endiadj said:

That’s what she consciously didn’t do - discuss his feeling. Read the damn book.

amethyst68 said:

The excerpts and headlines were enough to turn me off.
[Edited 1/22/18 16:30pm]

endiadj said:

Context matters, sweetheart. But keep on speculating about what you don’t know and reading the tabloids.
[Edited 1/22/18 16:52pm]

amethyst68 said:

endiadj said:

The excerpts and headlines were enough to turn me off. [Edited 1/22/18 16:30pm]

Context matters, sweetheart. But keep on speculating about what you don’t know and reading the tabloids. [Edited 1/22/18 16:52pm]

oh, snap!

amethyst68 said:

She is writing a book were she is trying to tell us what he thought.

amethyst68 said:

Actually the attorneys are saying that her name was on the last docs that they have. Many docs are missing so they do not know if she was removed as a director. Pat Cousins has 70 boxes of legal docs that the lawyers did not have access to at the time. So her name could have been removed. Due to all the stealing conducted by Mr.Cousins she had better hope that her name was removed from those docs.

laurarichardson said:

Im not going back and forth with you but you’re wrong. If you want to know what she actually said in her book, read it. Otherwise, save your assumptions.

laurarichardson said:

That was in 2016. The whole matter has been settle at this point. Her name was never removed from the foundation. Her friend confirmed this a few pages back.

amethyst68 said:

So why doesn’t the estate just shut M2 down? Looks like IAPW requested and received extensions on current applications and they keep filing new applications for Love 4 One Another? She must have something big planned and must need that name?

amethyst68 said:

laurarichardson said:

Actually the attorneys are saying that her name was on the last docs that they have. Many docs are missing so they do not know if she was removed as a director. Pat Cousins has 70 boxes of legal docs that the lawyers did not have access to at the time. So her name could have been removed. Due to all the stealing conducted by Mr.Cousins she had better hope that her name was removed from those docs.

That was in 2016. The whole matter has been settle at this point. Her name was never removed from the foundation. Her friend confirmed this a few pages back.

So what's the fingerpointing at Mani then? If she is going to put this under IAPW but it actually belonged to Mayte, then it sounds like they both had this in mind.

amethyst68 said:

—I did and she is trying to speak for him. Even when she was promoting the book she kept saying he never got over their son dying. She has no way of knowing this at all. She thinks it was conspiracy to get rid of by Larry Graham when I am sure Prince was capable of a making that decision on his own.

amethyst68 said:

Unless you had a means of looking in Patrick Cousins 70 boxes if documents which I believe the estate was still trying to obtain back in fall how would you or Dave know that are name was not removed? Also she was listed as a director not a manager if her name was still on anything it was probably because Patrick Cousins did not remove it and with the amount of theaft involved and M2 trying to get the trademark how do you think it looks.

morningsong said:

—Exactly

morningsong said:

I see you’re a little slow. They both didn’t have anything in mind. One woman is going after something she has no rights to. The other woman recently discovered Prince left her in charge of something they’d formed together years ago.
[Edited 1/23/18 4:30am]

Susu1976 said:

amethyst68 said:

Mayte used Prince to get money? Laughable. That’s like saying your mother and father birthed you to get a tax break.

Uhmmm... I clearly meant she made money off her relationship and continues to do so long after their relationship was finito and you know it. Don't twist my words with an idiom that doesn't fit the context of my post at all. It doesn't help your cause. I know you are trying to get to the bottom of some things that are unquestionably true but when you tell other people to get a clue you need to make sure you have one too. You cannot say with a straight face that Mayte has not profited from being Prince's wife for a nanosecond years ago. C'mon. If you truly want to accomplish what I frankly think is fair, you need to stick to gravitas as opposed to personal feelings. Otherwise,there is a bridge I like to sell you...over there in Brooklyn. [Edited 1/21/18 20:12pm]

Kim Berry is using Prince right now as we speak to make money. Where's the outrage.

amethyst68 said:

morningsong said:

So what's the fingerpointing at Mani then? If she is going to put this under IAPW but it actually belonged to Mayte, then it sounds like they both had this in mind.

I see you’re a little slow. They both didn’t have anything in mind. One woman is going after something she has no rights to. The other woman recently discovered Prince left her in charge of something they’d formed together years ago. [Edited 1/23/18 4:30am]

She was a director on the board. She was not in charge of anything she was not the manager and we have no idea what was in the 70 boxes of documents that Patrick Cousin had.

Did you know that according to Dr. Funkenberry that Pat Cousins was fired by Prince because he did not show up in court for the Revelations perfume case? Prince lost due to Mrs. Cousins not showing up. A judgement was put against him and when he did not pay it a lien was put on Paisley so he had to go ahead and pay the judgement. If this incompetent butthole did not show up in court for his client what makes you think he would have removed the divorced ex-spouse from the charity?

Like I said before she had better hope her name was removed. People may be going to jail.

Susu1976 said:

amethyst68 said:

She was never blocked from doing anything. Another lie that floats around like it’s the truth. She wasn’t blocked from writing a block just like none of his other associates or non-associates were blocked. If she made the decision to do a reality show to showcase her life, that’s on her. Prince was rarely mentioned and she has to sell what possessions she wants to sell. Why is that a sin? If I were, I would have had a public bonfire for the hell of it and burned ever piece of clothing he left. Who cares why she decided to sell those things but she had every right to sell them because they were lawfully hers whether you agree or not. Truth is, the only item she was successful at selling were the handcuffs he gave her. All the other items were pulled and still in her possession.

Why did she have the book published AFTER Prince's death? SHE herself admitted on Hollywood exes that she is not allowed to talk about Prince. You are reaching wayyyy too hard. I'm sorry but you are becoming less and less believable. Nobody with an iota of intelligence is buying what you are trying to sell right now. You have not successfully answered anything I asked you. It's too bad you feel the need to deny facts as there are enough things out there for you to make legit arguments yet you create a story that you and everyone else knows is not true. I'm not going to engage in further discussion about this as it seems to be an excercise in futility.

The book was ready to go and the publisher held it back and the publisher decided it would be released in April. Mayte didn't want that and told them so.

PennyPurple said:

Susu1976 said:

amethyst68 said: Uhmmm... I clearly meant she made money off her relationship and continues to do so long after their relationship was finito and you know it. Don't twist my words with an idiom that doesn't fit the context of my post at all. It doesn't help your cause. I know you are trying to get to the bottom of some things that are unquestionably true but when you tell other people to get a clue you need to make sure you have one too. You cannot say with a straight face that Mayte has not profited from being Prince's wife for a nanosecond years ago. C'mon. If you truly want to accomplish what I frankly think is fair, you need to stick to gravitas as opposed to personal feelings. Otherwise,there is a bridge I like to sell you...over there in Brooklyn. [Edited 1/21/18 20:12pm]

Kim Berry is using Prince right now as we speak to make money. Where's the outrage.

I contacted Comerica about the auction. I doubt they can do anything about the gifts but some people have really lost their damm minds with the DATs and bootleggs. I also have no idea why someone would want to sell a picture of Prince and his dad. Why would you not give that back to the family.

morningsong said:

ISaidLifeIsJustAGame said:

Were these Exhibits recently unsealed?

I dont remember seeing these before.

The Exhibit is an email dated September 1, 2016.

It states the issues surrounding the charity is complex and the records sparse.

In November 1996 a non-profit corporation was created named Love for One Another Charities.

The Directors of the Corporation were P, M1 and Kirk.

They cannot find documents that shows this was ever modified.

In 2008 an attorney created L4OA LLC under the Corporation.

Cousins is listed on some of the LLC documents as Manager.

It states the Love for One Another Charities was run properly until 2007.

Then crazy things happened.

$8.2 mil was transferred from one account to another account.

The new account listed Cousin's Florida address.

The tax exempt status was revoked in 2012 for non-filing of income tax returns.

The sole assets of the Corporation are 3 parcels of property.

They had requested the 70 boxes from Cousins.

What happened to the $8.2 mil?

20 years ago Mayte was in charge of something. That's nice. But it's 2018 today. And there are current post that are claiming she is STILL in charge. That's the part I want proof on. None of the paperwork dated in the 2000s shows Mayte's name anywhere. So, uh...I'm not convinced folks know what they are talking about and they're just expressing personal feelings and wishes. Which all good for them, I guess, but I'm not jumping on any bandwagons based on somebody's personal feelings and wishes.

She was never removed from the charity. Meltedman told us that, and nobody believed him. And what do you know..the court docs revealed what he said is true.

BEAUGARDE said:

She gets the Game Of Thrones walk of SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!

morningsong said:

amethyst68 said:

laurarichardson said: That was in 2016. The whole matter has been settle at this point. Her name was never removed from the foundation. Her friend confirmed this a few pages back.

So what's the fingerpointing at Mani then? If she is going to put this under IAPW but it actually belonged to Mayte, then it sounds like they both had this in mind.

Mayte isn't the one trying to trademark it.

PennyPurple said:

morningsong said:

20 years ago Mayte was in charge of something. That's nice. But it's 2018 today. And there are current post that are claiming she is STILL in charge. That's the part I want proof on. None of the paperwork dated in the 2000s shows Mayte's name anywhere. So, uh...I'm not convinced folks know what they are talking about and they're just expressing personal feelings and wishes. Which all good for them, I guess, but I'm not jumping on any bandwagons based on somebody's personal feelings and wishes.

She was never removed from the charity. Meltedman told us that, and nobody believed him. And what do you know..the court docs revealed what he said is true.

No they do not. When these e-mails were being discussed the estate managers did not have the 70 boxes of documents from Cousins. In fact they were still trying to get them last year. In the e-mail it states the following.

Mr. Nelson created a Mlnnesota nonprofit corporation called Love For One Another Char't' net haV8032“, die Irecttirstof the Corporation were Prince Rogers Nefson, Mayte Garcia Nelson and Kirk Johnson JAE: umen 21 ion suggesting that this was ever modified On A ' - 0 ' _ - prll 24, 2008,

Attorne Brian C E:n::n SEEN-3? orgamged LAOA, LLC. The organizational documents indicate the only member 0‘; the LLC‘ iitfgfmjgat 0 er arltles, a Mlnnesota non-profit corporation. Mr. Cousins is listed on some ofthe LLC docume t $1 “9 manager. We do not have any documentation suggesting this was ever modified

The estate managers back in 2016 had no information about what happend due to missing documents. They were waiting on those boxes from Patrick who should have turned all of that stuff over after he left Prince's employment.

[Edited 1/23/18 5:02am]

laurarichardson said:

PennyPurple said:

Kim Berry is using Prince right now as we speak to make money. Where's the outrage.

I contacted Comerica about the auction. I doubt they can do anything about the gifts but some people have really lost their damm minds with the DATs and bootleggs. I also have no idea why someone would want to sell a picture of Prince and his dad. Why would you not give that back to the family.

Because everybody is money grabbing.

laurarichardson said:

PennyPurple said:

She was never removed from the charity. Meltedman told us that, and nobody believed him. And what do you know..the court docs revealed what he said is true.

No they do not. When these e-mails were being discussed the estate managers did not have the 70 boxes of documents from Cousins. In fact they were still trying to get them last year. In the e-mail it states the following.

I don't think they have them yet, do they?

PennyPurple said:

laurarichardson said:

No they do not. When these e-mails were being discussed the estate managers did not have the 70 boxes of documents from Cousins. In fact they were still trying to get them last year. In the e-mail it states the following.

I don't think they have them yet, do they?

I am not sure and think about how long PC had those docs. Documents could have been destroyed on altered. He would not be eager to turn them him considering the amount of fraud that went on.

PennyPurple said:

morningsong said:

So what's the fingerpointing at Mani then? If she is going to put this under IAPW but it actually belonged to Mayte, then it sounds like they both had this in mind.

Mayte isn't the one trying to trademark it.

No but she has a friend trying to involve her with this charity and considering what is going on he needs to knock it off.

laurarichardson said:

PennyPurple said:

Mayte isn't the one trying to trademark it.

No but she has a friend trying to involve her with this charity and considering what is going on he needs to knock it off.

No meltedman isn't trying to involve her in it, she was never taken off of it, as far as we know at this point.

endiadj said:

ThatWhiteDude said:

They were not the only people who told the story, and if it wasn't true, why did his family not sue Mayte for telling a lie? Seems like they are okay with the book and what's in it. Sheila E wrote the foreword for the book. None of them seems to have a problem with the story.

Mayte had the chance to totally wreck him! Don't forget how he treated her! Think about it and be thankful that she's not a bitter woman who takes the chance to wreck him in a book. This book was not a tell all, I don't know where you get your infos from, probably LSA, right? I read the book and there was NOTHING exploiting about it!

And it was her son too! She gave birth to him! She had to back down 'cause Prince didn't trust the doctors, she played his game to make him happy! And I don't give a fuck if Prince decided not to talk about his son, he decided for himself! He had no right to tell her to shut her mouth. It's not his son only! Do you even understand what a woman feels if she loses her child? And how she feels if she has to act like it didn't happen at all? It's like the child dies over and over again!

She had to go through so much and now you dare to judge her for a beautiful book about HER TIME with Prince and THEIR CHILD.

She had the chance to totally blast him, but she didn't. Besides the PR Era Studio Sessions, it's probably the best book about Prince.

I doubt that you really read it, because you're talking so much crap about it that's not even the truth. You're only telling your truth, the one that only exists in your head, 'cause the hate you feel towards this woman would eat you up if you wouldn't always write it down.

[Edited 1/22/18 10:30am]

Of course she can talk about her child, express her feelings, emotions about their child. She shouldn't have discussed HIS feelings, emotions, horror concerning their child nor gossiped about HIM concerning their child since he's no longer here to comment in return.

She NEVER talked about his feelings, you didn't read the book right? So you don't know shit about it. How could she talk about his feelings if he never talked about it? The only thing she said was: "I don't think he got over it, no one can." Something like that. And isn't it common sense to think exactly that? I mean, he lost his son, it's not the natural order to survive the child, it's a trauma. And if you don't talk about it like he did, how can you ever cope with it?

amethyst68 said:

morningsong said:

So what's the fingerpointing at Mani then? If she is going to put this under IAPW but it actually belonged to Mayte, then it sounds like they both had this in mind.

I see you’re a little slow. They both didn’t have anything in mind. One woman is going after something she has no rights to. The other woman recently discovered Prince left her in charge of something they’d formed together years ago. [Edited 1/23/18 4:30am]

Is Mayte planning to do something about it?

ThatWhiteDude said:

endiadj said:

ThatWhiteDude said: Of course she can talk about her child, express her feelings, emotions about their child. She shouldn't have discussed HIS feelings, emotions, horror concerning their child nor gossiped about HIM concerning their child since he's no longer here to comment in return.

She NEVER talked about his feelings, you didn't read the book right? So you don't know shit about it. How could she talk about his feelings if he never talked about it? The only thing she said was: "I don't think he got over it, no one can." Something like that. And isn't it common sense to think exactly that? I mean, he lost his son, it's not the natural order to survive the child, it's a trauma. And if you don't talk about it like he did, how can you ever cope with it?

This is my point "I don't think he got over it, no one can" She has no idea what he got over. What would make her assume that her never talked about it. He may have discussed it with his pastor or Larry Graham or the lord. He was a man of faith I am sure he prayed on it and that is how he coped.

She had no idea and you did not address what I said early about her bringing up his health issues.

He never talked about private stuff in the public and she had no reason to discuss his health issues or make assumptions about how he felt about their child.