their fingerprints were found on just one magazine. and on different pages. just one fingerprint of MJ was found, his left thumb

LightOfArt said:

I thought Mike had an alteration years ago that transformed his left thumb into a second right thumb.

Cloudbuster said:

For some reason i have a bad feeling

Melville is going to let 93 in, because of lack of evidence on the prosecutions side

call it a gut reaction

Luv4oneanotha said:

Yeah, '93 will be in after tomorrow. Does that mean they will use it as pattern tool or will they really get back and put Jordy on the stand?

BlueNote

BlueNote said:

how do you guys know this? have soom faith..Jordy is not gonna do a damn thing.

lilgish said:

Its a different day and age...

if 93 leaks in to this case,

this trial could last a year

Cause that would mean

Defense will file motions for discovery, to search for evidence about the 93 case...

Jordy won't testify,

but the other players will...

That could mean contacting an incarcerated Pelicano,
etc...

In order to defeat the pattern of behavior claim they have to discourage
that 93 was a MAJOR conspiracy

That means we need to get Fields, Cochran eyc

Readmit the evidence.. etc

find the tapes etc...

this trial could be longer than Oj simpson

Luv4oneanotha said:

This trial is brought to you by Glad Barf Bags - like Kitchen Savers, but ready-made for infinite reuse. Washable and durable, every Michael Jackson fan should have one. Now being sold in the courtroom pews, discount.
[Edited 3/27/05 13:23pm]

Here's some pictures from today...

What a frikkin' shame, Mike.

For tomorrow's ruling, I just hope the judge puts out one rule: the boys themselves have to testify, or you cannot mention it. I mean, this would be (somewhat) fair to both parties, although you could argue that because of the weakness of the current case none of it should be allowed. It will be an interesting day for sure.

Disclaimer: i'm quite drunk so sorry for any mis-spells
[Edited 3/27/05 18:03pm]

OMG...

krayzie said:

yah i know the wig lol

Hey hold up peoplez, n wait a second ...







































Have you seen his childhood?

Luv4oneanotha said:

That is the most obvious chin implant I've ever seen. What did they do, glue it to his jaw and hope it stayed?

DAMN IT!!!! MELVILE ALLOWED THE 93 ALLEGATIONS!!!!

DAMN IT DAMN IT DAMN IT!!!!

Judge Allows Past Jackson Allegations
By TIM MOLLOY, Associated Press Writer

SANTA MARIA, Calif. - The judge in Michael Jackson (news)'s child molestation trial ruled Monday that the prosecution may present testimony about past allegations against the pop star involving five boys, including two who reached multimillion-dollar civil settlements with the singer

Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville ruled after hearing arguments by District Attorney Tom Sneddon and vigorous opposition by defense attorney Thomas Mesereau Jr.


The judge said he would allow testimony about alleged sexual offenses and an alleged pattern of "grooming," or preparing the boys for molestation.


The prosecution had sought to introduce testimony about seven boys, but the judge declined to allow evidence about two.


The judge said he would allow testimony by a 1990 accuser who received a $2.4 million settlement from Jackson and testimony by that boy's mother.


A boy who reached a multimillion-dollar settlement from Jackson in 1993 will not testify. Other testimony will be allowed from people who allegedly have knowledge of the case.


The judge said the jury can be told that Jackson reached settlements with the 1990 and 1993 accusers but may not be told the amounts, unless the defense brings them up.


...and it was going all so well this far....well the only good thing I can see about this is if MJ wins this, he´ll be cleared from it all and there shouldn´t be any doubt of his innocence whatsoever....

Edit: Nevermind
[Edited 3/28/05 10:50am]

What do you mean?

Oh someone cheer me up.

dag said:

dag said:

At least it will be interesting to have 3 of those 5 boys testify in court that nothing ever happened, a 4th one not showing up, and a 5th one that was alledgedly touched over his clothes when he was 9 and who only got a settlement 4 years later after the '93 settlement and after his mother sold her story to some tabloid magazine.

dag said:

If he didn't do anything in '93, '90 or 2003, then that begs the question: why would you be that upset?

Clearly, the jury hearing the allegations doesn't help Jackson, but if you maintain that they are not true, then why worry about them so?
[Edited 3/28/05 11:08am]

Thanks Cloudy

Anyways I hear that Sneddon claimed that there are 7 victims yet 5 of them denied ever being abused by MJ! Now someone plz explain this nonsence to me.

I don´t know. But can you imagine the stupid media? I can see the headlines tomorrow. 5 MORE VICTIMS!!!

dag said:

Well, the media will exploit anything. Which is why MJ shoulda stayed away from them boys AFTER 1993.

Oh... c'mon dag! this was planned right from the start. geragos was prepared for that and so is meserau. i said once and i say it again. it is better this way. total vindication is going to be the result. (i hope)

BlueNote

Good. i'm glad '93 is in. He can totally clear his name now.

No fear.

dag said:

How can you blame the media if he has paid million$ twice?

I'm waiting for Luv4oneanotha to show up

I know, but I just hope it´s not gonna make the trial last twice as long. I can´t wait when this shit is over.



I know, but I am not pissed off that the media are talking about it. I am just pissed off that they cannot get the facts straight over here and post just the prosecution´s shit. Well, at least over here in Czech republic. Gavin´s testimony made headlines and Messarau´s cross examination was totally ignored. That´s what pisses me off. That one sided attitude concluding he´s guilty. Cause no matter how many "victims" are there or how many times he´s paid, it´s still ridiculous. 7 alleged victims makes headlines and that 5 of them claim nothing ever happened is ignored. I konw that the fact that he paid makes it suspicious, but still where is ANY proof of it? So far it´s just one stupid soup opera that makes NO SENCE at all.

But hey guys, just ignore me. I will cool down soon. Let´s wait for the defence story. All we´ve heard so far was just the prosecution´s side which is weak by itself already.