independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > "The Prince We Never Knew" in the New York Times: long article on the Ezra Edelman documentary series for Netflix
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 11 of 13 « First<45678910111213>
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #300 posted 09/14/24 7:11pm

strawberrylett
er23

AvocadosMax said:

I don’t care about this doc. I don’t care what happened, don’t care what dirt they’re using to try to cancel Prince. Prince lives on. Regardless what he did in his personal life. The guy was a creative and musical genius. But he was human and nothing that comes out, not anything from this documentary, not the Jill Jones rumors, nothing can make me lose respect/love that I have for Prince. Don’t care. I just want this stuff to be over with so the estate can get back to preserving his legacy and releasing more vault material.

Nobody is trying to "cancel Prince", including the makers of the Doc..... JFC people - is subtlely and logic dead? lol

And nobody is saying this documentary is about making people lose respect for Prince. It is just painting the full picture of who he was good and bad. It isn't a hit piece

[Edited 9/14/24 19:14pm]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #301 posted 09/14/24 8:10pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

rainbowchild said:

Burning all my Prince albums /s

whofarted

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #302 posted 09/14/24 11:23pm

psyche2

bozojones said:

Londell strikes me as a very Trumpian kind of guy - thinks he's far smarter than he actually is, tries to bully people to get his way and throws a tantrum when it doesn't work, and so on. He should leave Prince's legacy the fuck alone and pivot into some kind of political grifting, that seems like it'd be more up his alley and with a quicker payout rolleyes

Thank you! I thought it was just me. Can't help reading his tweets with the voice of Trump in my head. Honest lol

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #303 posted 09/15/24 12:32am

RODSERLING

There is no way someone who's in charge of an estate artist legacy, would greenlight something that shed some controversy on him.
Londell is a dick, but all in all, any other estate would have act like him ( more subtly, less publicly, but still).


There are still good money to make out of Prince. In Hollywood, Nobody would like to make a movie about someone who punches women in the face, and treated her like shit.

That's the whole thing. This ain't just about that doc.
It will be really interesting to see how the children molestation accusations will be treated in the MJ biopic movie.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #304 posted 09/15/24 12:39am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

RODSERLING said:

There is no way someone who's in charge of an estate artist legacy, would greenlight something that shed some controversy on him.
Londell is a dick, but all in all, any other estate would have act like him ( more subtly, less publicly, but still).


There are still good money to make out of Prince. In Hollywood, Nobody would like to make a movie about someone who punches women in the face, and treated her like shit.



You haven't seen any elvis biopics im guessing.
Or jerry lee lewis.
Or straight outta compton on nwa, whose dr dre was famous for physical abuse.

All diff stories tbh, but none were shining knights in their romantic relationships.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #305 posted 09/15/24 12:46am

RODSERLING

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:

RODSERLING said:

There is no way someone who's in charge of an estate artist legacy, would greenlight something that shed some controversy on him.
Londell is a dick, but all in all, any other estate would have act like him ( more subtly, less publicly, but still).


There are still good money to make out of Prince. In Hollywood, Nobody would like to make a movie about someone who punches women in the face, and treated her like shit.



You haven't seen any elvis biopics im guessing.
Or jerry lee lewis.
Or straight outta compton on nwa, whose dr dre was famous for physical abuse.

All diff stories tbh, but none were shining knights in their romantic relationships.


Elvis is Elvis. He s is dead such a long time ago...
Jerry Lee Lewis is a minor artist, is there one or two fan somewhere?
NWA, that s US hip hop, they rely on violence in their music to sell, so nobody expect them to be nice little rabbits in private.

All these biopics didn't need to greenlighted by their estate to be released.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #306 posted 09/15/24 12:57am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

Point is, Hollywood made films on them. And they were big releases.

James brown too. Who was no perfect husband and partner.

So your idea that Hollywood wont do films on violent musicians is plain wrong.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #307 posted 09/15/24 7:17am

djThunderfunk

avatar

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:

RODSERLING said:
There is no way someone who's in charge of an estate artist legacy, would greenlight something that shed some controversy on him. Londell is a dick, but all in all, any other estate would have act like him ( more subtly, less publicly, but still). There are still good money to make out of Prince. In Hollywood, Nobody would like to make a movie about someone who punches women in the face, and treated her like shit.
You haven't seen any elvis biopics im guessing. Or jerry lee lewis. Or straight outta compton on nwa, whose dr dre was famous for physical abuse. All diff stories tbh, but none were shining knights in their romantic relationships.


Or James Brown, or Miles Davis, etc...

Don't hate your neighbors. Hate the media that tells you to hate your neighbors.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #308 posted 09/15/24 7:25am

SoulAlive

^^yes,and it's worth noting that NONE of those musicians were "cancelled",People still listen to their music.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #309 posted 09/15/24 7:29am

SoulAlive

Londell/the estate are just being overly paranoid.Fans already know that their favorite artists aren't saints.We know that they're only human and that they have flaws just like everybody else.

Release the documentary and then let's move onto another project.Maybe we could still get an SDE before year's end.

.

[Edited 9/15/24 7:29am]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #310 posted 09/15/24 7:31am

lustmealways

avatar

Look. We all know that this "cancel" stuff is smoke and mirrors, let's not kid ourselves.

The real reason there's so much tension regarding the release is that at approximately the 5 and a half hour mark, a snippet of Bloody Mouth is played and the Prince Estate just doesn't think the world is ready to hear it yet.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #311 posted 09/15/24 8:27am

PennyPurple

avatar

Anyone have a link to the NYT article that was supposed to be in today's paper?

Need to bypass the paywall

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #312 posted 09/15/24 8:34am

bozojones

lustmealways said:

Look. We all know that this "cancel" stuff is smoke and mirrors, let's not kid ourselves.

The real reason there's so much tension regarding the release is that at approximately the 5 and a half hour mark, a snippet of Bloody Mouth is played and the Prince Estate just doesn't think the world is ready to hear it yet.


lol

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #313 posted 09/15/24 8:36am

skywalker

avatar

Bream: I was grilled for 6 hours by the director of the controversial Prince documentaryDirector Ezra Edelman’s nine-hour authorized series may never come out because Prince’s estate objects to its content.

By Jon Bream
The Minnesota Star Tribune September 15, 2024 at 12:01AM


The Minnesota Star Tribune critic Jon Bream details what it was like to be interviewed for the Netflix Prince documentary that may never be released. (Warner Bros. )

Listen iconListenEzra Edelman did his homework.


The documentary filmmaker had piles of clippings in front of him. Apparently, he had read every article this hometown music critic had ever written about Prince. That’s hundreds of them, dating back to 1977.


For his six-hour authorized Netflix documentary about the Minnesota music icon, Edelman was determined to do a deep dive, asking everything and anything about Prince. His interactions with me, his religious beliefs, his drug use, certain concerts, my 1984 unauthorized biography of Prince. Edelman interrogated me on a June afternoon in 2021 at the former Alfred Pillsbury mansion near the Minneapolis Institute of Arts.
His producer had requested four hours. The inquisition lasted six hours. With one brief break.
A crew of eight worked behind the scenes. Edelman, my interrogator, was the only person I could see. The set was closed. No visitors — not even a makeup person because COVID-19 protocols were in place.


I’d been hesitant about doing the interview. When Prince died in 2016, I appeared on CNN, CBS and countless other outlets. Two days later, I stopped granting interviews unless I knew the questioner. Over the years, I’d been burned by TV producers whose footage ends up on the cutting room floor and by “journalists” saying they were writing a magazine article and it turned out they were penning a book.


Edelman ended up with something he hadn’t planned — an extra-long nine-hour documentary that may never be released because of objections from Prince’s estate, as the New York Times detailed in a lengthy story on Sept. 8. I have not seen the documentary.


I was suspicious of Edelman. First of all, Netflix was originally working in 2018 with director Ava DuVernay, whose vision was to make a Prince documentary literally using his speaking voice. He had given a limited number of interviews in his career, and most of the time he wouldn’t let print journalists record the interviews, not even take notes. I had two taped interviews with Prince from the late ‘70s, and DuVernay’s producers wanted them. I never trusted these producers, and I never shared the tapes.


DuVernay exited the Prince project for “creative differences” in 2019. Edelman, best known for the Oscar- and Emmy-winning 2016 documentary “O.J.: Made in America,” came on board with his own vision. Not necessarily a Prince fan, he wanted to learn as much as he could — warts and all — before framing his planned six-part documentary. He had access to all the unreleased recordings, concert footage and ephemera in Prince’s vault.


After producer Tamara Rosenberg emailed me in May 2020, it took a lot to persuade me to sit for an interview. There were several phone conversations and more than 30 emails exchanged. Who else were they talking to? Why should I trust Edelman when I didn’t trust any other reporters?
Eventually, I relented after receiving positive reports from Prince insiders whom Edelman interviewed. Our original session was canceled because COVID numbers spiked in the Twin Cities. More than a year after the first pitch, I sat for an interview. I was not paid for my participation.

Reliving ‘Purple Rain’ premiere and glitzy party in Hollywood Edelman, 50, could make “60 Minutes” look like amateur hour. He probed deep. He knew his stuff without looking at his notes.
Once or twice, he had to hand me an old article to refresh my memory. Some things, though, I recalled in vivid detail.


At one point, Edelman asked about a scene Prince filmed with me at the old Met Center in Bloomington for a 1982 movie, “The Second Coming,” that never came out. I described the scene in minute detail, down to what I was wearing.
“Have you ever seen the scene?” Edelman asked.
“No.”
Edelman pulled up the scene on his iPad.
“What do you think?” he asked after I watched it.
“It was just the way I described it.”
Edelman seemed disappointed. He was hoping for a “wow” reaction.


Did I sense where he was going? What his angle was? No. He was all over the place. He seemed to be looking for great emotion on camera, and this stoic journalist didn’t give it to him. I could sense Edelman’s frustration. He had expectations, and I didn’t meet them.


Edelman pressed me about times Prince was less than cordial — OK, rude — to me, like when he burned my review of the so-called symbol album on “The Arsenio Hall Show” in 1993 (note: unbeknownst to Prince, I was in the studio audience) or when he blasted me with his squirt-gun guitar at the old St. Paul Civic Center during the Purple Rain Tour in ‘84.
Edelman was hoping for an angry reaction. Instead, I was flattered that Prince paid attention to me and my work. I told the filmmaker, “You learned to roll with it with Prince. He was unpredictable.” Edelman had predicted a different reaction from me.
I wasn’t being protective of Prince, but I didn’t have any tea to spill, either. And some stories are for me to tell, not Ezra Edelman.


Prince’s estate — now controlled equally by Primary Wave and Prince Legacy LLC after his surviving siblings sold their shares — is reportedly objecting to some of the specifics, such as coroner’s photos, in the nine-hour documentary, thus preventing its release, per the original contract with Netflix.
“We are working to resolve matters concerning the documentary so that his story may be told in a way that is factually correct and does not mischaracterize or sensationalize his life,” Prince Legacy said in a statement on Sept. 9.


On Thursday, Londell McMillan of Prince Legacy LLC took to X to share some of his thoughts on the situation. “I will not permit ANYONE (ex’s, musicians, engineers, friends, family, enemies) hurt or falsely portray Prince (and we all know he had his ways) Everyone does… We look forward to sharing his balanced story,” McMillan said in one of eight tweets.


Is Edelman trying to do a hit job with his exhaustive documentary that might never come out? No, he’s trying to give a full portrait of a very complicated, very private, very controlling genius, who relished being mysterious, elusive and inscrutable. But Prince was human, flawed like all of us. It could take more than nine hours to explore the many facets and personae of the singular Purple One. But, in death, as in real life, we may never get to truly know the real Prince beyond his music.

"New Power slide...."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #314 posted 09/15/24 8:49am

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

Ill take that as an endorsement.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #315 posted 09/15/24 9:08am

Kares

avatar

skywalker said:


At one point, Edelman asked about a scene Prince filmed with me at the old Met Center in Bloomington for a 1982 movie, “The Second Coming,” that never came out. I described the scene in minute detail, down to what I was wearing.
“Have you ever seen the scene?” Edelman asked.
“No.”
Edelman pulled up the scene on his iPad.

.
Does Edelman have an iPad with the contents of the entire vault on it? Does he have armed guards?...

Friends don't let friends clap on 1 and 3.

The Paisley Park Vault spreadsheet: https://goo.gl/zzWHrU
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #316 posted 09/15/24 9:28am

scififilmnerd

avatar

skywalker said:

Bream: I was grilled for 6 hours by the director of the controversial Prince documentaryDirector Ezra Edelman’s nine-hour authorized series may never come out because Prince’s estate objects to its content.

All Bream's really saying is he was reluctant to participate and had no insights to add. Of course, Edelman was frustrated. Bream was wasting his time. Sounds like Edelman knew more about Prince than Bream did. lol

[Edited 9/15/24 9:33am]

rainbow woot! FREE THE 29 MAY 1993 COME CONFIGURATION! woot! rainbow
rainbow woot! FREE THE JANUARY 1994 THE GOLD ALBUM CONFIGURATION woot! rainbow
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #317 posted 09/15/24 9:31am

Mindbells9

avatar

Kares said:



skywalker said:



At one point, Edelman asked about a scene Prince filmed with me at the old Met Center in Bloomington for a 1982 movie, “The Second Coming,” that never came out. I described the scene in minute detail, down to what I was wearing.
“Have you ever seen the scene?” Edelman asked.
“No.”
Edelman pulled up the scene on his iPad.



.
Does Edelman have an iPad with the contents of the entire vault on it? Does he have armed guards?...



I was wondering the same thing lurking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #318 posted 09/15/24 10:20am

scififilmnerd

avatar

So, when L.M. Millions says "NOT releasing it! DONE", he's also saying we wont be getting any new SDE's, because then Netflix can also say "NOT releasing it! DONE"? confused

Of course, I suppose the Estate can buy themselves out of the contract by returning every penny they got from Netflix, but I somehow doubt Mr. L.M. Millions is willing to part with the millions. lol

rainbow woot! FREE THE 29 MAY 1993 COME CONFIGURATION! woot! rainbow
rainbow woot! FREE THE JANUARY 1994 THE GOLD ALBUM CONFIGURATION woot! rainbow
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #319 posted 09/15/24 10:53am

paisleyparkgir
l

avatar

It will get leaked.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #320 posted 09/15/24 2:26pm

funkbabyandthe
babysitters

Id like to know what happens if mcmillibaby refuses to cooperate. Or will we end up with a sanitised cut and then a directors cut comes later/gets leaked.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #321 posted 09/15/24 2:35pm

endlessstarlig
ht

Never seen this photo! Must have been straight out the Vault

PRNinPrint said:

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #322 posted 09/15/24 5:43pm

RODSERLING

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:

Point is, Hollywood made films on them. And they were big releases.

James brown too. Who was no perfect husband and partner.

So your idea that Hollywood wont do films on violent musicians is plain wrong.


As I already said,when JB died nobody-already- cared.
The only one who cared was MJ, who came back from his retreat in Bahreïn to say goodbye to JB. That was about all. No surge in sales, airplay, etc.

Get on Up was a flop. Cost 30M $+ in production, worldwide box office at 33M$
Soundtrack peaked at #61 Billboard.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #323 posted 09/15/24 5:49pm

RODSERLING

djThunderfunk said:



funkbabyandthebabysitters said:


RODSERLING said:
There is no way someone who's in charge of an estate artist legacy, would greenlight something that shed some controversy on him. Londell is a dick, but all in all, any other estate would have act like him ( more subtly, less publicly, but still). There are still good money to make out of Prince. In Hollywood, Nobody would like to make a movie about someone who punches women in the face, and treated her like shit.

You haven't seen any elvis biopics im guessing. Or jerry lee lewis. Or straight outta compton on nwa, whose dr dre was famous for physical abuse. All diff stories tbh, but none were shining knights in their romantic relationships.


Or James Brown, or Miles Davis, etc...


Miles Ahead : 5,1 M$ at the box office.

All these biopics didn't need their estate approval, anyway.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #324 posted 09/15/24 7:04pm

peedub

avatar

RODSERLING said:

djThunderfunk said:



funkbabyandthebabysitters said:


RODSERLING said:
There is no way someone who's in charge of an estate artist legacy, would greenlight something that shed some controversy on him. Londell is a dick, but all in all, any other estate would have act like him ( more subtly, less publicly, but still). There are still good money to make out of Prince. In Hollywood, Nobody would like to make a movie about someone who punches women in the face, and treated her like shit.

You haven't seen any elvis biopics im guessing. Or jerry lee lewis. Or straight outta compton on nwa, whose dr dre was famous for physical abuse. All diff stories tbh, but none were shining knights in their romantic relationships.


Or James Brown, or Miles Davis, etc...


Miles Ahead : 5,1 M$ at the box office.

All these biopics didn't need their estate approval, anyway.


You didn't say 'no estate'. You said 'nobody in Hollywood'. Nor does a release's ultimate profit prove or disprove that someone did, indeed, want to make it.
[Edited 9/15/24 19:05pm]
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #325 posted 09/15/24 7:38pm

RODSERLING

I just shown that nobody cared about JB, Miles Davis and Jerry Lee Lewis.
Their fanbase is about zilch, or may I just say for Miles that his audience is not ready to spend money on this.

Now clearly one might think that a Prince biopic could draw a bigger audience, could do 100's of millions $ at the BO. Prince fans could take their kids to the theaters, etc.
They're just waiting to see how the MJ biopic would perform. If that's a fucking success, you can be sure there will be a Prince movie as well.
[Edited 9/15/24 19:39pm]
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #326 posted 09/15/24 7:40pm

SpookyPurple

funkbabyandthebabysitters said:

Id like to know what happens if mcmillibaby refuses to cooperate. Or will we end up with a sanitised cut and then a directors cut comes later/gets leaked.

Depends on what the contract stipulates. If he can only hold it up due to length, I think Netflix cuts it down and leaves in whatever it wants. But no studio wants a subject’s estate badmouthing a project before release and dissuading people from viewing. So I think Netflix is likely trying to come to a compromise before hitting the nuclear option and finding a way to release even if estate is unhappy with content. If they do cut it, maybe a complete version comes out later or never at all. Doubt it will leak though. Honestly, at 9 hours I can’t imagine there isn’t a great 6 hour version in there. I’d be fine with that. I don’t need the segment on the Hall of Fame performance of Guitar Gently Weeps for example. That can hit the cutting room floor to make room for other things.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #327 posted 09/15/24 7:44pm

peedub

avatar

RODSERLING said:

I just shown that nobody cared about JB, Miles Davis and Jerry Lee Lewis.
Their fanbase is about zilch, or may I just say for Miles that his audience is not ready to spend money on this.

Now clearly one might think that a Prince biopic could draw a bigger audience, could do 100's of millions $ at the BO. Prince fans could take their kids to the theaters, etc.
They're just waiting to see how the MJ biopic would perform. If that's a fucking success, you can be sure there will be a Prince movie as well.
[Edited 9/15/24 19:39pm]


Make up your mind. First you say 'nobody cares enough to make it'. Now you're arguing 'nobody cares enough to watch it'. Let me know when you've picked one.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #328 posted 09/15/24 7:53pm

RODSERLING

peedub said:

RODSERLING said:

I just shown that nobody cared about JB, Miles Davis and Jerry Lee Lewis.
Their fanbase is about zilch, or may I just say for Miles that his audience is not ready to spend money on this.

Now clearly one might think that a Prince biopic could draw a bigger audience, could do 100's of millions $ at the BO. Prince fans could take their kids to the theaters, etc.
They're just waiting to see how the MJ biopic would perform. If that's a fucking success, you can be sure there will be a Prince movie as well.
[Edited 9/15/24 19:39pm]


Make up your mind. First you say 'nobody cares enough to make it'. Now you're arguing 'nobody cares enough to watch it'. Let me know when you've picked one.


No, I just said that obviously Londell thinks he can make good money out of movie, and that a bad rep and bad buzz could cancel that, or in the end, earning him less money.

Prince is not in JLL, JB or Miles Davis category. Their music was listened to your grandfather, now Prince was more current.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #329 posted 09/15/24 8:00pm

peedub

avatar

RODSERLING said:

peedub said:



Make up your mind. First you say 'nobody cares enough to make it'. Now you're arguing 'nobody cares enough to watch it'. Let me know when you've picked one.


No, I just said that obviously Londell thinks he can make good money out of movie, and that a bad rep and bad buzz could cancel that, or in the end, earning him less money.

Prince is not in JLL, JB or Miles Davis category. Their music was listened to your grandfather, now Prince was more current.


My grandfather listened to Benny Goodman and Glenn Miller. I listen to Benny Goodman and Glenn Miller. I listen to James Brown and Miles Davis. Anyhow... you're talking loud and saying nothing.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 11 of 13 « First<45678910111213>
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > "The Prince We Never Knew" in the New York Times: long article on the Ezra Edelman documentary series for Netflix