New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
Spellcheck Is it possible for you guys to add this function? I need it!  | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
magnificentsynthesizer667 said: Is it possible for you guys to add this function? I need it!
You can get a spellcheck for $392 AUD Life it ain't real funky unless you got that orgPop. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sabaisabai said: magnificentsynthesizer667 said: Is it possible for you guys to add this function? I need it!
You can get a spellcheck for $392 AUD  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
magnificentsynthesizer667 said: sabaisabai said: magnificentsynthesizer667 said: Is it possible for you guys to add this function? I need it!
You can get a spellcheck for $392 AUD ok, sick joke, playing around with spellcheck/soundcheck Life it ain't real funky unless you got that orgPop. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator |
I need it too  In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Me not need spell check, me spell good! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, then I will never spell mackeekle wrong again.
| |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How 'bout a grammar check for people who think "of" comes after should/would/could, instead of using "have" or "'ve"...
I've seen it so much I'm scurred I'm gonna inadvertently start writing that way.  This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Founder
|
Soon!
I'm testing a spellcheck function, but it's really really slow on long posts (and not so friendly to the server). So, until I either optimize that one, or find another... it's not going to be live. But I know it's high on the list  ben -- "the prince.org guy" |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
moderator
| Moderator |
ben said: Soon!
I'm testing a spellcheck function, but it's really really slow on long posts (and not so friendly to the server). So, until I either optimize that one, or find another... it's not going to be live. But I know it's high on the list Thanks Ben  Your the best  In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: How 'bout a grammar check for people who think "of" comes after should/would/could, instead of using "have" or "'ve"...
I've seen it so much I'm scurred I'm gonna inadvertently start writing that way. I think it's only contagious if you're around it for extended periods of time...  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Supernova said: How 'bout a grammar check for people who think "of" comes after should/would/could, instead of using "have" or "'ve"...
I've seen it so much I'm scurred I'm gonna inadvertently start writing that way. Now that's funny because I've never written it that way but I have said it that way -- A little ebonics creeping into my English classes.   [This message was edited Tue Sep 30 9:29:01 PDT 2003 by SweetKreme] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ben said: Soon!
I'm testing a spellcheck function, but it's really really slow on long posts (and not so friendly to the server). So, until I either optimize that one, or find another... it's not going to be live. But I know it's high on the list Can we make it proper English only please, and not US English?  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ian said: Can we make it proper English only please, and not US English?
agreed... it would have to be | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |