I see Star Tribune have finally got their way.....what a surprise...."the files didn't provide any insight into those issues" (painkillers, potential heirs, value of the estate).

Did anyone really think they would? Hasn't this always just been about digging into his past for the sake of it because they can since he's not here to stop it?

I'm glad the divorce file doesn't shed any light on those topics, but i'm sad that something that should have remained private (because he wanted it that way) now isn't private anymore.

Discuss here http://prince.org/msg/7/437638