independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > prince.org site discussion > Should the org ban the use of the N-word?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 5 of 5 <12345
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #120 posted 07/08/06 5:36pm

LleeLlee

Anx said:

LleeLlee said:

Rather than focus on one word, I think racist comments in general should not be tolerated. People dont always use racial slurs but thier intent is clear. Just because somebody hasnt used the N word but has said a whole heap of other shit besides, does this keep them in the clear? because it shouldnt.


yeah, but the hippie dippie idealist in me believes that people don't walk around with a sign on their shirt that says "hi! i'm racist! and i think it's GREAT!"

and when people make racist comments on forums like this, on an online "community", sometimes i think it should be the goal of the rest of us not to simply SUPPRESS the comments, but to try to INFORM and EDUCATE those people as to why their comments are objectionable.

hard as it may be to believe, sometimes people JUST DON'T KNOW.

now, the people who DO know better...the ones who post bullshit just to troll and get people upset...those people should be disciplined appropriately, not JUST because they're posting racist comments, but because of the larger issue: they're manipulating other people's emotions for attention and their own "entertainment". that has less to do with the person at fault being a racist than it has to do with them being an insensitive, manipulative, immature ass. racism is merely the tool they're using to get their precious attention.

and then, there are people who truly are racist to the bone, and believe their feelings are righteous and true. and those people...well...i have no idea what can be done in these cases. i mean, if they're causing other people a sense of danger or discomfort with being on this site, then measures really need to be taken. maybe (uhhh, definitely?) the org is not the site for them.

then there are the people who might be working through their ignorance, and we have an opportunity to influence and inform their perceptions. which leads me to the beginning of my post.

i believe all of us, even the trolls, believe we're good people at heart. it's this perception of other people that makes me want us to have open lines of communication. any one of us can say something that may trigger something in someone else that may change them forever, maybe for the worse, but sometimes - maybe more often than we think - maybe fore the better, too.

and if it takes a well-thought out use of even "the n-word" to make someone understand something someday, then it will be a word well used. and i would rather that possibility be allowed to exist. i'm not presumptuous enough to say when or how that could or could not happen. but when we ban words, we also ban ideas. and to me, the thought of that kinda sucks.


I agree that banning words is hardly a constructive way to deal with racism, and the JUST DON'T KNOWs would benefit from being enlightened about their ignorance. However, the other categories of ignorance that you've highlighted far out weigh the unbelievably naive on this site and its those people my comment was addressing. Banning a word isn't going to affect them in the slightest and I just think they should be made aware by the mods that their comments will not be tolerated. Somehwere the line has to be drawn because in the meantime people on the receiving end are being forced to tolerate comments that nobody should have to.

Whose interests are we fighting for here? Reforming the racist is all well and good and if it can be achieved than it would be a credit to this site, but lets not lose sight of the feelings of the people who these comments affect. striking the correct balance is difficult to achieve with such an emotive issue, just saying.

...
[Edited 7/8/06 17:37pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #121 posted 07/10/06 8:59am

ThreadBare

Anx, as much as I appreciate the challenge of what you're saying about educating racist Orgers, I think that's a misguided mission.

Most of them aren't interested in being educated, only in offending and provoking -- and their posts attest to that. If rehabilitation -- not just mere interaction and dialogue -- is the approach mods are interested in seeking, I envision a lot more pointless, personal attacks.

It's one thing to say: "As offensive as his posts are, he's owed a chance to be heard." It's another to say: "I think we can broaden his understanding, despite the offensiveness of his posts."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #122 posted 07/10/06 9:14am

gemini13

ThreadBare said:

Anx, as much as I appreciate the challenge of what you're saying about educating racist Orgers, I think that's a misguided mission.

Most of them aren't interested in being educated, only in offending and provoking -- and their posts attest to that. If rehabilitation -- not just mere interaction and dialogue -- is the approach mods are interested in seeking, I envision a lot more pointless, personal attacks.

It's one thing to say: "As offensive as his posts are, he's owed a chance to be heard." It's another to say: "I think we can broaden his understanding, despite the offensiveness of his posts."



You need to take perspective into account, because what you're speaking of reeks of censorship. "Offensive" is relative to experience, and most people are biased when it comes to their convictions and views.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #123 posted 07/10/06 9:43am

ThreadBare

gemini13 said:

ThreadBare said:

Anx, as much as I appreciate the challenge of what you're saying about educating racist Orgers, I think that's a misguided mission.

Most of them aren't interested in being educated, only in offending and provoking -- and their posts attest to that. If rehabilitation -- not just mere interaction and dialogue -- is the approach mods are interested in seeking, I envision a lot more pointless, personal attacks.

It's one thing to say: "As offensive as his posts are, he's owed a chance to be heard." It's another to say: "I think we can broaden his understanding, despite the offensiveness of his posts."



You need to take perspective into account, because what you're speaking of reeks of censorship. "Offensive" is relative to experience, and most people are biased when it comes to their convictions and views.



I think my posts -- especially on this thread -- have made fairly explicit distinctions between people who post honestly about their perspectives and people who try bait others by using incendiary, racist terms. And, it has been my practice to engage in discussions with the former while avoiding the latter.

As for censorship, I've also posted *against* banning that word. I've asked for scrutiny of its use and of moderation for people who are just out to bait other orgers.

How is that censorship?


.
[Edited 7/10/06 9:45am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #124 posted 07/10/06 11:20am

RipHer2Shreds

While I appreciate the effort, sos, the point is moot. Like any regular non-mod earthling, each individual mod is going to have a different knee-jerk reaction to it and do as they see fit without consulting anybody else. I was warned that I might be banned for posting a topic of discussion about a song that contained the word in its title (a highly influential song, no less). The topic was locked and deleted. Not a week later, a separate thread was started by somebody else with only the word "nigga" in the title ( http://www.prince.org/msg/8/192376 ). It racked up plenty of offensive posts and as far as I know is still open.

As others have said, banning the word will do nothing - it's not going to change the site and it's certainly not going to change somebody's deeply engrained belief systems.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #125 posted 07/10/06 1:37pm

sosgemini

avatar

RipHer2Shreds said:

While I appreciate the effort, sos, the point is moot. Like any regular non-mod earthling, each individual mod is going to have a different knee-jerk reaction to it and do as they see fit without consulting anybody else. I was warned that I might be banned for posting a topic of discussion about a song that contained the word in its title (a highly influential song, no less). The topic was locked and deleted. Not a week later, a separate thread was started by somebody else with only the word "nigga" in the title ( http://www.prince.org/msg/8/192376 ). It racked up plenty of offensive posts and as far as I know is still open.

As others have said, banning the word will do nothing - it's not going to change the site and it's certainly not going to change somebody's deeply engrained belief systems.



i had never seen that thread until you posted the link.

there were 0, ZERO, Zelch reports made to moderators and there were no posts in that thread by a moderator...yet numerous folks commenting how shocked they were that the thread was still open..

uhhh, HA HA HELLO???

smile
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #126 posted 07/10/06 3:14pm

Anx

ThreadBare said:

Anx, as much as I appreciate the challenge of what you're saying about educating racist Orgers, I think that's a misguided mission.

Most of them aren't interested in being educated, only in offending and provoking -- and their posts attest to that. If rehabilitation -- not just mere interaction and dialogue -- is the approach mods are interested in seeking, I envision a lot more pointless, personal attacks.

It's one thing to say: "As offensive as his posts are, he's owed a chance to be heard." It's another to say: "I think we can broaden his understanding, despite the offensiveness of his posts."


right. and i thought i did my best to include my thoughts on those people who know exactly what they're posting - which is to upset other people for their own amusement or for some kind of sick entertainment. there's really no argument from me where those folks are concerned - lock, hide, delete, ban, slice, dice, whatevs.

but i have seen a lot of people come on here and ask really vulnerable questions based on their own ignorance, and i've seen people give those threads a total "you're a big racist meanie!" smackdown. that's not right either. how else can we grow if we don't put our stuff out there, even if it's not always attractive or enlightened?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #127 posted 07/10/06 3:43pm

ThreadBare

Anx said:

ThreadBare said:

Anx, as much as I appreciate the challenge of what you're saying about educating racist Orgers, I think that's a misguided mission.

Most of them aren't interested in being educated, only in offending and provoking -- and their posts attest to that. If rehabilitation -- not just mere interaction and dialogue -- is the approach mods are interested in seeking, I envision a lot more pointless, personal attacks.

It's one thing to say: "As offensive as his posts are, he's owed a chance to be heard." It's another to say: "I think we can broaden his understanding, despite the offensiveness of his posts."


right. and i thought i did my best to include my thoughts on those people who know exactly what they're posting - which is to upset other people for their own amusement or for some kind of sick entertainment. there's really no argument from me where those folks are concerned - lock, hide, delete, ban, slice, dice, whatevs.

but i have seen a lot of people come on here and ask really vulnerable questions based on their own ignorance, and i've seen people give those threads a total "you're a big racist meanie!" smackdown. that's not right either. how else can we grow if we don't put our stuff out there, even if it's not always attractive or enlightened?


I totally agree. There has to be room for well-meaning folks' growth. Making that distinction is the task before the mods. Bless their hearts!
[Edited 7/10/06 15:43pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #128 posted 07/10/06 4:20pm

June7

Moderator

avatar

moderator

sosgemini said:

RipHer2Shreds said:

While I appreciate the effort, sos, the point is moot. Like any regular non-mod earthling, each individual mod is going to have a different knee-jerk reaction to it and do as they see fit without consulting anybody else. I was warned that I might be banned for posting a topic of discussion about a song that contained the word in its title (a highly influential song, no less). The topic was locked and deleted. Not a week later, a separate thread was started by somebody else with only the word "nigga" in the title ( http://www.prince.org/msg/8/192376 ). It racked up plenty of offensive posts and as far as I know is still open.

As others have said, banning the word will do nothing - it's not going to change the site and it's certainly not going to change somebody's deeply engrained belief systems.



i had never seen that thread until you posted the link.

there were 0, ZERO, Zelch reports made to moderators and there were no posts in that thread by a moderator...yet numerous folks commenting how shocked they were that the thread was still open..

uhhh, HA HA HELLO???

smile


confuse Yes. Usually we get a reporting from an Orger as to an offensive post or thread. I can't believe that thread went unreported. It's up to all Orgers to help us when things like that are posted - we cannot be at all places at all times... Thanks for dropping that thread SOS, yes... it was offensive. I'da locked it and hid it too. nod
[PRINCE 4EVER!]

[June7, "ModGod"]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #129 posted 07/10/06 4:46pm

FrancerulzV99

Jeez, it's just a word...If people have complaints about it, then that's all they should do...Don't change what people do because it may be considered offensive or morally wrong...I think that that's it's hipocritical that the ones who complain about using the word are the exact same people who use it on a regular basis...I cannot tell you how many times I've been walking and heard damn rap music utter the word every two seconds, or walk down the street and hear two black people calling each other that word...So I say, just shut up and deal with it, it's a word...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #130 posted 07/10/06 4:48pm

ThreadBare

June7 said:

sosgemini said:




i had never seen that thread until you posted the link.

there were 0, ZERO, Zelch reports made to moderators and there were no posts in that thread by a moderator...yet numerous folks commenting how shocked they were that the thread was still open..

uhhh, HA HA HELLO???

smile


confuse Yes. Usually we get a reporting from an Orger as to an offensive post or thread. I can't believe that thread went unreported. It's up to all Orgers to help us when things like that are posted - we cannot be at all places at all times... Thanks for dropping that thread SOS, yes... it was offensive. I'da locked it and hid it too. nod


Yeah, it's hard to believe such a contentious thread hadn't crossed a mod's radar, IMHO. Especially when I reported an orger for comments on a subsequent thread and referenced that first thread in my report. (But, hey, I think the way "A Different World" got canceled was the result of a racist conspiracy, too. So, don't mind me.)

Needless to say, I think you guys will find Orgers being extremely helpful in the notification process, from now on. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #131 posted 07/10/06 4:55pm

ThreadBare

FrancerulzV99 said:

I think that that's it's hipocritical that the ones who complain about using the word are the exact same people who use it on a regular basis...


Actually, hypocrisy would be the same person promoting one position while practicing its opposite. Black people can disagree without it being hypocrisy. White people -- in Congress, on TV shows, in court -- disagree all the time without it being hypocritical.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #132 posted 07/10/06 5:41pm

CalhounSq

avatar

FrancerulzV99 said:

Jeez, it's just a word...If people have complaints about it, then that's all they should do...Don't change what people do because it may be considered offensive or morally wrong...I think that that's it's hipocritical that the ones who complain about using the word are the exact same people who use it on a regular basis...I cannot tell you how many times I've been walking and heard damn rap music utter the word every two seconds, or walk down the street and hear two black people calling each other that word...So I say, just shut up and deal with it, it's a word...


Yea, this is helpful neutral

I agree w/ what many have said already - don't ban the word, ban users who bait & offend...
heart prince I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it prince heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #133 posted 07/11/06 8:37am

Graycap23

I would say no. It help me 2 determine who the FOOLS are.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #134 posted 07/14/06 4:09am

1FRO

I personally dislike the use of the word period, but I cannot control what words others use. I would just hope that all would have enough respect and consideration for the sake of others, but if this isn't the case (which it usually isn't), then we can all make the choice to ignore such ignorance. Placing a ban on word usage will only increase the likelihood of the word(s) being used more than before. Of course I could be wrong.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #135 posted 07/14/06 10:31am

Imago

I'm normally indifferent to the word as it doesn't directly affect me.

The last time I was offended by it I heard a white guy say it among some of his friends. Made me ill.

I hear younger black kids say it sometimes in the for of "Nigga", and it would offend me if it weren't for the fact that they are using it in conjunction with "motherfucka", "shit", "bitch" and a host of other things I would rather not here somebody say waiting in line to watch Pixar's CARS with my 6 and 7 year old nephews. rolleyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #136 posted 07/14/06 12:13pm

iceblueangel20
07

sosgemini said:

Disclaimer: This thread is has not been created to debate race relations. I just want to see what the general consensus from the site's community was. Please state Yay or Nay and if you'd like, a brief explanation why.
[Edited 6/30/06 15:52pm]


Yay, Yay, yay, yay, yay, yay, yay.
God doesn't just tells me how much he "LOVE's" me, God shows me how much he "LOVE's" me. Both telling and showing "LOVE" means to "LOVE". They go hand in hand. You can't have one with out the other. Something is spoken, then followed by an action. That is
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #137 posted 07/14/06 12:13pm

iceblueangel20
07

sosgemini said:

Oh...snaps.


This includes any variation of the word.

Thanks.


Ditto. please. smile
God doesn't just tells me how much he "LOVE's" me, God shows me how much he "LOVE's" me. Both telling and showing "LOVE" means to "LOVE". They go hand in hand. You can't have one with out the other. Something is spoken, then followed by an action. That is
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #138 posted 07/14/06 1:09pm

sosgemini

avatar

iceblueangel2007 said:

sosgemini said:

Disclaimer: This thread is has not been created to debate race relations. I just want to see what the general consensus from the site's community was. Please state Yay or Nay and if you'd like, a brief explanation why.
[Edited 6/30/06 15:52pm]


Yay, Yay, yay, yay, yay, yay, yay.



help me understand your statement,


1) are you annoyed by the nature of this discussion or

2) are you a banned or alias account user trying to get your digs at me personally?

wink
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #139 posted 07/15/06 4:52pm

AnotherLoverTo
o

sosgemini said:

iceblueangel2007 said:



Yay, Yay, yay, yay, yay, yay, yay.



help me understand your statement,


1) are you annoyed by the nature of this discussion or

2) are you a banned or alias account user trying to get your digs at me personally?

wink


Excuse me for interjecting, but I'm pretty sure that iceblueangel is answering your original request of "yay or nay" on banning the word. Iceblueangel is answering "yay x 7". shrug
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #140 posted 07/15/06 5:39pm

sosgemini

avatar

AnotherLoverToo said:

sosgemini said:




help me understand your statement,


1) are you annoyed by the nature of this discussion or

2) are you a banned or alias account user trying to get your digs at me personally?

wink


Excuse me for interjecting, but I'm pretty sure that iceblueangel is answering your original request of "yay or nay" on banning the word. Iceblueangel is answering "yay x 7". shrug



doh!

i totally read it like "yada yada" without the da at the end of it...

apologies...

boxed

ive been getting beat up lately here...guess im in defense mode right now...

wink
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #141 posted 07/16/06 7:30pm

Blackfunk69

avatar

I have gold nigga album
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #142 posted 07/19/06 1:17pm

purpledisc

Members should be 'adult' enough to know when and when not to use a term or word in an appropriate manner.

I would never dream of using the "N" word - even in jest, Whenever I hear or read that word I have these visions of a psycho wearing a white hood and a shotgun in his hand. sad It is an awful word in every sense.

But people are free ( however you would be arrested here in UK for saying it in public !!) to say what they want.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #143 posted 07/20/06 3:26pm

brownsugar

purpledisc said:

Members should be 'adult' enough to know when and when not to use a term or word in an appropriate manner.

I would never dream of using the "N" word - even in jest, Whenever I hear or read that word I have these visions of a psycho wearing a white hood and a shotgun in his hand. sad It is an awful word in every sense.

But people are free ( however you would be arrested here in UK for saying it in public !!) to say what they want.



this is what i was gonna post. this is not a board to babysit people. the word should not be banned for the sheer point thatnowords should be banned period. the freedom to do it but with discretion. people should just know better. its a hurtful word period. i don't say it on here, i don't say it in person and i'd slap the taste outta my kids mouth if they say it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #144 posted 07/28/06 11:02am

roanmairin

avatar

Anx said:

it's up to ben.

though if my opinion is in any way useful, i say ABSOLUTELY NOT.

*NO* word should be banned from use.

the use of all words, however, should be monitored for CONTEXT and INTENT.

when the org starts banning words, the shark has SERIOUSLY been jumped.


Strongly agree.

thumbs up! nod
"What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #145 posted 07/28/06 11:08am

roanmairin

avatar

nurse said:


You could search through all of these works and never find anything as worse as this one word. It was made for the purpose of making a race of people feel inferior-so you can call it what you want. I call it a shame. It's funny how threads get locked around here everyday for anything, but the one's with the N-word seem to last forever. Wonder what opinions the mods really have about it? Or do they really care? Lastly, how can it be justified that a site uses the name of an African-American who sings about these matters all the time in his music and yet this word is allowed to be used here daily. Really sad sad .


It is subjective though. Many words are designed to make people feel inferior.

They all impact different people differently.

It would be great if everyone used offensive language responsibly but just because they don't we cannot start banning words.

That simply isn't the right response.


confused
"What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #146 posted 07/28/06 11:19am

roanmairin

avatar

nurse said:


Question your motives? Yes. But your character never or maybe you're questioning yourself regarding the intent of this whole thread? Anyway, I've said my peace so my posting on this thread has come to an end. Maybe next time a thread with this topic will actually accomplish something.


Does it only accomplish something by coming to a conclusion you agree with?
"What a lovely fat beat with a zompige baslijn"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #147 posted 07/28/06 3:50pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

sosgemini said:

Disclaimer: This thread is has not been created to debate race relations. I just want to see what the general consensus from the site's community was.

Please state Yay or Nay and if you'd like, a brief explanation why.


This includes any variation of the word.

Thanks.


I vote nay to the ban of ALL bad words!

I believe that ALL people should be free to express themselves. I can never condone censorship under ANY circumstances.

With that said, if ALL of us would make the time to read more books (including a dictionary) and learn some new words to increase our vocabulary skills, then the use of foul languages (like nigga, nigger, wigga, wigger, bitch/bytch, ho, faggot/fag, fuck, shit/styt, ass, asshole, jackass, and other racially/sexually offensive words) would FINALLY decrease.

We can only hope.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 5 of 5 <12345
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > prince.org site discussion > Should the org ban the use of the N-word?