New topic
PrintableI can't believe $47,500 puts one in the top 1% I make more than that though. [Edited 10/26/09 10:34am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
2elijah said: I can't believe $47,500 puts one in the top 1% I make more than that though.
Yeah, i don't believe it either.[Edited 10/26/09 10:34am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
$47,500 ain't shit. If someone doesn't know how to spend right they are good as dead making double that. Fuck making that - my fund make that. Make the money/market work for me so I don't work for the money. That's the new American way, and Michael Moore hates it. He was on Stern explaining his ideas. I believe he is partly right but doubt his films will ever stop the greed. And its not that simple to sum up the market being evil because Jesus wouldn't day trade? etc.
Prince, I believe he does a lot for charity and isn't vocal about it! Actually I know for a fact he does a lot that goes unseen. Much of what he does is unseen by us. Heck he maybe doing more for Charity than LotusFlow3r site!! but ohh well. I still believe Bono is the coolest musician ever - when it comes to trying to change the world. That guys heart is really in the right place = he is like Lennon = trying to change the world 24/7. But he also uses his status to get people involved. Something that Prince and a million other celebs do not do as well or efficient as Bono/U2 or even REM. Prince is more private. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator
|
Vendetta1 said: so if you only need 47, 500 to be in the top 1%, are the rest of us who make that or more filthy capitalists, too? Should I not recommend the movie because of that?
That figure was in the world. In the US that would be quite different. Studies have shown the ass crack of the average Prince fan to be abnormally large. This explains the ease and frequency of their panties bunching up in it. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
moderatorMars23 said: Vendetta1 said: so if you only need 47, 500 to be in the top 1%, are the rest of us who make that or more filthy capitalists, too? Should I not recommend the movie because of that?
That figure was in the world. In the US that would be quite different. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
alandail said: jdcxc said: Oh please, Prince and Michael Moore are workers (albeit rich ones) hired by large multi-national corporations who are the "capitalists" with the real power. Micheal Moore's movie is put out by Paramount Films a subsidary of Viacom. Prince is primarily independent but must partner with the likes of Target, AEG and Universal for survival. I applaud Prince for encouraging people to see a progressive and enlightening documentary that will open minds to important issues. Your negativity is so elitist and contrary to political mobilization. Did you vote for Nader and indirectly GW? What does any of that have to do with Prince being one of the top 1% money earners in the world. Even Microsoft needs partners (Dell, HP, etc), that's completely irrelevant to who the top 1% or even the top 0.001% of money earners are. There are 6.7 billion people in the world, that means there are 67 million people in the top 1%. I suspect at least half are in the US, which is about 10% of our population. [Edited 10/26/09 5:18am] What are you a numerologist? What's the point? I guess Prince shouldn't recommend the Michael Moore movie base on your figures. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
^^ who said that - I responded specifically to a post (a couple of posts actually) that said Prince wasn't in the top 1% richest people in the world, when he clearly is. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
incredibleD said: It's again under the "News" Tab.
lotusflow3r says: What you mean like making a book containing vain photos of yourself then binding it in animal skin and covering it in jewels and selling it to the tasteless?  "My God it's full of Stars"
Indigo Club, September 21st 2008, 4.24am | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In the everlasting now, THIS girl is the most opulent. It's just a matter of perspective and value.
Sorry to hear about the limp  [Edited 10/29/09 1:28am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
What a damn shame.
I quite liked Michael Moore for bowling for Columbine and Sicko, but this just looks like simplistic drivel. I would love to see it but I'm not sure I could stand all the easy shots that ignore the complexities of macro-economics. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ThreadBare said:  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HOW THE HELL can anybody seriously comment on a) M. Moore, b) his new movie or c) capitalism in general now? I mean, the plain fact that we GOT THIS AD ON THE LF NEWS SECTION INSTEAD OF SOME CONTENT could make me hate humanity for years! WTF?!?!?! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FunkyDissCo said: HOW THE HELL can anybody seriously comment on a) M. Moore, b) his new movie or c) capitalism
 GOT THIS AD ON THE LF NEWS SECTION INSTEAD OF SOME CONTENT!!!  I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
