Stymie said: lilgish said: The man is/was fucking dope, I love the dancing, the ballads and shit..who gives a fuck about anything else.
I do. I do not buy music of people that I find out did something horrible to a child. If he gets found guilty, I will never buy another MJ record. I used to love the rapper Mystikal. He's in jail for rape. I haven't listened to his music since.Fucking consumers, everyone has to pleased with auxiliary bullshit, you either like Michael's music or you don't. An artists personal life has nothing to do with me liking their shit or not. Then you didn't really love Mystikal then. Loving art is solely based on the experience you get from the work. The self-promoting of an artist as a moral figure is marketing, PR bullshit used to increase profit and make someone buy something they really didn’t want to buy in the first place. The majority of music buyers are not music lovers, their consumers; they buy what mass media tells them to buy. The priciniples of consumer capitalism exceed those of art, especially in America. Roman Polanski doesn’t have to rely on big box office for acclaim. The MJ backlash is worse because consumers feel like they have been betrayed and wasted their money on a product that was tainted. Unfortunately, Mike was set up as the king of commerciality. Honestly, you should stop listening to music all together; it's a certainty that some great artist will likely be a deviant, amoral, or a plain ass hole. That’s Show Business, but why let it dictate your reaction to the work? [Edited 6/10/05 16:46pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'll read the article. I must have overlooked it.
Hey, what about my question concerning "yes-men"? I'll post it again coz it's probably gonna get lost in this thread: This is way off-topic, but I don't want to start a new thread. May I ask a question: do you all think that both Janet and Michael surround themselves with "yes-men"? More and more, I'm starting to think that Michael and even Janet just DON'T want to be told anything constructive. It's not really a matter of having a strong "vision," it's more like they are so insecure that they are threatened by criticism and want to avoid it. Going back to Prince again, he just seems like he is confident. Prince seems like that yeah maybe his friends give him some advice, and he might listen if feels like it could be good and/or genuine. Prince just doesn't seem afraid, plus has the desire to grow artistically. But Michael, and lately Janet appear to just AVOID the negative coz they don't want to hear it. And maybe lack the confidence to "grow as artists." Maybe that's why Janet's presentation of herself hasn't changed recently. What is your opinion on that?? I'm just curious. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't hate Michael Jackson. I think he has made one great album ("Thriller") and a number of other great singles.
I also think that he lost touch with reality a long time ago. People can blame the press all they want, but the reality is that only one person is responsible for Michael's current situation: Michael Jackson. On some level I do have sympathy for Michael, because I believe he is suffering a great deal. But generally I think the media coverage has been mostly fair except for the more tabloid type publications. I don't think there is widespread hatred for Michael. Derision? yes. Confusion? yes. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: I don't hate Michael Jackson. I think he has made one great album ("Thriller") and a number of other great singles.
I also think that he lost touch with reality a long time ago. People can blame the press all they want, but the reality is that only one person is responsible for Michael's current situation: Michael Jackson. On some level I do have sympathy for Michael, because I believe he is suffering a great deal. But generally I think the media coverage has been mostly fair except for the more tabloid type publications. I don't think there is widespread hatred for Michael. Derision? yes. Confusion? yes. I agree with this. The lines blur between who exactly is responsible for all that is happening. I do believe that if had wanted this all to stop...even way back when, he could have done so easily...well not so easily for him...but easily enough. Christian Zombie Vampires | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Isel said: This is way off-topic, but I don't want to start a new thread. May I ask a question: do you all think that both Janet and Michael surround themselves with "yes-men"? More and more, I'm starting to think that Michael and even Janet just DON'T want to be told anything constructive. It's not really a matter of having a strong "vision," it's more like they are so insecure that they are threatened by criticism and want to avoid it. Going back to Prince again, he just seems like he is confident. Prince seems like that yeah maybe his friends give him some advice, and he might listen if feels like it could be good and/or genuine. Prince just doesn't seem afraid, plus has the desire to grow artistically. But Michael, and lately Janet appear to just AVOID the negative coz they don't want to hear it. And maybe lack the confidence to "grow as artists." Maybe that's why Janet's presentation of herself hasn't changed recently. What is your opinion on that?? I'm just curious. I've heard this opinion/question a few times and have wondered myself. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
krayzie said: I started to hate Mike when he started to transform himself to a white woman...
It was during the Bad era... Same here. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Isel said: This is way off-topic, but I don't want to start a new thread. May I ask a question: do you all think that both Janet and Michael surround themselves with "yes-men"? More and more, I'm starting to think that Michael and even Janet just DON'T want to be told anything constructive. It's not really a matter of having a strong "vision," it's more like they are so insecure that they are threatened by criticism and want to avoid it. Going back to Prince again, he just seems like he is confident. Prince seems like that yeah maybe his friends give him some advice, and he might listen if feels like it could be good and/or genuine. Prince just doesn't seem afraid, plus has the desire to grow artistically. But Michael, and lately Janet appear to just AVOID the negative coz they don't want to hear it. And maybe lack the confidence to "grow as artists." Maybe that's why Janet's presentation of herself hasn't changed recently. What is your opinion on that?? I'm just curious. I've heard this opinion/question a few times and have wondered myself. That's very likely the case with Michael who is/was an artist. Janet I don't know. I suppose she gets people to write songs that reflect her as a person and I guess in that case it applies to her too. To me it seems like Janet is just more comfortable with herself and thus hasn't felt the need to change a whole lot. Michael never has been comfortable so he probably just, as you said, lacks the confidence to grow any further. Perhaps he's been burned once too often (no pun intended). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I guess people became subconciously alarmed when they noticed that he hated himself so much. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thank you all so much for answering my question. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
krayzie said: dreamfactory313 said: Im not using any race card. PurpleKinght mentioned that people started hated him when his appearance changed. All I said is that people were hating him when he was dark skinned, before the drastic change in appearance. Thats a fact from as far as I can see. People didn't hate him when he was black, but a lot of people was making a lot of joke because his voice was abnormally high... But after Thriller people started to hate him, because most of them were pissed of Thriller success... the same way people started to be pissed of Prince after Purple Rain... So how many people hated Shania Twain after Come On Over? Or how about Kylie after Fever? Or how about Mariah after Music Box or Butterfly? Or how about 2pac after All Eyez On Me? Or how about Jay-Z after The Blueprint Vol 1 or The Black Album? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: krayzie said:
But after Thriller people started to hate him, because most of them were pissed of Thriller success... the same way people started to be pissed of Prince after Purple Rain... People were pissed with Prince because he changed his musical style. People were pissed with Michael because he changed his looks. Agree! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: krayzie said: People didn't hate him when he was black, but a lot of people was making a lot of joke because his voice was abnormally high... But after Thriller people started to hate him, because most of them were pissed of Thriller success... the same way people started to be pissed of Prince after Purple Rain... So how many people hated Shania Twain after Come On Over? Or how about Kylie after Fever? Or how about Mariah after Music Box or Butterfly? Or how about 2pac after All Eyez On Me? Or how about Jay-Z after The Blueprint Vol 1 or The Black Album? Those albums combined aren't close to the level of Thriller | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: TonyVanDam said: So how many people hated Shania Twain after Come On Over? Or how about Kylie after Fever? Or how about Mariah after Music Box or Butterfly? Or how about 2pac after All Eyez On Me? Or how about Jay-Z after The Blueprint Vol 1 or The Black Album? Those albums combined aren't close to the level of Thriller Shania Twain's Come On Over was THE Michael Jackson Thriller of the 1990's! But you're right about everyone else. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
They weren't playing Come On Over in the hood though, it might have had mad sales but Thriller was everywhere, look who I'm telling, you know this man.....
The whole premise of this thread is If you're a music fan you like and/or respect Michael's work, all the haters are not music people..... [Edited 6/10/05 21:32pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: Stymie said: I do. I do not buy music of people that I find out did something horrible to a child. If he gets found guilty, I will never buy another MJ record. I used to love the rapper Mystikal. He's in jail for rape. I haven't listened to his music since.
Then you didn't really love Mystikal then. Loving art is solely based on the experience you get from the work. The self-promoting of an artist as a moral figure is marketing, PR bullshit used to increase profit and make someone buy something they really didn’t want to buy in the first place. The majority of music buyers are not music lovers, their consumers; they buy what mass media tells them to buy. The priciniples of consumer capitalism exceed those of art, especially in America. Roman Polanski doesn’t have to rely on big box office for acclaim. The MJ backlash is worse because consumers feel like they have been betrayed and wasted their money on a product that was tainted. Unfortunately, Mike was set up as the king of commerciality. Honestly, you should stop listening to music all together; it's a certainty that some great artist will likely be a deviant, amoral, or a plain ass hole. That’s Show Business, but why let it dictate your reaction to the work? [Edited 6/10/05 16:46pm] I guess you were trying to either be funny or condescending when you made the 'stop listening to music' crack. I couldn't care less if someone is immoral or a deviant or just a plain asshole, just as long as they ain't hurting someone else. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
when he got his arse kicked by u2 in the 88 grammys people started dissin him | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
marto said: when he got his arse kicked by u2 in the 88 grammys people started dissin him
He stole the freaking show when he performed the way you make me feel and man in the mirror and got a standing ovation . [Edited 6/11/05 0:35am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: krayzie said: I started to hate Mike when he started to transform himself to a white woman...
It was during the Bad era... Same here. Very open-minded. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I guess we're supposed to overlook Michael completely destroying his blackness and turning himself into a damn freak. Not to mention his Peter Pan complex.
JonSnow said it best. Michael brought a lot of this on himself. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Like I said, very open-minded.
And it's an established fact by now that he has vitiligo. Except for those open-minded few, of course. I'm sure he bleached the rest of his skin because he wouldn't want to run around with stains in his face, but so what? That's not "destroying his blackness". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I guess the endless plastic surgies don't count. Some fans will excuse anything. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Count for what? Should they give me reason to judge him?
And I don't see myself as a MJ fan anymore. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FunkyBrotha said: Anyone who hates on MJ right now is obviously sick in the head and i would have absolutely no wish to converse with them. Im also utterly disgusted that a Prince fan would spout filth from their mouths regarding michael, which i have witnessed on this site. Do these individuals have any morals/standards, do they not understand that no human being deserves to be treated in this way for no justifiable reason (and dont give me the "he's wacko" argument). Fair enough, you dont like the guy, but to launch vicious attacks on him and strip him of his dignity is just plain evil. This is especially disgusting, since MJ has contributed more to this world, its culture, its art, its history than everyone on this board combined. He deserves to be treated with the same respect he treats others.
Did anyone hear the story about him stopping his car the other day, and he bought 2 soda's from girls at the side of the road for $0.25 and he then gave them $100 each. A man who does that whilst being attacked by the whole world is to be commended imo. How any Prince fan can behave like this is unbelievable, obviously u have learned nothing from his music. And who do you suppose put out that $100 story...maybe a publicist desperate for some good P.R.? Okay, so I am sick in the head for "hating" on MJ. Really? That's funny, because I never 1) Purchase copies of "Barely Legal" and "Finally Legal", and at the very least, leave them around where other people's little boys can get their hands on them. 2) Purchase anatomically correct S&M dolls with breasts exposed, and at the very least leave them around where other people's little boys can get their hands on them 3) Sleep next to other people's little boys in my bed 4) Disfigure myself until I am unrecognizable from 25 years ago. Those are the facts. I am a Prince fan and I "behave" like this because Prince sleeps with sexy adult women, and as far as we know, has never shared hardcore porn with little boys. If you can't see the difference, remove those blinders! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: hellomoto said: i cant get over the title of the article about mj. sweat, freak!? are you being serious? or are you just overreacting? if there really is a title saying that im am absolutely SHOCKED! how can they do that? how can they get away with that? thats absolutely disgusting! poor michael, i didnt know the treatment from the media was that bad! seriously, michael DOES NOT deserve that, and he did not bring that om himself (meaning the media hatred) and any idiot that could possibly say to me he deserves that title is a sick freak themselves.
Rupert Murdoch should be killed. I would not view it as a crime. Headlines like that are no different from Nazi thought police. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: That is just horrible. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is where we are right now! This is exactly why I started this thread. This is so tasteless and inappropriate. How did we get to a place where something like this can be printed and sold to the masses? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
People were pissed with Prince because he changed his musical style. BLACK People were pissed with Michael because he changed his looks
A lot of black people were pissed at Mike because they felt like he wanted to be white with the nose and skin. The reason why he had plastic surgery on his nose because it was HUGE, not because he wanted to be white. He has a skin disorder but a lot of black people and some people in general wanted thought he wanted to be white because he didn't act black in their eyes and/or didn't fit the stereotype of being black. That's why in my opinion, you find more white people who believe he has a skin disorder than black. krayzie said:
I started to hate Mike when he started to transform himself to a white woman... It was during the Bad era... Same here. Coming from you, that comment doesn't suprise me. [Edited 6/11/05 8:55am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think that when someone or something is extremely popular, there is a certain type of person that finds enormous pleasure in seeing that popularity die. They come off more clever and edgy when they can piss on someone else's accomplishments. Sorta like these album critics that we read in Rolling Stone. They think they are so clever after they write a scathing review of a record that many people may like. Its the same sorta thing with MJ, I think.
I remember being about 5 years old (1984), when Thriller had sold over 40 million copies. People were calling him a fag and making all sorts of horrible jokes about his voice, his hair on fire, and etc. People got a tremendous amount of pleasure by demeaning him as much as possible even though he was the most popular thing going. I think this situation compounds itself when this superstar is a black man. We have to accept that many people never felt comfortable with a black man being the subject of the world's affections. Does anyone disagree with this statement? It seems as though when MJ started to break records held by the Beattles and Elvis, thats when the hate started. That's America from you. The media in America loves to put celebrity on a pedestol and then rip them to shreds when they make a mistake. Look at Mariah Carey for example. It's just sad. America society is so competive and fickle. Melting pot. That's a bunch of bs when a black man can't even be the most powerful man in America without getting crap put on him. I have never seen someone been shitted on as much as him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: They weren't playing Come On Over in the hood though, it might have had mad sales but Thriller was everywhere, look who I'm telling, you know this man.....
The whole premise of this thread is If you're a music fan you like and/or respect Michael's work, all the haters are not music people..... [Edited 6/10/05 21:32pm] I don't mean to sound culturely bias, but even I would agree that it would look crazy to hear a Shania Twain song at a block party of ANY 'hood!!!! Only a Michael Jackson song can be play EVERYWHERE, even in the country or a rave! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BoOTyLiCioUs said: I think that when someone or something is extremely popular, there is a certain type of person that finds enormous pleasure in seeing that popularity die. They come off more clever and edgy when they can piss on someone else's accomplishments. Sorta like these album critics that we read in Rolling Stone. They think they are so clever after they write a scathing review of a record that many people may like. Its the same sorta thing with MJ, I think.
I remember being about 5 years old (1984), when Thriller had sold over 40 million copies. People were calling him a fag and making all sorts of horrible jokes about his voice, his hair on fire, and etc. People got a tremendous amount of pleasure by demeaning him as much as possible even though he was the most popular thing going. I think this situation compounds itself when this superstar is a black man. We have to accept that many people never felt comfortable with a black man being the subject of the world's affections. Does anyone disagree with this statement? It seems as though when MJ started to break records held by the Beattles and Elvis, thats when the hate started. That's America from you. The media in America loves to put celebrity on a pedestol and then rip them to shreds when they make a mistake. Look at Mariah Carey for example. It's just sad. America society is so competive and fickle. Melting pot. That's a bunch of bs when a black man can't even be the most powerful man in America without getting crap put on him. I have never seen someone been shitted on as much as him. And it's a damn shame what the media has done to Michael over the years. But regardless of skin-color, only in America today are we treated like guilty until proven innocent! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |