Rhondab said: evenstar said: yeah you have! on your Evol account. U are so wrong there is some connection there between David and GP You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: MuthaFunka said: You hit the nail on the head and that was discovered in the "olive branch" thread. could it just be possilbe for everyone to instead of getting personal just ignore the posts of the people that push their buttons? like i know at certain times i can't talk to my biomother or my drag mother because i know they can push my buttons and cause me to fly off the handle, at those times i just don't talk to them. But how about going the proper step further and punishing those that DO make it personal to begin with? That's a lot better than having to weed through the "personals" in order to get to the posts on the topic at hand. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: ehuffnsd said: could it just be possilbe for everyone to instead of getting personal just ignore the posts of the people that push their buttons? like i know at certain times i can't talk to my biomother or my drag mother because i know they can push my buttons and cause me to fly off the handle, at those times i just don't talk to them. But how about going the proper step further and punishing those that DO make it personal to begin with? That's a lot better than having to weed through the "personals" in order to get to the posts on the topic at hand. we all either chose to engage those people or not. just because one says something doesn't mean we have to respond. at some point they will move on or the rest of the community will stop it. a couple years ago we had an orger that got really personal with sos and the rest of the regulars in PnR banned together in requesting a permaban. I don't have to respond to every comment someone addresses to me. Like when I've run into extremely anti-gay and homophobic people when I'm out as a Sister. They all say some pretty mean and hateful things and I could get upset and start some arguement but in the end that is giving them what they want. In light of that most of the time it's a thank you or bless you and a smile and go about my day. i know i've gotten tired of watching two people go at and building their armies. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: MuthaFunka said: But how about going the proper step further and punishing those that DO make it personal to begin with? That's a lot better than having to weed through the "personals" in order to get to the posts on the topic at hand. we all either chose to engage those people or not. just because one says something doesn't mean we have to respond. at some point they will move on or the rest of the community will stop it. a couple years ago we had an orger that got really personal with sos and the rest of the regulars in PnR banned together in requesting a permaban. I don't have to respond to every comment someone addresses to me. Like when I've run into extremely anti-gay and homophobic people when I'm out as a Sister. They all say some pretty mean and hateful things and I could get upset and start some arguement but in the end that is giving them what they want. In light of that most of the time it's a thank you or bless you and a smile and go about my day. i know i've gotten tired of watching two people go at and building their armies. I don't even respond to topics I would normally be interested in because of the fighting. It's a shame because both have so much to bring to the table. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: evenstar said: yeah you have! on your Evol account. U are so wrong | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: Rhondab said: U are so wrong there is some connection there between David and GP lawd....his other side? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: ehuffnsd said: we all either chose to engage those people or not. just because one says something doesn't mean we have to respond. at some point they will move on or the rest of the community will stop it. a couple years ago we had an orger that got really personal with sos and the rest of the regulars in PnR banned together in requesting a permaban. I don't have to respond to every comment someone addresses to me. Like when I've run into extremely anti-gay and homophobic people when I'm out as a Sister. They all say some pretty mean and hateful things and I could get upset and start some arguement but in the end that is giving them what they want. In light of that most of the time it's a thank you or bless you and a smile and go about my day. i know i've gotten tired of watching two people go at and building their armies. I don't even respond to topics I would normally be interested in because of the fighting. It's a shame because both have so much to bring to the table. But don't you agree that if the baiters are eliminated, you wouldn't have to avoid certain threads or P&R altogether? That's my point. Ignoring baiters is one thing, and that's cool, but getting rid of them completely is the best solution for all. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stymie said: ehuffnsd said: we all either chose to engage those people or not. just because one says something doesn't mean we have to respond. at some point they will move on or the rest of the community will stop it. a couple years ago we had an orger that got really personal with sos and the rest of the regulars in PnR banned together in requesting a permaban. I don't have to respond to every comment someone addresses to me. Like when I've run into extremely anti-gay and homophobic people when I'm out as a Sister. They all say some pretty mean and hateful things and I could get upset and start some arguement but in the end that is giving them what they want. In light of that most of the time it's a thank you or bless you and a smile and go about my day. i know i've gotten tired of watching two people go at and building their armies. I don't even respond to topics I would normally be interested in because of the fighting. It's a shame because both have so much to bring to the table. Why can't we respond to the topic and not the ones trying to get the thread locked? I still think an ignore button would be great. At least in P&R. "Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
greenpixies said: Honestly I don't know what's up in P&R. I haven't been posting there for the past few months because it's been boring as hell!
Message received: I'll post more Central Asia threads. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2the9s said: greenpixies said: Honestly I don't know what's up in P&R. I haven't been posting there for the past few months because it's been boring as hell!
Message received: I'll post more Central Asia threads. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
its starting again in p&r.
i'm just going to stay away. that's my fav forum here. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: its starting again in p&r.
i'm just going to stay away. that's my fav forum here. for heaven's sake, rhonda, i'll edit my post if you're going to be this dramatic about it. just ASK. [Edited 2/3/08 13:16pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: its starting again in p&r.
i'm just going to stay away. that's my fav forum here. I haven't even been to P&R yet today. Let me go check. It's my favorite forum too, Rhonda. Guess I'll be relegated to GD discussing farts. Just kidding...nothing wrong with farts. "Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar said: Rhondab said: its starting again in p&r.
i'm just going to stay away. that's my fav forum here. for heaven's sake, rhonda, i'll edit my post if you're going to be this dramatic about it. just ASK. [Edited 2/3/08 13:16pm] And yet who is trying to bring the drama.... Go have at it Even... and I wasn't necessarily talking about you | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noimageatall said: Rhondab said: its starting again in p&r.
i'm just going to stay away. that's my fav forum here. I haven't even been to P&R yet today. Let me go check. It's my favorite forum too, Rhonda. Guess I'll be relegated to GD discussing farts. Just kidding...nothing wrong with farts. The "baiting" began, that's what Rhonda was referring to. [Edited 2/3/08 13:42pm] nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noimageatall said: Stymie said: I don't even respond to topics I would normally be interested in because of the fighting. It's a shame because both have so much to bring to the table. Why can't we respond to the topic and not the ones trying to get the thread locked? I still think an ignore button would be great. At least in P&R. i'm not naming names or singling people out. i'm just as guilty about getting personal with some. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: evenstar said: for heaven's sake, rhonda, i'll edit my post if you're going to be this dramatic about it. just ASK. [Edited 2/3/08 13:16pm] And yet who is trying to bring the drama.... Go have at it Even... and I wasn't necessarily talking about you i was assuming you were because you posted right after i made that remark. if you weren't, i'm sorry, it was just a weird coincidence then. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2the9s said: greenpixies said: Honestly I don't know what's up in P&R. I haven't been posting there for the past few months because it's been boring as hell!
Message received: I'll post more Central Asia threads. You post threads 9's? I thought you just quipped with your pusillanimous and safe one-liners. America's political system used to be about the "pursuit of happiness." Now more and more of us want to stop chasing it and have it delivered.
"Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: Rhondab said: U are so wrong there is some connection there between David and GP Nice try. But RhondaB is right. When are you guys going to accept that people like me actually exist and we vote. America's political system used to be about the "pursuit of happiness." Now more and more of us want to stop chasing it and have it delivered.
"Our Constitution is designed only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for any other."- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
greenpixies said: 2the9s said: Message received: I'll post more Central Asia threads. You post threads 9's? I thought you just quipped with your pusillanimous and safe one-liners. shhh, newbie. and you aren't voting! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar said: Rhondab said: And yet who is trying to bring the drama.... Go have at it Even... and I wasn't necessarily talking about you i was assuming you were because you posted right after i made that remark. if you weren't, i'm sorry, it was just a weird coincidence then. apology accepted But the tone was being set with the "they" do with this and "they" say that stuff. Each person speaks for themselves and that "they" stuff only keeps the BS going. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: evenstar said: i was assuming you were because you posted right after i made that remark. if you weren't, i'm sorry, it was just a weird coincidence then. apology accepted But the tone was being set with the "they" do with this and "they" say that stuff. Each person speaks for themselves and that "they" stuff only keeps the BS going. It's tiresome and something needs to be done about it. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: Rhondab said: apology accepted But the tone was being set with the "they" do with this and "they" say that stuff. Each person speaks for themselves and that "they" stuff only keeps the BS going. It's tiresome and something needs to be done about it. Now I'm sure nothing will be done. Just locking a thread does nothing. That was a clear case of baiting. I'm so close to just leaving. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: evenstar said: i was assuming you were because you posted right after i made that remark. if you weren't, i'm sorry, it was just a weird coincidence then. apology accepted But the tone was being set with the "they" do with this and "they" say that stuff. Each person speaks for themselves and that "they" stuff only keeps the BS going. i can't see what was worth reporting on that thread to make it worth locking (not saying that you did personally, just going on what june7 posted), other than maybe eraclito's teasing jab at american orgers. the only other 'they' remark i can see anyone having a problem with is what mdiver said in one post, early on. there were people on past threads that hated on tiger and called him names, so i don't see what the issue is with that. & regardless, it could've been snipped if a mod thought it broke the rules & saw it as bait, right? unless i'm missing other 'they' focused remarks, i just don't see why that thread was worth shutting down. there wasn't a flurry of flaming or personal attacks. i dunno, obviously we just can't discuss tiger in p&r or something. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
evenstar said: Rhondab said: apology accepted But the tone was being set with the "they" do with this and "they" say that stuff. Each person speaks for themselves and that "they" stuff only keeps the BS going. i can't see what was worth reporting on that thread to make it worth locking (not saying that you did personally, just going on what june7 posted), other than maybe eraclito's teasing jab at american orgers. the only other 'they' remark i can see anyone having a problem with is what mdiver said in one post, early on. there were people on past threads that hated on tiger and called him names, so i don't see what the issue is with that. & regardless, it could've been snipped if a mod thought it broke the rules & saw it as bait, right? unless i'm missing other 'they' focused remarks, i just don't see why that thread was worth shutting down. there wasn't a flurry of flaming or personal attacks. i dunno, obviously we just can't discuss tiger in p&r or something. locking (shrug) That's up to the mods. And you should know, that mods could handle situations in a number of ways but they decide. as far as the rest, we interpret things as we want. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: MuthaFunka said: It's tiresome and something needs to be done about it. Now I'm sure nothing will be done. Just locking a thread does nothing. That was a clear case of baiting. I'm so close to just leaving. You leave - the Mob mentality wins It is by far easier to simply group people together then address each person for who and what they are - it's lazy and even safer to do so - It's really a reflection on that person when they project like that it's also a reflection to not engage in the games As I told another concerned P&R orger - the cliques, groups, gangs, mobs whatever you choose to call them are here - just as they are in all of human relations | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just thoughts ...
The P&R forum is about debate ... it's part of debating to "bait" to troll around and throw out bait and then even ride the line of "flames" in the process of debating something one feels passionate about Each thread posted, the title alone could be bait Each comment afterwards could be seen as bait to engage the next person Bait is offered and one can choose to take the hook and run or one can choose not to. We're really damned if we do damned if we dont in modding that forum - If we took action on each and every bait/troll/flame the forum would soon come to almost a stand still and even then people would complain about how things are not exactly to their liking or fair in their eyes I know many are frustrated - I too get frustrated We are in the process of gaining another Mod or two to add to P&R ~ perhaps that will help balance out the different energy and modding styles | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mach said: Rhondab said: Now I'm sure nothing will be done. Just locking a thread does nothing. That was a clear case of baiting. I'm so close to just leaving. You leave - the Mob mentality wins It is by far easier to simply group people together then address each person for who and what they are - it's lazy and even safer to do so - It's really a reflection on that person when they project like that it's also a reflection to not engage in the games As I told another concerned P&R orger - the cliques, groups, gangs, mobs whatever you choose to call them are here - just as they are in all of human relations But mach, you know its hasn't been like this in a very long time. This stuff reminds me of Icenine and all of that drama. This isn't about the "ART" of debate. I've been in p&r too long and I've been flamed, baited, etc. but this vibe is different. I do know you do your best. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: Mach said: You leave - the Mob mentality wins It is by far easier to simply group people together then address each person for who and what they are - it's lazy and even safer to do so - It's really a reflection on that person when they project like that it's also a reflection to not engage in the games As I told another concerned P&R orger - the cliques, groups, gangs, mobs whatever you choose to call them are here - just as they are in all of human relations But mach, you know its hasn't been like this in a very long time. This stuff reminds me of Icenine and all of that drama. This isn't about the "ART" of debate. I've been in p&r too long and I've been flamed, baited, etc. but this vibe is different. I do know you do your best. I have watched and noticed the shift of energy and agree this isn't really the "art" of debate but a lower vibration more like consistant persoanal attack/projection from people that hold onto things that do not serve them in a positive fashion- "It" feels stuck and almost consumed yet happy to be so ... I do not remember Icenine. If it was before 3.5 yrs ago I was not a member then ... I try to do my best but I also realize that I do not nor can always do the very best for all involved I am learning every moment and open to change and growth | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |