozygotes, heterozygotes, etc. don't apply. Neither does dominance/recessiveness. Although I admit the likelihood of a black man having 3 snowy white children with a white woman is very low. [Edited 7/17/05 18:18pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: ehuffnsd said: These kids aren't Black at all. Look at Maraih Carey she is only a quater black and looks alot more black than these kids that are half black. genotype is the genes like in the punnet squares when you have the big letter and the little letter. phenotype is the way the genes are expressed. if i remember correctly there are some traits that will have imcomplete dominance. like certain varites of flowers that can be either, red as the dominate trait, white as the recessive trait, and pink as the imcomplete dominate trait when you have a hetrogenous genotype. i believe skin color on people is that way. and those kids look homogenously white. Skin color is by polygenic inheritance. Terms like homozygotes, heterozygotes, etc. don't apply. Neither does dominance/recessiveness. Although I admit the likelihood of a black man having 3 snowy white children with a white woman is very low. [Edited 7/17/05 18:18pm] thanks for the correction... my degree is in chemistry not biology You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: VoicesCarry said: Skin color is by polygenic inheritance. Terms like homozygotes, heterozygotes, etc. don't apply. Neither does dominance/recessiveness. Although I admit the likelihood of a black man having 3 snowy white children with a white woman is very low. [Edited 7/17/05 18:18pm] thanks for the correction... my degree is in chemistry not biology Cool! Did you do organic, inorganic or physical (or a bit of all)? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: ehuffnsd said: thanks for the correction... my degree is in chemistry not biology Cool! Did you do organic, inorganic or physical (or a bit of all)? a little of it all was going to do a masters in anylatical You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ellie said: Anyway:
![]() What is Bobby Lee from Mad TV doing there? BTW, those kids are ADORABLE ~Stephanie~
U need another lover like u need a hole in yo head | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Uh huh. Except I don't really give a shit about the trash I post. You, however, seem to think that the endless minutiae of some billionaire pop star's existence is really something to get upset/serious over. Who gives a fuck?
than, I give a fuck. Maybe it´s the way you, guys, post that gets me upset. If you wrote, well by dangling the baby over balcony he screwed up, than I´ll say, yes that´s true. But if you say he´s fucked up, I have to react. I can´t help myself. Look Voices, We´re just different. I don´t bother to post about things I don´t give a fuck about and you do, that´s all. Oh, and BTW, my other post was a joke, in case you missed out on it. A love glove is a condom.
I missed that word "love" ic dag...thats for the clarification..
however, what does your new definition of love have to do with mj? oh, just forget about that. "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dag said: than, I give a fuck. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
These kids aren't MJ's. Debbie Rowe admitted it in the last case. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tosh said: These kids aren't MJ's. Debbie Rowe admitted it in the last case.
show me the quote..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tosh said: These kids aren't MJ's. Debbie Rowe admitted it in the last case.
No she didn't. She refused to answer any irrelevent questions like that. I read the entire transcript. Did you? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ellie said: Tosh said: These kids aren't MJ's. Debbie Rowe admitted it in the last case.
No she didn't. She refused to answer any irrelevent questions like that. I read the entire transcript. Did you? I meant that she admitted it in in the custody case, not the sexcase. Sorry to dissapoint you, he is not the natural farther. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tosh said: Ellie said: No she didn't. She refused to answer any irrelevent questions like that. I read the entire transcript. Did you? I meant that she admitted it in in the custody case, not the sexcase. Sorry to dissapoint you, he is not the natural farther. PPOR. simple as. She's 'admitted' nothing of the sort and you know it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: Tosh said: I meant that she admitted it in in the custody case, not the sexcase. Sorry to dissapoint you, he is not the natural farther. PPOR. simple as. She's 'admitted' nothing of the sort and you know it. Why are you MJ hardcore fans in denial of everything.? You are acting like he is Jezus Christ himself. He has his good and his bad things. It is nothing to be ashamed of, to be not the natural father of your children. I'm MJ fan myself, but I can still think straight And YES SHE ADMITTED ITIN THE CUSTODYCASE!!!!!. I rest my case [Edited 7/18/05 2:38am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tosh said: Marrk said: PPOR. simple as. She's 'admitted' nothing of the sort and you know it. Why are you MJ hardcore fans in denial of everything.? You are acting like he is Jezus Christ himself. He has his good and his bad things. It is nothing to be ashamed of, to be not the natural father of your children. I'm MJ fan myself, but I can still think straight And YES SHE ADMITTED ITIN THE CUSTODYCASE!!!!!. I rest my case [Edited 7/18/05 2:38am] Sorry I reopen the case Michael Jackson's claim he is the natural father of the two children born to ex-wife Debbie Rowe is a lie. Instead, Rowe was artificially inseminated with anonymously donated sperm to give birth to son Prince Michael Jnr and daughter Paris. Secret documents have been drawn up by Rowe making the claim as she prepares to seek "temporary exclusive custody" of the children. Debbie states: "I have no information whatsoever about the identity of the semen donor for either child, as such semen was obtained anonymously from a semen bank under an agreement of confidentiality. I consented to the artificial insemination with the specific intent of bearing a child to which Michael would be the father and treated in all respects as the father." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tosh said: Marrk said: PPOR. simple as. She's 'admitted' nothing of the sort and you know it. Why are you MJ hardcore fans in denial of everything.? You are acting like he is Jezus Christ himself. He has his good and his bad things. It is nothing to be ashamed of, to be not the natural father of your children. I'm MJ fan myself, but I can still think straight And YES SHE ADMITTED ITIN THE CUSTODYCASE!!!!!. I rest my case [Edited 7/18/05 2:38am] I'm not denying anything. For the record, i don't believe their his kids either, and never have. I asked you to post a link to back up your statement, nothing more. How you arrived at the Jesus comparison is beyond me. You must have a mental problem if that's how you see my post. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tosh said: Tosh said: Why are you MJ hardcore fans in denial of everything.? You are acting like he is Jezus Christ himself. He has his good and his bad things. It is nothing to be ashamed of, to be not the natural father of your children. I'm MJ fan myself, but I can still think straight And YES SHE ADMITTED ITIN THE CUSTODYCASE!!!!!. I rest my case [Edited 7/18/05 2:38am] Sorry I reopen the case Michael Jackson's claim he is the natural father of the two children born to ex-wife Debbie Rowe is a lie. Instead, Rowe was artificially inseminated with anonymously donated sperm to give birth to son Prince Michael Jnr and daughter Paris. Secret documents have been drawn up by Rowe making the claim as she prepares to seek "temporary exclusive custody" of the children. Debbie states: "I have no information whatsoever about the identity of the semen donor for either child, as such semen was obtained anonymously from a semen bank under an agreement of confidentiality. I consented to the artificial insemination with the specific intent of bearing a child to which Michael would be the father and treated in all respects as the father." wooooowza! Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I asked you to post a link to back up your statement, nothing more.
How you arrived at the Jesus comparison is beyond me. You must have a mental problem if that's how you see my post.[/quote] I've got myself checked yesterday. I'm okay Peace | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Errr, LINK PLEASE, to a reputable news site! Never have I EVER heard that quote from ANYWHERE. And considering the bulk of the MJ discussion boards and the concise breakdowns of daily news that gets posted that even mention his name in an article or quote over the last 5 years at least, I'd have heard about it.
ANd I say this because there have been actual quotes attributed to certain persons about MJ that turned out to be false. People cited quotes, dates, places and times to them and they still didn't exist. Hell, a false "quote" from Debbie Rowe once circulated around tabloid news sites saying she spoke on a local LA TV news station that didn't actually exist. [Edited 7/18/05 3:37am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |