New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
Is Sonar 6 the best and easiest? is this the best to do pop stuff on? | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
I looked at the program (did a search), and it seems like with the variety of programs out there, while some are better than others, unless you're a degreed professional in recording, etc., it's really six of one, half a dozen of the others. So you could use that, or you could even use something like Garage Band - they'd probably both work just as well, but both have their quirks. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TANKAEFC said: I looked at the program (did a search), and it seems like with the variety of programs out there, while some are better than others, unless you're a degreed professional in recording, etc., it's really six of one, half a dozen of the others. So you could use that, or you could even use something like Garage Band - they'd probably both work just as well, but both have their quirks.
will it make me sound like jimmy jam and terry lewis? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No, it won't make you sound like a professional producer in itself (I take it your comment was somewhat ironic / laconic though). That will take time and dedication to achieve. SONAR's been a great program for years though, but it's just a platform in itself.
I've been using SONAR 2.1 for years myself. The recording programs were enough sophisticated for professional level recording already in the early part of the decade, and the real improvements since have been quite marginal. The rest is up to your own skills - or rather, how much effort you are willing to put into learning about things you'll need to know about pop music production that cannot just be automated by some computer program. [Edited 12/29/07 2:30am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
novabrkr said: No, it won't make you sound like a professional producer in itself (I take it your comment was somewhat ironic / laconic though). That will take time and dedication to achieve. SONAR's been a great program for years though, but it's just a platform in itself.
I've been using SONAR 2.1 for years myself. The recording programs were enough sophisticated for professional level recording already in the early part of the decade, and the real improvements since have been quite marginal. The rest is up to your own skills - or rather, how much effort you are willing to put into learning about things you'll need to know about pop music production that cannot just be automated by some computer program. [Edited 12/29/07 2:30am] so if i work hard i can have a number 1 hit with it! thanks! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
exactly.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
 I'm sick and tired of the Prince fans being sick and tired of the Prince fans that are sick and tired! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
#1 is overrated.
mirrorbestfriend said: novabrkr said: No, it won't make you sound like a professional producer in itself (I take it your comment was somewhat ironic / laconic though). That will take time and dedication to achieve. SONAR's been a great program for years though, but it's just a platform in itself.
I've been using SONAR 2.1 for years myself. The recording programs were enough sophisticated for professional level recording already in the early part of the decade, and the real improvements since have been quite marginal. The rest is up to your own skills - or rather, how much effort you are willing to put into learning about things you'll need to know about pop music production that cannot just be automated by some computer program. [Edited 12/29/07 2:30am] so if i work hard i can have a number 1 hit with it! thanks! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TANKAEFC said: #1 is overrated.
mirrorbestfriend said: so if i work hard i can have a number 1 hit with it! thanks! i need the royalty checks | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |