New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
has that always been there? i was just looking over the rules of posting and noticed that it says no posting ethnic/racial/etc slurs, inluding in signatures (not a direct quote)
has that always been there or was that a recent change due to recent unnamed events from a few weeks ago? "hasselhoff is god spelled backwards" edit [This message was edited Sun Sep 7 13:53:04 PDT 2003 by cborgman] Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
It doesn't say that - it says at the top the the rules apply to posts on our forums including signatures, and then later it lists racial slurs etc as one of the things we do not permit. I think it has always been like that. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ian said: It doesn't say that - it says at the top the the rules apply to posts on our forums including signatures, and then later it lists racial slurs etc as one of the things we do not permit. I think it has always been like that.
that's why i put "not a driect quote" in the post... huh. i never noticed that before. that answered my question, thanks. do me a favor and lock this down before someone thinks i am taking about them? Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. - Lord Acton | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cborgman said: ian said: It doesn't say that - it says at the top the the rules apply to posts on our forums including signatures, and then later it lists racial slurs etc as one of the things we do not permit. I think it has always been like that.
that's why i put "not a driect quote" in the post... huh. i never noticed that before. that answered my question, thanks. do me a favor and lock this down before someone thinks i am taking about them?  "Waiting to be banned" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |