independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Breaking News: Jackson Accuser's Mom Falsely Solicited Charity For Son
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/04/05 1:08am

amit1234

avatar

Breaking News: Jackson Accuser's Mom Falsely Solicited Charity For Son

Celebrity Justice had this bombshell to report today...

http://celebrityjustice.w...1/03a.html

January 3, 2005

Even as embattled pop star Michael Jackson continues to offer words of appreciation for the support of his fans, "Celebrity Justice" has exclusively learned that the mother of the boy accusing Jackson of child molestation also went looking for support -- but in a very different way.

In 2000, when Jackson first met his accuser, an article appeared about the boy and his family in Mid Valley News, a community newspaper in the town of El Monte, just outside of Los Angeles. The story was an emotional appeal, detailing the boy's illness, the toll his treatment was taking on the family, and asking for readers' financial charity. "Our car has been repossessed" the mother was quoted as saying. "One chemotherapy injection costs more than $12,000."

Now, Connie Keenan, the editor of Mid Valley News, speaking exclusively to "CJ," has characterized the accuser's mother in a most uncharitable manner. "My gut level: she's a shark. She was after money," Keenan told us. "My readers were used. My staff was used. It's sickening."

In 2000, Keenan told us, the boy's mother approached the Mid Valley news and pitched her story: "She pleaded her case that her son needed all sorts of medical care and they had no financial means to provide it."

Keenan agreed to run the heartfelt story inviting readers to help, but recalled that, almost from the get go, there were red flags, including the fact that, according to Keenan, the mother, "Wanted the money sent to her in her name, at her home address."

And that was just the beginning. Keenan assigned the story to reporter Christie Causer, who was so moved by what she heard that, on Thanksgiving Day, she brought food to the family -- but, according to Keenan, "The mother, instead of being grateful that this woman brought her a complete Thanksgiving dinner, said 'I'd rather have the money. This is nice, but I'd rather have the money.'"

Keenan insisted that her paper would solicit funds only if the mother opened a trust account to receive them. Sources tell "CJ" that, nine days before the article ran, the boy's mother did open an account in her name for the benefit of the boy at a Washington Mutual bank on the Sunset Strip and deposited one cent -- but it was not a trust account.

The article gave readers a roadmap to make donations: the name of the bank, the account number, even the routing number. We've learned that, within the first three weeks after the article ran, $965 was deposited -- and $750 was promptly withdrawn. But Keenan told us that that absolutely wasn't enough for the mother: "She really wanted another story done on her son because they just didn't make enough money on the first article. And I told her -- and I can be a crusty old broad -- 'we're not doing another story on your son.'"

The mother's response? "'Well, I'll take it someplace else,'" Keenan recalled. "I said, 'Fine.'"

And as if all that wasn't enough, it turns out that the boy was being treated at Kaiser Permanente in Los Angeles, at absolutely no cost to the family. That's right, there were, in fact, no medical bills. All treatments were covered by insurance.

The boy's father was a teamster member who worked at a supermarket facility in the LA area. "CJ" spoke with Paul Kenny, heads of a teamster's union in LA, who confirmed that the teamsters negotiated a sweet deal when it came to health care coverage. "They're covered 100% under HMOs," Kenny stated. "Including Kaiser, which is an HMO."

"There was no cost to [the boy's father] out of pocket, at all," Kenny added. "Everything should be covered 100% under his contract. Everything. There is no exceptions."

When we asked Keenan if it was her impression that the family had to shell out for treatment, she told us, "Of course it was."

Two years after the article ran, when Santa Barbara County DA Tom Sneddon filed child molestation charges against Jackson, Keenan realized that the boy she wrote about was the accuser and made contact with Jackson's lawyer. "I just had this gut feeling that something was wrong here. So I sent a copy of the [Mid Valley News] to Mr. Geragos, who was representing Michael Jackson at the time," Keenan told us. "Because maybe there's a grain of truth to what Michael Jackson is saying -- 'I didn't do it' -- or maybe it's just to stop a shark."

Both Keenan and the article's writer tell CJ they have recently been contacted by Jackson's defense team.

A source close to the mother spoke with CJ and insists that none of the money collected was misspent but wouldn't say how the money was spent.
[Edited 1/3/05 17:26pm]
[Edited 1/3/05 18:09pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/04/05 1:34am

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

amit1234 said:

Celebrity Justice had this bombshell to report today...

http://celebrityjustice.w...1/03a.html

January 3, 2005

Even as embattled pop star Michael Jackson continues to offer words of appreciation for the support of his fans, "Celebrity Justice" has exclusively learned that the mother of the boy accusing Jackson of child molestation also went looking for support -- but in a very different way.

In 2000, when Jackson first met his accuser, an article appeared about the boy and his family in Mid Valley News, a community newspaper in the town of El Monte, just outside of Los Angeles. The story was an emotional appeal, detailing the boy's illness, the toll his treatment was taking on the family, and asking for readers' financial charity. "Our car has been repossessed" the mother was quoted as saying. "One chemotherapy injection costs more than $12,000."

Now, Connie Keenan, the editor of Mid Valley News, speaking exclusively to "CJ," has characterized the accuser's mother in a most uncharitable manner. "My gut level: she's a shark. She was after money," Keenan told us. "My readers were used. My staff was used. It's sickening."

In 2000, Keenan told us, the boy's mother approached the Mid Valley news and pitched her story: "She pleaded her case that her son needed all sorts of medical care and they had no financial means to provide it."

Keenan agreed to run the heartfelt story inviting readers to help, but recalled that, almost from the get go, there were red flags, including the fact that, according to Keenan, the mother, "Wanted the money sent to her in her name, at her home address."

And that was just the beginning. Keenan assigned the story to reporter Christie Causer, who was so moved by what she heard that, on Thanksgiving Day, she brought food to the family -- but, according to Keenan, "The mother, instead of being grateful that this woman brought her a complete Thanksgiving dinner, said 'I'd rather have the money. This is nice, but I'd rather have the money.'"

Keenan insisted that her paper would solicit funds only if the mother opened a trust account to receive them. Sources tell "CJ" that, nine days before the article ran, the boy's mother did open an account in her name for the benefit of the boy at a Washington Mutual bank on the Sunset Strip and deposited one cent -- but it was not a trust account.

The article gave readers a roadmap to make donations: the name of the bank, the account number, even the routing number. We've learned that, within the first three weeks after the article ran, $965 was deposited -- and $750 was promptly withdrawn. But Keenan told us that that absolutely wasn't enough for the mother: "She really wanted another story done on her son because they just didn't make enough money on the first article. And I told her -- and I can be a crusty old broad -- 'we're not doing another story on your son.'"

The mother's response? "'Well, I'll take it someplace else,'" Keenan recalled. "I said, 'Fine.'"

And as if all that wasn't enough, it turns out that the boy was being treated at Kaiser Permanente in Los Angeles, at absolutely no cost to the family. That's right, there were, in fact, no medical bills. All treatments were covered by insurance.

The boy's father was a teamster member who worked at a supermarket facility in the LA area. "CJ" spoke with Paul Kenny, heads of a teamster's union in LA, who confirmed that the teamsters negotiated a sweet deal when it came to health care coverage. "They're covered 100% under HMOs," Kenny stated. "Including Kaiser, which is an HMO."

"There was no cost to [the boy's father] out of pocket, at all," Kenny added. "Everything should be covered 100% under his contract. Everything. There is no exceptions."

When we asked Keenan if it was her impression that the family had to shell out for treatment, she told us, "Of course it was."

Two years after the article ran, when Santa Barbara County DA Tom Sneddon filed child molestation charges against Jackson, Keenan realized that the boy she wrote about was the accuser and made contact with Jackson's lawyer. "I just had this gut feeling that something was wrong here. So I sent a copy of the [Mid Valley News] to Mr. Geragos, who was representing Michael Jackson at the time," Keenan told us. "Because maybe there's a grain of truth to what Michael Jackson is saying -- 'I didn't do it' -- or maybe it's just to stop a shark."

Both Keenan and the article's writer tell CJ they have recently been contacted by Jackson's defense team.

A source close to the mother spoke with CJ and insists that none of the money collected was misspent but wouldn't say how the money was spent.
[Edited 1/3/05 17:26pm]


damn that is beyond fucked up...but then so is this case. so i;m not surprised.
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 01/04/05 1:46am

sosgemini

avatar

damn...this plot is getting thicker then kirstie ally's thighs...
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 01/04/05 2:44am

paisleypark4

avatar

sosgemini said:

damn...this plot is getting thicker then kirstie ally's thighs...


falloff falloff falloff
Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 01/04/05 3:50am

Axchi696

avatar

...and yet nothing but conspiracy theories have emerged from Jackson's camp. I'd still like to hear this from a credible source other than a diehard MJ fan/apologist.
I'm the first mammal to wear pants.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 01/04/05 5:59am

LightOfArt

...and yet nothing but conspiracy theories have emerged from Jackson's camp. I'd still like to hear this from a credible source other than a diehard MJ fan/apologist.


who is it? confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 01/04/05 6:15am

CinisterCee

LightOfArt said:

...and yet nothing but conspiracy theories have emerged from Jackson's camp. I'd still like to hear this from a credible source other than a diehard MJ fan/apologist.


who is it? confused


whistle Is it my broth-ahh!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 01/04/05 7:10am

FiveFootNine

avatar

The mother of this boy would've gotten anything she wanted for her son...just by being "friends" with MJ...wasn't MJ taking care of mostly everything in regards to this family? (money for medical treatments, money...and more money)

Why come forward with these allegations..."if" they weren't true or based on some fact?

Why bite the hand that feeds you...
**...they were right about you.**
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 01/04/05 7:38am

LightOfArt

FiveFootNine said:

The mother of this boy would've gotten anything she wanted for her son...just by being "friends" with MJ...wasn't MJ taking care of mostly everything in regards to this family? (money for medical treatments, money...and more money)

Why come forward with these allegations..."if" they weren't true or based on some fact?

Why bite the hand that feeds you...


Because mommy wanted more money and Mike refused to give. for example, she wanted to be paid for her son's appearance at Martin Mashir's doc

And don't forget, she planned this way before she even met Michael. She hired a lawyer, before they met Michael.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 01/04/05 8:18am

Luv4oneanotha

LightOfArt said:

FiveFootNine said:

The mother of this boy would've gotten anything she wanted for her son...just by being "friends" with MJ...wasn't MJ taking care of mostly everything in regards to this family? (money for medical treatments, money...and more money)

Why come forward with these allegations..."if" they weren't true or based on some fact?

Why bite the hand that feeds you...


Because mommy wanted more money and Mike refused to give. for example, she wanted to be paid for her son's appearance at Martin Mashir's doc

And don't forget, she planned this way before she even met Michael. She hired a lawyer, before they met Michael.


Not to mention Mike Kicked her ass out of Neverland after her 6 month stay

The same 6 months she claimed jackson withheld her as hostage...

Jackson even tried to buy her a Condo to ger her out of neverland

then forcefully got her out with his "Henchman"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 01/04/05 11:31am

WildStyle

avatar

FiveFootNine said:

The mother of this boy would've gotten anything she wanted for her son...just by being "friends" with MJ...wasn't MJ taking care of mostly everything in regards to this family? (money for medical treatments, money...and more money)

Why come forward with these allegations..."if" they weren't true or based on some fact?

Why bite the hand that feeds you...


Because MJ cut her off. Sneddon slid his card under her door after the Bashir interview (literally) and it was on for young and old.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 01/04/05 12:43pm

BlueNote

avatar

Yeah mommy. I know your game. lol

U say it's not about money? When can we pre-order your book? She wants to be the pedophile Rowling.

BlueNote
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 01/04/05 1:39pm

DavidEye

Wow! When you read this story,and you consider the "scam" that they pulled on JC Penneys,it kinda makes you wonder about this family,doesn't it?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 01/04/05 3:50pm

FiveFootNine

avatar

fucking greedy ass bitches!!! disbelief

I just don't understand ppl...
**...they were right about you.**
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 01/04/05 7:28pm

Luv4oneanotha

FiveFootNine said:

fucking greedy ass bitches!!! disbelief

I just don't understand ppl...


I do,

people will do anything to get ahead
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 01/05/05 2:42am

amit1234

avatar

Another bombshell report released today from Celebrity Justice...

http://celebrityjustice.w...1/04a.html

Comedy Kings Used in Bogus Benefits for Jackson Accuser?

January 4, 2005

George Lopez and Chris Tucker are two of comedy's brightest lights, but now it seems that the funny men may have been used as pawns in a scam involving the family of the boy currently accusing pop singer Michael Jackson of child molestation.

"CJ" recently broke the story that the mother of the accuser got a community newspaper to run an article soliciting funds for the boy's cancer treatments in 2000, even though the family didn't have to pay a penny in medical costs because the father's insurance covered everything.

Lopez has strong ties to Los Angeles' comedy club circuit, including The Laugh Factory on the Sunset Strip, and "CJ" has learned that several non-celebrities have also had strong ties to Lopez and the club, including Jackson's accuser and his family. Lopez met the boy at The Laugh Factory's summer camp for underprivileged kids, and when the boy was diagnosed with cancer in 2000, Lopez joined Chris Tucker and others to raise money for the child.

"CJ" has learned that the family got tens of thousands of dollars from donations and various Laugh Factory fundraisers. In light of the fact that the family's insurance apparently covered the boy's treatments, the question remains: where did the money go?

"CJ" has also learned that the family recruited Fritz Coleman, TV weather personality for LA's KNBC and a stand-up comic in his own right, to do an on-air plug for a charity event for the boy held at The Laugh Factory on October 26, 2000. Though Coleman couldn't be reached for comment, we're told he believed the money was being raised for the boy's medical expenses and that he's extremely upset he may have been misled. We're also told that Jackson's defense team believes Lopez and Tucker were used as well.

Despite the boy's hospital bills being covered by the family's insurance, Laugh Factory owner Jamie Masada, who was close to the accuser and his mother, has been quoted as saying, "Anything we raised we gave directly to the hospital, except for a couple of checks I wrote myself, which was for her apartment."

Lopez, Tucker and Fritz Coleman had no comment, but we're told all three have been contacted by Jackson's team. As for Masada, he would not comment on the statement that he gave the money to the hospital.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 01/05/05 4:06am

Thriller81

You know what's ironic, if the conspiracy charges weren't added to begin with, these stories wouldn't even matter.

If it was a simple "Michael Jackson molested my son, and I didn't know anything about it" story, the family would have more credibility. Plus, it would have helped more had they called the cops on Jackson as soon as they left instead of looking for an attorney for which they did, Larry Feldman.

But now the whole prosecution "they were held hostage at Neverland, the boy was molested by MJ" story is crap, and the story "Jackson stop giving money to the family, now they're pissed, in comes molestation charges" has more ground. Now with these stories coming out about charity scams, both sides, MJ and this family, have little credibility. Now it's up to a jury to decide which story is more believable.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 01/05/05 4:09am

sosgemini

avatar

amit1234 said:

Another bombshell report released today from Celebrity Justice...

http://celebrityjustice.w...1/04a.html

Comedy Kings Used in Bogus Benefits for Jackson Accuser?

January 4, 2005

George Lopez and Chris Tucker are two of comedy's brightest lights, but now it seems that the funny men may have been used as pawns in a scam involving the family of the boy currently accusing pop singer Michael Jackson of child molestation.

"CJ" recently broke the story that the mother of the accuser got a community newspaper to run an article soliciting funds for the boy's cancer treatments in 2000, even though the family didn't have to pay a penny in medical costs because the father's insurance covered everything.

Lopez has strong ties to Los Angeles' comedy club circuit, including The Laugh Factory on the Sunset Strip, and "CJ" has learned that several non-celebrities have also had strong ties to Lopez and the club, including Jackson's accuser and his family. Lopez met the boy at The Laugh Factory's summer camp for underprivileged kids, and when the boy was diagnosed with cancer in 2000, Lopez joined Chris Tucker and others to raise money for the child.

"CJ" has learned that the family got tens of thousands of dollars from donations and various Laugh Factory fundraisers. In light of the fact that the family's insurance apparently covered the boy's treatments, the question remains: where did the money go?

"CJ" has also learned that the family recruited Fritz Coleman, TV weather personality for LA's KNBC and a stand-up comic in his own right, to do an on-air plug for a charity event for the boy held at The Laugh Factory on October 26, 2000. Though Coleman couldn't be reached for comment, we're told he believed the money was being raised for the boy's medical expenses and that he's extremely upset he may have been misled. We're also told that Jackson's defense team believes Lopez and Tucker were used as well.

Despite the boy's hospital bills being covered by the family's insurance, Laugh Factory owner Jamie Masada, who was close to the accuser and his mother, has been quoted as saying, "Anything we raised we gave directly to the hospital, except for a couple of checks I wrote myself, which was for her apartment."

Lopez, Tucker and Fritz Coleman had no comment, but we're told all three have been contacted by Jackson's team. As for Masada, he would not comment on the statement that he gave the money to the hospital.


DAMN!!! We have just graduated to Rosie thighs..
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 01/05/05 4:12am

sosgemini

avatar

Thriller81 said:

You know what's ironic, if the conspiracy charges weren't added to begin with, these stories wouldn't even matter.

If it was a simple "Michael Jackson molested my son, and I didn't know anything about it" story, the family would have more credibility. Plus, it would have helped more had they called the cops on Jackson as soon as they left instead of looking for an attorney for which they did, Larry Feldman.

But now the whole prosecution "they were held hostage at Neverland, the boy was molested by MJ" story is crap, and the story "Jackson stop giving money to the family, now they're pissed, in comes molestation charges" has more ground. Now with these stories coming out about charity scams, both sides, MJ and this family, have little credibility. Now it's up to a jury to decide which story is more believable.



you get Chris Tucker and George Lopez on the stand and our celebrity obsessed culture no way a jury is gonna believe this family...THEM THIGHS ARE CHAFING!!!
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 01/05/05 4:38am

subhuman09

You guys need to lay off Tito.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 01/05/05 3:40pm

amit1234

avatar

It's been a question for awhile, the possibility, that Sneddon charged the victim, and failed to investigate the perpitrator.

The first case, was also questioned about this, and then when Michael asked for an investigation of extortion, and the world was told there were no grounds, the concern has continued.

It makes people very uncomfortable, because we are supposed to trust law enforcement to investigate the criminal, and charge the criminal, not investigate the victim, and charge the victim.
[Edited 1/5/05 7:48am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Breaking News: Jackson Accuser's Mom Falsely Solicited Charity For Son