Why Is it that all of the threads on this site about JW's are started by Non JW's or Ex JW's that are just trying to stir up ARGUMENTS. Never I have seen a thread started by a JW attacking anyone else on the org and their beliefs. If you have questions, by all means ask them. But man alive....give me a break. I will be leaving for the day now, and look forward to your responses in about 3 day's when I return.

And just remember the only way to Salvation is through Burt Reynolds.

bigonez said:

that is the most hilarious thing i've ever heard!!!

btw- i love your avatar!!!

bigonez said:

i've wondered about that too. anyone else notice that?

bigonez said:

Good question.
And when JWs enter a discussion, they try to answer the questions honestly, but are often met with hostility.
But it all works out in the end.

bigonez said:

fantasyislander said:

Reminds me of that movie EdTV. It was on the other night and I was cracking up at how Ed (Matthew McHananahay..cant spell is last name) idolized Burt Reynolds so much.

Great post, bigonez.
I wonder if the non-JWs or ex-JWs even know why they start up certain threads. If a person genuinely has a question, that's wonderful. But if a person doesn't like what JWs are about, I don't understand why they would spend so much time talking about them. I would never spend my day talking about fried chicken. I don't like fried chicken, therefore I stay away from it (I thought you'd appreciate the food analogy, 'big ).

Missunderstandings from both sides, its like sitting watching a game off table tennis (ping pong) thats never stops, just madness

bigonez said:

I agree with you! It is played and annoying!

And btw, I'm NOT a JW!

bigonez said:

well, i truly hope the JWs here aren't all feeling 'attacked'.

yes, there are a disproportionate number of JW threads. but prince is a JW, people are curious and this is a fan site. so, to me it doesn't seem unexpected. when the topics bore/offend me i don't click those threads.

also, the reason i don't think all the threads about JWs are 'attacks' is because i've noticed that when someone starts a thread asking about aspects of the tenets of the JW faith (blood transfusion, formal abstention from politics, not celebrating holidays), sometimes the very fact that a question has been raised is reactively taken by some as an 'attack'.