Author | Message |
The mass banning on the Hot Summer thread Allow me to blow off some steam.
It appears about a dozen people were temp-banned Monday by luv4u, based upon their requests to hear "Hot Summer". I was one of them. These bans were wrong, IMHO, for a couple reasons:
1. They were retroactive. Luv4u posted her warning well AFTER I had requested a way to listen to the song. In fact, the warning was posted after most of us that were temp-banned had made the posts in question. It was a retroactive decision. Had luv4u posted her warning prior to my post, I would never have asked for a way to hear the song. For the record, here's the warning:
[ATTENTION FOLKS !!!! - No asking for, hinting for, orgnoting for, wishing for or any other variation of asking for this song. Temp bans will be handed out left right and centre. I shit you not!! Now smarten up ! - luv4u]
2. This song is NOT a bootleg. It's been authorized to be played publicly by Prince, yet it is not offered for sale. What other way is there to here it than to ask if it's up somewhere? This is not, IMHO, the same thing as asking to hear, for example, the Small Club concert. That is a performance that Prince has NOT authorized to be played for the public, but "Hot Summer" WAS.
I might be wrong about this. But my feeling is that luv4u went over the line with this. I've made over 15,000 posts, and have never asked for a bootleg. I've never been banned or anything else. Same with some of the others that got the temp ban.
Considering that most of us made the allegedly-offending posts BEFORE luv4u posted her warning, and that many of us that were banned are NOT "the usual suspects", I think it's clear that at best, this was a misunderstanding of what constitutes a bootleg, and at worst, luv4u acted with an inappropriate hair trigger. IMHO, luv4u owes us an apology.
My two cents. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hear, hear. I was banned, too - eight hours after I said, "I'm sure some kind, generous soul recorded the song. " Nothing more than that.
The rules state, "No requests to copy." I did not request a copy. I said I was sure someone had one. Eight hours after the fact, we suddenly have new rules - "no hinting" and "no orgnoting." These were never spelled out prior to the action taken.
Like RodeoSchro, I have never been banned from this site. I have diligently abided by the rules as stated. It is simply not fair to make up new rules on the fly and punish people for "disobeying." We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You can try to contact Ben. Good luck!
[Edited 6/9/10 7:35am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, that was kind of foul, especially since it was without warning.
I've been on here for years, without breaking any rules... ignoring requests for info on P, etc.
I admit that me saying, "I'm sure I'll get it in the PM..." could be construed as a violation of the rules, but I would've appreciated a warning before being banned.
"He's a musician's musician..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So I found out the hard way, you can get a ban without warning or your comments being snipped. They don't even have to give you a reason.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wow, for real with this? I had no idea. How silly. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | My guess is this was a simple misunderstanding... |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Same thing happened over here. I was like DAYUM. I've been on here since the beginning with thousands of posts and never committed a ban-able offense.
I never asked for a link, I never provided a link in any posting. I did provide the link to drfb's page where people could listen.
I had no idea asking people to PM/orgnote me without any specific reference to purpose, would be something that would get me banned. Kinda whack to find out after the fact.
Glad it was just for one day though "That...magic, the start of something revolutionary-the Minneapolis Sound, we should cherish it and not punish prince for not being able to replicate it."-Dreamshaman32 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I know this bell can't be unrung, but if we really didn't do anything wrong, an apology from luv4u would be nice. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ex-Moderator | Without knowing what exactly was posted (as I don’t moderate in that forum and didn’t handle this myself), if folks were asking where they could listen to or find a legit stream of the song, that’s OK.
If folks were asking or joking about where they could “get” (i.e. download) the song, that’s not.
We will often err on the side of being cautious in these matters to avoid legal issues and there are warnings all over the site about this.
To me it sounds like a few of these may have been snip-worthy and a few may not have been. As for the banning, I think the extreme measures were likely taken as there were LOTS of posts coming all in at once and it was the quickest way to ensure action was taken with a minimum of issues on the site’s side.
Luv will have to chime in for herself, though. Just my take. |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The list of folks that were banned:
Genesia Giovanni777 organgrinder damn NuPwrSoul Shorty Bfunkthe1 Joyinrepatition Markk Dave1992 aiden ludwig minneapolisFunq PicklesMcMillan liv4love funkyhead RumandRaisin kaine kimrachell rossco RodeoSchro
. [Edited 6/9/10 9:00am] "He's a musician's musician..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't have a problem with anything you said. The main issue I have is that luv4u posted a warning that was extremely broad-based, and then retroactively banned anyone that came within 100 miles of that warning.
Had she posted the warning before I made my post, I wouldn't have posted the way I did. I would have disagreed with her stance, but at least I would have known what the rules for that thread were, and would have abided by them, as I have for the past 15+ years and 15,000 posts. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I do have another question though, that I'd like your input on. Specifically, is "Hot Summer" a bootleg?
My understanding/definition of a bootleg is a performance that Prince has not authorized to be played for or sold to the public. That can be an unreleased song or a concert performance.
"Hot Summer" WAS authorized by Prince to be played for the public. And it is NOT for sale anywhere. So, do you think that makes it a bootleg? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LOL! I'm not mad... I was in good company
And I feel Luv on being overly cautious--sometimes that's the best policy esp with our litigious friend. "That...magic, the start of something revolutionary-the Minneapolis Sound, we should cherish it and not punish prince for not being able to replicate it."-Dreamshaman32 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
surely by now you've grown accustomed to her willy-nilly style of moderation. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So that's why i was banned! Thanks for the courtesy orgnote letting me know why mods. Had to find out here. Nice one.
Oh, and i merely requested a fairy visit me as i recall. But not a hairy one.
I didn't ask for shit.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I've never had a problem with her or any other mod. Which, I guess, is why after 15,000 posts, this came as a bit of a surprise. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
May i ask how you know who got temp-banned? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
After I got banned, I clicked on several others' profiles, and the ones that came up "empty" were the ones that got banned.
Then, "RodeoShcro" composed this list in "General Discussion" 2 let folks know we didn't die or vaporize. "He's a musician's musician..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk, did you get an email? I was emailed at the address registered with this site letting me know about the ban. "That...magic, the start of something revolutionary-the Minneapolis Sound, we should cherish it and not punish prince for not being able to replicate it."-Dreamshaman32 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
didn't Mars23 say the best way to address this was through an org note to the moderator? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh, that'll be why. I haven't had that email address for the last 4 years. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I did that. I got no reply.
Pardon me, but do you actually have something to contribute or are you just being the resident scold today? We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh come on now! I'm usually one all for calling bullshit on Moderation around here but y'all were wrong as hell! So much so that even I had to say something about it, way before the Mods got around to it.
However, I did not report y'all. If I had, I'd be more than happy to say so.
I was trying to get y'all to cut it out because had that been the resident "Haters" doing that, we'd have been reported, reprimanded and told in numerous posts and hit and run threads, how disrespectful we were to Prince, the Org, the fans, the sun, the moon, the stars and then we'd have STILL been banned and more than likely not temporarily!
The rule at the very top of the main page of the PM&M forum state in flashing letters:
ABSOLUTELY NO SOLICITING FOR BOOTLEGS.
and if that rule applies to ME...it applies to EVERYBODY...no matter how cleverly WE might try to disguise it...out in the open forum.
I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I heard in CHAT that somebody died.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh. No. Wait. NOBODY died! That's what it was!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Maybe it's time for that antiquated ass RULE to die, ONCE AND FOR ALL?
I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yesterday, while my ban was in place, I clicked on the profiles of everyone that had a snip message from Luv4U, and each time I got the screen that indicates a profile isn't active.
I think there was one person who got snipped but not banned, but I can't remember who that was.
And there was at least one person that put up a link to hear the song that did not have their link taken down, nor were they banned. I'm not saying who that was, though. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
We'll all be laughing about this next week!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Most of us, if not all of us, did not solicit for a bootleg. We asked where we could go to hear a song that Prince had made available to the public to listen to, but not to buy.
And even if that is against the rules (I would argue it's not, or at best is a very gray area), what bothers me is that I was retroactively banned for violating a warning that was posted AFTER my post.
Even if my post was wrong, it seems to me that the correct order of events would have been to merely snip my post. I can see banning someone that posted something offensive AFTER the warning, but BEFORE?
As you can see by the list of those that got the ban, several long-time, non-bootlegging users got banned. I think the evidence is clear that our ban was wrong. We clearly aren't a bunch of serial bootleggers.
Just between me, Genesia and Giovanni, we have over 30,000 posts. None of us has ever been banned. Hell, I can count on one hand the number of snipped comments I've seen from us three. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |