independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > prince.org site discussion > Mutually-acceptable guidelines can be agreed upon for unofficial fan sites?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 11/20/07 3:29pm

sosgemini

avatar

Mutually-acceptable guidelines can be agreed upon for unofficial fan sites?

This statement makes me very uncomfortable. Just wanted to state that.

taken from: http://princefansunited.com/
[Edited 11/20/07 15:29pm]
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 11/20/07 3:36pm

Anxiety

I have to wonder exactly what kind of guideline$ are being agreed upon between Prince'$ organization and the unofficial fan $ite$...not that i'm worried about any particular outcome$, like buyout$ or anything...i ju$t like typing dollar $ymbols. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 11/20/07 4:08pm

m3taverse

There's something called the law, I think it's probably guideline enough.
"this especially prepared potato is called pomme de terre"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 11/20/07 5:16pm

gemini13

oh, me too. I felt a little strange when I read that.

Why should we have to accept any guidelines from the little guy? Tell him to set up his own damn forums. mad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 11/20/07 8:22pm

Markland

avatar

I am disturbed by that damned thumbprint with f.u.n.k on it replacing the pfu hand

It gives the impression this place is under the thumb and no prizes for guessing whose

And wtf set him up as an internet regulator?
[Edited 11/20/07 20:23pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 11/20/07 8:26pm

sosgemini

avatar

note that the org does not have that graphic displayed. the other two sites do. interesting.
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 11/20/07 8:28pm

Markland

avatar

sosgemini said:

note that the org does not have that graphic displayed. the other two sites do. interesting.


No it just took the hand down instead

I dont use the other two sites to be honest so I dont know what goes on on them

Are any of these sites UK based?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 11/20/07 8:46pm

sosgemini

avatar

Markland said:

sosgemini said:

note that the org does not have that graphic displayed. the other two sites do. interesting.


No it just took the hand down instead

I dont use the other two sites to be honest so I dont know what goes on on them

Are any of these sites UK based?


don't know...i don't really know much about those sites either.
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 11/20/07 8:49pm

Markland

avatar

sosgemini said:

Markland said:



No it just took the hand down instead

I dont use the other two sites to be honest so I dont know what goes on on them

Are any of these sites UK based?


don't know...i don't really know much about those sites either.


I am seriously considering setting up a UK based webpage and asking a few fans to sign over the copyright of pics they own the rights to

I don't mind giving WS a run for their money just to prove what bullshit this is

I bet they most they do is threaten to sue me in the US or Outer Mongolia or somewhere
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 11/21/07 1:37am

BorisFishpaw

avatar

sosgemini said:

This statement makes me very uncomfortable. Just wanted to state that.
taken from: http://princefansunited.com/


Why?

A) What is it about the statement that makes you uncomfortable?

It just looks like the usual kind of statement that's issued when two parties
enter into talks to resolve a dispute. As the statement has to be jointly
approved, it will contain both parties point of view and will not go into any
specific detail as talks like this are always confidential.

B) Why do you feel the need to publicly state that you're uncomfortable?

The reason these kind of talks are always confidential is to avoid outside
opinions (particularly the press etc.) influencing and/or jeopardizing the
outcome. I might expect a random statement like this from a regular
member, but not from a mod. I doubt Ben would appreciate this.
[Edited 11/21/07 1:59am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 11/21/07 2:11am

Markland

avatar

BorisFishpaw said:

sosgemini said:

This statement makes me very uncomfortable. Just wanted to state that.
taken from: http://princefansunited.com/


Why?

A) What is it about the statement that makes you uncomfortable?

It just looks like the usual kind of statement that's issued when two parties
enter into talks to resolve a dispute. As the statement has to be jointly
approved, it will contain both parties point of view and will not go into any
specific detail as talks like this are always confidential.

B) Why do you feel the need to publicly state that you're uncomfortable?

The reason these kind of talks are always confidential is to avoid outside
opinions (particularly the press etc.) influencing and/or jeopardizing the
outcome. I might expect a random statement like this from a regular
member, but not from a mod. I doubt Ben would appreciate this.
[Edited 11/21/07 1:59am]


"mutually acceptable guidelines"?

This isnt princes site to have any say in how its run the same way its not princes intellectual property in most cases that he is demanding is removed

This is big brother at its worst

Personally, whilst I am grateful to ben for providing a forum for discussion here, I am equally grateful to the moderators for their honesty and hard work

They have a right to free speech and the right to exercise it and voice their concerns

Stop trying to muzzle people
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 11/21/07 6:39am

sosgemini

avatar

BorisFishpaw said:

sosgemini said:

This statement makes me very uncomfortable. Just wanted to state that.
taken from: http://princefansunited.com/


Why?

A) What is it about the statement that makes you uncomfortable?

It leads one to think that three fan websites are agreeing upon guidelines for all fan websites.


It just looks like the usual kind of statement that's issued when two parties
enter into talks to resolve a dispute. As the statement has to be jointly
approved, it will contain both parties point of view and will not go into any
specific detail as talks like this are always confidential.

B) Why do you feel the need to publicly state that you're uncomfortable?

The reason these kind of talks are always confidential is to avoid outside
opinions (particularly the press etc.) influencing and/or jeopardizing the
outcome. I might expect a random statement like this from a regular
member, but not from a mod. I doubt Ben would appreciate this.



Ben has been very honest and open about his thoughts during this process and i am confident that he would want the same for us mods and orgers...regardless of view...hence us allowing the anti-org commentary to stray posted.

now, i can accept mutual agreement of what is copyright and what isnt but the language currently being used, "mutual guideline" just doesn't sit well with me...this is an independent website afterall.
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 11/21/07 7:03pm

sosgemini

avatar

another issue:

i would strongly suggest that the statement mentioned in the title of this thread be changed to "our unofficial fan sites".

as is currently stated it sounds like the "prince fans united" organization is trying to speak for all online prince fan sites. this issue is now a national story and anything that can appear as misleading probably isn't a good thing. IMHO.
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 11/21/07 11:15pm

Markland

avatar

sosgemini said:

another issue:

i would strongly suggest that the statement mentioned in the title of this thread be changed to "our unofficial fan sites".

as is currently stated it sounds like the "prince fans united" organization is trying to speak for all online prince fan sites. this issue is now a national story and anything that can appear as misleading probably isn't a good thing. IMHO.


I dont think anyone believes for a moment that the websites are doing anything except speak for the three sites affected by this tawdry legal nonsense

But you are right, its the type of thing his "representatives" would pick up on to make a point

What I have noticed is the press release alleging that the fan sites are "phoney" and making money off the fans/fams has never publicly been corrected or retracted

Despite claims that it was released "in error" and received worldwide publication

"The first casualty in war is always the truth"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 11/22/07 12:15am

ben

Founder

avatar

moderator

I can't speak too much of what's going on at the moment but I think you guys shouldn't get too hung up on the particular semantics there. Both sides do want to come to an agreement, or at least understanding. Don't stress out (well, not yet anyhow smile about the wording of what's going on, it's mostly procedural at this point.
ben -- "the prince.org guy"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 11/22/07 5:31pm

Markland

avatar

ben said:

I can't speak too much of what's going on at the moment but I think you guys shouldn't get too hung up on the particular semantics there. Both sides do want to come to an agreement, or at least understanding. Don't stress out (well, not yet anyhow smile about the wording of what's going on, it's mostly procedural at this point.


Firstly thanks for providing a great site to discuss all things purple on

With regard to these "negotiations"

Could you just make sure that fans are allowed to post their own pics regardless of who they are of to which the taker owns the copyright please?

I can fully understand photos commissioned by prince or artwork to which he owns the rights not being posted and fully endorse that action, but regarding material that he has no ownership of whatsoever, could you please put the fans pics back up?
[Edited 11/22/07 17:32pm]
[Edited 11/22/07 17:33pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 12/01/07 10:49am

ben

Founder

avatar

moderator

Markland said:

I can fully understand photos commissioned by prince or artwork to which he owns the rights not being posted and fully endorse that action, but regarding material that he has no ownership of whatsoever, could you please put the fans pics back up?


This is entirely in line with my desires and goals.
ben -- "the prince.org guy"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 12/10/07 4:46am

wlcm2thdwn

It just means Prince is gonna get his way, period! confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 12/11/07 4:43pm

Markland

avatar

wlcm2thdwn said:

It just means Prince is gonna get his way, period! confused


I bloody hope not

The last idiot who went for world domination was one Mr A Hitler

He didnt get his own way either
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 12/19/07 5:17am

Gav

avatar

ben said:

Markland said:

I can fully understand photos commissioned by prince or artwork to which he owns the rights not being posted and fully endorse that action, but regarding material that he has no ownership of whatsoever, could you please put the fans pics back up?


This is entirely in line with my desires and goals.


And to back Ben up, is fully within the draft being worked on.

As Ben said, don't get too hung up on wording.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 12/19/07 9:54pm

Illustrator

I say this is the only guideline we suggest:
finger
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > prince.org site discussion > Mutually-acceptable guidelines can be agreed upon for unofficial fan sites?