JANFAN4L said: sextonseven said: I recall Janet and Whitney being really successful at the same time in the 80s. In the 21st century however, it does seem to be all about Beyonce, unfortunately. Jody Watley was successful around this time period as well, but Janet and Whitney eclipsed her in popularity and rememberance. Poor Jody had to pose nude in Playboy a few years back to remind people who she was. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: ChimChimBadass said: Jill Scott can be awfully off-key when she performs live, I like her records but she sucks on stage. LOL funny, I dig her the opposite way. Studio she's dull & lifeless, live she's all o' that and a pack of brownies & cornbread too yeah...I don't like her studio stuff....she does oversing..but is good live! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The "Stripped" album was on point. I loved "Loving Me For Me" written by Aguilera and Scott "Crazy In Love" Storch. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
legendofnothing said: Jill Scott can't sing neither, she's a fat bore who does spoken word poetry. Golden is a lazy track that would put anyone to sleep.
Oh hell no. Since when does a person's size have anything to do with their ability to sing? Don't you know that some of the premiere opera singers have not been the most svelte individuals? Luciano Pavarotti Placido Domingo Deborah Voigt Jessye Norman Beverly Sills Not to mention Ella, Aretha, Luther (at times). Personally, i'd rather be put to sleep listening to Jill Scott's elegantly delivered studio version of "The Way" any day. tA Tribal Disorder http://www.soundclick.com...rmusic.htm "Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theVelvetRoper said: missfee said: Christina can sing, but her slutty reputation precedes her before we ever hear her voice, and monica, after she just spent all her proceeds from her last albums for tattoos all over her body, its a wonder why anyone would take her singing seriously on her current album.
if u ask me, all of them are washed up.... BRING ON JILL SCOTT!!!!! Yeah, Christina's just a slut, whereas Britney isn't. At least Christina will admit to liking sex, instead of trying to act coy and virginal, and then suddenly emerging as some sex-fiend. And what the hell does Monica having tattoos do with anything? Last I checked, so did Britney and Christina? yeah britney, christina, and brandy got tattoos, but it would read my 2 cents correctly, i was talking about how monica's tattoos outweigh all the others tattoos in which if ya'll wondering why she ain't on mtv cribs showing off her crib, then her spending money on all those damn tattoos is probably why!!!!! Hope i cleared it up for ya'll, if not (if it the subject is really "passionate" to you) then send me an orgnote. Thanx Guys!!! [This message was edited Tue Aug 10 16:36:33 2004 by missfee] I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think the reason that Brandy and Monica aren't Christina and Britney is becuase they take more time (for better or worse) to make their albums while Brit and Chris release stuff at a more steady pace of about an album a year. I think Monica's career was also kind of hurt by the fact that she had one album nearly scrapped, although that didn't seem to hurt Usher. I think if Brandy and Monica worked at a faster pace (well, their record companies, producers and writers) in the beginging of their careers and had gimicks like Brit and Chirstina, they would still be on top. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: I think the reason that Brandy and Monica aren't Christina and Britney is becuase they take more time (for better or worse) to make their albums while Brit and Chris release stuff at a more steady pace of about an album a year. I think Monica's career was also kind of hurt by the fact that she had one album nearly scrapped, although that didn't seem to hurt Usher. I think if Brandy and Monica worked at a faster pace (well, their record companies, producers and writers) in the beginging of their careers and had gimicks like Brit and Chirstina, they would still be on top.
We also have to remember that Brandy and Monica were more wrapped up in their personal lives than their recording careers. Brandy had a baby during the Full Moon era and that kept her out of the spotlight for some time -- not to mention her make-believe marriage and all the drama involving that. During, and after, "The Boy Is Mine" album, Monica was in a tumultuous relationship with No Limit's C-Murder which ended sourly and she adopted the daughter of her first ex-boyfriend who was tragically killed a year ago. These events took a toll on their respective careers and helped to dim their spotlights. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: I think the reason that Brandy and Monica aren't Christina and Britney is becuase they take more time (for better or worse) to make their albums while Brit and Chris release stuff at a more steady pace of about an album a year. I think Monica's career was also kind of hurt by the fact that she had one album nearly scrapped, although that didn't seem to hurt Usher. I think if Brandy and Monica worked at a faster pace (well, their record companies, producers and writers) in the beginging of their careers and had gimicks like Brit and Chirstina, they would still be on top.
How many albums has Christina Aguilera released since her debut in 1999? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |