Author | Message |
Matt-shady-C and the other socalled C matt--yoiu gave C a strike for something ina thread that was close to you...when others in the same thread said worse than he did. And especially when you are the one whos usally replying to complaints as "well lets just see how this goes..oh I odnt think thats that serious..." etc. Something is shady and its been found out... I cant beleive Im gonna say this but I wish Ian was back. Because you kinda suck since you lied and are shady with using another orger as a scapegoat to use as a "well u flamed them" to finally grow some balls and "deactivate" someone . You aint slick and its seen by a lot now what you and *** did. Both of yall are def not slick.
And its not even real becasue several others said worse than C in that thread and everyone knows it. Someombody been talkin in your ear just because they were poly by sucking over 100 dicks I bet..influencing you thats some shady shit heaven help for I think the new mod is gonna be a muthafucka (pox) on (some) of us all... um um um [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 0:18:18 PST 2004 by rdhull] "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
get used to it, if cborgman becomes a mod "oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What happened to Lavish?
She was cool. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
... I have no idea what this thread is about, but will be watching it closely as it looks like some kind of war is about to erupt ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Raspberry said: ... I have no idea what this thread is about, but will be watching it closely as it looks like some kind of war is about to erupt ...
Storm clouds... Hmmm... Something is, It don't look good... Don't worry... Raspberry ... I'll protect you... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wrong forum...
and facts-changing paranoid conspiracy theory too. but, wrong forum [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 6:15:44 PST 2004 by cborgman] Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: matt--yoiu gave C a strike for something ina thread that was close to you...when others in the same thread said worse than he did. And especially when you are the one whos usally replying to complaints as "well lets just see how this goes..oh I odnt think thats that serious..." etc. Something is shady and its been found out... I cant beleive Im gonna say this but I wish Ian was back. Because you kinda suck since you lied and are shady with using another orger as a scapegoat to use as a "well u flamed them" to finally grow some balls and "deactivate" someone . You aint slick and its seen by a lot now what you and *** did. Both of yall are def not slick.
And its not even real becasue several others said worse than C in that thread and everyone knows it. Someombody been talkin in your ear just because they were poly by sucking over 100 dicks I bet..influencing you thats some shady shit heaven help for I think the new mod is gonna be a muthafucka (pox) on (some) of us all... um um um [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 0:18:18 PST 2004 by rdhull] I have a question, why are you saying all this in the GD instead of orgnoting matt? You've started a thread about this before and it didn't really solve anything. I'm just wondering what your motive is here. I also agree that it's difficult to be an impartial moderator when you're in a relationship with a highly sensitive (or so it seems) and high vocal orger and that 'tackam's leaving' thread is a perfect example of that. But I don't think that you're going to get anymore answers out of matt about why C was deactivated. Especially not after you say that his girl sucked 100 dicks. Poly or not, no guy wants to hear that about their girl. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jessyMD32781 said: rdhull said: matt--yoiu gave C a strike for something ina thread that was close to you...when others in the same thread said worse than he did. And especially when you are the one whos usally replying to complaints as "well lets just see how this goes..oh I odnt think thats that serious..." etc. Something is shady and its been found out... I cant beleive Im gonna say this but I wish Ian was back. Because you kinda suck since you lied and are shady with using another orger as a scapegoat to use as a "well u flamed them" to finally grow some balls and "deactivate" someone . You aint slick and its seen by a lot now what you and *** did. Both of yall are def not slick.
And its not even real becasue several others said worse than C in that thread and everyone knows it. Someombody been talkin in your ear just because they were poly by sucking over 100 dicks I bet..influencing you thats some shady shit heaven help for I think the new mod is gonna be a muthafucka (pox) on (some) of us all... um um um [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 0:18:18 PST 2004 by rdhull] I have a question, why are you saying all this in the GD instead of orgnoting matt? You've started a thread about this before and it didn't really solve anything. I'm just wondering what your motive is here. I also agree that it's difficult to be an impartial moderator when you're in a relationship with a highly sensitive (or so it seems) and high vocal orger and that 'tackam's leaving' thread is a perfect example of that. But I don't think that you're going to get anymore answers out of matt about why C was deactivated. Especially not after you say that his girl sucked 100 dicks. Poly or not, no guy wants to hear that about their girl. well, the thing being ignored and revised depending on which thread you read on which day is that C's comment had nothing to do with melissa or matt, it was a flame about me, for me. personally, and it was something he was on his second warning about. personally, i wish c had not been deactivated for it, since i did not ask that the flame be reported, but he had been warned repeatedly. matt was very very cool about the comments about melissa in that thread and in the several other ones aaron and rd had created or participated in since then, and allows the innumerous childish comments to stay. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wonder how many times that penguin hater ice was warned until finally deactivated for good. Seems like more than 3!
To Sir, with Love | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PEJ said: I wonder how many times that penguin hater ice was warned until finally deactivated for good. Seems like more than 3!
yea, but he was banned. c was just deactivated. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
oOoOJulyOoOo said: Raspberry said: ... I have no idea what this thread is about, but will be watching it closely as it looks like some kind of war is about to erupt ...
Storm clouds... Hmmm... Something is, It don't look good... Don't worry... [color=berry:81ab178c2c:4dcdf4c0b1]Raspberry ... I'll protect you... ... thank you July | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PEJ said: I wonder how many times that penguin hater ice was warned until finally deactivated for good. Seems like more than 3!
Je crois personnellement que vous désirez la Glace dans le sens Biblique, Pej. . [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 6:56:10 PST 2004 by Number23] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: jessyMD32781 said: rdhull said: matt--yoiu gave C a strike for something ina thread that was close to you...when others in the same thread said worse than he did. And especially when you are the one whos usally replying to complaints as "well lets just see how this goes..oh I odnt think thats that serious..." etc. Something is shady and its been found out... I cant beleive Im gonna say this but I wish Ian was back. Because you kinda suck since you lied and are shady with using another orger as a scapegoat to use as a "well u flamed them" to finally grow some balls and "deactivate" someone . You aint slick and its seen by a lot now what you and *** did. Both of yall are def not slick.
And its not even real becasue several others said worse than C in that thread and everyone knows it. Someombody been talkin in your ear just because they were poly by sucking over 100 dicks I bet..influencing you thats some shady shit heaven help for I think the new mod is gonna be a muthafucka (pox) on (some) of us all... um um um [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 0:18:18 PST 2004 by rdhull] I have a question, why are you saying all this in the GD instead of orgnoting matt? You've started a thread about this before and it didn't really solve anything. I'm just wondering what your motive is here. I also agree that it's difficult to be an impartial moderator when you're in a relationship with a highly sensitive (or so it seems) and high vocal orger and that 'tackam's leaving' thread is a perfect example of that. But I don't think that you're going to get anymore answers out of matt about why C was deactivated. Especially not after you say that his girl sucked 100 dicks. Poly or not, no guy wants to hear that about their girl. well, the thing being ignored and revised depending on which thread you read on which day is that C's comment had nothing to do with melissa or matt, it was a flame about me, for me. personally, and it was something he was on his second warning about. personally, i wish c had not been deactivated for it, since i did not ask that the flame be reported, but he had been warned repeatedly. matt was very very cool about the comments about melissa in that thread and in the several other ones aaron and rd had created or participated in since then, and allows the innumerous childish comments to stay. ... I was away too long, obviously. Haven't a clue what you're all talking about ... keep it up though, it's fun trying to figure it out | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Man...this place... :LOL: Fear is the mind-killer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Raspberry said: cborgman said: jessyMD32781 said: rdhull said: matt--yoiu gave C a strike for something ina thread that was close to you...when others in the same thread said worse than he did. And especially when you are the one whos usally replying to complaints as "well lets just see how this goes..oh I odnt think thats that serious..." etc. Something is shady and its been found out... I cant beleive Im gonna say this but I wish Ian was back. Because you kinda suck since you lied and are shady with using another orger as a scapegoat to use as a "well u flamed them" to finally grow some balls and "deactivate" someone . You aint slick and its seen by a lot now what you and *** did. Both of yall are def not slick.
And its not even real becasue several others said worse than C in that thread and everyone knows it. Someombody been talkin in your ear just because they were poly by sucking over 100 dicks I bet..influencing you thats some shady shit heaven help for I think the new mod is gonna be a muthafucka (pox) on (some) of us all... um um um [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 0:18:18 PST 2004 by rdhull] I have a question, why are you saying all this in the GD instead of orgnoting matt? You've started a thread about this before and it didn't really solve anything. I'm just wondering what your motive is here. I also agree that it's difficult to be an impartial moderator when you're in a relationship with a highly sensitive (or so it seems) and high vocal orger and that 'tackam's leaving' thread is a perfect example of that. But I don't think that you're going to get anymore answers out of matt about why C was deactivated. Especially not after you say that his girl sucked 100 dicks. Poly or not, no guy wants to hear that about their girl. well, the thing being ignored and revised depending on which thread you read on which day is that C's comment had nothing to do with melissa or matt, it was a flame about me, for me. personally, and it was something he was on his second warning about. personally, i wish c had not been deactivated for it, since i did not ask that the flame be reported, but he had been warned repeatedly. matt was very very cool about the comments about melissa in that thread and in the several other ones aaron and rd had created or participated in since then, and allows the innumerous childish comments to stay. ... I was away too long, obviously. Haven't a clue what you're all talking about ... keep it up though, it's fun trying to figure it out well, it's as simple as this: C flamed me in a thread that people were hardcore knocking on tackam in, like really aggressively doing so. it was his third strike (the mods have a three warning system, then temporary deactivation), and he got deactivated. i didn't report it, and probably would not have done so, as i have never had any beef with c, but it was his third strike, and he paid the consequence. cut to a few weeks later, and you have people making up these wild conspiracy theories about how matt was out to get C, and how it's all a big plot, and that the people who miss icenine are in on it, pulling the strings behind the curtain, etc, etc. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
teller said: Man...this place... :LOL:
hilarious, isn't it? it gets too quiet, so a few people go create these huge hysterical overwrought dramas. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Number23 said: PEJ said: I wonder how many times that penguin hater ice was warned until finally deactivated for good. Seems like more than 3!
Je crois personnellement que vous désirez la Glace dans le sens Biblique, Pej. . [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 6:56:10 PST 2004 by Number23] You think Pej wants Ice in the biblical sense...ah, I see! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
if we're gonna create some huge conspiracy historically inaccurate conspiracy theory, let's do it right... oliver stone style!
back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
if people got deactivated every time cborgman said they had flamed him, then there wouldn't be any orgers left. there is little credibility to the notion that that was all there was to it. "oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AaronAlmighty said: if people got deactivated every time cborgman said they had flamed him, then there wouldn't be any orgers left. there is little credibility to the notion that that was all there was to it.
back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The sucking of 100 diocks was NOT referring to melissa at all. But someone else. "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
, [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 8:14:03 PST 2004 by cborgman] Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: Raspberry said: cborgman said: jessyMD32781 said: rdhull said: matt--yoiu gave C a strike for something ina thread that was close to you...when others in the same thread said worse than he did. And especially when you are the one whos usally replying to complaints as "well lets just see how this goes..oh I odnt think thats that serious..." etc. Something is shady and its been found out... I cant beleive Im gonna say this but I wish Ian was back. Because you kinda suck since you lied and are shady with using another orger as a scapegoat to use as a "well u flamed them" to finally grow some balls and "deactivate" someone . You aint slick and its seen by a lot now what you and *** did. Both of yall are def not slick.
And its not even real becasue several others said worse than C in that thread and everyone knows it. Someombody been talkin in your ear just because they were poly by sucking over 100 dicks I bet..influencing you thats some shady shit heaven help for I think the new mod is gonna be a muthafucka (pox) on (some) of us all... um um um [This message was edited Tue Jan 13 0:18:18 PST 2004 by rdhull] I have a question, why are you saying all this in the GD instead of orgnoting matt? You've started a thread about this before and it didn't really solve anything. I'm just wondering what your motive is here. I also agree that it's difficult to be an impartial moderator when you're in a relationship with a highly sensitive (or so it seems) and high vocal orger and that 'tackam's leaving' thread is a perfect example of that. But I don't think that you're going to get anymore answers out of matt about why C was deactivated. Especially not after you say that his girl sucked 100 dicks. Poly or not, no guy wants to hear that about their girl. well, the thing being ignored and revised depending on which thread you read on which day is that C's comment had nothing to do with melissa or matt, it was a flame about me, for me. personally, and it was something he was on his second warning about. personally, i wish c had not been deactivated for it, since i did not ask that the flame be reported, but he had been warned repeatedly. matt was very very cool about the comments about melissa in that thread and in the several other ones aaron and rd had created or participated in since then, and allows the innumerous childish comments to stay. ... I was away too long, obviously. Haven't a clue what you're all talking about ... keep it up though, it's fun trying to figure it out well, it's as simple as this: C flamed me in a thread that people were hardcore knocking on tackam in, like really aggressively doing so. it was his third strike (the mods have a three warning system, then temporary deactivation), and he got deactivated. i didn't report it, and probably would not have done so, as i have never had any beef with c, but it was his third strike, and he paid the consequence. cut to a few weeks later, and you have people making up these wild conspiracy theories about how matt was out to get C, and how it's all a big plot, and that the people who miss icenine are in on it, pulling the strings behind the curtain, etc, etc. lookit how he writes his script so matt sees fit to deactivate C on a thread about tackam...when has Matt ever takena stand in the last 2 years...but with tackam thread he decides to? And thats nerve of YOU talking about drama etc :disbeleif: Im just stating what has been said and known...somene else usually is the one cryuing "wehats the matta here...let me wrote a long play about it and tell u how dramatic you are" heaven help us all at whomever is our new mama "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: The sucking of 100 diocks was NOT referring to melissa at all. But someone else.
I was very drunk. I only enjoyed the first 20. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jessyMD32781 said: I have a question, why are you saying all this in the GD instead of orgnoting matt? You've started a thread about this before and it didn't really solve anything. I'm just wondering what your motive is here..
So people know. You should see what is kept as hush hush around here. Why cant the denizens of a place be privy to what is really going on? ..thats why. "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Number23 said: rdhull said: The sucking of 100 diocks was NOT referring to melissa at all. But someone else.
I was very drunk. I only enjoyed the first 20. lol not u silly..and u wouldnt make a federal case of sympathy about it if u did. "Climb in my fur." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: jessyMD32781 said: I have a question, why are you saying all this in the GD instead of orgnoting matt? You've started a thread about this before and it didn't really solve anything. I'm just wondering what your motive is here..
So people know. You should see what is kept as hush hush around here. Why cant the denizens of a place be privy to what is really going on? ..thats why. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. back... and to the left. Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sr. Moderator moderator |
AaronAlmighty said: if people got deactivated every time cborgman said they had flamed him, then there wouldn't be any orgers left. there is little credibility to the notion that that was all there was to it.
There was also a long history of violations by C, resulting in multiple prior deactivations. He knew--or should have known--the consequences of his actions, and he proceeded to flame cborgman anyway. Over 99% of all .orgers have no trouble abiding by the rules. But for whatever reason, a small number of them seems unable to do so. Please note: effective March 21, 2010, I've stepped down from my prince.org Moderator position. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rdhull said: Number23 said: rdhull said: The sucking of 100 diocks was NOT referring to melissa at all. But someone else.
I was very drunk. I only enjoyed the first 20. lol not u silly..and u wouldnt make a federal case of sympathy about it if u did. I certainly would not. I'd call Guineess to enquire about an entry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |