softandwet said: is there anyone who does that who also posts here?
I was looking at some threads just now, and noticed a woman who joined in March 2003, who is approaching 36,000 posts! I worked out its an average of nearly 33 A DAY for THREE FUCKING YEARS! Now consider the lulls in prince activity, where theres nothing much to talk about (particularly on a censored board like the npgmc) - isn't that quite weird? No offence or anything, but damn! 36 THOUSAND! Whats the most anyone on this board has posted? I'm only on 916 and I've been here 2 years! On the NPGMC I'm probably on less than 50 in an entire year, over a year in fact... I know what your saying there are a lot of people on the NPG that have A LOT of posts. I swear, I could name a few who use the site for theraputic reasons I would really like to suggest they get shrinks! Their posts are numerous. I'm on NPG a lot but like it less and less. There is member in paticular she replies to everyone's posts but only one line, I don't think her little brain is capable of much more thought than one sentance. Her remarks are stupid and usually rude. They need to kick her off. I go to these sites to get information and make friends. I don't understand why people are rude and pissy to each other. I just want to make friends and have fun, ya know? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
musica said: softandwet said: is there anyone who does that who also posts here?
I was looking at some threads just now, and noticed a woman who joined in March 2003, who is approaching 36,000 posts! I worked out its an average of nearly 33 A DAY for THREE FUCKING YEARS! Now consider the lulls in prince activity, where theres nothing much to talk about (particularly on a censored board like the npgmc) - isn't that quite weird? No offence or anything, but damn! 36 THOUSAND! Whats the most anyone on this board has posted? I'm only on 916 and I've been here 2 years! On the NPGMC I'm probably on less than 50 in an entire year, over a year in fact... I know what your saying there are a lot of people on the NPG that have A LOT of posts. I swear, I could name a few who use the site for theraputic reasons I would really like to suggest they get shrinks! Their posts are numerous. I'm on NPG a lot but like it less and less. There is member in paticular she replies to everyone's posts but only one line, I don't think her little brain is capable of much more thought than one sentance. Her remarks are stupid and usually rude. They need to kick her off. I go to these sites to get information and make friends. I don't understand why people are rude and pissy to each other. I just want to make friends and have fun, ya know? then do so and don't let others "ruin" it for you. [Edited 5/2/06 16:31pm] Christian Zombie Vampires | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Romera said: PositivityNYC said: dont forget housequake I'm not gonna diss you on the internet..... I meant Housequake.com did you? Hag. Muse. Web Goddess. Taurean. Tree Hugger. Poet. Professional Nerd. Geek.
"Resistance is futile." "All shall love me and despair!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jone70 said: It's from posting little responses like "Thanks" every time a PP starts a thread with some tidbit of info. People do that at HQ too. You can have a thread with 100 posts most of which read, "Thanks" or "Cool." I don't notice it as much here--probably b/c you actually have to go into someone's profile to see how many posts they have so it's not as much of an ego thing, I guess; whereas at NPG & HQ it's next to one's avatar & so some people feel that a lot of posts = bigger fan.
There are people who do that but if you are referring tothe "30,000 & more" group of members, actually it's not.. that's a resul of having multiple marathon conversations nearly every day for over 3 years ha-ha I never got that "more posts = bigger fan" feeling at npgmc.. HQ however.... lol Hag. Muse. Web Goddess. Taurean. Tree Hugger. Poet. Professional Nerd. Geek.
"Resistance is futile." "All shall love me and despair!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
musica said: softandwet said: is there anyone who does that who also posts here?
I was looking at some threads just now, and noticed a woman who joined in March 2003, who is approaching 36,000 posts! I worked out its an average of nearly 33 A DAY for THREE FUCKING YEARS! Now consider the lulls in prince activity, where theres nothing much to talk about (particularly on a censored board like the npgmc) - isn't that quite weird? No offence or anything, but damn! 36 THOUSAND! Whats the most anyone on this board has posted? I'm only on 916 and I've been here 2 years! On the NPGMC I'm probably on less than 50 in an entire year, over a year in fact... I know what your saying there are a lot of people on the NPG that have A LOT of posts. I swear, I could name a few who use the site for theraputic reasons I would really like to suggest they get shrinks! Their posts are numerous. I'm on NPG a lot but like it less and less. There is member in paticular she replies to everyone's posts but only one line, I don't think her little brain is capable of much more thought than one sentance. Her remarks are stupid and usually rude. They need to kick her off. I go to these sites to get information and make friends. I don't understand why people are rude and pissy to each other. I just want to make friends and have fun, ya know? thankfully the Ignore feature came into play I think I know which one you mean. if you put her on Ignore, you can get through the threads much quicker (and not eevn have to see the dumb crap she writes) -! Hag. Muse. Web Goddess. Taurean. Tree Hugger. Poet. Professional Nerd. Geek.
"Resistance is futile." "All shall love me and despair!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PositivityNYC said: Romera said: I decided to never speak that name again.
I'm not gonna diss you on the internet..... I meant Housequake.com did you? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PositivityNYC said: jone70 said: It's from posting little responses like "Thanks" every time a PP starts a thread with some tidbit of info. People do that at HQ too. You can have a thread with 100 posts most of which read, "Thanks" or "Cool." I don't notice it as much here--probably b/c you actually have to go into someone's profile to see how many posts they have so it's not as much of an ego thing, I guess; whereas at NPG & HQ it's next to one's avatar & so some people feel that a lot of posts = bigger fan.
There are people who do that but if you are referring to the "30,000 & more" group of members, actually it's not.. that's a result of having multiple marathon conversations nearly every day for over 3 years ha-ha I never got that "more posts = bigger fan" feeling at npgmc.. HQ however.... lol I'm sure duration of membership plays a part, but there are definitely people at NPG who feel that larger number of posts should entitle them to more priveleges or that they are truer/bigger fans. I've never met any NPGers personally, but some of the threads I've read give me that impression. Each website (.org, HQ, NPG) has it's own quirks and personality. Nothing wrong with it, but that definitely plays a part in why I visit some more frequently than others. The check. The string he dropped. The Mona Lisa. The musical notes taken out of a hat. The glass. The toy shotgun painting. The things he found. Therefore, everything seen–every object, that is, plus the process of looking at it–is a Duchamp. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's cool that nobody here on this site has an abundance of threads and everybody talks about significant things that are of the utmost(sp?) importance etc.
I mean...that's what the org. is known for, right? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I mainly lurk here, but I have to say a couple a three things...
1. In addition to the fact that they have formed a number of friendships and are extremely popular... The members with the high post count have been members since the club was "Love For One Another".. their post counts were rolled into npgmc and the high numbers reflect that; and 2. I'm too busy living my own life to give the slightest damn about how someone who isn't hurting anyone else lives theirs. In fact, I find the concept of an entire thread devoted to the subject to be extremely petty and sad. Oh.. and 3. before you flame me (and I'm sure someone will) ask me if I give a shit... *goes back to lurking* | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CPP said: I mainly lurk here, but I have to say a couple a three things...
I love you whoever you are. 1. In addition to the fact that they have formed a number of friendships and are extremely popular... The members with the high post count have been members since the club was "Love For One Another".. their post counts were rolled into npgmc and the high numbers reflect that; and 2. I'm too busy living my own life to give the slightest damn about how someone who isn't hurting anyone else lives theirs. In fact, I find the concept of an entire thread devoted to the subject to be extremely petty and sad. Oh.. and 3. before you flame me (and I'm sure someone will) ask me if I give a shit... *goes back to lurking* | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CPP said: I mainly lurk here, but I have to say a couple a three things...
And oh yeah, once upon a time a thread like this would have been poofed days ago. 1. In addition to the fact that they have formed a number of friendships and are extremely popular... The members with the high post count have been members since the club was "Love For One Another".. their post counts were rolled into npgmc and the high numbers reflect that; and 2. I'm too busy living my own life to give the slightest damn about how someone who isn't hurting anyone else lives theirs. In fact, I find the concept of an entire thread devoted to the subject to be extremely petty and sad. Oh.. and 3. before you flame me (and I'm sure someone will) ask me if I give a shit... *goes back to lurking* | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleLove7 said: Romera said: I'm sorry but no, it isn't scary. The most beloved people from the Org have tens of thousands of posts.
If it makes those people happy, what does it matter to anyone else? I'm sayin' tho... I post A LOT @ The NPGMC. The Org is where all the WIERDNESS xists... People say some Fucked Up thing here... I feel the same way about all the yahoo news that you cut and paste in your club | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CPP said: I mainly lurk here, but I have to say a couple a three things...
1. In addition to the fact that they have formed a number of friendships and are extremely popular... The members with the high post count have been members since the club was "Love For One Another".. their post counts were rolled into npgmc and the high numbers reflect that; and 2. I'm too busy living my own life to give the slightest damn about how someone who isn't hurting anyone else lives theirs. In fact, I find the concept of an entire thread devoted to the subject to be extremely petty and sad. Oh.. and 3. before you flame me (and I'm sure someone will) ask me if I give a shit... *goes back to lurking* I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
So what if someone posts a million and one posts at NPGMC? It's their choice and their right. I'm a member of NPGMC, HQ and the org. I'm a member because I'm a Prince fan and that is the reason why most of us are here in the first place. I'm not crazy if I wanted to post on one of them sights 100 times a day. It's all about the subject and like someone said, I might be friends with one of them, which really seems to be the case over at NPGMC when I'm there. Look at this place. And why must those fans be "scary"? If they are so "crazy" are you at least praying for them to get over their crazyness? If not them leave them alone. As the one for who this site is dedicated for said in back in the day:
"Mind your own motherfucker let a man be a man" I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: So what if someone posts a million and one posts at NPGMC? It's their choice and their right. I'm a member of NPGMC, HQ and the org. I'm a member because I'm a Prince fan and that is the reason why most of us are here in the first place. I'm not crazy if I wanted to post on one of them sights 100 times a day. It's all about the subject and like someone said, I might be friends with one of them, which really seems to be the case over at NPGMC when I'm there. Look at this place. And why must those fans be "scary"? If they are so "crazy" are you at least praying for them to get over their crazyness? If not them leave them alone. As the one for who this site is dedicated for said in back in the day:
"Mind your own motherfucker let a man be a man" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
someone said "the woman" with 36,000 posts must not be able to relate to people in real life. well dumbass, i met that woman in march and she is not only a beautiful woman, she relates to people very well.
someone else brought up 2 other members with over 40,000 posts. both of them are people i'm happy to call a friend. the woman i've been talking to online and off for over 2 years and she does nothing but go out of her way to make other people's life better. and the man, he's someone i'm proud to call a friend. funny, witty, thought provoking. what kind of dumbass looks at how many times someone else has posted and then runs to another site to make some judgemental comment about them? you're just sad. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CPP said: [color=darkred] The members with the high post count have been members since the club was "Love For One Another".. their post counts were rolled into npgmc and the high numbers reflect that;
I don't believe that to be true. Not that it really matters, I just don't think that's a true statement. (I reserve the right to be incorrect) "not a fan" yeah...ok | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CPP said: I mainly lurk here, but I have to say a couple a three things...
1. In addition to the fact that they have formed a number of friendships and are extremely popular... The members with the high post count have been members since the club was "Love For One Another".. their post counts were rolled into npgmc and the high numbers reflect that; and 2. I'm too busy living my own life to give the slightest damn about how someone who isn't hurting anyone else lives theirs. In fact, I find the concept of an entire thread devoted to the subject to be extremely petty and sad. Oh.. and 3. before you flame me (and I'm sure someone will) ask me if I give a shit... *goes back to lurking* *Co-sign* Thank U! It's not hard 2 b at the NPGMC post and work at several other things at a time... especially when it's all PC based. The bottom line is that the person this thread is directed to is loved very much and we all enjoy reading her posts... Many of us have known one another 4 nearly 11 years. And let's not fail 2 mention that the woman being bashed, would never speak out against anyone and hurt their feelings, it isn't her way. So the mere fact that there is a thread here devoted 2 her and her post count is just wrong on so many levels. Angels, love and light,
Synergy It Snowed April 21st, 2016 and My heart is irrevocably broken. I love you and miss you, Prince. Thank you for giving me so much. 🌹 RIP 💜 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
keesie said: someone said "the woman" with 36,000 posts must not be able to relate to people in real life. well dumbass, i met that woman in march and she is not only a beautiful woman, she relates to people very well.
someone else brought up 2 other members with over 40,000 posts. both of them are people i'm happy to call a friend. the woman i've been talking to online and off for over 2 years and she does nothing but go out of her way to make other people's life better. and the man, he's someone i'm proud to call a friend. funny, witty, thought provoking. what kind of dumbass looks at how many times someone else has posted and then runs to another site to make some judgemental comment about them? you're just sad. I suppose you're referring to me. I'm revising my opinion to say that she must have a lot of time on her hands and "prefers" to relate to people on the Internet more than in real life. I'm just curious why??? Could it be an Internet addiction then? Is that politically correct enough for you? And do take notice that I did not need to spew out empty insults to explain or question. How sad that most people choose to behave this way. That may be why I just don't give a shit in most cases. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[b][i]Those Peeps, the Mods, and the psycho fanatics are SCARY. You can totally understand why Prince travels with the equivelance of the defensive line of the Bears as bodyguards. Some of those NUTS know how many hairs He's got on His head.Most of them, Male or Female would conduct lewd & lacivious acts on Him at the blink of His eye----- SCARY!!! I Dare you to go there and say a negative word about thier GOD. And if you shell out the 25$ to get in They treat (newbies) as if they don't exist. And you know what? They don't even know who that newbie may be!I'll say it for the last time, They're a clique bordering on being a cult, they're fuckin' scary. This is not a sweeping genralization, there are some good-nice people there, but you won't see thier names(masks) too often, they get fed up and frustrated and stay away. Shame, because the site, technically, is superb in its layout. Bordering on a game, as you search the rooms, which is cool. But don't expect to find ANYTHIG free!!! Exept the forums, and as I said, have fun there!!! Best Regards D | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: keesie said: someone said "the woman" with 36,000 posts must not be able to relate to people in real life. well dumbass, i met that woman in march and she is not only a beautiful woman, she relates to people very well.
someone else brought up 2 other members with over 40,000 posts. both of them are people i'm happy to call a friend. the woman i've been talking to online and off for over 2 years and she does nothing but go out of her way to make other people's life better. and the man, he's someone i'm proud to call a friend. funny, witty, thought provoking. what kind of dumbass looks at how many times someone else has posted and then runs to another site to make some judgemental comment about them? you're just sad. I suppose you're referring to me. I'm revising my opinion to say that she must have a lot of time on her hands and "prefers" to relate to people on the Internet more than in real life. I'm just curious why??? Could it be an Internet addiction then? Is that politically correct enough for you? And do take notice that I did not need to spew out empty insults to explain or question. How sad that most people choose to behave this way. That may be why I just don't give a shit in most cases. R U a certified counselor or psychiatrist that U can make a diagnosis on a person that U do not know? She chats on the boards while working, I don't see how that qualifies her as an internet junkie. Her job is 2 b on the net... if she has the ability 2 do her job and do it well and chat with her friends, what difference does it make 2 U? One could take a stab at diagnosing U and U're preoccupation with a person that is as sweet as sweet can b and always a true friend 2 all, but then I'd be questioning U and U'r mental status, won't I? Is that fair, U think? Even if it is what U r doing 2 this person... is it right that I should do the same 2 U? U have gone about bashing this woman, and not even with the decency 2 talk directly 2 her, instead Ur "preference", Ur "choice" is 2 do so in a forum where she cannot defend herself. If there is anything 2 talk about here, it is that there r many of us that have formed true friendships with one another... that is what U should awknowledge. Instead, U "prefer" 2 malign others' character; people whom are very good and kind, loving people - while "relating" through the "internet" 2 members here with a particular devotion that has now taken up several pages. Does that qualify U as one addicted 2 the internet? What is sad is that if U truthfully didn't give a "shit" U wouldn't feel the need 2 express yourself so earnestly over and over again about the same subject targeted at chosen individuals. One that does not give a shit behaves in a manner that clearly illustrates thier lack of thought on a subject -- That is they would not do, say, relate or even ponder the subject to such a degree as to post ad nauseam about that which they say they care nothing about... not seeing that your behavior belies your own words is what is truly, truly sad. Angels, love and light,
Synergy It Snowed April 21st, 2016 and My heart is irrevocably broken. I love you and miss you, Prince. Thank you for giving me so much. 🌹 RIP 💜 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Synergy said: gemini13 said: I suppose you're referring to me. I'm revising my opinion to say that she must have a lot of time on her hands and "prefers" to relate to people on the Internet more than in real life. I'm just curious why??? Could it be an Internet addiction then? Is that politically correct enough for you? And do take notice that I did not need to spew out empty insults to explain or question. How sad that most people choose to behave this way. That may be why I just don't give a shit in most cases. R U a certified counselor or psychiatrist that U can make a diagnosis on a person that U do not know? She chats on the boards while working, I don't see how that qualifies her as an internet junkie. Her job is 2 b on the net... if she has the ability 2 do her job and do it well and chat with her friends, what difference does it make 2 U? One could take a stab at diagnosing U and U're preoccupation with a person that is as sweet as sweet can b and always a true friend 2 all, but then I'd be questioning U and U'r mental status, won't I? Is that fair, U think? Even if it is what U r doing 2 this person... is it right that I should do the same 2 U? U have gone about bashing this woman, and not even with the decency 2 talk directly 2 her, instead Ur "preference", Ur "choice" is 2 do so in a forum where she cannot defend herself. If there is anything 2 talk about here, it is that there r many of us that have formed true friendships with one another... that is what U should awknowledge. Instead, U "prefer" 2 malign others' character; people whom are very good and kind, loving people - while "relating" through the "internet" 2 members here with a particular devotion that has now taken up several pages. Does that qualify U as one addicted 2 the internet? What is sad is that if U truthfully didn't give a "shit" U wouldn't feel the need 2 express yourself so earnestly over and over again about the same subject targeted at chosen individuals. One that does not give a shit behaves in a manner that clearly illustrates thier lack of thought on a subject -- That is they would not do, say, relate or even ponder the subject to such a degree as to post ad nauseam about that which they say they care nothing about... not seeing that your behavior belies your own words is what is truly, truly sad. Pleeeeease.....I really DON'T give a shit who this person is, but in general, I CHOOSE to deem people who spend a lot of time on the Internet as addicts. Sorry if you don't like my OPINION, but I don't give a shit about THAT either. Save your long, dramatic odes to your "friends". I don't care to know any of you over there. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: keesie said: someone said "the woman" with 36,000 posts must not be able to relate to people in real life. well dumbass, i met that woman in march and she is not only a beautiful woman, she relates to people very well.
someone else brought up 2 other members with over 40,000 posts. both of them are people i'm happy to call a friend. the woman i've been talking to online and off for over 2 years and she does nothing but go out of her way to make other people's life better. and the man, he's someone i'm proud to call a friend. funny, witty, thought provoking. what kind of dumbass looks at how many times someone else has posted and then runs to another site to make some judgemental comment about them? you're just sad. I suppose you're referring to me. I'm revising my opinion to say that she must have a lot of time on her hands and "prefers" to relate to people on the Internet more than in real life. I'm just curious why??? Could it be an Internet addiction then? Is that politically correct enough for you? And do take notice that I did not need to spew out empty insults to explain or question. How sad that most people choose to behave this way. That may be why I just don't give a shit in most cases. i like to know who i am talking to, so i did a search and realized you are the same moron who was crying that Prince was degrading white women in the song Black Sweat. And while you wanna act superior with your "i don't spew empty insults" crap...aren't you the same person who posted "I've never been on a site as full of immature, misinformed, and HIGHLY DELUSIONAL people"? stupid and hypocritical make for a bad combination, baby. as to the topic at hand, revising your statement doesn't seem to make it any more intelligent. it isn't about whether or not your politically correct, i've never been a proponent of political correctness. it's about you making an assumption about somebody, not on what she posts, but how many times she posts. that is stupid, especially since you have made the comment over there that your post count doesn't matter. does it affect your life in anyway how often she or anyone else posts? does it matter in anyway why she has that many posts? if you've got post count envy, go get you a pump or something. maybe get some surgery to remove that stick from your ass and make a friend, you might be able to bring your post count up. i have almost 14,000 posts there, does that mean i don't have a life or can't relate to people offline? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
prndc33 said: I Dare you to go there and say a negative word about thier GOD.
hell i do that on a regular basis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
gemini13 said: keesie said: someone said "the woman" with 36,000 posts must not be able to relate to people in real life. well dumbass, i met that woman in march and she is not only a beautiful woman, she relates to people very well.
someone else brought up 2 other members with over 40,000 posts. both of them are people i'm happy to call a friend. the woman i've been talking to online and off for over 2 years and she does nothing but go out of her way to make other people's life better. and the man, he's someone i'm proud to call a friend. funny, witty, thought provoking. what kind of dumbass looks at how many times someone else has posted and then runs to another site to make some judgemental comment about them? you're just sad. I suppose you're referring to me. I'm revising my opinion to say that she must have a lot of time on her hands and "prefers" to relate to people on the Internet more than in real life. I'm just curious why??? Could it be an Internet addiction then? Is that politically correct enough for you? And do take notice that I did not need to spew out empty insults to explain or question. How sad that most people choose to behave this way. That may be why I just don't give a shit in most cases. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Synergy said: gemini13 said: I suppose you're referring to me. I'm revising my opinion to say that she must have a lot of time on her hands and "prefers" to relate to people on the Internet more than in real life. I'm just curious why??? Could it be an Internet addiction then? Is that politically correct enough for you? And do take notice that I did not need to spew out empty insults to explain or question. How sad that most people choose to behave this way. That may be why I just don't give a shit in most cases. R U a certified counselor or psychiatrist that U can make a diagnosis on a person that U do not know? She chats on the boards while working, I don't see how that qualifies her as an internet junkie. Her job is 2 b on the net... if she has the ability 2 do her job and do it well and chat with her friends, what difference does it make 2 U? One could take a stab at diagnosing U and U're preoccupation with a person that is as sweet as sweet can b and always a true friend 2 all, but then I'd be questioning U and U'r mental status, won't I? Is that fair, U think? Even if it is what U r doing 2 this person... is it right that I should do the same 2 U? U have gone about bashing this woman, and not even with the decency 2 talk directly 2 her, instead Ur "preference", Ur "choice" is 2 do so in a forum where she cannot defend herself. If there is anything 2 talk about here, it is that there r many of us that have formed true friendships with one another... that is what U should awknowledge. Instead, U "prefer" 2 malign others' character; people whom are very good and kind, loving people - while "relating" through the "internet" 2 members here with a particular devotion that has now taken up several pages. Does that qualify U as one addicted 2 the internet? What is sad is that if U truthfully didn't give a "shit" U wouldn't feel the need 2 express yourself so earnestly over and over again about the same subject targeted at chosen individuals. One that does not give a shit behaves in a manner that clearly illustrates thier lack of thought on a subject -- That is they would not do, say, relate or even ponder the subject to such a degree as to post ad nauseam about that which they say they care nothing about... not seeing that your behavior belies your own words is what is truly, truly sad. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How many of you guys actually GO to the boards at the club everyday? How many of you are part of that community of people that have been in contact with each other there everyday for years and years? Y'all sound sound bitter. Stop hatin'! I assure you there aren't any posts about how much people post at the Org (or speaking badly about the Org at all). If there were they'd be removed (cough), because the goal there is not to seperate, but include. Y'all oughta try it sometime. Come on by! We don't bite....most of the time. [Edited 5/14/06 21:48pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
keesie said: prndc33 said: I Dare you to go there and say a negative word about thier GOD.
hell i do that on a regular basis No really! He does. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cerebus said: How many of you guys actually GO to the boards at the club everyday? How many of you are part of that community of people that have been in contact with each other there everyday for years and years?
I never post at NPGMC and I never will, in fact I don't even know what it is. What is the NPGMC? Besides I heard they all bow down before Prince and worship him - what a bunch of elephants!, sorry I mean sycophants! prince.org is much better and that's why i have about 1000 posts here. That is a much healthier number IMHO. in fact anyone who has more than a 1000 posts here must be a bit mad too. Yes anyone who has posted in excess of 1000 on any forum, anywhere on the web, ever is an idiot. No wait that includes me. Let me think of a new ideal number of posts that is healthy and balanced. Maybe I should have thought this through bit more. Just somewhere in the middle,
Not too good and not too bad. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |