SquirrelMeat said: I'd love to know where some poeples "facts" come from.
Out of their asses, it seems. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kev1n said: speeddemon said: So go back to Earth, Elvis means nothing in today's world, his influence is nowhere. Quite the contrary, for many in the Black community, he's the object of hatred and scorn. Musically, his music is totally old-fashioned and isn't played anymore apart of oldies radios and rodeo festivals. are you serious? Elvis was one of the key factors in establishing rock & roll (and rock music in general wich originated from it). He may not have come up with the concept but he damn sure brought the memphis sound to every household in the world. Guys like Jerry lee lewis, roy orbisson, johnny cash, Carl perkins, and so many others benefited hugely from elvis' spotlight. he brought 'sun records' and it's incredible stable into the sunlight. Saying that Elvis had little to no influence on today's music is saying that guys like stevie wonder or marvin gaye had no influence. The best way to compare this is to take a look at little richard (who elvis took a lot from), sure kids today don't know him but without the guy there would be no Jay-z, no dr dre, no snoop dog, no nothin. The same goes for elvis and rock if it wasn't for elvis rock music MIGHT never have become as big as it was and is. And that's not just the ramblin of a fan (wich i'm not) but simple music history. speeddemon is an MJ fanatic. All useful dialogue with him stops right there. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just clicked on this thread for the first time because I thought it was about penis size. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: I just clicked on this thread for the first time because I thought it was about penis size.
The biggest prick? You need us to answer that???? . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2 completely different artists being compared.... ahhh a;lsditja;sldkjt; | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Musicology2004 said: 2 completely different artists being compared.... ahhh a;lsditja;sldkjt;
I'm sorry, but as great an entertainer as Elvis was and as influential as a performer, he is not an artist at all by today's standards. Granted it wasn't the norm for performers to write their own material, but many of the other rock and roll pioneers did namely Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Buddy Holly and they were all close to, if not the equals of Elvis as performers. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said: minneapolisgenius said: I just clicked on this thread for the first time because I thought it was about penis size.
The biggest prick? You need us to answer that???? "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SquirrelMeat said:I'd love to know where some poeples "facts" come from.
Have you guys never travelled? Spend some time in Asia and Africa and you'll find Elvis is a hell of a lot more popular than Bob Marley. Walk into a shop in Egypt for example, you'll have a lot better chance of finding 3 Elvis albums and seeing sight of Bobs "Legend". Elvis is truely global, without even touring. I actually live in Europe and usually travel in Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia. Believe me, MJ an Bob Marley are much more important than Elvis there. In the rest of the world, it's pretty much the same. Elvis is just, like Marylin and John Wayne, outside of Ameica, a relic of old fashioned Americanism. Icons such as Michael Jordan and Jackson are the new torchbearer of American culture as a global culture. In Africa, Elvis is barely known while Michael has even been crowned king there (back in 1992) when he was welcomed by 100 of thousands of people . There's no point quoting billboard 100 stats only. Thats not the whole picture. Try the world. That's pretty much in America and in the UK that Elvis was the better charting artist. In the rest of the world, MJ had much more #1s. For example, MJ had 8 #1s on the Dutch Charts VS 0 for Elvis 8 #1s on the French chart VS 1 for Elvis 9 #1s in Ireland VS 7 for Elvis 12#1s in Belgium VS 7 for Elvis 7 #1s in Italy VS 1 for Elvis 12 #1s in Spain VS 0 for Elvis In the US, MJ has had 13 #1s as solo artist and 4 with the Jackson 5 on the Billboard Hot 100. Elvis's had 14 #1s on Billboard, invluding 7 on the Hot 100. Elvis is the official Guiness Book Of World Records holder for the most records sold. 117.5 million albums, and 211 million singles. That doesn't include the last 2 number one albums (the first one sold something like 8.5m). MJ has been awarded Best selling male artist of the Millenium by IFPI (International Federation of The Phonographic Industry), which is the only organism that tabulates world sales, through its ingerence on local music industries. MJ and Paul Mc Cartney sold more records during their entire careers than Elvis. Elvis is the official world record holder of the most number one singles. Not simply the USA stats. Totally untrue Aloha from Hawaii was the first TV programme to register 1 billion viewers. Hype and propaganda, not offical numbers. Let's try this one: The 10 most watched entertainment shows in TV history: 1. M.A.S.H., CBS, February 28, 1983, 50.1 million 2. Dallas, CBS, November 21, 1980, 41.4 million 3. The Day After, ABC, November 20, 1983, 38.5 million 4. Michael Jackson talks To Oprah, ABC, February 10, 1993, 36.5 million. 5. Roots, Part 8, ABC, January30, 1977, 36.3 million. For the record, I do not own an Elvis recording. I think his music is pretty cool, I think his films suck, But credit where credit is due. i am sure of your good motivations. Unfortunately, and being totally objective, a lot of people like myself looks at MJ as the biggest artist ever. However, I am aware that some give more importance to Elvis either. When I see an MJ Inpersonator Curry House open in my town, like the Elvis one, I'll know MJ is finally rising to the challenge.
When Elvis will be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, when he'll be the hero of video games and cartoons, then he will rise on my estim. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
good job speeddemon. cool info, cheers for that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LightOfArt said: good job speeddemon. cool info, cheers for that
Too bad Elvis has 17 #1 hits on Billboard (notice I didn't say Hot 100, speeddemon, just so you don't get tickled over the semantics again). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
speeddemon said: SquirrelMeat said:I'd love to know where some poeples "facts" come from.
Have you guys never travelled? Spend some time in Asia and Africa and you'll find Elvis is a hell of a lot more popular than Bob Marley. Walk into a shop in Egypt for example, you'll have a lot better chance of finding 3 Elvis albums and seeing sight of Bobs "Legend". Elvis is truely global, without even touring. I actually live in Europe and usually travel in Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia. Believe me, MJ an Bob Marley are much more important than Elvis there. In the rest of the world, it's pretty much the same. Elvis is just, like Marylin and John Wayne, outside of Ameica, a relic of old fashioned Americanism. Icons such as Michael Jordan and Jackson are the new torchbearer of American culture as a global culture. In Africa, Elvis is barely known while Michael has even been crowned king there (back in 1992) when he was welcomed by 100 of thousands of people . There's no point quoting billboard 100 stats only. Thats not the whole picture. Try the world. That's pretty much in America and in the UK that Elvis was the better charting artist. In the rest of the world, MJ had much more #1s. For example, MJ had 8 #1s on the Dutch Charts VS 0 for Elvis 8 #1s on the French chart VS 1 for Elvis 9 #1s in Ireland VS 7 for Elvis 12#1s in Belgium VS 7 for Elvis 7 #1s in Italy VS 1 for Elvis 12 #1s in Spain VS 0 for Elvis In the US, MJ has had 13 #1s as solo artist and 4 with the Jackson 5 on the Billboard Hot 100. Elvis's had 14 #1s on Billboard, invluding 7 on the Hot 100. Elvis is the official Guiness Book Of World Records holder for the most records sold. 117.5 million albums, and 211 million singles. That doesn't include the last 2 number one albums (the first one sold something like 8.5m). MJ has been awarded Best selling male artist of the Millenium by IFPI (International Federation of The Phonographic Industry), which is the only organism that tabulates world sales, through its ingerence on local music industries. MJ and Paul Mc Cartney sold more records during their entire careers than Elvis. Elvis is the official world record holder of the most number one singles. Not simply the USA stats. Totally untrue Aloha from Hawaii was the first TV programme to register 1 billion viewers. Hype and propaganda, not offical numbers. Let's try this one: The 10 most watched entertainment shows in TV history: 1. M.A.S.H., CBS, February 28, 1983, 50.1 million 2. Dallas, CBS, November 21, 1980, 41.4 million 3. The Day After, ABC, November 20, 1983, 38.5 million 4. Michael Jackson talks To Oprah, ABC, February 10, 1993, 36.5 million. 5. Roots, Part 8, ABC, January30, 1977, 36.3 million. For the record, I do not own an Elvis recording. I think his music is pretty cool, I think his films suck, But credit where credit is due. i am sure of your good motivations. Unfortunately, and being totally objective, a lot of people like myself looks at MJ as the biggest artist ever. However, I am aware that some give more importance to Elvis either. When I see an MJ Inpersonator Curry House open in my town, like the Elvis one, I'll know MJ is finally rising to the challenge.
When Elvis will be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, when he'll be the hero of video games and cartoons, then he will rise on my estim. Two notes: 1. Do you like or admire anyone who isn't Michael Jackson? Or are they just "relics" of American cultural desolation too (you should note that the average guy on the street considers MJ a freak and/or a cultural relic himself, so I have to laugh at your claims of objectivity)? 2. Nominee lists for the Nobel Prizes are never released. MJ could have easily had his people trump up the hype for that one, without even being nominated. It's not like he doesn't suffer from delusions of grandeur. And getting nominated for the Peace Prize doesn't count for shit - after all, they gave one to Henry Kissinger of all people . [Edited 9/17/04 11:04am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ok why don't we stop fighting but here's a statement to end off this note.....
There is one king And there is one self procclaimed king Who will be your leader? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jayaredee said: Ok why don't we stop fighting but here's a statement to end off this note.....
There is one king And there is one self procclaimed king Who will be your leader? Chuck Berry | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |