Request: they get pruned after every 150 posts or so. Otherwise they get difficult to load.

Pretty please ?

That thread was impossible to open I wonder how many threads this is gonna take up. Is bashir gonna be held in contempt? What does it mean to be held in contempt exactly?

Witness claims intrigue over Jackson catalogue deal with Sony

By LINDA DEUTSCH
AP Special Correspondent


Michael Jackson's infamous relationship with Sony Music became a subtext for testimony at his molestation trial Wednesday, with suggestions by a witness that associates were plotting behind his back to wrest away his co-ownership of a valuable song catalogue that includes the music of the Beatles.

The unexpected testimony came from Ann Kite, who was hired briefly in 2003 to work on public relations damage control after the airing of a documentary in which Jackson said he let boys sleep in his bedroom.

She suggested that some of the men charged as unindicted co-conspirators in the molestation case were actually enemies of Jackson's interests who were planted in his inner circle to bring about his downfall.

The issue of the catalogue came up during cross-examination of Kite by defense attorney Thomas Mesereau Jr.

Drawing on Kite's previous statements to police he suggested there was a backstairs intrigue going on among Jackson's "team."

"You told the police that you thought Michael Jackson was being slammed by the team?" asked Mesereau.

"Yes," she said.

"And your opinion was this team was not out to help Michael Jackson?" asked the lawyer.

"That was my opinion," she said.

Jackson's stake in Sony/ATV, which includes catalogues for the Beatles and many Elvis Presley songs, was estimated by Forbes magazine several years ago to be worth at least $350 million. Jackson bought ATV in 1985 for about $47.5 million and sold it to Sony for about $95 million in 1995, but retained a half interest.

Kite, who said she only lasted on the job for Jackson for six days and never met the pop superstar, said she tried in that short time to shift the attention of his associates to crisis management but to no avail.

"Michael was going to get skewered on national TV and there was no plan of action to protect his interests from scurrilous allegations," she said.

Kite said she believed she had Jackson's public relations interest at heart more than adviser Ronald Konitzer, his partner, Dieter Wiesner, and Stuart Backerman, who was then Jackson's official spokesman. She also named unindicted co-conspirator Marc Schaffel as a key figure working against Jackson.

"You said that Mr. Konitzer was hired to isolate Michael Jackson and let him create his downfall so that Sony could get the catalogue back, isn't that correct?" asked Mesereau.

"Not in those words," said the witness.

But she said she was aware of the importance of Jackson's interest in Sony and understood that he owned the rights to many major songs including those by the Beatles.

"I knew that Mr. Jackson had spoken out vigorously against record labels and still had a contract with Sony," she said.

Mesereau asked if she had told police that "Sony was waiting for the opportunity to get the Sony catalogue back."

"That's correct," she said.

In 2002, Jackson launched a public feud with then-Sony Music chief Tommy Mottola. Jackson, following poor sales and alleged lack of promotion of the album "Invincible," accused Mottola of being a racist, saying he was "mean, he's a racist, and he's very, very devilish." Several black industry executives spoke in Mottola's defense and Sony called his statements "ludicrous spiteful and hurtful."

Mottola resigned from the company in 2003 to start a new musical venture.

A telephone message seeking comment on the witness' claims was left at Sony Corp. in New York City after business hours Wednesday night. There was no immediate response.

A call to Konitzer also was not immediately returned late Wednesday.

As for the "Crack Whore" angle, it is a move to show that the defense's compelling case for "reasonable doubt" is nothing but a smokescreen, a concerted effort to blame the victim.

Risky move for the prosecution.

Okay, this is really shocking. I never wanted to be a kind of conspiracy nerd who believes Sony is behind this, but what Mesereau got out of this Ann Gabriel is almost mind blowing! This is not from a nerdy fan, this comes from AP...



BlueNote

I love the way this case is turning out!! Go Mickey!!!!!

dag said:

Ain't nuttin' but a muffin, dag, and Mike's got a LOTTA butta to go.

namepeace said:

Yeah, but he got the best possible start.

BlueNote

Okay I admit, I thought it was mostly just pro-Jackson propaganda spread by the fanatics but most of the information they [individuals such as daq etc.] stated over the net over the last year has already turned out to be quite corrent and not just hear'say.

From the opening statements alone I must say it's a one bloody dubious case anyway. The prosecution admits freely the accusing mother has had a dubious past - already in the opening statement? The prosecutions key witness for a suspected-crime-behind-the-closed-doors is a document maker? Their most important piece of evidence to be presented at the court is a TV programme seen by hundreds of millions of people around the world? Great detective work. Glad to see California is using its tax money to finance such smart police force.

Btw, in case Jackson is found to be not guilty how much is he going to file for damage compensation anyway? Like... a billion dollars?!?

Btw, in case Jackson is found to be not guilty how much is he going to file for damage compensation anyway? Like... a billion dollars?!?

Jacko May Be Saved by 'Lost' Interview
Thursday, March 03, 2005
By Roger Friedman


Michael Jackson | Ann Gabriel

Jacko May Be Saved by 'Lost' Interview

A long forgotten newspaper interview may save Michael Jackson's bleached hide in his child molestation case.

The interview by reporter David Gardner in London's Daily Mail was conducted with the mother of the boy featured in the Martin Bashir documentary "Living with Michael Jackson." Gardner also interviewed comedy club owner Jamie Masada, who had brought the boy to Jackson's attention three years earlier.

Because the documentary aired in Britain three days sooner that it did in the U.S., Gardner was able to catch the mother before she and her kids were whisked off to meet Jackson in Miami on Chris Tucker's private jet. The interview was published in London on Feb. 8 and in Sydney on Feb. 9, but never made it to our shores.

Both the mother and Masada wax enthusiastic about Jackson in the interview. This was before the mother's claims that she was being manipulated or her comments were scripted by Jackson's team. In fact, my sources say she received $4,000 for her story from the Daily Mail, which she turned over to her own mother.


But the statements made by the mother and Masada could come back to haunt them. At the time, people were furious that Jackson was holding hands with the boy on TV and talking about kids sleeping in his bed. Gardner, aware of the outrage, asks Masada about possible child abuse.

"[The boy] said they had fun and played games. [The boy] is not a naive kid. He would have said if something bad had happened," he said

Here, we have very early confirmation of what many consider the boy's abrasive and aggressive qualities. He is no wallflower, as director Brett Ratner pointed out in this column some months ago. Ratner said that when the boy visited the set of "Rush Hour 2," he refused to vacate the director's chair and cursed Ratner out in the process.

The boy also reportedly shot his mother in the leg with a BB gun and told the Department of Child Services she was guilty of abuse. This, the defense may argue, is not a kid who hangs back for 10 weeks and says nothing.

The mother of the boy — widely portrayed as a scheming, Machiavellian grifter looking for a payday — arguably sinks her own ship in the Daily Mail story. She boasted to Gardner about her hopes that Jackson would include her kids in his entourage "when he travels around the world."

That comment, when probed by defense attorneys, is certainly a set up for why the Jackson team thought the mother would agree to go to Brazil for a cooling off period. Suddenly, the obtaining of passports doesn't seem so far-fetched.

The mother also sang Jackson's praises in the Gardner piece, unprompted or coached by anyone.

"Michael has brought something special to our lives," the mother told Gardner.

She also underscores her own son's grand jury testimony that he asked Jackson if he could call him "Daddy," since his own father was gone.

"He has pet names for all my children and [my son] even calls him 'Daddy.' He is the father they never had. He is a saint to them," she said.

At the time, it apparently didn't bother her that her daughter was exempt from nicknames and that Jackson dubbed her sons "Apple Head" and "Blow Hole."

Gardner, a respected British journalist, was first on the scene with the family, thanks to the early UK broadcast. He observed that the mother was doing all she could to encourage the relationship between Jackson and her kids. And no matter what the mother eventually told a grand jury a year later, she didn't have any objections to the kids staying overnight with Jackson on Feb. 8, 2003.

"I am not worried about Michael at all. He has been so good to all of us. Sometimes they stay overnight. I am totally comfortable with that," she said. "They are happy with him and have a lot of fun. I don't need to be there all the time."

The mother said the traveling was something Jackson actually had promised them.

"This is what he told them all will happen. It's a dream come true for them. He is their angel," she said.

But this column reported that after her child custody hearing for more financial support from her ex-husband was over on March 11, 2003, the mother became enraged that Jackson had not fulfilled perceived promises. My sources say she told Jackson associate Vincent Amen: "Michael promised my kids careers."

The defense will argue that the family was eased out of Neverland and Jackson's life after that weekend and that the mother, embittered about returning to her regular life, concocted the story of child molestation.

The mother, by the way, told Gardner that at one point she and her children were so poor they lived in a horse stable in Bakersfield, Calif. and slept on hay. But nothing about the stable has ever been mentioned again, even in grand jury testimony. She almost certainly did not tell Gardner that she had been the recipient of monies from several fundraising drives over the previous three years, including one by the Los Angeles Police Department.

Gabriel Blows Her Horn and Her Credibility

Ann Gabriel, aka Ann Kite, worked for Michael Jackson for a total of six days: Feb. 9 to Feb. 15, 2003. But yesterday she was called as a prosecution witness in the Jackson trial as an expert. If her open court testimony was at all similar to what she told a grand jury last year, Gabriel made a lot of mistakes.

In her grand jury testimony, published on the web by The Smoking Gun, Gabriel made two statements that continue to define her self-enlarged role in this story.

She claimed that Las Vegas attorney David LeGrand told her on Feb. 9, 2003, that the Jackson team had the accuser's family on tape and that the mother would come off "like a crack whore."

Gabriel also claimed that Jackson aide Marc Schaffel told her he was worried the family would sell their story to a British tabloid.

Each of those statements is problematic. For one thing, no videotape of the family was made until Feb. 20, one day after Gabriel had been fired. On Feb. 9, no video of them existed at all.

As for telling their story: Too late! Gabriel's statement that Schaffel was worried could not be correct. Why? On Feb. 9, two days after the family returned to California with Jackson from Miami, the Sunday Mail in London ran an interview with the mother and with the man who introduced her to Jackson, Jamie Masada. The mother, according to my sources, asked for and received $4,000 from the reporter, David Gardner.

This was on Feb. 9. Three months later, the boy suddenly recalled that between Feb. 20 and March 10, something in appropriate did happen. The boy, knowing the whole world was watching, didn't mention anything for about 10 weeks. Either Masada is a poor judge of character or the boy fabricated his story.

And Gabriel, insiders argue, made several other preposterous claims on the stand yesterday. One of them was that Schaffel somehow participated in "embezzling" $1 million from Jackson. The same insiders got a good laugh at this one. Schaffel is known for keeping meticulous records. He is currently suing Jackson for millions he's owed.

"If he'd actually embezzled money, I don't think he'd be suing for it now," sniffed a source.

Did anyone see this trial happening or any of these events to play out the moment you saw the Martin Bashir documentary?

I did. I remember saying out loud "What is he doing? He's just asking for a lawsuit "

namepeace said:

The strange thing is this "Crack Whore" story is from before any alledged abuse took place. It basically shows that the Jackson camp was worried about this family before the alledged abuse took place. Since both boys testified they were very fond of MJ until the alledged abuse, i guess they felt the mother would come out with (false) stories so she could make an easy buck? Or am i missing something here?