EmmaMcG said:

dodger said:

I'm not into these photo-books (what's the point, you'd flick through it a couple of times and that's it) but I bought 21 Nights for the CD. I know it could have been better but that's a different thread..

.

I'd happily pay $75 if this new book came with music, but of course it won't

I don't see the appeal of photo books either. What's the point in looking at pictures of him? And if you want to look at pictures of Prince, there's thousands of them on Google images and they're all free. You can print them out and everything. 21 Nights was OK. But I wouldn't spend 75 quid for it.

Just so I get it clear in my mind...are you saying you won't spend 75 quid for a book? I wasn't sure.

EmmaMcG said:

TwiliteKid said:

Isn't quid slang for pounds?

Not in Ireland it isn't. We don't use pounds.

It's being facetious. It means pounds. Even in its own county, if doesn't care about Euros.

iZsaZsa said:

dodger said:

iZsaZsa said:

This thread is cracking me up. Now there is a weasel named Beyonce on here calling fans sheep.

😂 and some fool talking about Pritt Stick

I have 3 sticks on my desk. Elmer's.

I am not new but here I just have better things to do then obsess and coment all the time. Its all about the music and nothing else really..but everyone is different.

pricetag said:

pricetag said:

EmmaMcG said:

pricetag said:

Just so I get it clear in my mind...are you saying you won't spend 75 quid for a book? I wasn't sure.

Not for a book of photographs. I have spent a lot more than that on other, real books though.

You took it seriously. What a bore.

EmmaMcG said:

pricetag said:

It's being facetious. It means pounds. Even in its own county, if doesn't care about Euros.

Is English a second language for you? I have no idea what you're talking about. That's a joke by the way. Even though I still don't know what you're trying to say. [Edited 1/27/19 10:25am]

We got here because of your own, staggeringly narcissistic incoherence. Think about it.

pricetag said:

EmmaMcG said:

pricetag said:

You took it seriously. What a bore.

Oh, were you being sarcastic? It looks like I was giving you more credit than you deserved.

...aaaaand you brought it back to YOU again. What a narcissist.

pricetag said:

Once again, jeff KATZ should release a book as well instead of posting Mother Nature pictures on his FB account....

Ramzoo said:

Once again, jeff KATZ should release a book as well instead of posting Mother Nature pictures on his FB account....

100% Agree.

With respect to the others, Katz is the only one with legit creditials (and not shepherded by Prince). When you see's Katz's work, the subject of Prince, his image, and photography suddenly gets serious.

pricetag said:

Ramzoo said:

Once again, jeff KATZ should release a book as well instead of posting Mother Nature pictures on his FB account....

100% Agree.

With respect to the others, Katz is the only one with legit creditials (and not shepherded by Prince). When you see's Katz's work, the subject of Prince, his image, and photography suddenly gets serious.

Randee has worked with a lot of big name artists.

motherfunka said:

pricetag said:

100% Agree.

With respect to the others, Katz is the only one with legit creditials (and not shepherded by Prince). When you see's Katz's work, the subject of Prince, his image, and photography suddenly gets serious.

Randee has worked with a lot of big name artists.

Oh, Christ. There's always one. Why do you bother?

pricetag said:

motherfunka said:

Randee has worked with a lot of big name artists.

Oh, Christ. There's always one. Why do you bother?

I bother because people like you make statements that aren't based on fact and I'm going to call you out on it. The word is credentials, not creditials.

motherfunka said:

pricetag said:

Oh, Christ. There's always one. Why do you bother?

I bother because people like you make statements that aren't based on fact and I'm going to call you out on it. The word is credentials, not creditials.

You're just not impressive. Sorry. You honed in on half a statement and decided to leave out, very conveniently, the second-half; which is what binds the point together and makes it so salient. Katz has more credential because he wasn't "sherpherded" by Prince (unlike St. Nicholas and the rest who took pictures of Prince because they were mentored by him). Katz came in already well-known and established. Do you not know the history of this?

It's no good "calling people out" on things you evidently know nothing about. Hence, my "why bother" response. Also, your point about spelling is off-topic and, of course, another weakness.

sirweasel said:

I am not new but here I just have better things to do then obsess and coment all the time. Its all about the music and nothing else really..but everyone is different.

I understand.

iZsaZsa said:

sirweasel said:

I am not new but here I just have better things to do then obsess and coment all the time. Its all about the music and nothing else really..but everyone is different.

I understand.

Yes, good point. I'm really glad sirweasel spends their time productively (something I always wondered about) and, yes, someone's got to say it...it really is all about the music. Prince was a musician people! Let's not forget that!

pinkcashmere23 said: