independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince Did Blow It By Being So Difficult With Fans
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 5 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #120 posted 05/08/16 1:23pm

Cloreen

avatar

ufoclub said:

The very first sentence of your post: "In the wake of Prince's passing, something has dawned on me: Prince and his offbeat behavior with the caretaking of his music really cost him an opportunity to be a very special and extremely beloved entertainer." is false. Did you see what happened in Los Angeles? On the charts? He IS a special and beloved entertainer in the pop universe. One that is now passed away in real life.

.

He IS special and beloved...in death. He could have had it in life throughout the later half of his career if he hadn't been so difficult getting his records out there to the public.

.

The fact that you say this: "Yes, downloading the music by joining an online club is easier than ordering and getting a delivery or driving out and buying a CD," is very strange. Joining a club, paying membership is easier than paying $12.99 for a CD at Target? Wow. You have got to be the first person on Earth who loves doling out money for membership fees.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #121 posted 05/08/16 1:44pm

BanishedBrian

Aerogram said:

He's only going to be known forever as The musical genius of his era, his name associated with a colour and his very own symbol, a body of work that stretches as far as the eye can see, leaving a mountain of iconic imagery for future generations to refer to forever and a day.

But he "blew it"????

Good one.

All of those things were destined as of 1996 when he left WB. I'd compare Prince's business decisions over the last 20 years to Donald Trump... Trump may have a fortune today, but if you'd invested his then-wealth in an S&P index fund 20 years ago it would be worth a lot more. He's underperformed the mean. From a business perspective, Prince was the same way. His legacy would be even greater today if he'd made sure his live material was archived and made available for purchase in soundboard/professional quality. Thank God for people disobeying his instructions and taking illegal audio/video of his concerts or his greatness might have been lost forever. Granted, perhaps we'll find out that it's all safely in the Vault and that it was going to all be releaed someday... but that's hopeful speculation at this point.

No Candy 4 Me
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #122 posted 05/08/16 3:05pm

Eileen

ufoclub said:

The emotional outpouring now is proof that he didn't cause any serious damage by being difficult to fans. It's proof that he won out in the end. This explosion of testimonials and the online deluge of videos and music is more than any marketing firm could have engineered. It's also more than what happened with Elvis, Kurt Cobain or John Lennon in terms of suddenly work unveiled dramatically (both charitable, personal, and artistic). Inadvertently, he created a full knuckle punch of a wake. A wake up. Almost like how a tidal wave works.


He "won out in the end" ? by dying so young and unexpectedly that hardcore fans and music/media peers are shocked, while still being young enough themselves, and in their peak period of social media and mainstream media control, to create the tidal wave of their own youth on his behalf. It's an accident of time.


He may well also have continued keeping much of his work under wraps for another 20 or 30 years and then died. There wouldn't have been a large enough base who remembered or cared what might be in the vault to create more than a paddle bump. It's an accident of time.

[Edited 5/8/16 15:07pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #123 posted 05/08/16 3:19pm

purplestainedt
ears

beacheemom said:

To keep it simple: the way Prince was is what made us desire more of him; well besides his musical genius abilities. I mean, he didn't want to be like other artists, he wasn't like other artists. I understand the frustration of not being able to get to some of his music, but it kept us desiring. He was complex and so many different sides to him that made us normal folk shaking our heads wondering his motive behind some of his decisions. Bottom line is I believe he knew how special he was. He has stated in interviews he did not fame. He just wanted to make music and great music at that. His songs were his babies and he just wanted to protect them is all.

Agree with every word.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #124 posted 05/08/16 4:07pm

Cloreen

avatar

beacheemom said:

He was complex and so many different sides to him that made us normal folk shaking our heads wondering his motive behind some of his decisions.

.

Wait a minute. Because the guy was a master musician and could write some incredible songs, that means everything he did was marvelous and us normal folk should shake our heads in wonder? If he dribbled the basketball with his elbow all of us normal folk should say, "Wow, remarkable" instead of saying, "That's a stupid way to play basketball"?

.

Prince's brilliant musical acumen does not mean his decision making elsewhere was brilliant. Just because we shake our heads in wonder and awe over his guitar playing doesn't mean we have to shake our heads in wonder and awe over his NPG Music Club.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #125 posted 05/08/16 5:03pm

AlexHahn

C

.

The guy chose not to share his music readily. He kept making it, but for some reason he made his fans jump through hoops to get it.

.

And I didn't even talk here about how he left no option at all for new fans, for young people to discover, obtain, and cherish his music.

I agree with this. I've been asking people to share with me their essential tracks from the past 10 years because I haven't been able to readily consume it. Hearing some of these tracks now, I think they're great. But even many serious fans are limited in time and energy, and my experience with "Crystal Ball" permanently soured me to fan club releases and the like.

More importantly, in talking to young people these past few weeks, I'm finding that they haven't been exposed to Prince beyond Purple Rain and Little Red Corvette. It's frankly a shame. Having all of this stuff up on YouTube was likely not what Prince would have wanted, but it certainly is giving people access to stuff that should have been widely heard a long time ago.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #126 posted 05/08/16 5:15pm

mynameisnotsus
an

Cloreen said:






beacheemom said:


He was complex and so many different sides to him that made us normal folk shaking our heads wondering his motive behind some of his decisions.


.


Wait a minute. Because the guy was a master musician and could write some incredible songs, that means everything he did was marvelous and us normal folk should shake our heads in wonder? If he dribbled the basketball with his elbow all of us normal folk should say, "Wow, remarkable" instead of saying, "That's a stupid way to play basketball"?


.


Prince's brilliant musical acumen does not mean his decision making elsewhere was brilliant. Just because we shake our heads in wonder and awe over his guitar playing doesn't mean we have to shake our heads in wonder and awe over his NPG Music Club.



There was ALWAYS a lot of criticism about his every business decision - especially here. And quite a lot of his musical ones as well razz
Who should he have been more like? Exactly who's business practices and living beloved-ness should he have been closer to?
None of the so-called legends get played on the radio or are selling like they use to.
He sold out 20000 seats in Oakland in March with 3 days notice. This was after playing 2 smaller shows the weekend before. He did the same in Perth with similar short notice. Conventional wisdom would have had him announce 6 months in advance. He did whatever he wanted - good or bad. That was rule number 1.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #127 posted 05/08/16 6:19pm

ufoclub

avatar

Cloreen said:

ufoclub said:

The very first sentence of your post: "In the wake of Prince's passing, something has dawned on me: Prince and his offbeat behavior with the caretaking of his music really cost him an opportunity to be a very special and extremely beloved entertainer." is false. Did you see what happened in Los Angeles? On the charts? He IS a special and beloved entertainer in the pop universe. One that is now passed away in real life.

.

He IS special and beloved...in death. He could have had it in life throughout the later half of his career if he hadn't been so difficult getting his records out there to the public.

.

The fact that you say this: "Yes, downloading the music by joining an online club is easier than ordering and getting a delivery or driving out and buying a CD," is very strange. Joining a club, paying membership is easier than paying $12.99 for a CD at Target? Wow. You have got to be the first person on Earth who loves doling out money for membership fees.

Everyone on the planet switched to the ease of online transactions. you know that. It's changed the music biz.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #128 posted 05/08/16 6:20pm

ufoclub

avatar

Eileen said:

ufoclub said:

The emotional outpouring now is proof that he didn't cause any serious damage by being difficult to fans. It's proof that he won out in the end. This explosion of testimonials and the online deluge of videos and music is more than any marketing firm could have engineered. It's also more than what happened with Elvis, Kurt Cobain or John Lennon in terms of suddenly work unveiled dramatically (both charitable, personal, and artistic). Inadvertently, he created a full knuckle punch of a wake. A wake up. Almost like how a tidal wave works.


He "won out in the end" ? by dying so young and unexpectedly that hardcore fans and music/media peers are shocked, while still being young enough themselves, and in their peak period of social media and mainstream media control, to create the tidal wave of their own youth on his behalf. It's an accident of time.


He may well also have continued keeping much of his work under wraps for another 20 or 30 years and then died. There wouldn't have been a large enough base who remembered or cared what might be in the vault to create more than a paddle bump. It's an accident of time.

[Edited 5/8/16 15:07pm]

don't twist it into me saying that death was the win, I'm saying the public recognition and respect is the win.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #129 posted 05/08/16 7:13pm

saviour7

FUNKYNESS said:

He hasn't been dead a month yet and ungrateful "fans" have come out to keep on bitching about what isnt on the web and made easy to steal. I have supported every business move Prince has made to control his art and intellectual property - be it with the business people or the fans. That is because, like Prince, I understand that neither cares about Prince as much as Prince. They all want as much as they can get from him. He isn't obligated to give away anything to the web or the greedy white executives he fought so gallantly. God blessed him and he passed it on to us in great magnitude. No one has ever been as prolific or brilliant. Prince gave us several lifetimes worth of music.



Prince understood the nature of humans - and human nature has never been able to go unchecked by those who do not become consumed by it. Look at the world today - everyone must protect themselves. There are hundreds of way to exploit, defraud and flat out rip someone off - whether they are the world's greatest musical genius or a regular Joe.We are appalled and shocked on nearly a daily basis at the depths that people can sink to while employing tools and tactics that could be used for some much good instead.



Those of us who want to receive Prince the way Prince wants to be received have taken it the way he gave it. We understand that no one should have control - or even a say - over how Prince distributed his work to the world. He wasn't a factory producing something that people needed to survive. He wasn't a government agency providing welfare. With the sorted and evil history of the music industry in regards to black musicians, his acutely informed and defiantly independent stance was probably the one thing that made him my hero. No one else had the brains or the guts to do it the way he did it - and from the looks of it, no one ever will.



Amen.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #130 posted 05/08/16 9:10pm

Toadlips

ufoclub said:

Cloreen said:

.

He IS special and beloved...in death. He could have had it in life throughout the later half of his career if he hadn't been so difficult getting his records out there to the public.

.

The fact that you say this: "Yes, downloading the music by joining an online club is easier than ordering and getting a delivery or driving out and buying a CD," is very strange. Joining a club, paying membership is easier than paying $12.99 for a CD at Target? Wow. You have got to be the first person on Earth who loves doling out money for membership fees.

Everyone on the planet switched to the ease of online transactions. you know that. It's changed the music biz.

Sure, every major artist is making their music available online. I'm pretty sure that would have happened without Prince, just like proportional fonts would have happened without Steve Jobs.

The difference between Prince and other artists is that Prince made you join a "club" which overpromised and underdelivered. Rather than spending your money on a specific item that you wanted to purchase, you paid a monthly fee and you got whatever Prince felt like giving you. And Prince didn't exactly open the vault for his loyal subjects -- he actually left them feeling fleeced and duped, and that's why his online ventures failed.

His latest collaboration with Tidal is no different: $9.99 for the sub-par 96kbit option geared toward Prince's hearing impaired audience or $19.99 for those who think it makes sense to pay $239.88 for 3 CDs worth of new music per year. I'll buy my 3 CDs and own my music for decades to come, thank you. Call me a crazy old fool who just doesn't "get" new technology, but I understand when I'm being "taken" and that has nothing to do with the method of distribution.

And I have to laugh at ignorant statements like FUNKYNESS's:

"fans" have come out to keep on bitching about what isnt on the web and made easy to steal.

Everything is and always has been "on the web". Yes, I have purchased everything that has been available through legitimate channels, but, to illustrate my point, I could download Prince's entire discography as a single archived package right now without paying a cent to anyone. That is why I find it so bizarre that Prince made it difficult for people to buy things from him directly at a reasonable price and without some BS monthly fee. What was he thinking?

Indeed, it's the bootleggers, many of them in it for the love of the MUSIC and not the $$, who have leveraged the Internet to distribute some of Prince's best work. Since you all are fans, I am sure you know what I'm talking about: soundboard concerts, unofficial concert videos, out-of-print albums and extended singles, studio versions of unreleased material, music videos etc. All of these things Prince could have made available to the fans, but did not.

Sure, that's his prerogative to keep everything hoarded in his vault till the day he dies, but it's also my prerogative to say "eff that fool." If Prince doesn't know to use the Internet to his advantage, I do.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #131 posted 05/08/16 9:45pm

Eileen

ufoclub said:

don't twist it into me saying that death was the win, I'm saying the public recognition and respect is the win.


Oh for pete's sake. Completely missed the point. OTOH, you believe "everyone on the planet" is doing online transactions, so in this particular case I will pass on restating.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #132 posted 05/08/16 11:30pm

ufoclub

avatar

Eileen said:

ufoclub said:

don't twist it into me saying that death was the win, I'm saying the public recognition and respect is the win.


Oh for pete's sake. Completely missed the point. OTOH, you believe "everyone on the planet" is doing online transactions, so in this particular case I will pass on restating.

Your point seems to be the labeling of the tidal wave of sympathy and the surprise flooding of video and audio an accident. But that doesn't change the fact that it is an inadvertent win for Prince's art and persona? See whats happened on the charts? The attitude of most of the news reports? The unveiling of all the charitable work which contradicts the previous public image of him?

I'm pointing out what has actually happened in reality right now. Not some imagined future in "20 or 30 years "

You believe that online consumption is not the major marketing shift in behavior by consumers for music?

https://www.boundless.com/users/235420/textbooks/business-fundamentals/adding-products-and-services-13/adding-products-and-services-52/examples-of-business-models-from-the-music-industry-245-15548/

and beyond that:

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/01/buying-music-is-so-over/384790/

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #133 posted 05/09/16 12:41am

Electrostar

avatar

In recent years Prince didn't want to be worshipped. He wanted people ONLY to worship God. So he smashed up his relationship with hardcore fans. That's not being difficult, that's love.
As equality grows, violence declines.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #134 posted 05/09/16 2:50am

chamill

Eileen said:



Cloreen said:



The fan base was clearly there, yet he chose not to give them a fair chance at hearing his music.



Prince kept the joy of his music from fans who loved his music. Heck, I'm a Prince fanatic and I haven't seen that "Batdance" video in decades. That should never have been the case. Never. He also kept that great music from young people who use youtube to discover music.





Couldn't agree more. For someone who uttered the fairly repellent, "I don't talk to old people…they try to find ways to stay static. Young folks are the ones with the ideas and constantly moving forward," he was awfully quick to reject the young folks ideas all the same.



And yet he contradicted himself by associating with Larry Graham, Maceo Parker and others a fair bit older than him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #135 posted 05/09/16 3:10am

lynx

Any musician who forces his fans to get his music illegally is doing something wrong. Prince could have had my money many times over but I guess he didn't need it..

[Edited 5/9/16 3:11am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #136 posted 05/09/16 9:22am

Cloreen

avatar

mynameisnotsusan said:

Exactly who's business practices and living beloved-ness should he have been closer to?

.

How about Paul McCartney?

.

The issue here is not having hits on the charts right now. I can only think of two old fogeys who charted songs on the pop charts: Sinatra at 65 with "New York, New York" and Cher at 52 with "Believe." No one is expecting Prince to be all over the modern charts. But what he could have had was what Paul McCartney has. As many have pointed out in this thread the younger set really have zero idea of Prince and his music. A song or two and a Dave Chapelle sketch. But Paul by not removing himself from the music bizz, by allowing his stuff on youtube where young people listen to music, has remained a performer who is not a "whatever ever happened to" question. Prince turned himself into that question for millions and millions...and not just young people. Many of the PURPLE RAIN fan set also wondered whatever happened to Prince.

.

Taking your new material out of the record stores (amazon.com) and not allowing one snippet of your material to be listened to on youtube was not the business model to create.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #137 posted 05/09/16 1:30pm

rocknrolldave

avatar

My thing with music is this:
I don't like the whole 'iTunes exclusive bonus track'/ 'Best Buy Exclusive' thing, I think music should be INclusive not EXclusive. Music deserves to be heard, music should be available to buy for anyone who wants it, not given away once in newspaper and then impossible to find...etc etc... So that side of Prince's business model definitely left me behind.

Of course, it was absolutely his prerogative to release whatever music he wanted to release however he damn well wanted to, but as a fan during the early 2000's I definitely felt like it was getting hard work to follow the releases and keep up with what was going on.
This is not an exit
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #138 posted 05/09/16 1:37pm

Iamtheorg

avatar

lynx said:

Any musician who forces his fans to get his music illegally is doing something wrong. Prince could have had my money many times over but I guess he didn't need it..

[Edited 5/9/16 3:11am]

Nobody forces anyone to get music illegally. Do you realize how you sound?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #139 posted 05/09/16 2:12pm

Wlcm2thdwn3

avatar

Funkmeimfamous said:

I'm tore about this. . I think Prince recognised that the same people that own YouTube were the ones that owned Warner Brothers. Essentially he did not want big business to profit from his art. . I think it's admirable that Prince wasn't so obsessed with his celebrity that he was willing to overlook his own values.

Great answer. Prince had every right to say NO. Why couldn't people understand that ?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #140 posted 05/09/16 5:33pm

1nonly

avatar

Wlcm2thdwn3 said:

Funkmeimfamous said:

I'm tore about this. . I think Prince recognised that the same people that own YouTube were the ones that owned Warner Brothers. Essentially he did not want big business to profit from his art. . I think it's admirable that Prince wasn't so obsessed with his celebrity that he was willing to overlook his own values.

Great answer. Prince had every right to say NO. Why couldn't people understand that ?

I think the problem is that too many people in this thread are hung up on Prince's moral value. That's not what is being asked or questioned.

Did his choices, for whatever reason he chose to do them, hinder new and casual listenders from being able to access his music? That's the question. Whether it was the right, wrong, morally-driven choice plays no role in one's answer. We, as fans, must exclude our experiences, as we can always find his music (illegally or not) because we know where and how to look for it outside of the typical means.

Prince eschewed typical means. And again, the questions posed is: Did this type of thinking keep more people from truling finding out who the music maker was and what all he did musically?

Walking alone in the dark, I see nothing u see
I can be in a park, or flying in the…in the deep sea
I wish u’d hold my hand; then everything could b
There’s nothing strange, we’re not deranged
We only want everyday 2 b a Cosmic Day
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #141 posted 05/09/16 7:29pm

Pokeno4Money

avatar

rocknrolldave said:

My thing with music is this: I don't like the whole 'iTunes exclusive bonus track'/ 'Best Buy Exclusive' thing, I think music should be INclusive not EXclusive. Music deserves to be heard, music should be available to buy for anyone who wants it, not given away once in newspaper and then impossible to find...etc etc... So that side of Prince's business model definitely left me behind.


The "exclusive bonus track" thing has been around for a while now, many musicians use it simply for more money. It's the old concept of limiting supply to increase demand, but I do think it backfires on the musicians.

Look at Lenny's Black and White America album, there's a "Target Deluxe Edition" that includes "What Do You Want From Me". It's my favorite track on the entire 22-song album, but I often wondered if the reason why the song never became popular was because Target was literally the ONLY place it could be purchased legally.

"Never let nasty stalkers disrespect you. They start shit, you finish it. Go down to their level, that's the only way they'll understand. You have to handle things yourself."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #142 posted 05/09/16 7:36pm

Pokeno4Money

avatar

Wlcm2thdwn3 said:

Funkmeimfamous said:

I'm tore about this. . I think Prince recognised that the same people that own YouTube were the ones that owned Warner Brothers. Essentially he did not want big business to profit from his art. . I think it's admirable that Prince wasn't so obsessed with his celebrity that he was willing to overlook his own values.

Great answer. Prince had every right to say NO. Why couldn't people understand that ?


I guess the big question is, did he leave his music and videos up on OTHER video sharing websites? I do remember being able to see some of his videos on other sites such as Vimeo, but not a whole lot. Was Prince as aggressive in removing his music from non-YouTube sites?

"Never let nasty stalkers disrespect you. They start shit, you finish it. Go down to their level, that's the only way they'll understand. You have to handle things yourself."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #143 posted 05/09/16 8:01pm

Eileen

Pokeno4Money said:

The "exclusive bonus track" thing has been around for a while now, many musicians use it simply for more money. It's the old concept of limiting supply to increase demand, but I do think it backfires on the musicians.

Look at Lenny's Black and White America album, there's a "Target Deluxe Edition" that includes "What Do You Want From Me". It's my favorite track on the entire 22-song album, but I often wondered if the reason why the song never became popular was because Target was literally the ONLY place it could be purchased legally.


Great point about the Lenny song. What I would change there is >>It's the old concept of limiting supply to increase demand<< What it actually is, is the old concept of a monopoly. Target wants a monopoly on a version of the album and Best Buy wants a monopoly on a version of the album etc. As you noted, limiting the supply of "What Do You Want From Me" didn't increase demand for the song. But it probably got a little extra traffic for Target, nothing that amounted to anything for Lenny, just a few more bucks in impulse sales at Target

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #144 posted 05/09/16 8:54pm

mynameisnotsus
an

Cloreen said:



mynameisnotsusan said:


Exactly who's business practices and living beloved-ness should he have been closer to?

.


How about Paul McCartney?


.


The issue here is not having hits on the charts right now. I can only think of two old fogeys who charted songs on the pop charts: Sinatra at 65 with "New York, New York" and Cher at 52 with "Believe." No one is expecting Prince to be all over the modern charts. But what he could have had was what Paul McCartney has. As many have pointed out in this thread the younger set really have zero idea of Prince and his music. A song or two and a Dave Chapelle sketch. But Paul by not removing himself from the music bizz, by allowing his stuff on youtube where young people listen to music, has remained a performer who is not a "whatever ever happened to" question. Prince turned himself into that question for millions and millions...and not just young people. Many of the PURPLE RAIN fan set also wondered whatever happened to Prince.


.


Taking your new material out of the record stores (amazon.com) and not allowing one snippet of your material to be listened to on youtube was not the business model to create.



I thought of Macca but that is pretty rarified air, no? He's only the most successful songwriter in the history of music lol and are young people really that aware of his newer music? I doubt it, I see its up on YouTube but they aren't massive viewing numbers - and those are probably from fans since The Beatles.
His recent album charts seem pretty similar to Prince shrug
McCartney is such a 'regular guy' superstar though. Someone on here told a story how they were on a train and Paul McCartney was in the same cabin and chatted to him and showed new photos of his baby daughter with Heather Mills - I love that. But that is so not Prince :-D

I do take the point the younger generation don't know or had access to Princes music, the younger members of my family only know it because I force fed it to them - they have their own pop stars to be interested in. The Warners albums have always been on Amazon, if they wanted to dig deeper with the newer music, well, they just had to jump through the hoops I had to razz
And yes he has said himself how it would have been so easy to follow Purple Rain with Purple Rain part 2 and just do the Let's Go Crazy solo in a different key, but he wasn't interested in that. It's the core of his modus operandi, do what people don't expect. He did it better than anyone for a decade and then he decided that he REALLY didn't want to play by industry standards. Who changes their name to an unpronounceable symbol??

He became all about the deal and control. The content was virtually irrelevant as were the audience. If he announced a show someone was gonna show up. He got paid for most of his later recordings upfront with exclusive deals, why wait for royalty checks after going through the industry accounting system?

I think he was happy to be an outsider and he did seem more at peace recently and secure in his legacy, which is why he seemed to be intent on working with a number of younger artists in the last half a dozen years or so. I loved the Piano and microphone shows I got to see, he was still trying out new things. I couldn't ask for more...but if there are new Vault recordings issued I will gladly accept them wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #145 posted 05/09/16 9:25pm

Pokeno4Money

avatar

Eileen said:

Pokeno4Money said:

The "exclusive bonus track" thing has been around for a while now, many musicians use it simply for more money. It's the old concept of limiting supply to increase demand, but I do think it backfires on the musicians.

Look at Lenny's Black and White America album, there's a "Target Deluxe Edition" that includes "What Do You Want From Me". It's my favorite track on the entire 22-song album, but I often wondered if the reason why the song never became popular was because Target was literally the ONLY place it could be purchased legally.


Great point about the Lenny song. What I would change there is >>It's the old concept of limiting supply to increase demand<< What it actually is, is the old concept of a monopoly. Target wants a monopoly on a version of the album and Best Buy wants a monopoly on a version of the album etc. As you noted, limiting the supply of "What Do You Want From Me" didn't increase demand for the song. But it probably got a little extra traffic for Target, nothing that amounted to anything for Lenny, just a few more bucks in impulse sales at Target


Exactly, only Target benefited from increased sales thanks to people like me who wanted the bonus tracks. However Lenny did benefit as well, up front, as his agreement with Target was no doubt more lucrative because of the bonus tracks exclusivity.

So basically it's a gamble for both the musician and the retailer. Would Lenny have made more money if he had allowed every retailer to sell the deluxe edition? Hard to say, without knowing how much more of an advance he got from Target and how many more CDs would have been sold through other retailers.

One of the most infamous "exclusive agreements" was the Best Buy/Chinese Democracy fiasco. Best Buy paid Guns N' Roses $14 million for the exclusive right to sell physical copies of the album in the US, and the album was a huge commercial failure. Eventually Best Buy marked down hundreds of thousands of unsold copies to just $1.99

"Never let nasty stalkers disrespect you. They start shit, you finish it. Go down to their level, that's the only way they'll understand. You have to handle things yourself."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #146 posted 05/09/16 10:10pm

Eileen

Pokeno4Money said:

Exactly, only Target benefited from increased sales thanks to people like me who wanted the bonus tracks. However Lenny did benefit as well, up front, as his agreement with Target was no doubt more lucrative because of the bonus tracks exclusivity.


Oh yes, you're right about probable additional up-front money from places like Target for those exclusives. I was just thinking about increased popularity for the song. You are correct. And the GNR was another good example.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #147 posted 05/13/16 9:00am

KEROUAC

I came across another example today quite by accident. There is a really great site for learning guitar called Justinguitar.com where the guy who runs it teaches guitar completely free in his youtube videos and he is excellent at it. I just saw this message from him....

"I was of course gutted to hear about the passing of Prince and a lot of people have been asking about a tribute lesson and I really want to, but he pulled all the lessons of his songs I had done (including some that never went live!) and it nearly cost me my channel! So I'm reluctant to risk it again until it's clear what's going on - though it seems a few others have managed to get some done without them getting pulled... I'll do some as soon as I can."

Kind of sad that Prince wouldn't even let a video of somoeone teaching how to play one of his songs be allowed on the web don't you think?

(PS Sorry I can't figure out how to insert spaces between my pargraphs)

[Edited 5/13/16 9:03am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #148 posted 05/13/16 9:31am

FunkiestOne

avatar

It's not said that often, but Prince was a briliiant artist but a really poor businessman. What business decision or deal did he ever make that made him lots of money? He lost money on his Glam Slam clubs, Paisley Park records, etc, etc. He could always tour and bring in million$, so it never hurt him much but he just wasn't smart to take all his material off Youtube, etc. It cost him new fans and lots of revenue/profits in the end.

.

But saying he was crappy at business is not a knock against him. He was an idealistic artist and that's what enabled him to make the music that we love so much.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #149 posted 05/13/16 9:32am

FunkiestOne

avatar

Iamtheorg said:

lynx said:

Any musician who forces his fans to get his music illegally is doing something wrong. Prince could have had my money many times over but I guess he didn't need it..

[Edited 5/9/16 3:11am]

Nobody forces anyone to get music illegally. Do you realize how you sound?

.

Illegal and Immoral are often far from the same thing.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 5 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince Did Blow It By Being So Difficult With Fans