independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince Did Blow It By Being So Difficult With Fans
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 05/07/16 12:26pm

FUNKYNESS

He hasn't been dead a month yet and ungrateful "fans" have come out to keep on bitching about what isnt on the web and made easy to steal. I have supported every business move Prince has made to control his art and intellectual property - be it with the business people or the fans. That is because, like Prince, I understand that neither cares about Prince as much as Prince. They all want as much as they can get from him. He isn't obligated to give away anything to the web or the greedy white executives he fought so gallantly. God blessed him and he passed it on to us in great magnitude. No one has ever been as prolific or brilliant. Prince gave us several lifetimes worth of music.

Prince understood the nature of humans - and human nature has never been able to go unchecked by those who do not become consumed by it. Look at the world today - everyone must protect themselves. There are hundreds of way to exploit, defraud and flat out rip someone off - whether they are the world's greatest musical genius or a regular Joe.We are appalled and shocked on nearly a daily basis at the depths that people can sink to while employing tools and tactics that could be used for some much good instead.

Those of us who want to receive Prince the way Prince wants to be received have taken it the way he gave it. We understand that no one should have control - or even a say - over how Prince distributed his work to the world. He wasn't a factory producing something that people needed to survive. He wasn't a government agency providing welfare. With the sorted and evil history of the music industry in regards to black musicians, his acutely informed and defiantly independent stance was probably the one thing that made him my hero. No one else had the brains or the guts to do it the way he did it - and from the looks of it, no one ever will.

Save America - Stop Illegal Immigration. God bless America. PEACE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 05/07/16 12:27pm

Cloreen

avatar

Bohemian67 said:

His catalogue will go on and be enjoyed for decades to come.

.

Are we living in the same world? Prince's catalogue was not and presently is not available! Tell me exactly how someone right now can get "20ten"? How about "N.E.W.S"? What about "Xpectation"? Show me how the public can enjoy "One Night Alone...Live!"

.

Sure the Warner Brothers releases can be and always have been enjoyed by music listeners. But the above albums and 90% of Prince releases post-Warners can not "be enjoyed for decades to come." You couldn't even enjoy them in the decade they were "released"! It took me six years to finally say, "F-it, Prince is not releasing "20ten" to the general public, I'm going to just illegally download it."

.

Friend, do you have a record store that has "Rave In2 The Joy Fantastic" in stock? Give me the address, please. Then, as you claim, we can all enjoy Prince's music. As for now, it's pretty damn hard for the public to enjoy the man's music because it ain't out there! It was barely out there when it was being officially released. That's the entire point of this thread.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 05/07/16 12:29pm

2freaky4church
1

avatar

We were equally difficult. Just look at this site? We are the reason big fans of his do not come here to post, but we get mad at them, not at how fanatical we are or can be.

Prince may have been confused at our reactions to his music. One person saying Jughead is great, another saying it is total shit. The same with other songs like Planet Earth, Musicology, Get On The Boat.

Bart and his ilk didn't help either. Now he is gone and we are all lost.

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 05/07/16 12:31pm

Guitarhero

2freaky4church1 said:

We were equally difficult. Just look at this site? We are the reason big fans of his do not come here to post, but we get mad at them, not at how fanatical we are or can be.

Prince may have been confused at our reactions to his music. One person saying Jughead is great, another saying it is total shit. The same with other songs like Planet Earth, Musicology, Get On The Boat.

Bart and his ilk didn't help either. Now he is gone and we are all lost.

Bart posted today on another thread.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 05/07/16 12:37pm

Cloreen

avatar

Bohemian67 said:

And by the way 'No one forces you to download music for free'. That is a personal choice. Take responsiblity and stop blaming Prince.

.

.

You tell me exactly how a person in America was to add Prince's new album "20ten" to their Prince collection.

.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 05/07/16 12:56pm

ufoclub

avatar

Cloreen said:

Bohemian67 said:

His catalogue will go on and be enjoyed for decades to come.

.

Are we living in the same world? Prince's catalogue was not and presently is not available! Tell me exactly how someone right now can get "20ten"? How about "N.E.W.S"? What about "Xpectation"? Show me how the public can enjoy "One Night Alone...Live!"

.

Sure the Warner Brothers releases can be and always have been enjoyed by music listeners. But the above albums and 90% of Prince releases post-Warners can not "be enjoyed for decades to come." You couldn't even enjoy them in the decade they were "released"! It took me six years to finally say, "F-it, Prince is not releasing "20ten" to the general public, I'm going to just illegally download it."

.

Friend, do you have a record store that has "Rave In2 The Joy Fantastic" in stock? Give me the address, please. Then, as you claim, we can all enjoy Prince's music. As for now, it's pretty damn hard for the public to enjoy the man's music because it ain't out there! It was barely out there when it was being officially released. That's the entire point of this thread.

At the time only 20ten was hard to get, but it sure seemed like everyone had it on this site. Wasn't he simply using that album as a promo for the concerts in London? ONA live was a boxed set I bought at a local record store, and I saw it in stiock for a while. NEWS and Xpectation all available through his website at the time, weren't they?

Sure, now, they are not in stock, but at the time, it wasn't like he didn't make all kinds of material available through various means. Rememember he first released Musicology with the public live broadcast of the opening concert at movie theaters. It didn't even have a cover yet. He was pushing to get material out there in many ways.

Also some of those things wouldn't have appealed to a general public, so no need to sign a deal with a major distributor. He did go through major distributors for those projects designed for a the general public.

Rave was a major release, with an appearance on MTV and then a live New Years concert. It was everywhere in stores back then.

So think you're a bit off saying he was difficult with fans at the time of the releases.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 05/07/16 1:14pm

Cloreen

avatar

ufoclub said:

Rave was a major release, with an appearance on MTV and then a live New Years concert. It was everywhere in stores back then.

So think you're a bit off saying he was difficult with fans at the time of the releases.

.

No, that's "Rave Un2..." not "Rave In2..."

.

And you make it sound like joining an internet club, paying a membership fee, then paying annual fees, then paying for the product you want, then downloading it, then printing your own labels and CD covers and lyric booklets is an easy accessible thing to do?. All those internet releases were relatively difficult for hard core fans to get. Now imagine how the casual music fan who simply wanted to buy the latest from Prince must have felt.

.

Look, numbers show there are just under a million hard core Prince fans who did what we all did -- jump through hoops to get his latest album. But remember "Purple Rain"? Fourteen million people bought that record. Thirteen million of them were no way in hell going to go through what I described above just to hear the latest Prince album. He made it unreasonably difficult for people who just wanted to buy a Prince album. There was a larger audience out there who would have liked to sample Prince music. But he sure removed himself from them. As I stated in my first post -- just look at the emotional outpouring of love for the guy. Had Prince had some records on amazon.com instead of NPG Music Club, those people would have bought some Prince records throughout the 2000s.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 05/07/16 1:37pm

destinyc1

http://www.phoenixnewtime...es-6611739 These are the 20 albums everyone is speaking of.Is everyone fam with this magazine?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 05/07/16 1:48pm

PaisleyShark

I'm with FUNKYNESS on this one. I can't understand the ungratefulness and false sense of entitlement you see on here in the face of a man's death. Freeing his music surely meant freeing it for himself, not making it free for everyone to do as they see fit with HIS art.

I don't think for a minute that there would've been a sizeable market for most of his releases over the last 20 years if his attitude to labels or video-sharing websites was different. As for hard-to-find releases, he's not alone in having out of print albums. It happens.

One thing he was quite clearly right about all along is that the industry was moving in a direction where the artist was the last in line to get paid. If that meant he didn't want the CEO of youtube to make money off videos of his live performances, I say what's wrong with that? Just because he's no longer here doesn't mean it should be a free-for-all with his art that he was so keen to control when alive.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 05/07/16 1:58pm

Cloreen

avatar

PaisleyShark said:

I can't understand the ungratefulness and false sense of entitlement you see on here in the face of a man's death. Freeing his music surely meant freeing it for himself, not making it free for everyone

As for hard-to-find releases, he's not alone in having out of print albums. It happens.

.

1. Where do you get the idea that people want FREE Prince music?

.

2. True, artists have out of print records. But name one superstar artist who has an out of print record a year after the thing was released!

.

You really think Prince releasing music on his own worked brilliantly? The guy's stuff can not even be purchased right now. If you didn't get it fresh off the press back then you were sh!t out of luck, forget about getting an album from five years ago.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 05/07/16 2:24pm

pdiddy2011

Cloreen said:

ufoclub said:

Rave was a major release, with an appearance on MTV and then a live New Years concert. It was everywhere in stores back then.

So think you're a bit off saying he was difficult with fans at the time of the releases.

.

No, that's "Rave Un2..." not "Rave In2..."

.

And you make it sound like joining an internet club, paying a membership fee, then paying annual fees, then paying for the product you want, then downloading it, then printing your own labels and CD covers and lyric booklets is an easy accessible thing to do?. All those internet releases were relatively difficult for hard core fans to get. Now imagine how the casual music fan who simply wanted to buy the latest from Prince must have felt.

.

Look, numbers show there are just under a million hard core Prince fans who did what we all did -- jump through hoops to get his latest album. But remember "Purple Rain"? Fourteen million people bought that record. Thirteen million of them were no way in hell going to go through what I described above just to hear the latest Prince album. He made it unreasonably difficult for people who just wanted to buy a Prince album. There was a larger audience out there who would have liked to sample Prince music. But he sure removed himself from them. As I stated in my first post -- just look at the emotional outpouring of love for the guy. Had Prince had some records on amazon.com instead of NPG Music Club, those people would have bought some Prince records throughout the 2000s.

Again, Prince didn't believe artists were treated fairly by music corps; he distributed the music in a way that he felt better compensated himself, the artist. There were plenty of opportunities to get Prince's music if you wanted it. You might miss a handful of official releases, mainly by your own ignorance of their availability, or your decision not to join a club. 2010, which you keep focusing on (1 album out of 39 official), is really the only one that was really "difficult" to get. It's amazing to me that rather than focus on the awe of ANY one artist officially releasing 38 official albums, you want to fixate on the 2 or 3 of those that were "difficult" to obtain.

Again, to one of your original points, the music was not and is not hard to find.

[Edited 5/7/16 14:27pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 05/07/16 2:38pm

AaronA

Thanks to all who uploaded the videos, shows I missed out on seeing for the last 20 plus years

Being a hardcore fan I,ve missed out on a lot, it's great people can see him as the genius we knew.

To me, since he did'nt care about a will he's endorsed all fan's etc to do as we please with his material.

Maybe its his gift to us for making it so hard to be a fan, I don't even have 20ten and the NPG Club stuff, I should'nt have had to miss out.

Bitter sweet Phase 2 arrived at my door the day he died.

Thanks Prince, for the last 31 years of albums I have.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 05/07/16 2:46pm

Selena4641

Toadlips said:

Cloreen, I agree with you 100%. Back in the day when Prince was fighting to free himself from WB, I was stoked. Prince said he was gonna "free the music", and I believed him. Supposedly, WB wasn't letting him put out all of the stuff he wanted to, and when he released the 3-disc Emancipation with the promise that "this is what freedom sounds like", I actually thought things were going to work out great for the fans. It turned out to be hogwash, of course. Instead of freedom, we got crappy websites and dysfunctional music clubs. Instead of being easier to get Prince's music, it was harder.



More recently, Prince wanted us to join "Tidal" at a RIDICULOUS monthly rate in order to hear a paltry "purple pick of the week" and be left with nothing at the end of the subscription. Sorry, but I've been getting better picks of the week from bootlegs. Why is it that bootleggers are releasing better music than Prince himself? Why is Prince releasing a single live song (that wasn't the highlight of the show) from a 2 hour concert rather than the whole concert? Why was he so admant about getting the masters and then not capitalizing on them with a remaster? I just don't get it.



I'll agree with all of you who say that Prince was a musical genius, but he was no genius when it came to business. If the main reason for maintaining control over his music was to make a dollar, then he certainly missed the boat. If he thought that take down notices, overpriced fan clubs and rent-to-never-own streaming services were what freedom sounded like, then he was sorely mistaken.




I agree 100% with both of you. I'm not going to go on a treasure hunt to find anyone's music, because I have a life, a Husband a job and two children who were quite young then when he started this mess. I didn't have time to jump through hoops to get his music. To pay $100 to join the website pissed me off. And while people shouldn't rip music from YouTube, it's a fact of life that it happens to artists. And I doubt that stealing his music would've made a dent financially for him. Prince keeping his music off YouTube and the like costs him future fans. An example is my 21 year old daughter. While she knows who Prince is, and his earlier, more common songs, she couldn't tell me the name of the song that was playing this week at the Gap where she works. When I told her, she was like, "why haven't I heard this before? Or seen a video for the song, I like it." I had to explain the whole reasoning behind Prince and his music. To tell the truth, I started losing interest when he wrote Slave on his face. I'm sorry but a Slave is not someone that was paid $100 million dollars and then became unhappy because because he couldn't release music the way he wanted. That's a slap in the face to people that were Slaves. I wonder if he wrote Slave on his face in the last year if people would call him out on it now, because we are living in a very PC world now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 05/07/16 2:47pm

dalsh327

Rave In2 was the remix thru NPGMC

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 05/07/16 2:58pm

PaisleyShark

Cloreen said:



PaisleyShark said:



I can't understand the ungratefulness and false sense of entitlement you see on here in the face of a man's death. Freeing his music surely meant freeing it for himself, not making it free for everyone



As for hard-to-find releases, he's not alone in having out of print albums. It happens.

.


1. Where do you get the idea that people want FREE Prince music?


.


2. True, artists have out of print records. But name one superstar artist who has an out of print record a year after the thing was released!


.


You really think Prince releasing music on his own worked brilliantly? The guy's stuff can not even be purchased right now. If you didn't get it fresh off the press back then you were sh!t out of luck, forget about getting an album from five years ago.




1. That wasn't directed at anyone in particular, but in general I think music is increasingly seen as 'free' (non-premium streaming services, youtube). So I think the criticism of his online control fits in with this comment.
2. Anything that's pressed in limited quantities fits in with this. Record Store Day releases, for example. Major artists release limited editions all the time. Jack White runs The Third Man Vault and if you're not subscribed within a one month sign up, you can't get the record for each quarterly membership, and once it's gone, it's gone. Jack White isn't being criticised for making limited records, and on a single format. There are Prince singles I don't have, so b-sides I'm missing, but I can't get too worked up about it as I wasn't around to be a fan at the time. Some of these out of print 'albums' are the equivalent of fanclub releases (The Chocolate Invasion, etc), and again that's pretty common. As are store- or web-exclusives.

Was he meant to press 14 million copies of The Rainbow Children, just in case? I'm sure they pressed as many as they expected to sell. I suspect all of his studio albums will become available again in the near future.

I'm not saying it worked brilliantly, like a lot of his business decisions, but they were his decisions. I'd maybe feel differently if he'd made them extremely difficult to get on release date, but as far as I'm aware, they were there if you wanted them.

I just don't think he missed out on massive sales through his approach. I don't see many artists who peaked (commercially) in the 80s/early 90s shifting records like they used to. Look at U2 or REM - very fan-friendly - but their sales plummeted (much earlier for REM than U2). No amount of fan-friendliness would have sold 14m copies of 20Ten!

I really didn't mean this as a direct criticism of you or anyone else. I think it's unfortunate that some albums aren't available, or he didn't want videos on YouTube, but I think it's understandable that he wanted control over his records and music in general, and I think he'd lost the mainstream (in terms of record sales) by the end of the Warner period.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 05/07/16 3:09pm

mynameisnotsus
an

PaisleyShark said:

Cloreen said:



PaisleyShark said:



I can't understand the ungratefulness and false sense of entitlement you see on here in the face of a man's death. Freeing his music surely meant freeing it for himself, not making it free for everyone



As for hard-to-find releases, he's not alone in having out of print albums. It happens.

.


1. Where do you get the idea that people want FREE Prince music?


.


2. True, artists have out of print records. But name one superstar artist who has an out of print record a year after the thing was released!


.


You really think Prince releasing music on his own worked brilliantly? The guy's stuff can not even be purchased right now. If you didn't get it fresh off the press back then you were sh!t out of luck, forget about getting an album from five years ago.




1. That wasn't directed at anyone in particular, but in general I think music is increasingly seen as 'free' (non-premium streaming services, youtube). So I think the criticism of his online control fits in with this comment.
2. Anything that's pressed in limited quantities fits in with this. Record Store Day releases, for example. Major artists release limited editions all the time. Jack White runs The Third Man Vault and if you're not subscribed within a one month sign up, you can't get the record for each quarterly membership, and once it's gone, it's gone. Jack White isn't being criticised for making limited records, and on a single format. There are Prince singles I don't have, so b-sides I'm missing, but I can't get too worked up about it as I wasn't around to be a fan at the time. Some of these out of print 'albums' are the equivalent of fanclub releases (The Chocolate Invasion, etc), and again that's pretty common. As are store- or web-exclusives.

Was he meant to press 14 million copies of The Rainbow Children, just in case? I'm sure they pressed as many as they expected to sell. I suspect all of his studio albums will become available again in the near future.

I'm not saying it worked brilliantly, like a lot of his business decisions, but they were his decisions. I'd maybe feel differently if he'd made them extremely difficult to get on release date, but as far as I'm aware, they were there if you wanted them.

I just don't think he missed out on massive sales through his approach. I don't see many artists who peaked (commercially) in the 80s/early 90s shifting records like they used to. Look at U2 or REM - very fan-friendly - but their sales plummeted (much earlier for REM than U2). No amount of fan-friendliness would have sold 14m copies of 20Ten!

I really didn't mean this as a direct criticism of you or anyone else. I think it's unfortunate that some albums aren't available, or he didn't want videos on YouTube, but I think it's understandable that he wanted control over his records and music in general, and I think he'd lost the mainstream (in terms of record sales) by the end of the Warner period.


More than 2.5 million copies of 20Ten were distributed in the UK with the newspapers they went out on. It was a brilliant move, he would have never sold that many via usual distribution channels. I bought mine direct from the papers website at the time - probably found a link to their site on the org
razz

They shipped it to me in Australia and it cost about $10.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 05/07/16 3:18pm

Cloreen

avatar

PaisleyShark said:

I don't see many artists who peaked (commercially) in the 80s/early 90s shifting records like they used to. Look at U2 or REM - very fan-friendly - but their sales plummeted (much earlier for REM than U2). No amount of fan-friendliness would have sold 14m copies of 20Ten!

.

But we'll never know.

.

Look, realistically he wasn't going to sell 14 million copies of an album ever again. The current stars of today (Beyonce, Bieber...) aren't even doing that. But to say just because R.E.M. or U2 are not selling in great numbers now means Prince wouldn't either I think is wrong. As I said, would "20ten" sell 14 mill? No. But why not give it the old college try and give it a go? What was Prince up to releasing his stuff only in Europe or for limited time on his web club? Why remove oneself from the game? Why not take a shot? I feel he would have released something eventually that would have knocked everyone out again, but he hindered those chances by having his albums so removed from any public exposure.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 05/07/16 3:36pm

Eileen

Selena4641 said:

To tell the truth, I started losing interest when he wrote Slave on his face. I'm sorry but a Slave is not someone that was paid $100 million dollars and then became unhappy because because he couldn't release music the way he wanted. That's a slap in the face to people that were Slaves. I wonder if he wrote Slave on his face in the last year if people would call him out on it now, because we are living in a very PC world now.


That's an good point... two actually.


It's funny - the people who worked for Prince couldn't eat what they wanted or sleep anywhere near the time or number of hours they wanted or be guaranteed an uninterrupted evening for sexy time or to play with their children. But the guy who signed the contract twice and had big money backing to help him become rich and famous, he was the face of the downtrodden.


If the artists of the past had had Prince's stance on intellectual property, he wouldn't have had access to much of the material that inspired and influenced him.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 05/07/16 3:41pm

Cloreen

avatar

Eileen said:


If the artists of the past had had Prince's stance on intellectual property, he wouldn't have had access to much of the material that inspired and influenced him.

.

Touche. Excellent point.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 05/07/16 5:49pm

FUNKYNESS

ufoclub said:

Cloreen said:

.

Are we living in the same world? Prince's catalogue was not and presently is not available! Tell me exactly how someone right now can get "20ten"? How about "N.E.W.S"? What about "Xpectation"? Show me how the public can enjoy "One Night Alone...Live!"

.

Sure the Warner Brothers releases can be and always have been enjoyed by music listeners. But the above albums and 90% of Prince releases post-Warners can not "be enjoyed for decades to come." You couldn't even enjoy them in the decade they were "released"! It took me six years to finally say, "F-it, Prince is not releasing "20ten" to the general public, I'm going to just illegally download it."

.

Friend, do you have a record store that has "Rave In2 The Joy Fantastic" in stock? Give me the address, please. Then, as you claim, we can all enjoy Prince's music. As for now, it's pretty damn hard for the public to enjoy the man's music because it ain't out there! It was barely out there when it was being officially released. That's the entire point of this thread.

At the time only 20ten was hard to get, but it sure seemed like everyone had it on this site. Wasn't he simply using that album as a promo for the concerts in London? ONA live was a boxed set I bought at a local record store, and I saw it in stiock for a while. NEWS and Xpectation all available through his website at the time, weren't they?

Sure, now, they are not in stock, but at the time, it wasn't like he didn't make all kinds of material available through various means. Rememember he first released Musicology with the public live broadcast of the opening concert at movie theaters. It didn't even have a cover yet. He was pushing to get material out there in many ways.

Also some of those things wouldn't have appealed to a general public, so no need to sign a deal with a major distributor. He did go through major distributors for those projects designed for a the general public.

Rave was a major release, with an appearance on MTV and then a live New Years concert. It was everywhere in stores back then.

So think you're a bit off saying he was difficult with fans at the time of the releases.

Well said. And throw in the number of tracks that Prince put out there on the net for free. Lotusflow3r was a triple album priced likea single album in a major retail chain store - who else does that?

I also look at some of those releases that were for loyal fans that he could not have done under contract (Crystal Ball, Xpectation, NEWS (which won a Grammy nomination), the special version of Rave, even the Mayte and NPG albums). Instead of crying about these releases not being easy to download (steal), real fans appreciate the amount and frequency of material that no other major artist has ever equalled.

Save America - Stop Illegal Immigration. God bless America. PEACE
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 05/07/16 5:58pm

Cloreen

avatar

FUNKYNESS said:

Instead of crying about these releases not being easy to download (steal), real fans appreciate the amount and frequency of material that no other major artist has ever equalled.

.

How about this: Instead of saying every single thing Prince did was brilliant, real fans can say Prince was rather obtuse with the way he released his albums after he left Warner Brothers.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 05/07/16 6:07pm

Pokeno4Money

avatar

Cloreen said:

Bohemian67 said:

And by the way 'No one forces you to download music for free'. That is a personal choice. Take responsiblity and stop blaming Prince.

.

.

You tell me exactly how a person in America was to add Prince's new album "20ten" to their Prince collection.

.


nod

I own every album he's officially released, EXCEPT that one. I refuse to pay someone on Ebay for a CD they got for free, and I absolutely LOVE Laydown after finding an audio link on the net years ago.

"Never let nasty stalkers disrespect you. They start shit, you finish it. Go down to their level, that's the only way they'll understand. You have to handle things yourself."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 05/07/16 6:14pm

Cloreen

avatar

Pokeno4Money said:


I own every album he's officially released, EXCEPT that one. I refuse to pay someone on Ebay for a CD they got for free

.

More power to you. I held out for six years. Was always bothered by that gap in my Prince collection. With his passing I just said, "F-it" and downloaded the darn thing.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 05/07/16 6:28pm

Pokeno4Money

avatar

Cloreen said:

Pokeno4Money said:


I own every album he's officially released, EXCEPT that one. I refuse to pay someone on Ebay for a CD they got for free

.

More power to you. I held out for six years. Was always bothered by that gap in my Prince collection. With his passing I just said, "F-it" and downloaded the darn thing.


I'm old school ... or actually, just plain old. If it ain't on vinyl or CD, I ain't got it. LOL

The only boots I have are the Black Album on vinyl, and Dream Factory on CD ... both purchased in small music stores when I was young and naive, thinking they were just new album releases. innocent

"Never let nasty stalkers disrespect you. They start shit, you finish it. Go down to their level, that's the only way they'll understand. You have to handle things yourself."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 05/08/16 7:17am

1nonly

avatar

Cloreen said:

FUNKYNESS said:

Instead of crying about these releases not being easy to download (steal), real fans appreciate the amount and frequency of material that no other major artist has ever equalled.

.

How about this: Instead of saying every single thing Prince did was brilliant, real fans can say Prince was rather obtuse with the way he released his albums after he left Warner Brothers.

100% Cloreen. Just about all counter arguments on tis thread are from the viewpoint of a hardcore fan. But I totally understand where you're coming from. A casual listener (especially nowadays) would not be interested in Prince. Why? Because they cannot easily obtain his music.

Oh, right now they can? Because of the publicity his death has created. An yeah, I know it's difficult for some to talk in this light, but it's the reality. HIs death is a very strong form of advertisement for the artist. With so many other artists doing their thing to honor him, and so much adoration (newfound or not) for the man. It works in putting his name out there, from a business standpoint. He's broken records recently.

Again, this is not meant to be rude, only truthful. If he had allowed this much exposure when he was alive he may have reached more ears. He may not have cared so much about the money, but I would be hard pressed to believe he didn't want more people to hear his music.

Yes, he was very obtuse in his release methods, and if this slaps the rose colored glasses off some people's eyes then so be it. I don't apologize for that, at least I can see the reality of it.

Thank you, Cloreen.

Walking alone in the dark, I see nothing u see
I can be in a park, or flying in the…in the deep sea
I wish u’d hold my hand; then everything could b
There’s nothing strange, we’re not deranged
We only want everyday 2 b a Cosmic Day
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 05/08/16 8:17am

Cloreen

avatar

1nonly said:

Thank you, Cloreen.

.

Hey, I wasn't trying to be provocative with my thread. I was just stating something that in light of current events, is pretty evident.

.

It was all the outpouring of emotion that made me see, "Prince, ya blew it by being so obtuse with the release of your music." The interest and love for Prince we can now see was always out there. But requiring them to join clubs, pay membership fees...why? Hard core fans would. Casual music buyers (the guy/gal who is walking around "Best Buy" and sees a new album and happily buys) sure wouldn't and didn't.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 05/08/16 9:42am

1nonly

avatar

Yup, I agree. If anything, now there's a silver lining in that people are now being exposed to his vast music and catchingon tto what we as fans always knew. And yet, some hardcore fans will still gripe at these new folks coming onto his music now that he's dead. But that's a discussion for another day and another thread.
Walking alone in the dark, I see nothing u see
I can be in a park, or flying in the…in the deep sea
I wish u’d hold my hand; then everything could b
There’s nothing strange, we’re not deranged
We only want everyday 2 b a Cosmic Day
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 05/08/16 9:50am

nursev

I have no issues with it...it was his music/art and he did what he wanted with it yes it may have cost him fans/money, but looking at all those people mourning him people still knew he was talented and loved him for that and for standing up for his beliefs against the record industry. Prince will never be forgotten just for that alone.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 05/08/16 12:06pm

Bohemian67

avatar

Cloreen said:

Bohemian67 said:

His catalogue will go on and be enjoyed for decades to come.

.

Are we living in the same world? Prince's catalogue was not and presently is not available! Tell me exactly how someone right now can get "20ten"? How about "N.E.W.S"? What about "Xpectation"? Show me how the public can enjoy "One Night Alone...Live!"

.

Sure the Warner Brothers releases can be and always have been enjoyed by music listeners. But the above albums and 90% of Prince releases post-Warners can not "be enjoyed for decades to come." You couldn't even enjoy them in the decade they were "released"! It took me six years to finally say, "F-it, Prince is not releasing "20ten" to the general public, I'm going to just illegally download it."

.

Friend, do you have a record store that has "Rave In2 The Joy Fantastic" in stock? Give me the address, please. Then, as you claim, we can all enjoy Prince's music. As for now, it's pretty damn hard for the public to enjoy the man's music because it ain't out there! It was barely out there when it was being officially released. That's the entire point of this thread.

.

Bolded available on Tidal, including Planet Earth (also newspaper give away). 20Ten, Raveand TRC originals were easy to get via a second hand site. If you wanted the music, were in the loop and were looking for it, you'd find it. His distribution methods were alternative, like he was, but I doubt you've read why by researching the suggested thread. So I stick by my opinion. He blew nothing. Prince honoured his artistic output and knew that in the throw away easy come easy go society, it would be less appreciated by just being readily available. Whether the enjoyment of that art was to be now or later (time didn't matter to Prince) he knew it would eventually be out there, but on his terms. Nothing wrong with that, it gave him the freedom he desired. Control over his work.

"Free URself, B the best that U can B, 3rd Apartment from the Sun, nothing left to fear" Prince Rogers Nelson - Forever in my Life -
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 05/08/16 12:19pm

ufoclub

avatar

Cloreen said:

ufoclub said:

Rave was a major release, with an appearance on MTV and then a live New Years concert. It was everywhere in stores back then.

So think you're a bit off saying he was difficult with fans at the time of the releases.

.

No, that's "Rave Un2..." not "Rave In2..."

.

And you make it sound like joining an internet club, paying a membership fee, then paying annual fees, then paying for the product you want, then downloading it, then printing your own labels and CD covers and lyric booklets is an easy accessible thing to do?. All those internet releases were relatively difficult for hard core fans to get. Now imagine how the casual music fan who simply wanted to buy the latest from Prince must have felt.

.

Look, numbers show there are just under a million hard core Prince fans who did what we all did -- jump through hoops to get his latest album. But remember "Purple Rain"? Fourteen million people bought that record. Thirteen million of them were no way in hell going to go through what I described above just to hear the latest Prince album. He made it unreasonably difficult for people who just wanted to buy a Prince album. There was a larger audience out there who would have liked to sample Prince music. But he sure removed himself from them. As I stated in my first post -- just look at the emotional outpouring of love for the guy. Had Prince had some records on amazon.com instead of NPG Music Club, those people would have bought some Prince records throughout the 2000s.

Yes, downloading the music by joining an online club is easier than ordering and getting a delivery or driving out and buying a CD. The state of things now proves this, and that was the flow of consumer behavior in the 2000's. Packaging unfortunately was also phasing out, so all those other steps you described of printing labels and CD covers were becoming extinct in terms of popular music. That was not what casual mainstream music fans cared about. And it is all truly extinct now. Young people actually make fun of buying CD'. Or any discs for that matter like DVD or blu-rays.

Prince's internet releases were extra output on top of his traditional album releases through distributors. He was exercising the freedom of putting out more material on whatever schedule and means he wanted. Basically, Prince did have albums on Amazon in the 2000's in addition to having material online through a club.

The fact is, even if he had put out Xpectation, One night Alone, or NEWS through a major distributor, at the same time as ONA live, and Rainbow Children, it wasn't like the new generation of top 40 teenagers were going to buy it or even take notice in that mature vein of output (in the past generation it was a majority of teens who bought up Purple Rain). Purple Rain had pop singles with lyrics that teenagers could identify with, plus music videos, and a lotto win hit movie that was also aimed at a teenage level of plot. All that combined drove up the sales. His planned album "High" might have been intended for the teen/tween audience bu that was dropped. So the biggest loss in terms of fans was the material from that and the two albums culled from the online club output. But that's it besides 20ten, right? Every other album was in stores.

And you brought up yourself that you are referring to Rave Un2 which was a specialized partial remix of an album he had already put out through traditional mainstream channels and promotion.

The emotional outpouring now is proof that he didn't cause any serious damage by being difficult to fans. It's proof that he won out in the end. This explosion of testimonials and the online deluge of videos and music is more than any marketing firm could have engineered. It's also more than what happened with Elvis, Kurt Cobain or John Lennon in terms of suddenly work unveiled dramatically (both charitable, personal, and artistic). Inadvertently, he created a full knuckle punch of a wake. A wake up. Almost like how a tidal wave works.

In my opinion the most difficult years of public relations with casual fans were in the late 80's when he was seen as aloof and weird (hence his dropping sales with each album until the tie in with Batman). His PR scandal with We are the World and bodyguard incidents combined with teenage alienating albums caused a very observable effect and backlash.

and then the next most difficult time would have been the mid 90's with the name change at a time when he didn't have any hit singles on the charts, although the glow of the symbol album and the single "7" were to completely faded.

If anything he was trying to turn that around in his later years by putting out some material with more pop oriented beats and lyrics such as the recent HitnRun phase 1. He went through a huge phase of friendly interviews during Musicology unlike any time in the past. How many interivews or talk show sitdowns can you find from the 80's? He was making a big effort to be a relatable and a "friendly" from the Celebrations onward.

The very first sentence of your post: "In the wake of Prince's passing, something has dawned on me: Prince and his offbeat behavior with the caretaking of his music really cost him an opportunity to be a very special and extremely beloved entertainer." is false. Did you see what happened in Los Angeles? On the charts? He IS a special and beloved entertainer in the pop universe. One that is now passed away in real life.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince Did Blow It By Being So Difficult With Fans