Author | Message |
Suggestion I think it's strange that there can be hundreds of different posts about some of the most asinine things. I check the "latest headlines" and real threads are few and far between.
Then, if somebody brings up a thread about a interesting and relevant topic that is already being discussed, they are locked and told to go to the first thread that ever remotely dealt with the topic. Case in point: when I wanted to read a thread about the NAACP awards, I had to read through ONE LONG POST THAT WAS JACKED LIKE 3 TIMES. Meanwhile, I could go to the General Discussions forum and read one of a dozen threads talking nonsense about poo, dick, daily news I can get off Google, etc. Now, I have absolutely nothing against poo dick daily news and even etc. But it's getting annoying to have to wade through the junk to find the one thread with enough unrelated posts on it to be its own forum. Thanks for letting me say my piece. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
so you'd rather read a bunch of threads with like four or five responses to find info and reactions you may be looking for?
if there were a bunch of threads on the NAACP awards and one of 'em had a kajillion responses, and the rest all only had like four or five posts, which would you wanna look at first? what do you propose as an improvement? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: so you'd rather read a bunch of threads with like four or five responses to find info and reactions you may be looking for?
if there were a bunch of threads on the NAACP awards and one of 'em had a kajillion responses, and the rest all only had like four or five posts, which would you wanna look at first? what do you propose as an improvement? Because of my old slow computer and unreliable dial-up innernet, I usually don't click on threads with over 50 posts unless I am really desperate to read something. Long threads freeze up my computer regularly, but thats just me . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
well, i know that with the michael jackson court case threads, they have a new sticky thread every day or two, so the post count doesn't get way out of hand. i think that's a good idea.
i will say that i think having central threads for big events or incidents is a good idea. i will also say that i see two problems with this: 1) when the number of posts makes the thread a pain in the butt to open and scroll through; and 2) there's always the possibility of wanting to get "too" organized, and in the process we might end up locking some good sub-topic threads that could certainly stand on their own as forum discussions. this stuff is all work in progress, folks. i know it's frustrating when it's not all 100% user-friendly, but we're trying our best to make things better. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dauphin said: I could go to the General Discussions forum and read one of a dozen threads talking nonsense about poo, dick, daily news I can get off Google, etc.
Thanks for validating our existence. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well, it makes sense though.
There is only one Pope John Paul. Only one Terry Schivo. But so many variations of dick, poo, and vaginal discharge--these are all stories on their own. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: Well, it makes sense though.
There is only one Pope John Paul. Only one Terry Schivo. But so many variations of dick, poo, and vaginal discharge--these are all stories on their own. but isnt that the nature of the gd forum? its the closest to a free for all your gonna find....people who dont want poo, can stay away. Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: AsianBomb777 said: Well, it makes sense though.
There is only one Pope John Paul. Only one Terry Schivo. But so many variations of dick, poo, and vaginal discharge--these are all stories on their own. but isnt that the nature of the gd forum? its the closest to a free for all your gonna find....people who dont want poo, can stay away. Without such freedom I would have no forum to enlighten my fellow orgers. none. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: sosgemini said: but isnt that the nature of the gd forum? its the closest to a free for all your gonna find....people who dont want poo, can stay away. Without such freedom I would have no forum to enlighten my fellow orgers. none. you know, your strating to grow on me kid.... Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: AsianBomb777 said: Without such freedom I would have no forum to enlighten my fellow orgers. none. you know, your strating to grow on me kid.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: sosgemini said: you know, your starting to grow on me kid.... you take, two steps fowards i take two steps back... Space for sale... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: AsianBomb777 said: you take, two steps fowards i take two steps back... [img]underatted musical prodigy [Edited 4/1/05 18:09pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: so you'd rather read a bunch of threads with like four or five responses to find info and reactions you may be looking for?
if there were a bunch of threads on the NAACP awards and one of 'em had a kajillion responses, and the rest all only had like four or five posts, which would you wanna look at first? what do you propose as an improvement? you can: - be a lot more lenient on multiple threads that are TOPICAL like you are to threads that are just fun community discussion. - Create a Hot Topics forum so people can have multiple threads about a current event like the NAACP Awards, Shiavo, etc. Once a topic is no longer "hot", you lock all related threads. Example: for the next week, or two, it would be appropriate to have the Hot Topic forum feature discussion on the Pope. After a while and everybody gets it out of their system, close out the topic. - If you're going to keep threads limited to one, at least go in and remove the garbage. In fact, I can see at least three replies to THIS thread that have no business being associated with the topic. - Also, consider removing General Discussion topics from the "25 Newest Topics" list. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dauphin said: - be a lot more lenient on multiple threads that are TOPICAL like you are to threads that are just fun community discussion. you ought to see how much we delete in a day. i mean, really. that said, i do think we mods should continue dialoging about how far we should go with regards to multiple threads, and when to lock and when not to lock. - Create a Hot Topics forum so people can have multiple threads about a current event like the NAACP Awards, Shiavo, etc. Once a topic is no longer "hot", you lock all related threads. Example: for the next week, or two, it would be appropriate to have the Hot Topic forum feature discussion on the Pope. After a while and everybody gets it out of their system, close out the topic.
sounds kinda labor intensive, don'tcha think? now, if you wanna pay me by the hour to do this gig, keep talkin'.... - If you're going to keep threads limited to one, at least go in and remove the garbage. In fact, I can see at least three replies to THIS thread that have no business being associated with the topic.
no. if you think that any one of us is going to go through all the forums and judge the content of every single post on this site, i've got a really rude awakening for ya. - Also, consider removing General Discussion topics from the "25 Newest Topics" list.
no. GD is part of this site. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Don't know what to tell you then.
Look, the PML and PPML used to be GREAT. Definitive resources and discussions. When the Org came, it embodied MUCH of that same spirit. That spirit is replaced with what we have now. Prince.org is no longer a PRINCE website. Oh well... Oh yeah, and your "rude awakening." YAWN. Yeah, sure was rude. And if you're deleting so many posts a day, where are all the bans? Anxiety said: Dauphin said: - be a lot more lenient on multiple threads that are TOPICAL like you are to threads that are just fun community discussion. you ought to see how much we delete in a day. i mean, really. that said, i do think we mods should continue dialoging about how far we should go with regards to multiple threads, and when to lock and when not to lock. no. if you think that any one of us is going to go through all the forums and judge the content of every single post on this site, i've got a really rude awakening for ya. - Also, consider removing General Discussion topics from the "25 Newest Topics" list.
no. GD is part of this site. [Edited 4/2/05 20:06pm] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yep. Nice to see that the General Discussion Forum is such an intregal part of the website.
===== I think I'm going to masterbate now. ReturnOfDOOK 5 22 04/02/2005 7:52pm by bkw¤ A GOOD FUCKING TOWN Hotlegs 3 19 04/02/2005 7:49pm by bkw¤ The Pope really died now AndGodCreatedMe 41 275 04/02/2005 7:32pm by Chico319 I had a dream about Muse last night! applekisses 12 71 04/02/2005 7:13pm by applekisses Anyone know a good website for free Motorola ringtones??? missfee 0 0 04/02/2005 7:07pm JD!!! What Were U Thinking??? LOL Chico319 0 6 04/02/2005 7:04pm DEEP THROAT, CATFISH, & A BALL Hotlegs 8 92 04/02/2005 6:52pm by RazzBeret Super size me Annastesia22 10 70 04/02/2005 6:44pm by Tom Holy crap! What the hell happened to the GD? It's turned into LS&R with all these horny topics. mrdespues 12 86 04/02/2005 6:34pm by Muse2NOPharaoh even more fucked up shit !!!!! nakedpianoplayer 9 101 04/02/2005 6:21pm by psychodelicide¤ sosgemini is mean klhk 12 113 04/02/2005 6:12pm by TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs tell me about the love songs TheDuck 40 160 04/02/2005 6:11pm by brownsugar PUSSY??? AndGodCreatedMe 34 207 04/02/2005 6:02pm by emm¤ What song has been stuck in your head today-be honest! JDINTERACTIVE 81 412 04/02/2005 6:01pm by emm¤ off to tan now... nakedpianoplayer 7 47 04/02/2005 5:55pm by CynthiasSocks Why Can't Every Woman Deep Throat? analbolique 69 533 04/02/2005 5:41pm by OnionJuice AMERICAN IDOL - CRIMINAL RECORD MIGUELGOMEZ 9 68 04/02/2005 5:40pm by OnionJuice Which Dysfunctional Care Bear are you? PurpleThunder 11 69 04/02/2005 5:31pm by nakedpianoplayer¤ the toilet seat! TheDuck 16 73 04/02/2005 5:14pm by purplecam You Might Be Next (NSFW) analbolique 7 75 04/02/2005 4:51pm by glamslamkid Dual Shocked.... Nikster 1 36 04/02/2005 4:36pm by luv4u¤ Do you basically think no other woman/man can come close to your partner? mrdespues 3 32 04/02/2005 4:21pm by brownsugar eating my pussy klhk 42 364 04/02/2005 4:18pm by abierman MY VAGINA IS SORE AND I HAVE PMS klhk 56 326 04/02/2005 4:07pm by SammiJ Worship Le Peepee (NSFW) analbolique 12 135 04/02/2005 4:04pm by SammiJ Still Waiting... REDFEATHERS 6 41 04/02/2005 4:03pm by TaoOfGimp Why do Asian Guys have fake boobs? AsianBomb777 10 82 04/02/2005 3:56pm by luv4u¤ Dreams 2005 -- House, Globe, Knobs, and Hermits Janfriend 0 4 04/02/2005 3:53pm Why hasn't the United Nations Adressed the Issue with FAKE BOOBS? AsianBomb777 3 34 04/02/2005 3:50pm by AsianBomb777 Why do white guys love fake boobs? REDFEATHERS 13 103 04/02/2005 3:48pm by REDFEATHERS Why do black guys hate fake boobs? Krystal666 13 114 04/02/2005 3:40pm by luv4u¤ i dont even know what to say nakedpianoplayer 35 224 04/02/2005 3:35pm by REDFEATHERS what iz u listenin' to? Christopher 44 135 04/02/2005 3:24pm by Christopher Porn Clips (NSFW) analbolique 1 45 04/02/2005 3:18pm by REDFEATHERS holding a mans peter. nakedpianoplayer 65 391 04/02/2005 3:15pm by BobGeorge909 FOR SALE!!!! Gold319 89 423 04/02/2005 2:58pm by REDFEATHERS MIGUEL!!! Natisse 9 76 04/02/2005 2:53pm by PurpleThunder -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dauphin said: ...big list slagging off GD....
Your card is well and truly marked. Seriously, if you don't like it, you should find another website. It's not what you want to hear, but that's always the official line. Mind ask for your money back on the way out.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
doctormcmeekle said: Dauphin said: ...big list slagging off GD....
Your card is well and truly marked. Seriously, if you don't like it, you should find another website. It's not what you want to hear, but that's always the official line. Mind ask for your money back on the way out.... How about, if you don't like it, offer opinions on how to fix it. I'm trying to be constructive about it all. I am a huge proponent of the concept of the General Discussion forum. I thought the original Love, Sex, Relationships forum was a great idea. However, I never thought that the inane "chat" style of the org would become so saturated in the community that the "Prince" focus would be SECONDARY (some would say even further down the list). So...thanks for trying the "hard line" on me, but I know perfectly well that I can leave it. I've been with it too long (since the old PML) to not at least let my feelings known. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dauphin said: doctormcmeekle said: Your card is well and truly marked. Seriously, if you don't like it, you should find another website. It's not what you want to hear, but that's always the official line. Mind ask for your money back on the way out.... How about, if you don't like it, offer opinions on how to fix it. I'm trying to be constructive about it all. I am a huge proponent of the concept of the General Discussion forum. I thought the original Love, Sex, Relationships forum was a great idea. However, I never thought that the inane "chat" style of the org would become so saturated in the community that the "Prince" focus would be SECONDARY (some would say even further down the list). So...thanks for trying the "hard line" on me, but I know perfectly well that I can leave it. I've been with it too long (since the old PML) to not at least let my feelings known. I say it just shows that people don't really feel like discussing Princely matters that much these days. At least not as much as talking about nonsense. LSR was a good idea, however strangely enough those not into discussing any of that were complaining about there not being enough posts on GD. Funny because those very same people were complaining about the sex threads messing up GD. I don't really check out the Prince forums these days, but if what you say is true then you do have a point. Then again, decisions made at the org are not always democratic or fair. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i think we do our best to maintain a useful and fun web site, and that the org also goes through periods of high activity when prince actually has a lot going on that we can discuss, and the org has periods when there's not a lot to chat about in princeland and we have to make our own kinda entertainment.
have you thought about starting up your own site or blog or mailing list that is designed more in step with the way you want things to be? nothing's stopping you, ya know. or maybe you think you have what it takes to join the moderator team here on the org, and you can get in touch with ben to share some ideas about how you'd clean the place up to create a more dauphin-compliant org. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That's kinda the point. When events occur that would warrant large amounts of Prince related posts, they get regulated to ONE THREAD. Meanwhile, there can be a dozen threads on the Newest Thread page about Cock Warmers.
It's simple: You'd think that on a Prince themed website, and one that was THE PREMIER webspace for Prince related conversation, 5-10 threads about peoples reactions to the NAACP Awards is a heck of a lot better than 5-10 threads about fake boobs. You're showing your priorities as a moderator, and rewording the "well, we don't care for you so can just go" stance shows plenty. I don't expect the site to completely submit to my every whim. IF I did, I would have been bitchin and moanin a LONG time ago. Instead I just tried to stick with the forums that would generate quality discussions. But now, it seems that more and more of those threads start great, and then denegrate to personal back and forth banter that veers from the topic. You've shown how much you're willing to tolerate. I'm noting that from where I sit, that level is pretty low, Low enough to discourage a LONG TIME member from wanting to visit the site on a regular basis, and instead I get "Yeah, well, who needs you. Go start your own site." Thanks a bunch! Anxiety said: i think we do our best to maintain a useful and fun web site, and that the org also goes through periods of high activity when prince actually has a lot going on that we can discuss, and the org has periods when there's not a lot to chat about in princeland and we have to make our own kinda entertainment.
have you thought about starting up your own site or blog or mailing list that is designed more in step with the way you want things to be? nothing's stopping you, ya know. or maybe you think you have what it takes to join the moderator team here on the org, and you can get in touch with ben to share some ideas about how you'd clean the place up to create a more dauphin-compliant org. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dauphin, what do you think this site owes you?
i'm really curious to read your answer to this question. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
There has never been a single thread about cock warmers. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AsianBomb777 said: There has never been a single thread about cock warmers.
well, actually, there's been one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: AsianBomb777 said: There has never been a single thread about cock warmers.
well, actually, there's been one. http://www.prince.org/msg/100/140125 yes, I just realized. My apologize. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |