independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > *Spoiler Warning* Prince and the Parade / SOTT era studio sessions.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 06/18/21 10:54pm

LoveGalore

VaultCurator said:

I’ve gone through the book and I’ve put together a list of all of the newly tracked recordings in chronological order. The list excludes older songs that have been pulled out of storage for additional overdubs and mixing.



Here’s some statistics (providing I haven’t made any mistakes which I probably have)…

Total number of new Prince recordings between 1985-1986: 181
Number that have been released: 109 (60.22%)
Additional number that have leaked: 33 (18.23%)
Remaining unreleased & not leaked: 39 (21.55%)

Total number of new Prince recordings (1985 only): 76
Number that have been released: 36 (47.37%)
Additional number that have leaked: 22 (28.95%)
Remaining unreleased & not leaked: 18 (23.68%)



Total number of new Prince recordings (1986 only): 105
Number that have been released: 73 (69.52%)
Additional number that have leaked: 11 (10.48%)
Remaining unreleased & not leaked: 21 (20%)

edit for line breaks

[Edited 6/18/21 20:28pm]



What's the list of 39?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 06/19/21 2:44am

VaultCurator

avatar

Hi Love Galore,

It turns out there are only 37 that are both unreleased and yet to be leaked. Someone pointed out to me that 'Call Of The Wild' had actually leaked, but was mistakenly titled '9-5 People'. Also for some reason I also had Baby Go-Go marked too.

Here are the remaining 37 tracks...
1985-01-05 Fish Fries
1985-04-16 untitled instrumental
1985-04-19 Evolsidog
1985-04-19 Tibet
1985-05-01 Velvet Kitty Cat (new recording)
1985-05-26 Stella & Charles
1985-05-27 Married Man
1985-05-27 Polka-Dotted Tiger
1985-05-27 Zebra With The Blonde Hair
1985-06-02 Unnamed New Song
1985-07-10 God Is Everywhere
1985-07-25 (U Got The) Good Drawers
1985-11-12 Soul Sister (variation of New Position?)
1985-11-30 An Honest Man (recording 1)
1985-12-09 She Pony
1985-12-17 An Honest Man (recording 2)
1985-12-18 Love On A Blue Train (recording 1 faster version)
1986-01-04 Tricky
1986-02-09 Duet With Dad (AKA Sunday Afternoon)*
1986-02-17 Euphoria Highway (recording 1)
1986-02-17 Euphoria Highway (recording 2) (Only partial leak)
1986-03-11 Fun Love
1986-03-11 Twosday
1986-03-19 And How
1986-05-10 Frustration
1986-05-11 Boy U Bad
1986-05-15 Untitled track
1986-07-22 Dixieland style instrumental
1986-07-22 Untitled Instrumental (AKA. Easy Does It)
1986-09-28 Baby Doll House
1986-10-05 Rescue Me
1986-10-08 Nine (recording 1 'Six And 1/2')
1986-10-16 Untitled Track
1986-11-01 Nine (recording 2)
1986-12-13 Untitled Track
1986-12-26 Ponyride
1986-12-28 Wally (recording 1)

*Top note claims song was only overdubed, although book sugests it was also tracked on this day.

[Edited 6/19/21 2:49am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 06/19/21 2:52am

LILpoundCAKE

avatar

VaultCurator said:

Hi Love Galore,

It turns out there are only 37 that are both unreleased and yet to be leaked. Someone pointed out to me that 'Call Of The Wild' had actually leaked, but was mistakenly titled '9-5 People'. Also for some reason I also had Baby Go-Go marked too.

Here are the remaining 37 tracks...
1985-01-05 Fish Fries
1985-04-16 untitled instrumental
1985-04-19 Evolsidog
1985-04-19 Tibet
1985-05-01 Velvet Kitty Cat (new recording)
1985-05-26 Stella & Charles
1985-05-27 Married Man
1985-05-27 Polka-Dotted Tiger
1985-05-27 Zebra With The Blonde Hair
1985-06-02 Unnamed New Song
1985-07-10 God Is Everywhere
1985-07-25 (U Got The) Good Drawers
1985-11-12 Soul Sister (variation of New Position?)
1985-11-30 An Honest Man (recording 1)
1985-12-09 She Pony
1985-12-17 An Honest Man (recording 2)
1985-12-18 Love On A Blue Train (recording 1 faster version)
1986-01-04 Tricky
1986-02-09 Duet With Dad (AKA Sunday Afternoon)*
1986-02-17 Euphoria Highway (recording 1)
1986-02-17 Euphoria Highway (recording 2) (Only partial leak)
1986-03-11 Fun Love
1986-03-11 Twosday
1986-03-19 And How
1986-05-10 Frustration
1986-05-11 Boy U Bad
1986-05-15 Untitled track
1986-07-22 Dixieland style instrumental
1986-07-22 Untitled Instrumental (AKA. Easy Does It)
1986-09-28 Baby Doll House
1986-10-05 Rescue Me
1986-10-08 Nine (recording 1 'Six And 1/2')
1986-10-16 Untitled Track
1986-11-01 Nine (recording 2)
1986-12-13 Untitled Track
1986-12-26 Ponyride
1986-12-28 Wally (recording 1)

*Top note claims song was only overdubed, although book sugests it was also tracked on this day.

[Edited 6/19/21 2:49am]


Thanks for that! cool

May U Live 2 See The Release of Parade SDE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 06/19/21 4:31am

LoveGalore

VaultCurator said:

Hi Love Galore,

It turns out there are only 37 that are both unreleased and yet to be leaked. Someone pointed out to me that 'Call Of The Wild' had actually leaked, but was mistakenly titled '9-5 People'. Also for some reason I also had Baby Go-Go marked too.

Here are the remaining 37 tracks...
1985-01-05 Fish Fries
1985-04-16 untitled instrumental
1985-04-19 Evolsidog
1985-04-19 Tibet
1985-05-01 Velvet Kitty Cat (new recording)
1985-05-26 Stella & Charles
1985-05-27 Married Man
1985-05-27 Polka-Dotted Tiger
1985-05-27 Zebra With The Blonde Hair
1985-06-02 Unnamed New Song
1985-07-10 God Is Everywhere
1985-07-25 (U Got The) Good Drawers
1985-11-12 Soul Sister (variation of New Position?)
1985-11-30 An Honest Man (recording 1)
1985-12-09 She Pony
1985-12-17 An Honest Man (recording 2)
1985-12-18 Love On A Blue Train (recording 1 faster version)
1986-01-04 Tricky
1986-02-09 Duet With Dad (AKA Sunday Afternoon)*
1986-02-17 Euphoria Highway (recording 1)
1986-02-17 Euphoria Highway (recording 2) (Only partial leak)
1986-03-11 Fun Love
1986-03-11 Twosday
1986-03-19 And How
1986-05-10 Frustration
1986-05-11 Boy U Bad
1986-05-15 Untitled track
1986-07-22 Dixieland style instrumental
1986-07-22 Untitled Instrumental (AKA. Easy Does It)
1986-09-28 Baby Doll House
1986-10-05 Rescue Me
1986-10-08 Nine (recording 1 'Six And 1/2')
1986-10-16 Untitled Track
1986-11-01 Nine (recording 2)
1986-12-13 Untitled Track
1986-12-26 Ponyride
1986-12-28 Wally (recording 1)

*Top note claims song was only overdubed, although book sugests it was also tracked on this day.

[Edited 6/19/21 2:49am]




Legend! Thanks bud.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 06/19/21 6:11am

BartVanHemelen

avatar

soladeo1 said:


Prince recorded 181 songs in 85-86, or around 90 a year...but yet we only know of ~20 songs he recorded in 1980??? Something doesn’t add up... [Edited 6/18/21 21:08pm]

.

He did not have access to the same resources back in 1980, nor might he have been as inspired.

.

Are there gaps in our knowledge of his work from that year? Probably, considering that we've had some unexpected revelations in recent years. However, I highly doubt there are dozens of songs from that era which remain completely undocumented.

.

It's not like 1990 was that great a year for Prince either: http://www.princevault.co...orded_1990

.

© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 06/19/21 8:15am

LoveGalore

BartVanHemelen said:



soladeo1 said:



Prince recorded 181 songs in 85-86, or around 90 a year...but yet we only know of ~20 songs he recorded in 1980??? Something doesn’t add up... [Edited 6/18/21 21:08pm]

.


He did not have access to the same resources back in 1980, nor might he have been as inspired.


.


Are there gaps in our knowledge of his work from that year? Probably, considering that we've had some unexpected revelations in recent years. However, I highly doubt there are dozens of songs from that era which remain completely undocumented.


.


It's not like 1990 was that great a year for Prince either: http://www.princevault.co...orded_1990


.



You lot don't even bother reading the shit you reply to. HOW SIMILAR DO 8 AND 9 LOOK TO YOU.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 06/19/21 3:55pm

BartVanHemelen

avatar

LoveGalore said:

BartVanHemelen said:

.

He did not have access to the same resources back in 1980, nor might he have been as inspired.

.

Are there gaps in our knowledge of his work from that year? Probably, considering that we've had some unexpected revelations in recent years. However, I highly doubt there are dozens of songs from that era which remain completely undocumented.

.

It's not like 1990 was that great a year for Prince either: http://www.princevault.co...orded_1990

.

You lot don't even bother reading the shit you reply to. HOW SIMILAR DO 8 AND 9 LOOK TO YOU.

.

Must be hard to grasp the concept of a comparison. I merely pointed out that 1990 wasn't (as far as we know) very productive either. Notice the word EITHER? There, I but it in bold and italics and all-caps.

© Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for
your use. All rights reserved.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 06/19/21 4:11pm

fortuneandsere
ndipity

How do you get from 700-800 songs in 1985 to 2000 songs in 1989? Hell that's a lot of gaps with missing, unchronicled songs. If these numbers are even remotely close to true, the author appears to have had an impossible job. Over to you VaultCurator.

https://www.youtube.com/w...u273pvAd_w

The world's problems like climate change can only be solved through strategic long-term thinking, not expediency. In other words all the govts. need sacking!

If you can add value to someone's life then why not. Especially if it colors their days...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 06/19/21 5:21pm

LoveGalore

BartVanHemelen said:



LoveGalore said:


BartVanHemelen said:


.


He did not have access to the same resources back in 1980, nor might he have been as inspired.


.


Are there gaps in our knowledge of his work from that year? Probably, considering that we've had some unexpected revelations in recent years. However, I highly doubt there are dozens of songs from that era which remain completely undocumented.


.


It's not like 1990 was that great a year for Prince either: http://www.princevault.co...orded_1990


.



You lot don't even bother reading the shit you reply to. HOW SIMILAR DO 8 AND 9 LOOK TO YOU.

.


Must be hard to grasp the concept of a comparison. I merely pointed out that 1990 wasn't (as far as we know) very productive either. Notice the word EITHER? There, I but it in bold and italics and all-caps.



It's an irrelevant comparison and in 1990 he had an international tour, movie, and slew of side projects he was involved in.

He was doing none of that in 1980.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 06/19/21 5:43pm

rap

BartVanHemelen said:

LoveGalore said:

BartVanHemelen said: You lot don't even bother reading the shit you reply to. HOW SIMILAR DO 8 AND 9 LOOK TO YOU.

.

Must be hard to grasp the concept of a comparison. I merely pointed out that 1990 wasn't (as far as we know) very productive either. Notice the word EITHER? There, I but it in bold and italics and all-caps.

Oh Bort, will you never learn.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 06/20/21 9:48am

lurker316

avatar


I'm about 75% of the way through the book and I have two observations/comments:

1.) In the lead up to SOTT SDE being released, I recall hearing a lot of talk about SOTT not being as much of a solo album as fans generally consider it, and that it was really the last Revolution album. After reading this book, I have no idea how anyone could make that argument.

Yes, Wendy & Lisa were around while he was recording SOTT. In the broadest possible sense they were part of that era and, as such, may have indirectly influenced it. And yes, Wendy & Lisa contributed to a lot of songs during that time period that didn't make the finally cut.

But the final album, as released, was almost devoid of them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "It's Gonna Be a Beautiful Night" is the only song with the Revolution, right? While Wendy & Lisa had done a lot of work on Strange Relationship, the version that appears on the album had most of their overdubs removed, right? Even if you give them credit for that song as well, that's still only 2 songs out of 16.



[Edited 6/20/21 10:04am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 06/20/21 10:03am

scififilmnerd

avatar

lurker316 said:


I'm about 75% of the way through the book and I have two observations/comments:

1.) In the lead up to SOTT SDE being released, I recall hearing a lot of talk about SOTT not being as much of a solor album as fans generally consider it, and that it was really the last Revolution album. After reading this book, I have no idea how anyone could make that argument.

Yes, Wendy & Lisa were around while he was recording SOTT. In the broadest possible sense they were part of that ear and, as such, may have indirectly influenced it. And yes, Wendy & Lisa contributed to a lot of songs during that time period that didn't make the finally cut.

But the final album, as released, was almost devoid of them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "It's Gonna Be a Beautiful Night" is the only song with the Revolution, right? While Wendy & Lisa had done a lot of work on Strange Relationship, the version that appears on the album had most of their overdubs removed, right? Even if you give them credit for that song as well, that's still only 2 songs out of 16.



They are also on Slow Love. biggrin

rainbow woot! FREE THE 29 MAY 1993 COME CONFIGURATION! woot! rainbow
rainbow woot! FREE THE JANUARY 1994 THE GOLD ALBUM CONFIGURATION woot! rainbow
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 06/20/21 10:03am

lurker316

avatar


2.) I hadn't realized until I read this book that Eric Leeds is generally not a fan of Prince's music. There are many quotes hinting at that, and at one point he's quoted as saying: "I'm not even listening to the song half the time because Prince doesn't pay me to like his music, he's paying me to play it."

I found some old threads here on the Org talking about Leeds' opinions of Prince's music. As is often the case, those threads turned into an argument between two extremes: on one side, people tried spinning Leed's comments to suggest there was nothing remotely critical in them about Prince's music -- they felt the controversy was manufactured. On the other side, people condemed Leeds as though he was a Judas and faulted him for taking a paycheck from Prince.

I guess I came down in the middle. On the one hand, it's obvious he definitely didn't like a lot of Prince's music, and no amount of spin will change that. But on the other hand, nothing he said was meanspirted. He apparently respected Prince the person and the musician, but Prince's music simply wasn't his cup of tea. Even when he says Lisa's compositions were more complex and sophisicated than Prince's, to me, it comes across as a neutral observation, not an insult.

I respect that Leeds is offering his honest opinion. Many of Prince's associates were in absolutely awe of him, to the point of being syncophants and "yes men". It was probably good for Prince to have someone in his camp who didn't worship every noise that Prince created. Having a contrarian point of view can be healthy.




[Edited 6/20/21 14:27pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 06/20/21 11:38am

LoveGalore

lurker316 said:


2.) I hadn't realized until I read this book that Eric Leeds is generally not a fan of Prince's music. There are many quotes hinting at that, and at one point he's quoted as saying: "I'm not even listening to the song half the time because Prince doesn't pay me like his music, he's paying me to play it."

I found some old threads here on the Org talking about Leeds' opions of Prince's music. As is often the case, those threads were typically turned into an argument between two extremes: Some people tried spinning Leed's comments to suggest there was nothing remotely critical in them about Prince's music and the controversy was manufactured. On the other side, some people condemed Leeds as though he was a Judas and faulted him for taking a paycheck from Prince.

I guess I came down in the middle. On the one hand, it's obvious he definitely didn't like a lot of Prince's music, and no amount of spin will change that. But on the other hand, nothing he said was meanspirted. He apparently respected Prince the person and the musician, but Prince's music simply wasn't his cup of tea. Even when he's quoted saying things like Lisa's compositions were more complex and sophisicated than Prince's, to me it comes across as a neutral observation, not an insult.

I respect that he's being honest. It often seems that many of Prince's associates were in absolutely awe of him, to the point of being syncophants and "yes men". I think it was probably good for Prince to have someone in his camp who didn't worship every noise that Prince created. Having a contrarian point of view can be health.



[Edited 6/20/21 10:09am]



For sure, I agree with everything you say on this.

I do think that it was a bit disappointing when I first read him saying he wasn't a fan of Prince's music and this was years ago (post mortem of course). Given Eric is one of Prince's longest ever collaborators, one would hope he enjoyed the wonderful music he had a part in creating. So many songs of Prince's are iconic in part because of Eric's contribution. The man who played on Crucial, Adore, Mountains, Gett Off, and countless others didn't even like the songs? Fucking hell, it is painful to think about.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 06/20/21 1:30pm

nayroo2002

avatar

cool.

But, where's the book review thread with the link to buy it?

You all just assume we all have it already.

The original release thread has long expired.

This and many other very important/official Prince releases are buried in obscure threads.

Not the "org" i remember.

confused

"Whatever skin we're in
we all need 2 b friends"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 06/20/21 2:16pm

LoveGalore

nayroo2002 said:

cool.


But, where's the book review thread with the link to buy it?


You all just assume we all have it already.


The original release thread has long expired.


This and many other very important/official Prince releases are buried in obscure threads.


Not the "org" i remember.


confused



It's still called the org, same aesthetic, and Bart is still here. Everything else is ephemeral.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 06/20/21 3:47pm

wilmer

lurker316 said:


2.) I hadn't realized until I read this book that Eric Leeds is generally not a fan of Prince's music. There are many quotes hinting at that, and at one point he's quoted as saying: "I'm not even listening to the song half the time because Prince doesn't pay me to like his music, he's paying me to play it."

I found some old threads here on the Org talking about Leeds' opinions of Prince's music. As is often the case, those threads turned into an argument between two extremes: on one side, people tried spinning Leed's comments to suggest there was nothing remotely critical in them about Prince's music -- they felt the controversy was manufactured. On the other side, people condemed Leeds as though he was a Judas and faulted him for taking a paycheck from Prince.

I guess I came down in the middle. On the one hand, it's obvious he definitely didn't like a lot of Prince's music, and no amount of spin will change that. But on the other hand, nothing he said was meanspirted. He apparently respected Prince the person and the musician, but Prince's music simply wasn't his cup of tea. Even when he says Lisa's compositions were more complex and sophisicated than Prince's, to me, it comes across as a neutral observation, not an insult.

I respect that Leeds is offering his honest opinion. Many of Prince's associates were in absolutely awe of him, to the point of being syncophants and "yes men". It was probably good for Prince to have someone in his camp who didn't worship every noise that Prince created. Having a contrarian point of view can be healthy.





[Edited 6/20/21 14:27pm]



I feel exactly like you with regards to Eric's comments about Prince's music. I heard him talk about this on the Juice Podcast and he sounded genuine on this. It is not a diss, it's just that his idols are people from another era. He came from a different musical sensibility. Even though it is a little bit disappointing, I get it and I respect it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 06/21/21 12:31am

fredmagnus

I'm so glad i received the book as scheduled...

Though i'm far from done with reading the whole book, i've already learned so many things...

For instance, "Evolsidog" was reported as being a Funk track on the old Turn It Up book but what we learn here is that it's in fact a reggae flavoured song that features Prince using steel drums & a backwards guitar. Wow eek

[Edited 6/21/21 0:33am]

[Edited 6/21/21 0:36am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 06/21/21 12:32am

fredmagnus

.

[Edited 6/21/21 0:32am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 06/21/21 7:43am

LILpoundCAKE

avatar

fredmagnus said:

I'm so glad i received the book as scheduled...

Though i'm far from done with reading the whole book, i've already learned so many things...

For instance, "Evolsidog" was reported as being a Funk track on the old Turn It Up book but what we learn here is that it's in fact a reggae flavoured song that features Prince using steel drums & a backwards guitar. Wow eek

[Edited 6/21/21 0:33am]

[Edited 6/21/21 0:36am]



steel drums and backwards guitar eek I want it more than ever now smile

May U Live 2 See The Release of Parade SDE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 06/21/21 6:40pm

tab32792

lurker316 said:


I'm about 75% of the way through the book and I have two observations/comments:

1.) In the lead up to SOTT SDE being released, I recall hearing a lot of talk about SOTT not being as much of a solo album as fans generally consider it, and that it was really the last Revolution album. After reading this book, I have no idea how anyone could make that argument.

Yes, Wendy & Lisa were around while he was recording SOTT. In the broadest possible sense they were part of that era and, as such, may have indirectly influenced it. And yes, Wendy & Lisa contributed to a lot of songs during that time period that didn't make the finally cut.

But the final album, as released, was almost devoid of them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "It's Gonna Be a Beautiful Night" is the only song with the Revolution, right? While Wendy & Lisa had done a lot of work on Strange Relationship, the version that appears on the album had most of their overdubs removed, right? Even if you give them credit for that song as well, that's still only 2 songs out of 16.




[Edited 6/20/21 10:04am]





EGGZACKLY
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 06/21/21 6:44pm

tab32792

lurker316 said:


2.) I hadn't realized until I read this book that Eric Leeds is generally not a fan of Prince's music. There are many quotes hinting at that, and at one point he's quoted as saying: "I'm not even listening to the song half the time because Prince doesn't pay me to like his music, he's paying me to play it."

I found some old threads here on the Org talking about Leeds' opinions of Prince's music. As is often the case, those threads turned into an argument between two extremes: on one side, people tried spinning Leed's comments to suggest there was nothing remotely critical in them about Prince's music -- they felt the controversy was manufactured. On the other side, people condemed Leeds as though he was a Judas and faulted him for taking a paycheck from Prince.

I guess I came down in the middle. On the one hand, it's obvious he definitely didn't like a lot of Prince's music, and no amount of spin will change that. But on the other hand, nothing he said was meanspirted. He apparently respected Prince the person and the musician, but Prince's music simply wasn't his cup of tea. Even when he says Lisa's compositions were more complex and sophisicated than Prince's, to me, it comes across as a neutral observation, not an insult.

I respect that Leeds is offering his honest opinion. Many of Prince's associates were in absolutely awe of him, to the point of being syncophants and "yes men". It was probably good for Prince to have someone in his camp who didn't worship every noise that Prince created. Having a contrarian point of view can be healthy.





[Edited 6/20/21 14:27pm]




I also think that Eric just wanted it to be known and understood that he was a musician before Prince even though almost nobody heard of him outside of that. If you didn’t like his music that much why stay? Lol Prince said it himself, I don’t pay you to like my music. I pay you to play it
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 06/22/21 8:21am

udo

avatar

I do not want to complain here, just stating some facts.

Prince and the Purple Rain Era Studio Sessions: 1983 and 1984 (Prince Studio Sessions)

22.86 x 16 x 3.81 cm

Prince and the Parade and Sign O' The Times Era Studio Sessions: 1985 and 1986 (Prince Studio Sessions)

(bound first edition)

16.21 x 4.9 x 23.83 cm

.

I.e.: the newer book is remarkably smaller than the previous book.

This even though the newer book has more pages. (554 vs 728)

So why did they not make it a same or very similar form factor?

Right now it appears that even book publishers do not know how to produce book releases of a series.

(same as the Estate/WB/etc w.r.t. SDE editions)

.

The storyline itself (in the newer book) is nice reading and shows some previously unknown facts.

Pills and thrills and daffodils will kill... If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 06/22/21 10:20am

PJMcGee

avatar

The new book is larger.

Height = 23.83 versus 22.86
Width = 16.21 versus 16
Thickness = 4.9 versus 3.81

So roughly, 1 cm taller, slightly wider, 1 cm thicker.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 06/22/21 1:35pm

Vannormal

-

bunch of size queens !

wink))

-

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts" (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 06/22/21 1:40pm

jdcxc

tab32792 said:

lurker316 said:


2.) I hadn't realized until I read this book that Eric Leeds is generally not a fan of Prince's music. There are many quotes hinting at that, and at one point he's quoted as saying: "I'm not even listening to the song half the time because Prince doesn't pay me to like his music, he's paying me to play it."

I found some old threads here on the Org talking about Leeds' opinions of Prince's music. As is often the case, those threads turned into an argument between two extremes: on one side, people tried spinning Leed's comments to suggest there was nothing remotely critical in them about Prince's music -- they felt the controversy was manufactured. On the other side, people condemed Leeds as though he was a Judas and faulted him for taking a paycheck from Prince.

I guess I came down in the middle. On the one hand, it's obvious he definitely didn't like a lot of Prince's music, and no amount of spin will change that. But on the other hand, nothing he said was meanspirted. He apparently respected Prince the person and the musician, but Prince's music simply wasn't his cup of tea. Even when he says Lisa's compositions were more complex and sophisicated than Prince's, to me, it comes across as a neutral observation, not an insult.

I respect that Leeds is offering his honest opinion. Many of Prince's associates were in absolutely awe of him, to the point of being syncophants and "yes men". It was probably good for Prince to have someone in his camp who didn't worship every noise that Prince created. Having a contrarian point of view can be healthy.





[Edited 6/20/21 14:27pm]




I also think that Eric just wanted it to be known and understood that he was a musician before Prince even though almost nobody heard of him outside of that. If you didn’t like his music that much why stay? Lol Prince said it himself, I don’t pay you to like my music. I pay you to play it


Eric is just bitter that Miles chose Prince over him. Lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 06/22/21 1:58pm

Vannormal

-

Eric never was or is bitter.

I'd rather think Prince was (at the end).

-

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. And wiser people so full of doubts" (Bertrand Russell 1872-1972)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 06/22/21 7:29pm

paraded

wilmer said:

lurker316 said:


2.) I hadn't realized until I read this book that Eric Leeds is generally not a fan of Prince's music. There are many quotes hinting at that, and at one point he's quoted as saying: "I'm not even listening to the song half the time because Prince doesn't pay me to like his music, he's paying me to play it."

I found some old threads here on the Org talking about Leeds' opinions of Prince's music. As is often the case, those threads turned into an argument between two extremes: on one side, people tried spinning Leed's comments to suggest there was nothing remotely critical in them about Prince's music -- they felt the controversy was manufactured. On the other side, people condemed Leeds as though he was a Judas and faulted him for taking a paycheck from Prince.

I guess I came down in the middle. On the one hand, it's obvious he definitely didn't like a lot of Prince's music, and no amount of spin will change that. But on the other hand, nothing he said was meanspirted. He apparently respected Prince the person and the musician, but Prince's music simply wasn't his cup of tea. Even when he says Lisa's compositions were more complex and sophisicated than Prince's, to me, it comes across as a neutral observation, not an insult.

I respect that Leeds is offering his honest opinion. Many of Prince's associates were in absolutely awe of him, to the point of being syncophants and "yes men". It was probably good for Prince to have someone in his camp who didn't worship every noise that Prince created. Having a contrarian point of view can be healthy.




[Edited 6/20/21 14:27pm]

I feel exactly like you with regards to Eric's comments about Prince's music. I heard him talk about this on the Juice Podcast and he sounded genuine on this. It is not a diss, it's just that his idols are people from another era. He came from a different musical sensibility. Even though it is a little bit disappointing, I get it and I respect it.

Even if Eric wasn't personaly a fan of a lot of Prince's music, even much of the music he created with Prince, he still considered Prince a hero of his and a genius. There was an interview I read a while ago where he is clearly in awe of Prince as a musician. And what's more, he acknowledges that guys like Miles Davis -- who was one of Eric's greatest inspirations -- felt a musical kinship with Prince moreso than they did with more sophisticated counterparts. So Eric definitely has a lot of admiration for Prince's musical universe even if he also has ambivlance about a lot of the individual works.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 06/23/21 3:49am

jaawwnn

lurker316 said:


I'm about 75% of the way through the book and I have two observations/comments:

1.) In the lead up to SOTT SDE being released, I recall hearing a lot of talk about SOTT not being as much of a solo album as fans generally consider it, and that it was really the last Revolution album. After reading this book, I have no idea how anyone could make that argument.

Yes, Wendy & Lisa were around while he was recording SOTT. In the broadest possible sense they were part of that era and, as such, may have indirectly influenced it. And yes, Wendy & Lisa contributed to a lot of songs during that time period that didn't make the finally cut.

But the final album, as released, was almost devoid of them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "It's Gonna Be a Beautiful Night" is the only song with the Revolution, right? While Wendy & Lisa had done a lot of work on Strange Relationship, the version that appears on the album had most of their overdubs removed, right? Even if you give them credit for that song as well, that's still only 2 songs out of 16.


I'll defend W&L all day and night because I think they're great musicians and songwriters in their own right and had a very obvious influence on Prince's music... but I do agree pretty much with all of this. SOTT was a solo album, was always a solo album, and will always be a solo album. It's right there in the title. Hell, when it comes down to it even the Revolution albums are all Prince anyway.

The influences imho come out in the inflections of the music, same as how the Time is Prince & Morris (and occasionally Jesse I suppose? I don't hear any Jam & Lewis in it though). I can see the connections between the W&L solo stuff and Prince's Revolution work but it's kind of in a backwards manner, because the songs aren't being written by Prince, so you have to decide if you like W&L as songwriters as well. If you don't like their songs you're got gonna care one bit about the "vibes." I get it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 06/23/21 10:16am

Robbajobba

avatar

jaawwnn said:

lurker316 said:


I'm about 75% of the way through the book and I have two observations/comments:

1.) In the lead up to SOTT SDE being released, I recall hearing a lot of talk about SOTT not being as much of a solo album as fans generally consider it, and that it was really the last Revolution album. After reading this book, I have no idea how anyone could make that argument.

Yes, Wendy & Lisa were around while he was recording SOTT. In the broadest possible sense they were part of that era and, as such, may have indirectly influenced it. And yes, Wendy & Lisa contributed to a lot of songs during that time period that didn't make the finally cut.

But the final album, as released, was almost devoid of them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "It's Gonna Be a Beautiful Night" is the only song with the Revolution, right? While Wendy & Lisa had done a lot of work on Strange Relationship, the version that appears on the album had most of their overdubs removed, right? Even if you give them credit for that song as well, that's still only 2 songs out of 16.


I'll defend W&L all day and night because I think they're great musicians and songwriters in their own right and had a very obvious influence on Prince's music... but I do agree pretty much with all of this. SOTT was a solo album, was always a solo album, and will always be a solo album. It's right there in the title. Hell, when it comes down to it even the Revolution albums are all Prince anyway.

The influences imho come out in the inflections of the music, same as how the Time is Prince & Morris (and occasionally Jesse I suppose? I don't hear any Jam & Lewis in it though). I can see the connections between the W&L solo stuff and Prince's Revolution work but it's kind of in a backwards manner, because the songs aren't being written by Prince, so you have to decide if you like W&L as songwriters as well. If you don't like their songs you're got gonna care one bit about the "vibes." I get it.

Yeah, what I'm taking from the book is that "Parade" was an incredibly collaborative album for Prince, given the significant input from the Revolution, Clare Fisher, David Z & Mazarati on 'Kiss'.... and that SOTT was a total volte face, a deliberate shunning of those outside influences, and very much a solo record ... Which I guess was always the consensus (at least, before the SDE publicity) - it's just interesting to read about the events leading up to that decision in such detail.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > *Spoiler Warning* Prince and the Parade / SOTT era studio sessions.