Thank you! Finally! Something concrete.

morningsong said:

Thank you! Finally! Something concrete.

So unless you are spoonfeed info it is not valid? The link was on the board and avalible. So many people around Prince have conducted themselves in a greedy and vulture like manner no one really needs to make up anything.

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

Thank you! Finally! Something concrete.

So unless you are spoonfeed info it is not valid? The link was on the board and avalible. So many people around Prince have conducted themselves in a greedy and vulture like manner no one really needs to make up anything.

I do expect if someone present something for all the world to see to back their facts up solidly and not spoonfeed me a bunch of soap opera drama. Some people aren't interested in all that goofy drama.

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

Susu1976 said:

OMG. I. FUCKING. CAN'T. Ever heard of not it being a good thing trying to teach a fish how to swim? Obviously you didn't understand Menes's comment either and the whole thing seems to still go way over your head. That's on another thread so don't deflect. Btw, come to me when you have analysed 100+ autopsy reports. Keep this thread where is intended to be. I presented to you some issues about your comments. If you can't elaborate or offer counter arguments.... [Edited 12/4/17 22:25pm] [Edited 12/4/17 22:26pm]

Again this is what I mean I wasn't talking to Menes and the answer didn't come from Menes and if Menes answered I didn't read it because it didn't address what I was asking. In fact no one answered specifically what I asked and it's obvious here you haven't a clue what I was asking just like you're not addressing what I'm asking here but deflecting because I'm not jumping on the whoopie cushion to be foul over something I'm challenging folks to please explain what about this thing is foul. She's not making money and she not getting pets on the back and she's not getting awards so how has this been benefitting her? If you don't know then you don't know and jumping on me doesn't make it look like you know.

TO ME it is foul because of the timing. Who does something like that six days after someone dies.

that is all i have Morning, for me it is simply timing. i agree she isn't currently benefiting so the foul

ness is kinda mute. But to me it is like people selling Prince's stuff. I can't get on board with these

folks timing. it upsets me on that level. i don't know if i answered your challenge but that is all i

have as far as i am personally concerned. best.

morningsong said:

purplemist7777 said:

laurarichardson said:

See the link below. Took two seconds. The estate did not approve of what she was doing. Why would anyone think they would is beyond me. You do not own something so it is not yours to take and I guess you are going to pretend the trademark for making merchandise does not exisit.

http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?qs=87015620

Opposition

Number: 91234048 Filing Date: 04/17/2017 Status: Terminated Status Date: 06/12/2017 General Contact Number: 571-272-8500 Interlocutory Attorney: ELIZABETH A DUNN Paralegal Name: AMY L MATELSKI Defendant Name: In A Perfect World Foundation Correspondence: DAVID G SCHELZEL
BEST & FLANAGAN LLP
60 S SIXTH ST STE 2700
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402
UNITED STATES
trademark@bestlaw.com, dschelzel@bestlaw.com, johnsullivan@bestlaw.com
Phone: 612-339-7121 Serial #: 87015620 Application File Assignment Application Status: Notice of Allowance - Issued Mark: LOVE 4 ONE ANOTHER Plaintiff Name: The Estate of Prince Roge... Charities Correspondence: CAMILLE M MILLER
COZEN O'CONNOR
1650 MARKET STREET, ONE LIBERTY PLACE SUITE 2800
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
UNITED STATES
CMiller@cozen.com, clattimer@cozen.com, cbranka@cozen.com
Phone: 215-665-7273 Serial #: 78616776 Application File Assignment Registration #: 3864275 Application Status: Cancelled - Section 8 Mark: LOVE 4 ONE ANOTHER Prosecution History #DateHistory TextDue Date 8 06/12/2017 TERMINATED 7 06/12/2017 BD DECISION: DISMISSED W/O PREJ 6 06/09/2017 W/DRAW OF OPPOSITION 5 05/31/2017 EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED 4 05/30/2017 STIP FOR EXT 3 04/18/2017 PENDING, INSTITUTED 2 04/18/2017 NOTICE AND TRIAL DATES SE...NSWER DUE: 05/28/2017 1 04/17/2017 FILED AND FEE

Results as of 12/05/2017 03:05 PM Back to search results

[Edited 12/5/17 12:15pm]

Thank you! To be clear the estate blocked IAPW from trademarking L4OA? Does this include FingerPrince? I did a search and nothing shows up on that and looks like IAPW still has? Thx again

thanks for posting all this LR, i can find a recipe for you but knowing the correct gov office to look for some of these docs, not so much. it is appreciated.

[Edited 12/5/17 14:07pm]

Purplebflogirl said:

IMHO we have all learned ALOT about her since his death.. The divorce records getting unsealed (and the reason she fought to keep them sealed) proved she was about the $.The incredibly tacky shit her husband has done..singing P's songs etc and now this money grab..tacky,tacky!

She's disgusting!

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

I do expect if someone present something for all the world to see to back their facts up solidly and not spoonfeed me a bunch of soap opera drama. Some people aren't interested in all that goofy drama.

—Some people are not interested in reading the info in front of their face which is normal for this board. Court docs and govt websites are open to all to view facts. Are you M2?

From what I can tell (and Im not an expert at trademarks) the Estate filed an Opposition and M2 had a certain period of time to respond to the opposition and never did.

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said:

I do expect if someone present something for all the world to see to back their facts up solidly and not spoonfeed me a bunch of soap opera drama. Some people aren't interested in all that goofy drama.

—Some people are not interested in reading the info in front of their face which is normal for this board. Court docs and govt websites are open to all to view facts. Are you M2?

I'll read IF it put up. But it wasn't put there so what the heck are you talking about, you and your momentary friends said go look for it and then proceded with regurgitating the same exact stuff that's been said 500 times over the past 2 years. Again, if you want your word to be Golden and water tight then back your mess up with real stuff and not just opinions. I know I don't need anyone to think for me, I can read and comprehend pretty damned well. Maybe other people need their stuff chewed up for them so they can swallow it, but a whole lot of people don't. Sorry if folks don't like to be challenged on what they say but hey welcome to the grown-up world. And that bullying mess can go in the garbage.

morningsong said:

laurarichardson said:

morningsong said: —Some people are not interested in reading the info in front of their face which is normal for this board. Court docs and govt websites are open to all to view facts. Are you M2?

I'll read IF it put up. But it wasn't put there so what the heck are you talking about, you and your momentary friends said go look for it and then proceded with regurgitating the same exact stuff that's been said 500 times over the past 2 years. Again, if you want your word to be Golden and water tight then back your mess up with real stuff and not just opinions. I know I don't need anyone to think for me, I can read and comprehend pretty damned well. Maybe other people need their stuff chewed up for them so they can swallow it, but a whole lot of people don't. Sorry if folks don't like to be challenged on what they say but hey welcome to the grown-up world. And that bullying mess can go in the garbage.

The page for the trademark website is on this page so what are you talking about?. Jesus help us if you do not know how to read the web address and go to the site in 2017.

How is something being regurgitated? I knew nothing about the trademark issue until a few days ago and the other information about M2 we have known about for sometime via court docs and tax forms. All of which you can use the search buttong or goggle to locate.

Everything has been backed up and then some. Who is bullying you? You are being presented with information that you want to pretend is not avalible. Are you sure you are not M2?

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

From what I can tell (and Im not an expert at trademarks) the Estate filed an Opposition and M2 had a certain period of time to respond to the opposition and never did.

It appears at least one action was dropped because they did not respond in time. Perhaps they will revisit if M2 tries to do some merchandising.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

From what I can tell (and Im not an expert at trademarks) the Estate filed an Opposition and M2 had a certain period of time to respond to the opposition and never did.

I bet she didn't...The estate high powered lawyers and publicity would have eaten her alive. Anything that provided a leg up for her in life came from him.

A year later, in 2006, Testolini and Prince divorced amicably. When asked about whether or not they kept in touch on charitable works after the divorce, she says, "I don't want to bring up the divorce, so I'm just going to stick on the charity subject." (Testolini is now married to singer-songwriter Eric Benét.)

They divorced amicably.. HAHAHA

She doesn't want to talk about the divorce. HAHAHA

^^^ I think M2 also applied to trademark the above.

These documents are so hard to follow on the trademark site.

I cant even figure them out but it is an area of law that I have very little knowledge.

It could very well be she was issued the trademarks.

It shows A Perfect World as the owner.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

CandyCool said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

^^^ I think M2 also applied to trademark the above.

These documents are so hard to follow on the trademark site.

I cant even figure them out but it is an area of law that I have very little knowledge.

It could very well be she was issued the trademarks.

It shows A Perfect World as the owner.

Not sure about that. She also filed a trademark for the words "In A Perfect World"... on April 27, 2016. I would think that the heirs/ estate had other things on their minds at that particular time than issuing trademarks to an ex-wife.

I agree they heirs/estate had bigger things going on than filing for a trademark of Ps long time charity.

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

CandyCool said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said: Not sure about that. She also filed a trademark for the words "In A Perfect World"... on April 27, 2016. I would think that the heirs/ estate had other things on their minds at that particular time than issuing trademarks to an ex-wife.

I agree they heirs/estate had bigger things going on than filing for a trademark of Ps long time charity.

Okay, now I'm confused. Isn't what was posted saying that's what Comerica did? That's how I'm reading it. They went after her trying to trademark L4OA under IAPW.

Been my freeway driving anthem for a few weeks now.

PennyPurple said:

A year later, in 2006, Testolini and Prince divorced amicably. When asked about whether or not they kept in touch on charitable works after the divorce, she says, "I don't want to bring up the divorce, so I'm just going to stick on the charity subject." (Testolini is now married to singer-songwriter Eric Benét.)

They divorced amicably.. HAHAHA

She doesn't want to talk about the divorce. HAHAHA

Yeah...I know that when I divorce someone amicably, I always tear the house down. Then, when the split is about to hit the papers, I pull the plug on my website because I don't want the members discussing it in my own living room (so to speak).

purplemist7777 said:

So it appears the estate is making some kind of agreement with IAPW. The opposition dismissed is the estate dropping their opposition to M2’s application. She also filed another one last week. Whatever we may think about the family, they should have L4OA trademarks for the family charitable foundation. I don’t trust M2 at all. If our beloved Prince had a grave he would be rolling over in it 💜💜💜💜💜

They all seem to love her. In divorce sides are taken and it is interesting that they are on hers.

purplemist7777 said:

So it appears the estate is making some kind of agreement with IAPW. The opposition dismissed is the estate dropping their opposition to M2’s application. She also filed another one last week. Whatever we may think about the family, they should have L4OA trademarks for the family charitable foundation. I don’t trust M2 at all. If our beloved Prince had a grave he would be rolling over in it 💜💜💜💜💜

Well if they're fine with it, I'm fine with it. But now I've got another question.

morningsong said:

purplemist7777 said:

morningsong said:

Well if they're fine with it, I'm fine with it. But now I've got another question.

Who knows if the family even knows. They have a lot of things they’re dealing with.

Well, I'm assuming Comerica at least has to let them know something. I mean I don't know that for absolutely sure but it sounds funny that nobody out of all of them wouldn't be kept informed of what's being done in the name of The Estate.


Honestly I can't tell from the link all the ups and down, but I supposing something somewhere is saying that IAPW has permission to use L4OA trademark for charities as they see fit???

Vashtix said:

amethyst68 said:

amethyst68 said:

Vashtix said:

They all seem to love her. In divorce sides are taken and it is interesting that they are on hers.

What rock have you been living under to not see his family doesn’t deal with her with the exception of Omarr? She wasn’t even invited to the family memorial and didn’t acknowledge her at all in the memorial program. The family and the estate lawyers are well aware of how Prince felt about her after their divorce and are not in favor of her trademarking the name and logo for his charitable foundation.

You speak the truth.

MANIpulative causes me to side eye her.

[Edited 12/12/17 7:20am]