independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Record label says it didn’t get what it paid for in deal for Prince’s music rights
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 04/14/17 2:33pm

IstenSzek

avatar

and true love lives on lollipops and crisps
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 04/14/17 2:38pm

rogifan

laurarichardson said:

rogifan said:


What was/is their alternative?

Well WSJ report no other companies even got a shot at bidding. So will no what other offers could have been avaliable or if the WB makes any offer moot. It is a giant fuck up and the lawsuits will be flying.

Yeah well both Londell and Koppelman went on the record saying that story wasn't accurate. Just because the Wall Street Journal reports it doesn't make it true. I'm not defending anyone here, and that includes Tyka and Omarr.
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 04/14/17 2:43pm

rogifan

donnyenglish said:



rogifan said:


laurarichardson said:
--It is stupid and backs up the complaints that Tyka and Omarr had about Breamer and McMillian who is an entertainment attorney WTF

What was/is their alternative?


I am certain that the Universal required a disclosure of any rights to the material. Assuming that no such disclosure was made then they should be able to terminate the contract and get their money back.



Again, this is some amateur stuff on the seller's side? It seems rushed and sloppy. Maybe that is why it was only for $30M. It was an "as is" purchase, but we assumed that related to the contents of the vault. If he had 300 finished albums that were all masterpieces, then they got a great deal. If the vault just has material like unfinished demos, extended stuff, mediocre quality live recordings, outtakes, etc., that only us diehards on this site would purchase, then the deal may be better for the heirs. But, Universal didn't go into this thinking that the rights to 20 years of the vault material that they purchased the rights belonged to someone else.



Matter of time before the heirs file a malpractice lawsuit. This thing is a mess. And with the release of the investigation file on Monday, it is going to be a tough time for fans. I swear, I wish we were in charge.


McMillan and Koppelman were interviewed in Billboard when this deal was announced. They made sure it happened right before the Grammys. If Universal ends up terminating this deal it's going to make the two of them look like incompetent buffoons. I have a feeling there's more to the story that we don't know.
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 04/14/17 2:47pm

morningsong

justAmeda said:

morningsong said:

I take it those lovely cryptic tweets have stopped.

hope so! I know recently that Sharon, Norrine, and Alfred got an emergency protection order granted against Londell



Sounds like they're closing ranks.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 04/14/17 2:53pm

NewpowerScarfo

avatar

Universal must didn't want the masters to "Poom Poom" and "Purple & Gold".

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 04/14/17 3:57pm

Ingela

Oh this is perfect. lol

Prince is Prince even in the after life.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 04/14/17 4:27pm

laurarichardso
n

NewpowerScarfo said:

Universal must didn't want the masters to "Poom Poom" and "Purple & Gold".


---- Maybe they want go get what they paid for.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 04/14/17 5:10pm

laurarichardso
n

rogifan said:

donnyenglish said:



rogifan said:


laurarichardson said:
--It is stupid and backs up the complaints that Tyka and Omarr had about Breamer and McMillian who is an entertainment attorney WTF

What was/is their alternative?


I am certain that the Universal required a disclosure of any rights to the material. Assuming that no such disclosure was made then they should be able to terminate the contract and get their money back.



Again, this is some amateur stuff on the seller's side? It seems rushed and sloppy. Maybe that is why it was only for $30M. It was an "as is" purchase, but we assumed that related to the contents of the vault. If he had 300 finished albums that were all masterpieces, then they got a great deal. If the vault just has material like unfinished demos, extended stuff, mediocre quality live recordings, outtakes, etc., that only us diehards on this site would purchase, then the deal may be better for the heirs. But, Universal didn't go into this thinking that the rights to 20 years of the vault material that they purchased the rights belonged to someone else.



Matter of time before the heirs file a malpractice lawsuit. This thing is a mess. And with the release of the investigation file on Monday, it is going to be a tough time for fans. I swear, I wish we were in charge.


McMillan and Koppelman were interviewed in Billboard when this deal was announced. They made sure it happened right before the Grammys. If Universal ends up terminating this deal it's going to make the two of them look like incompetent buffoons. I have a feeling there's more to the story that we don't know.

____ Do you think a company like UMG is going ask for their money back for no reason? Something is wrong with this deal. Anyone know matter of what their background can be crooked and Londell had problems when he worked for the Jacksons and he offered Tkya a 10 million dollar low cost loan and was stupid enough to put it in writing. I am not so sure how much Koppelman was involved he could be clueless. All I know is that for years everyone said Prince was paranoid and controlling maybe he knew their were crooks looking to steal.




he Jackson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 04/14/17 6:09pm

NewpowerScarfo

avatar

laurarichardson said:

NewpowerScarfo said:

Universal must didn't want the masters to "Poom Poom" and "Purple & Gold".

---- Maybe they want go get what they paid for.

That's assuming they had an clue on what exactly they're paying for. Clearly there was miscommunication.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 04/15/17 12:53am

Misty48

How can the record company own the music that is in his personal vault????? I totally do not understand that!! He never released it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 04/15/17 9:04am

laurarichardso
n

Misty48 said:

How can the record company own the music that is in his personal vault????? I totally do not understand that!! He never released it.


I think when he signed his deal with WB to get back the masters a part of the deal was that WB would get the right to license out the material. WB is going to put out greatest hits, remaster the WB albums, put out box sets, and take care of the marketing and promotion. Basically he had to give up some control to the master tapes and realize that putting out the vault material would require a outlay of cash with no gurranteed of a profit. I think he thought that working WB would be a good way to get the music out. According to the media report the rights that WB have internationaly are forever. Media reports said that the deal domestically would end in 2018. Now I am thinking that is not true and the WB deal domestically may forever as well. If this true it means Prince's wish will be honored no matter what greedy lawyers, sibs, probate court, or greedy ass ex-mangers have to say. We see soon enough to what happened but I think Prince got the last laugh.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 04/15/17 9:17am

jdcxc

What company would pay $30 million without doing their due dilligence first?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 04/15/17 9:32am

PurpleDiamonds
1

Misty48 said:

How can the record company own the music that is in his personal vault????? I totally do not understand that!! He never released it.


Thought Prince used to say when you are under contract all the music an artist makes is owned by that record company. Someone correct me if that's not it..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 04/15/17 10:02am

charismatic

rogifan said:

laurarichardson said:


Well WSJ report no other companies even got a shot at bidding. So will no what other offers could have been avaliable or if the WB makes any offer moot. It is a giant fuck up and the lawsuits will be flying.

Yeah well both Londell and Koppelman went on the record saying that story wasn't accurate. Just because the Wall Street Journal reports it doesn't make it true. I'm not defending anyone here, and that includes Tyka and Omarr.


The fact that WB owns distribution right to Prince's back catalogue is a common industry practice that is in almost everyone's contract, so I don't understand how verifying that these songs weren't recorded during a contract period wasn't the first thing Universal did. That sounds like a major rookie mistake which means it likely didn't happen the way it's being told.

The thing is Prince worked, and was basically, creatively owned by WB so anything he produced during the contract period, whether it was released or not, is owned by WB if that material is ever sold publicly.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 04/15/17 10:10am

Strive

Prince traded the non-US rights to his albums forever along with giving Warner to right to block any pre-1995 vault release so he could get his masters back? eek



-edit What a mess. I can't believe he gave up the rights to Purple Rain and Parade in perpetuity.

The problem, sources say, may lie in the complexity of Prince’s 2014 deal with Warner. That deal, negotiated by Warner Bros. Records chairman/CEO Cameron Strang, was struck as the rights to albums from Prince’s Warner catalog were becoming eligible to revert to him. (A 1976 revision to U.S. copyright law allows creators of intellectual property to reclaim ownership 35 years after a work is first released or published; the first of Prince’s 18 albums for the label was released in 1978.) The 2014 deal, for which Prince was represented by attorney and CNN commentator Van Jones, had different terms for certain albums: Warner retained the rights to soundtrack albums to Warner Bros. films — including Prince’s biggest-selling albums, “Purple Rain,” “Parade,” and “Batman “– in perpetuity. But the other albums were subject to varying terms, territories (Warner retains non-U.S. rights to most recordings in perpetuity), formats (digital vs. physical), and term lengths.



One source tells Variety that the complex terms of the 2014 deal would be easy to misrepresent or misunderstand if read quickly or cursorily.



Koppelman and McMillan signed on as special music-industry advisers in June and, with a January 2017 due date for the first installment of a $100 million estate-tax bill, quickly set to work securing the late artist’s music assets. In addition to updating the 2014 Warner pact (clearing the way for the November release of the Prince 4Ever compilation and a forthcoming deluxe edition of “Purple Rain,” both with unreleased tracks) and the Universal recorded-music deal, those include a publishing pact with Universal, performing rights with Irving Azoff’s Global Music Rights, and merchandising with Universal’s Bravado. Those deals also cleared the way for much of Prince’s music to be made widely available on major streaming services; from July 2015 until February of this year, Prince’s music was limited to the Tidal streaming service, via a deal made by the artist that is currently being contested by the estate.

Koppelman and McMillan’s arrangement as advisors to the estate, which sources say netted them a 10 percent commission on each deal, ended when Bremer voluntarily stepped down as administrator. However, McMillan remains deeply involved, as he represents four of Prince’s six likely heirs (although his representation of one of them, Alfred Jackson, is disputed by another attorney); Van Jones represents two.

While the Universal deal gave the company rights to most of Prince’s non-Warner material as well as the hundreds of unreleased recordings in his much-vaunted “vault,” sources say the company was far more interested in the proven hits from the ‘80s.

This latest development suggests that the legal battles around Prince’s estate will become even more tangled and complex in the months and years to come.

[Edited 4/15/17 10:25am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 04/15/17 11:30am

mediumdry

Strive said:

I can't believe he gave up the rights to Purple Rain and Parade in perpetuity.

Look on the bright side, if the Purple Rain deluxe actually pans out, we might get one for Parade too, most likely long before the estate gets it's house in order. cool

Paisley Park is in your heart - Love Is Here!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 04/15/17 11:59am

rogifan

charismatic said:

rogifan said:


Yeah well both Londell and Koppelman went on the record saying that story wasn't accurate. Just because the Wall Street Journal reports it doesn't make it true. I'm not defending anyone here, and that includes Tyka and Omarr.


The fact that WB owns distribution right to Prince's back catalogue is a common industry practice that is in almost everyone's contract, so I don't understand how verifying that these songs weren't recorded during a contract period wasn't the first thing Universal did. That sounds like a major rookie mistake which means it likely didn't happen the way it's being told.

The thing is Prince worked, and was basically, creatively owned by WB so anything he produced during the contract period, whether it was released or not, is owned by WB if that material is ever sold publicly.

This is what I don't get and why I have a hard time treating Universal as the victim here. Even if Londell and Koppelman were totally incompetent or attempting something shady for personal financial gain how does Universal not do the proper due diligence to make sure they know what they're getting?
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 04/15/17 5:55pm

Asenath0607

march said:

Does anyone out there know the details of the contract Prince signed with WB in 2014?What did Prince get out of the deal?

I was wondering the same thing after I read this portion of the article in Variety

"The problem, sources say, may lie in the complexity of Prince’s 2014 deal with Warner. That deal, negotiated by Warner Bros. Records chairman/CEO Cameron Strang, was struck as the rights to albums from Prince’s Warner catalog were becoming eligible to revert to him. (A 1976 revision to U.S. copyright law allows creators of intellectual property to reclaim ownership 35 years after a work is first released or published; the first of Prince’s 18 albums for the label was released in 1978.) The 2014 deal, for which Prince was represented by attorney and CNN commentator Van Jones, had different terms for certain albums: Warner retained the rights to soundtrack albums to Warner Bros. films — including Prince’s biggest-selling albums, “Purple Rain,” “Parade,” and “Batman “– in perpetuity"

Sorry if this was discussed previously, but why (speculation I know) would P agree to permitting WB to retain the rights to those albums given that he could have gotten the rights to Purple Rain in about 5 more years (i.e. if it was released in 1984, 35 years after would have been 2019).

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 04/15/17 6:47pm

DD55

Asenath0607 said:

march said:

Does anyone out there know the details of the contract Prince signed with WB in 2014?What did Prince get out of the deal?

I was wondering the same thing after I read this portion of the article in Variety

"The problem, sources say, may lie in the complexity of Prince’s 2014 deal with Warner. That deal, negotiated by Warner Bros. Records chairman/CEO Cameron Strang, was struck as the rights to albums from Prince’s Warner catalog were becoming eligible to revert to him. (A 1976 revision to U.S. copyright law allows creators of intellectual property to reclaim ownership 35 years after a work is first released or published; the first of Prince’s 18 albums for the label was released in 1978.) The 2014 deal, for which Prince was represented by attorney and CNN commentator Van Jones, had different terms for certain albums: Warner retained the rights to soundtrack albums to Warner Bros. films — including Prince’s biggest-selling albums, “Purple Rain,” “Parade,” and “Batman “– in perpetuity"

Sorry if this was discussed previously, but why (speculation I know) would P agree to permitting WB to retain the rights to those albums given that he could have gotten the rights to Purple Rain in about 5 more years (i.e. if it was released in 1984, 35 years after would have been 2019).

I don't understand it either.

Ok, I don’t know anything about the music industry. Does it saythat Prince himself gave up (licensed all use) all control to all his music to WB internationally? As in the entire world except for domestically? Forever???? And Prince gave up rights to the albums listed above? And the vault stuff recoreded while at WB?

What did Prince get out of this?

Sorry to be dense, I just don’t understand. Please give me the Prince WP licensing for dummies version. thank you.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 04/16/17 1:14am

ForeverPaisley

Wow, that is quite a deal if WB did get the right to block any pre-1995 release from the vault! That's HUGE. But I guess it depend on how much was written/there from 1995-2016. That's another two decades after all - and those which included some tumultuous times for him. I imagine there were lots of writing through them.

I just wish someone who could properly manager these type of affairs was at the helm so that all parties are handled correctly and so that Paisley Park is left on positive ground. And so the items that are there are finally shared with us fans who would cherish it smile

Dance where y'are, just groove y'all.
canada
Commemorative Guitar Picks, Buttons & Magnets - check Marketplace 4 info
wave thumbs up!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 04/16/17 2:52am

thedance

avatar

What the holy fuck.. THIS STINKS... sad sad sad sad sad sad sad sad sad

Prince 4Ever. heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 04/16/17 5:09am

Lovejunky

laurarichardson said:

RaspBerryGirlFriend said:

I know almost nothing about what's going on with the estate, mainly because I'm not particularly interested in all this businessy shit (not why I got into Prince's music), but does this mean that the Purple Rain deluxe edition might be delayed or cancelled?

It is not going to be delayed if WB has the rights to put it out. They have already announced it and Universal would not be asking for their money back if they were not sure that cannot have the rights to the WB vault material.

It is not that complicated either WB has the rights or they do not. I love it as it proves Prince made provisions for this material before his death. No greedy ass lawyers and family members can go against his wishes.

If some stupid ass attorney had not tried to come in and go against his wishes this mess would never have happened in the first place.

I gotta hand it to you Laura..You are one smart cookie..

U THink like Prince..

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 04/16/17 5:12am

Lovejunky

laurarichardson said:

rogifan said:
What was/is their alternative?
Well WSJ report no other companies even got a shot at bidding. So will no what other offers could have been avaliable or if the WB makes any offer moot. It is a giant fuck up and the lawsuits will be flying.

In other words The estate tried to sell, something that actualy belonged with Warners all along ?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 04/16/17 5:16am

Lovejunky

laurarichardson said:

Misty48 said:

How can the record company own the music that is in his personal vault????? I totally do not understand that!! He never released it.

I think when he signed his deal with WB to get back the masters a part of the deal was that WB would get the right to license out the material. WB is going to put out greatest hits, remaster the WB albums, put out box sets, and take care of the marketing and promotion. Basically he had to give up some control to the master tapes and realize that putting out the vault material would require a outlay of cash with no gurranteed of a profit. I think he thought that working WB would be a good way to get the music out. According to the media report the rights that WB have internationaly are forever. Media reports said that the deal domestically would end in 2018. Now I am thinking that is not true and the WB deal domestically may forever as well. If this true it means Prince's wish will be honored no matter what greedy lawyers, sibs, probate court, or greedy ass ex-mangers have to say. We see soon enough to what happened but I think Prince got the last laugh.

His Genius continues..

Its a canny move on his behalf because it also guaratnees that his Music will be well circulated

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 04/16/17 5:22am

Lovejunky

DD55 said:

Asenath0607 said:

I was wondering the same thing after I read this portion of the article in Variety

"The problem, sources say, may lie in the complexity of Prince’s 2014 deal with Warner. That deal, negotiated by Warner Bros. Records chairman/CEO Cameron Strang, was struck as the rights to albums from Prince’s Warner catalog were becoming eligible to revert to him. (A 1976 revision to U.S. copyright law allows creators of intellectual property to reclaim ownership 35 years after a work is first released or published; the first of Prince’s 18 albums for the label was released in 1978.) The 2014 deal, for which Prince was represented by attorney and CNN commentator Van Jones, had different terms for certain albums: Warner retained the rights to soundtrack albums to Warner Bros. films — including Prince’s biggest-selling albums, “Purple Rain,” “Parade,” and “Batman “– in perpetuity"

Sorry if this was discussed previously, but why (speculation I know) would P agree to permitting WB to retain the rights to those albums given that he could have gotten the rights to Purple Rain in about 5 more years (i.e. if it was released in 1984, 35 years after would have been 2019).

I don't understand it either.

Ok, I don’t know anything about the music industry. Does it saythat Prince himself gave up (licensed all use) all control to all his music to WB internationally? As in the entire world except for domestically? Forever???? And Prince gave up rights to the albums listed above? And the vault stuff recoreded while at WB?

What did Prince get out of this?

Sorry to be dense, I just don’t understand. Please give me the Prince WP licensing for dummies version. thank you.

Guarantee that his music will be circulated

Warners have control of it, and you can be dam sure they will try and make as mouch money as they can..

And what will Prince get ?

More Fame,

and the fortune ?

Final Gift to warners,

yeah I won, But you can have the Prize anyway,

You need it more than me Love God

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 04/16/17 7:51am

bonatoc

avatar

Let's not be too harsh on the estate.
It took them one year, but after so much anticipation, we finally got tamborines ugly as hell.
Uh, sorry, "tamboraccas".

I say let's all make a Kickstarter to buy some cloud servers in world regions where no one can't get their MBA's dirty hands on, and sell all of the Vault for profit to charities.
After all, we already have it, for the most part. Let's have these corporate mothafuckaz kiss his ass, m'kay.

[Edited 4/16/17 7:51am]

The Colors R brighter, the Bond is much tighter
No Child's a failure
Until the Blue Sailboat sails him away from his dreams
Don't Ever Lose, Don't Ever Lose
Don't Ever Lose Your Dreams
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 04/16/17 11:44am

laurarichardso
n

bonatoc said:

Let's not be too harsh on the estate.
It took them one year, but after so much anticipation, we finally got tamborines ugly as hell.
Uh, sorry, "tamboraccas".

I say let's all make a Kickstarter to buy some cloud servers in world regions where no one can't get their MBA's dirty hands on, and sell all of the Vault for profit to charities.
After all, we already have it, for the most part. Let's have these corporate mothafuckaz kiss his ass, m'kay.

[Edited 4/16/17 7:51am]


--This actually sounds like a good idea. At this fans and collectors could do a better job of getting the music out.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 04/16/17 11:48am

laurarichardso
n

Asenath0607 said:



march said:


Does anyone out there know the details of the contract Prince signed with WB in 2014?What did Prince get out of the deal?


I was wondering the same thing after I read this portion of the article in Variety



"The problem, sources say, may lie in the complexity of Prince’s 2014 deal with Warner. That deal, negotiated by Warner Bros. Records chairman/CEO Cameron Strang, was struck as the rights to albums from Prince’s Warner catalog were becoming eligible to revert to him. (A 1976 revision to U.S. copyright law allows creators of intellectual property to reclaim ownership 35 years after a work is first released or published; the first of Prince’s 18 albums for the label was released in 1978.) The 2014 deal, for which Prince was represented by attorney and CNN commentator Van Jones, had different terms for certain albums: Warner retained the rights to soundtrack albums to Warner Bros. films — including Prince’s biggest-selling albums, “Purple Rain,” “Parade,” and “Batman “– in perpetuity"




Sorry if this was discussed previously, but why (speculation I know) would P agree to permitting WB to retain the rights to those albums given that he could have gotten the rights to Purple Rain in about 5 more years (i.e. if it was released in 1984, 35 years after would have been 2019).


By rights do they mean licensing or master tapes. If it is licensing then he made have had no choice since he wanted the master tapes. Sometimes you have to give up something to something. Anyway it means his wishes will be honored.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 04/16/17 12:29pm

ForeverPaisley

sad I wonder if the time he made the deal with WB was along the line of time Tyka said he told her he did what all he was meant to do (paraphrasing I don't remember word for word).

Dance where y'are, just groove y'all.
canada
Commemorative Guitar Picks, Buttons & Magnets - check Marketplace 4 info
wave thumbs up!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 04/16/17 12:41pm

rdhull

avatar

is the label going to write 'slave' across their emblem?

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Record label says it didn’t get what it paid for in deal for Prince’s music rights