independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Associated artists & people > Manuela with her new man
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 03/28/08 12:21pm

Jeffiner

Well, I'll say one thing, Mani and Eric look pretty loved up, and she looks a lot happier than when she was with Prince, oh and P looks a lot happier too confused Wasn't Mani a JW? Maybe that's what attracted him.... eek
[Edited 3/28/08 12:22pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 03/28/08 12:23pm

march

He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 03/28/08 12:36pm

Adisa

avatar

march said:

He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory

lol
I'm sick and tired of the Prince fans being sick and tired of the Prince fans that are sick and tired!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 03/28/08 12:41pm

wonder505

Jeffiner said:

Well, I'll say one thing, Mani and Eric look pretty loved up, and she looks a lot happier than when she was with Prince, oh and P looks a lot happier too confused Wasn't Mani a JW? Maybe that's what attracted him.... eek
[Edited 3/28/08 12:22pm]


she was not a JW when she met Prince and how much you wanna bet she ain't one now. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 03/28/08 12:56pm

Nothinbutjoy

avatar

Giovanni777 said:

Nothinbutjoy said:




EVERYONE makes forum mistakes, you could have simply said "WRONG FORUM"

You dug for the "enough trash".

For some it's ONLY about Prince's music...for some...it's about the package (take that anyway you want.)

One person's trash is another person's treasure.

rose


Fair enough. Maybe I do need a hug.
[Edited 3/28/08 10:42am]



hug rose I got plenty of those!
I'm firmly planted in denial
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 03/28/08 12:57pm

Nothinbutjoy

avatar

bellanoche said:

Giovanni777 said:

I am hereby proposing that any crap about Prince's Exs be posted where they should be... in "Associated Artists & PEOPLE".

This section is jammed up enough with other non-musical subjects, and Exs should be considered associated people at best.

ANX? What R your thoughts?

Are not ex-girlfriends, former wives, etc, associated people?

~Giovanni


Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient.

Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it.
[Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm]



The mods will move it when they see it. rose

I heart the .org mod sqad

mushy

rose
I'm firmly planted in denial
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 03/28/08 1:41pm

C0RAZ0N

Nothinbutjoy said:

bellanoche said:



Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient.

Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it.
[Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm]



The mods will move it when they see it. rose

I heart the .org mod sqad

mushy

rose

Yes I agree this belongs elsewhere
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 03/28/08 2:14pm

txlaw

bellanoche said:

Giovanni777 said:

I am hereby proposing that any crap about Prince's Exs be posted where they should be... in "Associated Artists & PEOPLE".

This section is jammed up enough with other non-musical subjects, and Exs should be considered associated people at best.

ANX? What R your thoughts?

Are not ex-girlfriends, former wives, etc, associated people?

~Giovanni


Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient.

Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it.
[Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm]


You take things so seriously.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 03/28/08 2:17pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

Moving manuela to associated artists
[Edited 3/28/08 14:42pm]
canada

Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 03/28/08 2:42pm

VenusBlingBlin
g

avatar

luv4u said:

Moving manuella to associated artists


falloff

Gosh, I have no idea why I thought that was funny...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 03/28/08 3:12pm

malbena

txlaw said:

bellanoche said:



Giovanni, I agree! I was just commenting on a thread that I posted last night how this site can be an EXCELLENT resource for answers to questions about Prince's music. However, at its worse it dips into things that are far too unrelated to anything musical or sane. All the info on the exes should definitely be confined to the Associated forum. If it is not music related, it should not be here. Prince: Music and "More" already has enough craziness to satisfy the "More" quotient.

Let me clarify that I'm not taking a dig at the OP. My message is directed at the mods. I think they should move these kinds of threads when they see them. I know I have posted threads and even said, hey if this is the wrong forum please move it.
[Edited 3/28/08 12:18pm]


You take things so seriously.


Relax you all!
1-Maybelle probably posted this thread in the wrong forum by accident initially.
2- The moderators know what they have to do. They don't need more complaints than they already have.
3- Luv is really good at locking or moving threads anyways. It was just a matter of time before doing it.

smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 03/28/08 5:23pm

misslilly

march said:

He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory

jw with divorce you must make amends with church and family until that time u are shunned/ then you move on with your life/forgivness and compassion/went through this with jw freind
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 03/29/08 3:21am

prodigalfan

avatar

SexyBeautifulOne said:

Prince hasn't been getting any since 2000? eek Oh hell, I almost hope that's true! Cuz that would explain ALOT!!! eek



nod

explain why he went from Mayte (hot sexy mama) to Mani (cold fish) boxed

and why when they broke up, Mani went to Eric Benet (sex addict).
that cold fish needed to jump in the frying pan. razz
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 03/29/08 3:24am

prodigalfan

avatar

wonder505 said:

Jeffiner said:

Well, I'll say one thing, Mani and Eric look pretty loved up, and she looks a lot happier than when she was with Prince, oh and P looks a lot happier too confused Wasn't Mani a JW? Maybe that's what attracted him.... eek
[Edited 3/28/08 12:22pm]


she was not a JW when she met Prince and how much you wanna bet she ain't one now. wink



nod
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 03/29/08 6:49am

mayebelle81

i've also heard people say he cheated on mayte with mani but never seen any proof of it i know he was studying to be a jw when he was with mayte so i kind of want to give him the benefit of doubt because people can change i read in another forum about how people were saying that prince was pushing up on the girls at his club what's wrong with that? just because he's a jw who is single now i guess, doesn't mean he supposed to not look and see women desirable people say he's been with the twins, tamar, and whoever else but with what proof? are they enlodged in those girls va-jay-jay's? people just need to leave him alone also saying he's had a girlfriend for a year and a half so what? jw's have girlfriends too it happens, then they decide whether they are compatible to get marry you know like regular people if he wants to keep his business to himself, respect it i know when me and him start dating, I AIN'T TELLIN' Y'ALL NOTHING!!!!! lol wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 03/29/08 7:44am

Heiress

misslilly said:

march said:

He may not be having sex because of his religious beliefs?The bible states that if you divorce for any reason other than adultry then you would be guilty of adultry for having sex with someone else.Unless of course you dont have sex.
Just a theory

jw with divorce you must make amends with church and family until that time u are shunned/ then you move on with your life/forgivness and compassion/went through this with jw freind


there's not hard & fast rules on this. i was divorced and never "shunned."

if you treated your spouse treacherously and no adultery or abuse was involved, you'd set a bad example for the congregation by divorcing.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 03/29/08 11:55am

misslilly

Heiress said:

misslilly said:


jw with divorce you must make amends with church and family until that time u are shunned/ then you move on with your life/forgivness and compassion/went through this with jw freind


there's not hard & fast rules on this. i was divorced and never "shunned."

if you treated your spouse treacherously and no adultery or abuse was involved, you'd set a bad example for the congregation by divorcing.

i only know from my personal experience and my freinds pain forgive me if i insulted
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 03/31/08 12:07am

Heiress

misslilly said:

Heiress said:



there's not hard & fast rules on this. i was divorced and never "shunned."

if you treated your spouse treacherously and no adultery or abuse was involved, you'd set a bad example for the congregation by divorcing.

i only know from my personal experience and my freinds pain forgive me if i insulted


you did not insult anybody; no worries. everybody's circumstances are different.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 03/31/08 5:06am

Evvy

avatar

Heiress said:

misslilly said:


i only know from my personal experience and my freinds pain forgive me if i insulted


you did not insult anybody; no worries. everybody's circumstances are different.


if you divorce without fornication being the reason- then you commit adultery if you re-marry. for JWs It's possible to legally separate if you are being abused- which often leads to fornication, resulting in divorce
LOVE HARD.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 03/31/08 5:47am

Heiress

Evvy said:

Heiress said:



you did not insult anybody; no worries. everybody's circumstances are different.


if you divorce without fornication being the reason- then you commit adultery if you re-marry. for JWs It's possible to legally separate if you are being abused- which often leads to fornication, resulting in divorce


right, that's biblical; adultery as justification for remarriage. i divorced rather than just legally separating, for reasons of abuse. but i did not plan to remarrying anyone until i had some evidence of adultery on his part (just had a suspicion). i did get the evidence of adultery later... but frankly, just getting away and severing legal ties was quite enough.

suffice to say, mani cheated on prince, so their marriage was broken biblically.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 03/31/08 7:25am

mayebelle81

Heiress said:

Evvy said:



if you divorce without fornication being the reason- then you commit adultery if you re-marry. for JWs It's possible to legally separate if you are being abused- which often leads to fornication, resulting in divorce


right, that's biblical; adultery as justification for remarriage. i divorced rather than just legally separating, for reasons of abuse. but i did not plan to remarrying anyone until i had some evidence of adultery on his part (just had a suspicion). i did get the evidence of adultery later... but frankly, just getting away and severing legal ties was quite enough.

suffice to say, mani cheated on prince, so their marriage was broken biblically.


for real, how do you know that?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 03/31/08 10:53am

Flowerz

mayebelle81 said:

i read that someone said that prince said that he had been celibate for like eight years. whether that was true or not, i don't know. but if so, she picked the right one to be with because he loves it.


http://i260.photobucket.c...anuela.jpg



lol @ 8 years...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 03/31/08 11:24am

mayebelle81

Flowerz said:

mayebelle81 said:

i read that someone said that prince said that he had been celibate for like eight years. whether that was true or not, i don't know. but if so, she picked the right one to be with because he loves it.


http://i260.photobucket.c...anuela.jpg



lol @ 8 years...



hey i read that in a thread
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 03/31/08 9:50pm

paintedlady

avatar

Graycap23 said:

Giovanni777 said:

I am hereby proposing that any crap about Prince's Exs be posted where they should be... in "Associated Artists & PEOPLE".

This section is jammed up enough with other non-musical subjects, and Exs should be considered associated people at best.

ANX? What R your thoughts?

Are not ex-girlfriends, former wives, etc, associated people?

~Giovanni

I thought u were going 2 say, "In the garbage".

lol The BOTH of you... lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 03/31/08 11:51pm

Heiress

mayebelle81 said:

Heiress said:



right, that's biblical; adultery as justification for remarriage. i divorced rather than just legally separating, for reasons of abuse. but i did not plan to remarrying anyone until i had some evidence of adultery on his part (just had a suspicion). i did get the evidence of adultery later... but frankly, just getting away and severing legal ties was quite enough.

suffice to say, mani cheated on prince, so their marriage was broken biblically.


for real, how do you know that?


me & a friend here had kind of figured it out... but then got confirmation from a guy who knows prince last year. shhh
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 04/01/08 1:54am

Anji

Confirmation from a guy? Irrespective of the truth, which I suspect is more complex than any one-way story, I didn't expect unsubstantiated rumour to be passed off as fact, least of all from you Heiress. Time to reflect.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 04/01/08 2:11am

Heiress

Anji said:

Confirmation from a guy? Irrespective of the truth, which I suspect is more complex than any one-way story, I didn't expect unsubstantiated rumour to be passed off as fact, least of all from you Heiress. Time to reflect.


Nope, it was a JW from his congregation... we are not, as a rule, liars. I probably shouldn't talk about it here; i just get fed up with Prince being portrayed as some kind of a pimp. It's unfair because he's made a lot of changes in recent years.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 04/01/08 2:17am

CalhounSq

avatar

I heard... & an Orger said... & she looks like... LAWD, this entire thread is fucking retarded arrow


.
[Edited 4/1/08 2:17am]
heart prince I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it prince heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 04/01/08 2:17am

Anji

Irrespective of who passes the information (JW from his congregation) and irrespective of whether anyone wholly believes they are telling the truth (liar or not), this information still qualifies as unsubstaintiated rumour, don't you think?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 04/01/08 2:25am

Heiress

Anji said:

Irrespective of who passes the information (JW from his congregation) and irrespective of whether anyone wholly believes they are telling the truth (liar or not), this information still qualifies as unsubstaintiated rumour, don't you think?


Well, believe whatever you like.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Associated artists & people > Manuela with her new man