independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > I use to think P was taking things over the top with record companies think artist are slaves but read this article.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/13/05 8:25am

laurarichardso
n

I use to think P was taking things over the top with record companies think artist are slaves but read this article.

January 13, 2005 -- WE thought that Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. But the news might have been lost on Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead, who last year ruled the late singer Aaliyah was an "asset" of her record company. The ruling allowed Blackground Records to sue the music video company that arranged the charter flight that crashed and killed the 22-year-old star in 2001, The Post's Dan Mangan reports. Edmead's head-scratching decision has just been scathingly tossed out by the Appellate Division, which wrote, "The concept that a person is a property asset of another is, of course, abhorrent to modern-day thinking. Courts almost universally reject the antiquated proprietary view of the master/servant relationship."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/13/05 8:39am

Thunderbird

avatar

The concept that Aaliyah's creative output is an asset is OK (like how they own her songs), but herself? That's not right.
When the sunlight strikes raindrops in the air, they act as a prism and form a rainbow. The rainbow is a division of white light into many beautiful colors. Regardless of the day, I'm glad you were born.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > I use to think P was taking things over the top with record companies think artist are slaves but read this article.