well, I don't actually know what you're referring to, but that's OK. As I said before, I'm pretty sure Laura can handle herself and I doubt she's as perturbed by me as you apparantly are. I kinda get the impression she enjoys arguing and I think she's rather appreciates having people who spar with her rather than, say, ignore her.

-

Anyway, that's all I have to say about this silliness. This thread is supposed to be where the few people who are interested in hashing over the estate issues can do so.

Mumio said:

disch said:

Mumio, if anything about this forum is enraging you the point that you need to erupt in cursing, maybe step away from the computer for a bit? just a thought.

-

As for my "needling" Laura and "trolling": All I can say is Laura is a big girl, has been here for many many many years, and I'm certain (as evidenced by her rate of posting, which far exceeds mine) that anything I post is not disuading her in any way. (As for the particular post of mine that you quoted below, I had originally responded to someone else entirely with a comment, Laura jumpted in with a reponse to me, I responded with the comment below, then Laura responded with a somewhat snarky comment back at me... and it ended with that. If you're going to accuse me of "trolling," at least read the whole conversation! Geesh)

Enraged? Nope. I'm grown, cursing is allowed My comment is more directed toward repeated behavior on your part. Not just this one time. You know what I am talking about A one or two time behavior doesn't require commenting on.

nelcp777 said:

There is a DNA request (Writ of Mamandus) for paternity testing of Ogeda Patrick filed in the court documents February 23rd.

I found an Ogeda LeJuan Patrick serving 25 years in Georgia.

This is the same name on the Probate Court Notices.

nelcp777 said:

cloveringold85 said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

http://prince.org/msg/12/233940

I found an old org thread from 2007 where it was discussed that the property across from

PP (L4OA real estate) had been put up on the market.

Malbena was the one that said her researched showed it was L4OA parcels of land. I wonder if she remembers this and why it was taken off?

Or was it Cousins and not P that put the property on the market?

I do not argue. I present information. Many us want to know why you keep asking the same questions over and over again.

disch said:

well, I don't actually know what you're referring to, but that's OK. As I said before, I'm pretty sure Laura can handle herself and I doubt she's as perturbed by me as you apparantly are. I kinda get the impression she enjoys arguing and I think she's rather appreciates having people who spar with her rather than, say, ignore her.

-

Anyway, that's all I have to say about this silliness. This thread is supposed to be where the few people who are interested in hashing over the estate issues can do so.

Mumio said:

Enraged? Nope. I'm grown, cursing is allowed My comment is more directed toward repeated behavior on your part. Not just this one time. You know what I am talking about A one or two time behavior doesn't require commenting on.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

nelcp777 said:

There is a DNA request (Writ of Mamandus) for paternity testing of Ogeda Patrick filed in the court documents February 23rd.

I found an Ogeda LeJuan Patrick serving 25 years in Georgia.

This is the same name on the Probate Court Notices.

That is the same person serving jail time.

laurarichardson said:

You keep asking me about drug addiction and if I believe he was addicted to these drugs. You keep asking about the cancer rumor and that has been explained about a half a dozen times.

It does not matter if you ask the same question 2 times or 20 times it makes appear that something is clearly wrong or that you have some agenda.

I am saying do as you please but stop acting as if you do not know what you are doing.

disch said:

This is actually pretty funny. Why do I post the “same questions”? I dunno, guess I haven’t seen a good answer? Isn’t the entire nature of conversation about issues related to princes death about people just repeating the same thoughts over and over, given that no new facts have come out in like a year? Regarding the estate specifically, in the 13 THREADS about this topic how many posts have I made? Pretty darn few — go ahead and count if you’d like; I certainly am not going to. - Anyway, carry on with estate discussions. I’ll continue to post when and what I feel like, and the same rules apply: if you’re not interested, then scroll on by! And if you think my posts violate board rules, take it up with the moderator. Don’t hijack a thread to pick a personal spat. - laurarichardson said:

I do not argue. I present information. Many us want to know why you keep asking the same questions over and over again.

[Edited 3/1/18 4:26am]

[Edited 3/1/18 7:35am]

I think we can all agree that the estate has, in part, been hijacked by not only family but hangers-on, wannabes, and nefarious advisors. Instead of putting attention to the legacy, they have walked over it to get their hands on anything and everything. As LR has said, even if he had a will or similar document in place, we can now assume these people would have contested it to the bitter end.

1Sasha said:

I think we can all agree that the estate has, in part, been hijacked by not only family but hangers-on, wannabes, and nefarious advisors. Instead of putting attention to the legacy, they have walked over it to get their hands on anything and everything. As LR has said, even if he had a will or similar document in place, we can now assume these people would have contested it to the bitter end.

Of course they would have because some feel that are owed something or entitled. No reason to keep two versions of the NPG going and band configuration that he was not even working with when he died.

One example of an unnessarcy cash grab for people who need to go and stand on their own two feet.

I do have to say I saw The Revolution last year and loved them. They were absolutely terrific. I don't mind them going out and doing their bit, but the others - no no no.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

nelcp777 said:

I don't think Comerica can sell the land for less than 90% of the market value. I believe I read that in some of the earlier documents.

^^^ This is true.

They would have to get an Order from the Judge to sell for less than 90%.

If this is true, it would probably be a problem for the County. I lived in Albertville for several years and the County would have to be involved in approving. Rofigan ?

Comerica would assuredly get more money from a private developer.

While I believe Laura is correct that generational wealth does not exist if people sell off everything. This is a different case. The famalies will have enough of the money they haven't earned. Comerica should sell.

Rev said:

disch said:

This is actually pretty funny. Why do I post the “same questions”? I dunno, guess I haven’t seen a good answer? Isn’t the entire nature of conversation about issues related to princes death about people just repeating the same thoughts over and over, given that no new facts have come out in like a year? Regarding the estate specifically, in the 13 THREADS about this topic how many posts have I made? Pretty darn few — go ahead and count if you’d like; I certainly am not going to. - Anyway, carry on with estate discussions. I’ll continue to post when and what I feel like, and the same rules apply: if you’re not interested, then scroll on by! And if you think my posts violate board rules, take it up with the moderator. Don’t hijack a thread to pick a personal spat. - laurarichardson said:

I do not argue. I present information. Many us want to know why you keep asking the same questions over and over again.

[Edited 3/1/18 4:26am]

.

If you don't mind me butting in. In Disch's defense; he is not a Troll. He is here quite regularly and shares his own ideas/questions and adds to the conversation(s).

1Sasha said:

I think we can all agree that the estate has, in part, been hijacked by not only family but hangers-on, wannabes, and nefarious advisors. Instead of putting attention to the legacy, they have walked over it to get their hands on anything and everything. As LR has said, even if he had a will or similar document in place, we can now assume these people would have contested it to the bitter end.

.

rogifan said:

Rev said:

If this is true, it would probably be a problem for the County. I lived in Albertville for several years and the County would have to be involved in approving. Rofigan ?

Comerica would assuredly get more money from a private developer.

While I believe Laura is correct that generational wealth does not exist if people sell off everything. This is a different case. The famalies will have enough of the money they haven't earned. Comerica should sell.

That part of the city council meeting wasn’t videotaped. All we have is this document: https://chanhassen.novusa...ItemID=155

After checking out the document. It's obvious these lots are ready for development. Up to and including the marsh lands. Easily 160+ acres to make money on.

Rev said:

Rev said:

cloveringold85 said:

disch said:

This is actually pretty funny. Why do I post the “same questions”? I dunno, guess I haven’t seen a good answer? Isn’t the entire nature of conversation about issues related to princes death about people just repeating the same thoughts over and over, given that no new facts have come out in like a year? Regarding the estate specifically, in the 13 THREADS about this topic how many posts have I made? Pretty darn few — go ahead and count if you’d like; I certainly am not going to. - Anyway, carry on with estate discussions. I’ll continue to post when and what I feel like, and the same rules apply: if you’re not interested, then scroll on by! And if you think my posts violate board rules, take it up with the moderator. Don’t hijack a thread to pick a personal spat. - laurarichardson said: [Edited 3/1/18 4:26am]

.

If you don't mind me butting in. In Disch's defense; he is not a Troll. He is here quite regularly and shares his own ideas/questions and adds to the conversation(s).

PennyPurple said:

cloveringold85 said:

.

If you don't mind me butting in. In Disch's defense; he is not a Troll. He is here quite regularly and shares his own ideas/questions and adds to the conversation(s).

co-sign

rogifan said:

Rev said:

After checking out the document. It's obvious these lots are ready for development. Up to and including the marsh lands. Easily 160+ acres to make money on.

Why would the Estate want to be in residential property development? Anyway they haven't sold anything yet so it’s entirely possible it does end up going to a developer.

Does anyone know the zoning for the property location? It may be impossible to develop much of it due to zoning laws. Also, (at least in NY) wetlands are protected, more so every year, so that may have an impact on what can be done with the property. Does anyone know the details?

thanks, ~~DD55

DD55 said:

DD55 said:

I hate seeing the word deceased.

SNJ have filed a petition contesting Coamerica and attorney's fees: http://www.mncourts.gov/m...tition.pdf

The fees do sound excessive to me. For example, $1,431 to write a memo. The petition is requesting that Coamerica's attorneys be placed on a flat fee arrangement.

So I have a few questions for Orgers who are in the legal field:

1. Why are they paying by the hour anyway? 2. Why did the court allow hourly fees? 3. What criteria have to be met to declare that the estate is settled?

rogifan said:

Rev said:

After checking out the document. It's obvious these lots are ready for development. Up to and including the marsh lands. Easily 160+ acres to make money on.

Why would the Estate want to be in residential property development? Anyway they haven't sold anything yet so it’s entirely possible it does end up going to a developer.

They have sold at least one of Prince's properties.

tmo1965 said:

SNJ have filed a petition contesting Coamerica and attorney's fees: http://www.mncourts.gov/m...tition.pdf

The fees do sound excessive to me. For example, $1,431 to write a memo. The petition is requesting that Coamerica's attorneys be placed on a flat fee arrangement.

So I have a few questions for Orgers who are in the legal field:

1. Why are they paying by the hour anyway? 2. Why did the court allow hourly fees? 3. What criteria have to be met to declare that the estate is settled?

I thought they were charging a flat fee and are now asking for a different arrangement.