The great tit!

Made some new ones.

One day I hope to use a Phantom Flex camera.

Today I discovered it.First reaction..hmm..could that be 10000$...but I think it's around 500.000$.

Check it out!Awsome!!Shoots up to 10000 frames a sec..5000 at 1280x980 (+/-)

[Edited 1/24/12 8:50am]

It seems like the frame rate would not be 420 bt more like 12...from what I've leanred stndard movies are 30 frames per second.

It is cool to watch

and I hate pigeons

Slave2daGroove said:

It seems like the frame rate would not be 420 bt more like 12...from what I've leanred stndard movies are 30 frames per second.

It is cool to watch

and I hate pigeons

pigeontoes said:

Slave2daGroove said:

It seems like the frame rate would not be 420 bt more like 12...from what I've leanred stndard movies are 30 frames per second.

It is cool to watch

and I hate pigeons

i luved watching all those vids!!!!

when i was watching them i was listening to funky poo music by thierry ~ it seemed to mix in great!!!!

Slave2daGroove said:

It seems like the frame rate would not be 420 bt more like 12...from what I've leanred stndard movies are 30 frames per second.

It is cool to watch

and I hate pigeons

The old super 8 film was 24 frames a sec and I think single 8 was 18 fps.

The TV / video was 25.

Now alot of digital cameras are default 30 fps.

The higher the nr. fps the slower it gets.(like 420 is damn slow..12 frames fps is twice as fast as 24 fps.

12 fps would be fast..like a Charlie Chaplin movie...silent movies were shot 16 fps.

I went to the menu of my highspeed camera and selected 420 fps.

The only thing is..the higher the speed the lower my resolution gets..it sux.

That's why I wish I had a Phantom flex..LOL..It shoots 5000 fps at around 1280 x 970 pixels.

I started filming when I was 10..used super 8 stop motion etc.

I had a 16mm bolex that went to 64 fps max...awsome camera.

But now digital needs a expensive camera to get good resolution.

I think there's a canon that shoots 1000 fps at 720X576.

It's around 1000$.

[Edited 1/26/12 1:01am]

ThisOne said:

i luved watching all those vids!!!!

when i was watching them i was listening to funky poo music by thierry ~ it seemed to mix in great!!!!

Thx!!

I'll check out funky poo!

ThisOne said:

pigeontoes said:

i luved watching all those vids!!!!

when i was watching them i was listening to funky poo music by thierry ~ it seemed to mix in great!!!!

emile58 said:

Slave2daGroove said:

It seems like the frame rate would not be 420 bt more like 12...from what I've leanred stndard movies are 30 frames per second.

It is cool to watch

and I hate pigeons

The old super 8 film was 24 frames a sec and I think single 8 was 18 fps.

The TV / video was 25.

Now alot of digital cameras are default 30 fps.

The higher the nr. fps the slower it gets.(like 420 is damn slow..12 frames fps is twice as fast as 24 fps.

12 fps would be fast..like a Charlie Chaplin movie...silent movies were shot 16 fps.

I went to the menu of my highspeed camera and selected 420 fps.

The only thing is..the higher the speed the lower my resolution gets..it sux.

That's why I wish I had a Phantom flex..LOL..It shoots 5000 fps at around 1280 x 970 pixels.

I started filming when I was 10..used super 8 stop motion etc.

I had a 16mm bolex that went to 64 fps max...awsome camera.

But now digital needs a expensive camera to get good resolution.

I think there's a canon that shoots 1000 fps at 720X576.

It's around 1000$.

[Edited 1/26/12 1:01am]

Thanks for the info! Just when you think you know something, someone educates you. I love it! Thanks Again!