Well, I'll say one thing, Mani and Eric look pretty loved up, and she looks a lot happier than when she was with Prince, oh and P looks a lot happier too Wasn't Mani a JW? Maybe that's what attracted him.... [Edited 3/28/08 12:22pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
march said: He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory I'm sick and tired of the Prince fans being sick and tired of the Prince fans that are sick and tired! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Jeffiner said: Well, I'll say one thing, Mani and Eric look pretty loved up, and she looks a lot happier than when she was with Prince, oh and P looks a lot happier too Wasn't Mani a JW? Maybe that's what attracted him....
[Edited 3/28/08 12:22pm] she was not a JW when she met Prince and how much you wanna bet she ain't one now. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Giovanni777 said: Nothinbutjoy said: EVERYONE makes forum mistakes, you could have simply said "WRONG FORUM" You dug for the "enough trash". For some it's ONLY about Prince's music...for some...it's about the package (take that anyway you want.) One person's trash is another person's treasure. Fair enough. Maybe I do need a hug. [Edited 3/28/08 10:42am] I got plenty of those! I'm firmly planted in denial | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: Giovanni777 said: I am hereby proposing that any crap about Prince's Exs be posted where they should be... in "Associated Artists & PEOPLE".
This section is jammed up enough with other non-musical subjects, and Exs should be considered associated people at best. ANX? What R your thoughts? Are not ex-girlfriends, former wives, etc, associated people? ~Giovanni Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient. Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it. [Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm] The mods will move it when they see it. I the .org mod sqad I'm firmly planted in denial | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nothinbutjoy said: bellanoche said: Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient. Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it. [Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm] The mods will move it when they see it. I the .org mod sqad Yes I agree this belongs elsewhere | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: Giovanni777 said: I am hereby proposing that any crap about Prince's Exs be posted where they should be... in "Associated Artists & PEOPLE".
This section is jammed up enough with other non-musical subjects, and Exs should be considered associated people at best. ANX? What R your thoughts? Are not ex-girlfriends, former wives, etc, associated people? ~Giovanni Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient. Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it. [Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm] You take things so seriously. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moderator moderator |
Moving manuela to associated artists [Edited 3/28/08 14:42pm] Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
luv4u said: Moving manuella to associated artists
Gosh, I have no idea why I thought that was funny... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
txlaw said: bellanoche said: Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient. Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it. [Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm] You take things so seriously. Relax you all! 1-Maybelle probably posted this thread in the wrong forum by accident initially. 2- The moderators know what they have to do. They don't need more complaints than they already have. 3- Luv is really good at locking or moving threads anyways. It was just a matter of time before doing it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
march said: He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory jw with divorce you must make amends with church and family until that time u are shunned/ then you move on with your life/forgivness and compassion/went through this with jw freind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SexyBeautifulOne said: Prince hasn't been getting any since 2000? Oh hell, I almost hope that's true! Cuz that would explain ALOT!!!
explain why he went from Mayte (hot sexy mama) to Mani (cold fish) and why when they broke up, Mani went to Eric Benet (sex addict). that cold fish needed to jump in the frying pan. "Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wonder505 said: Jeffiner said: Well, I'll say one thing, Mani and Eric look pretty loved up, and she looks a lot happier than when she was with Prince, oh and P looks a lot happier too Wasn't Mani a JW? Maybe that's what attracted him....
[Edited 3/28/08 12:22pm] she was not a JW when she met Prince and how much you wanna bet she ain't one now. "Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i've also heard people say he cheated on mayte with mani but never seen any proof of it i know he was studying to be a jw when he was with mayte so i kind of want to give him the benefit of doubt because people can change i read in another forum about how people were saying that prince was pushing up on the girls at his club what's wrong with that? just because he's a jw who is single now i guess, doesn't mean he supposed to not look and see women desirable people say he's been with the twins, tamar, and whoever else but with what proof? are they enlodged in those girls va-jay-jay's? people just need to leave him alone also saying he's had a girlfriend for a year and a half so what? jw's have girlfriends too it happens, then they decide whether they are compatible to get marry you know like regular people if he wants to keep his business to himself, respect it i know when me and him start dating, I AIN'T TELLIN' Y'ALL NOTHING!!!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
misslilly said: march said: He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory jw with divorce you must make amends with church and family until that time u are shunned/ then you move on with your life/forgivness and compassion/went through this with jw freind there's not hard & fast rules on this. i was divorced and never "shunned." if you treated your spouse treacherously and no adultery or abuse was involved, you'd set a bad example for the congregation by divorcing. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Heiress said: misslilly said: jw with divorce you must make amends with church and family until that time u are shunned/ then you move on with your life/forgivness and compassion/went through this with jw freind there's not hard & fast rules on this. i was divorced and never "shunned." if you treated your spouse treacherously and no adultery or abuse was involved, you'd set a bad example for the congregation by divorcing. i only know from my personal experience and my freinds pain forgive me if i insulted | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
misslilly said: Heiress said: there's not hard & fast rules on this. i was divorced and never "shunned." if you treated your spouse treacherously and no adultery or abuse was involved, you'd set a bad example for the congregation by divorcing. i only know from my personal experience and my freinds pain forgive me if i insulted you did not insult anybody; no worries. everybody's circumstances are different. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Heiress said: misslilly said: i only know from my personal experience and my freinds pain forgive me if i insulted you did not insult anybody; no worries. everybody's circumstances are different. if you divorce without fornication being the reason- then you commit adultery if you re-marry. for JWs It's possible to legally separate if you are being abused- which often leads to fornication, resulting in divorce LOVE HARD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Evvy said: Heiress said: you did not insult anybody; no worries. everybody's circumstances are different. if you divorce without fornication being the reason- then you commit adultery if you re-marry. for JWs It's possible to legally separate if you are being abused- which often leads to fornication, resulting in divorce right, that's biblical; adultery as justification for remarriage. i divorced rather than just legally separating, for reasons of abuse. but i did not plan to remarrying anyone until i had some evidence of adultery on his part (just had a suspicion). i did get the evidence of adultery later... but frankly, just getting away and severing legal ties was quite enough. suffice to say, mani cheated on prince, so their marriage was broken biblically. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Heiress said: Evvy said: if you divorce without fornication being the reason- then you commit adultery if you re-marry. for JWs It's possible to legally separate if you are being abused- which often leads to fornication, resulting in divorce right, that's biblical; adultery as justification for remarriage. i divorced rather than just legally separating, for reasons of abuse. but i did not plan to remarrying anyone until i had some evidence of adultery on his part (just had a suspicion). i did get the evidence of adultery later... but frankly, just getting away and severing legal ties was quite enough. suffice to say, mani cheated on prince, so their marriage was broken biblically. for real, how do you know that? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mayebelle81 said: i read that someone said that prince said that he had been celibate for like eight years. whether that was true or not, i don't know. but if so, she picked the right one to be with because he loves it.
http://i260.photobucket.c...anuela.jpg @ 8 years... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Flowerz said: mayebelle81 said: i read that someone said that prince said that he had been celibate for like eight years. whether that was true or not, i don't know. but if so, she picked the right one to be with because he loves it.
http://i260.photobucket.c...anuela.jpg @ 8 years... hey i read that in a thread | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: Giovanni777 said: I am hereby proposing that any crap about Prince's Exs be posted where they should be... in "Associated Artists & PEOPLE".
This section is jammed up enough with other non-musical subjects, and Exs should be considered associated people at best. ANX? What R your thoughts? Are not ex-girlfriends, former wives, etc, associated people? ~Giovanni I thought u were going 2 say, "In the garbage". The BOTH of you... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mayebelle81 said: Heiress said: right, that's biblical; adultery as justification for remarriage. i divorced rather than just legally separating, for reasons of abuse. but i did not plan to remarrying anyone until i had some evidence of adultery on his part (just had a suspicion). i did get the evidence of adultery later... but frankly, just getting away and severing legal ties was quite enough. suffice to say, mani cheated on prince, so their marriage was broken biblically. for real, how do you know that? me & a friend here had kind of figured it out... but then got confirmation from a guy who knows prince last year. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Confirmation from a guy? Irrespective of the truth, which I suspect is more complex than any one-way story, I didn't expect unsubstantiated rumour to be passed off as fact, least of all from you Heiress. Time to reflect. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said: Confirmation from a guy? Irrespective of the truth, which I suspect is more complex than any one-way story, I didn't expect unsubstantiated rumour to be passed off as fact, least of all from you Heiress. Time to reflect.
Nope, it was a JW from his congregation... we are not, as a rule, liars. I probably shouldn't talk about it here; i just get fed up with Prince being portrayed as some kind of a pimp. It's unfair because he's made a lot of changes in recent years. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I heard... & an Orger said... & she looks like... LAWD, this entire thread is fucking retarded
. [Edited 4/1/08 2:17am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Irrespective of who passes the information (JW from his congregation) and irrespective of whether anyone wholly believes they are telling the truth (liar or not), this information still qualifies as unsubstaintiated rumour, don't you think? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anji said: Irrespective of who passes the information (JW from his congregation) and irrespective of whether anyone wholly believes they are telling the truth (liar or not), this information still qualifies as unsubstaintiated rumour, don't you think?
Well, believe whatever you like. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |