Author | Message |
Janet on the cover of GENRE magazine damn she's still fine Too bad she's still with that low-life JD Official member of the Paw Power Posse
Pawer to the people! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
She looks good. I'll give her that; however.... That's the same and perhaps only photo she's taken since "All For You". Enough with the barely-there tops, and vulnerable look to the camera. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Chico1 said: She looks good. I'll give her that; however.... That's the same and perhaps only photo she's taken since "All For You". Enough with the barely-there tops, and vulnerable look to the camera. um...hello, chico? its a gay publication! if the men are all half naked inside, of course janet's gonna be. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassyBritches said: Chico1 said: She looks good. I'll give her that; however.... That's the same and perhaps only photo she's taken since "All For You". Enough with the barely-there tops, and vulnerable look to the camera. um...hello, chico? its a gay publication! if the men are all half naked inside, of course janet's gonna be. Oh.. I didn't know what magazine it was. I guess that makes some kind of sense. But still. I stand behind my argument. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Almost bought this. I thought the feature was a bit short (article size queen). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: Almost bought this. I thought the feature was a bit short (article size queen).
it was one of the only articles i've read that was fairly supportive. it was also the first time i've heard janet speak of the media using the "exposure" to detract from political happenings. it wasn't a big conspiracy theory or anything but she does mention that with everything else going on it seems odd that such an enormous deal was made over a boob. it was a decent article...but, yeah, a little too short. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassyBritches said: CinisterCee said: Almost bought this. I thought the feature was a bit short (article size queen).
it was one of the only articles i've read that was fairly supportive. it was also the first time i've heard janet speak of the media using the "exposure" to detract from political happenings. it wasn't a big conspiracy theory or anything but she does mention that with everything else going on it seems odd that such an enormous deal was made over a boob. it was a decent article...but, yeah, a little too short. And I think I read it in 15 seconds while standing at the magazine rack. I then bought Blender and XXL to which the Mac's cashier exclaimed, "Whoa, what diverse tastes in music!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: SassyBritches said: it was one of the only articles i've read that was fairly supportive. it was also the first time i've heard janet speak of the media using the "exposure" to detract from political happenings. it wasn't a big conspiracy theory or anything but she does mention that with everything else going on it seems odd that such an enormous deal was made over a boob. it was a decent article...but, yeah, a little too short. And I think I read it in 15 seconds while standing at the magazine rack. I then bought Blender and XXL to which the Mac's cashier exclaimed, "Whoa, what diverse tastes in music!" is it the blender with larry mullen,jr (oops, i meant u2) on the cover? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Chico1 said:[quote] SassyBritches said: Oh.. I didn't know what magazine it was. I didn't even know it was a gay magazine...but um..read the headlines in the bottom right corner: PUSH-UP BRIEFS. *slowly backs away from computer Official member of the Paw Power Posse
Pawer to the people! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
smellmyfunk said:[quote] Chico1 said: SassyBritches said: Oh.. I didn't know what magazine it was. I didn't even know it was a gay magazine...but um..read the headlines in the bottom right corner: PUSH-UP BRIEFS. *slowly backs away from computer i own this magazine and i never noticed it. i pretty much just scanned the skin products and read the janet article. homos are so funny sometimes! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassierBritches said: CinisterCee said: And I think I read it in 15 seconds while standing at the magazine rack. I then bought Blender and XXL to which the Mac's cashier exclaimed, "Whoa, what diverse tastes in music!" is it the blender with larry mullen,jr (oops, i meant u2) on the cover? Yes, Larry Mullen nipple cover | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: SassierBritches said: is it the blender with larry mullen,jr (oops, i meant u2) on the cover? Yes, Larry Mullen nipple cover he is absolutely the sexiest drummer ever. and still hot at his age! i know older guys can be sexyor attractive (i'm certainly not an agist) but he is still damn sexy!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |