No festival will ever say that they don't want someone. Them saying it's not likely to ever happen is quite the same. There are acts that are desirable to events for decades but like in any relationships sometimes the moment passes and the magiq is gone. At the moment no festival in a whole world would count their financal succes on Prince. He has been playing festivals in Europe during recent years but they have been new, one-off or huge enough to risk with him. Roskilde can handle cancellation of any act but their press and hype is not all about headliners. Glasto is a special case because the secrecy and mystique they create around headliners. You can't rumour, feed rumours, give hints, create hype atc. based on a act that a) hasn't confirmed b) won't show up. Major tours are booked very early and major festivals know already who are the main touring acts 2015. Prince can never do that and unless this changes he won't get a pyramid -stage headliner slot at glasto. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Can this be a permanent sticky, and can we make it so that every Glastonbury comment has to go in this thread? You know, like with Michael Jackson in the Non-Prince Music forum? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Everything you have said is disputed by the facts. Prince does and has played major festivals. ANY festival would be delighted to have someone of his stature play. So much so, Glastonbury have been chasing him for YEARS and is admitted by the organisers themselves. And, even with all the knockbacks, Michael Eavis has pretty much given him an open invitiation to play - "If he wants to do it, he will, but it's up to him".
So, really, you're assumptions count for jack in the face of the facts put forward by people who are actually involved in the scene. Incidentally, Michael Eavis doesn't stand for any nonsense either - he kicked a Pyramid-stage act out of the festival for unreasonable backstage behaviour, without batting an eyelid. The fact he still tries to engage with Prince might indicate that Prince has, so far, not been too unreasonable with them. ...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...
My dance project; www.zubzub.co.uk Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here; www.zubzub.bandcamp.com Go and glisten | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. .
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mindflux said:
Part A is mostly true, except for the part about the people attending. It is a very wide range of people who attend the event, but the common ground is they all like good music, no matter who it is. Year in, year out, the main stage field is rammed for the headline acts who are as diverse as the crowd. Prince would have no problems at Glasto at all.
Part B - I highly doubt that. Do you have any evidence for that. Also, there is nothing to stop him cancelling at any moment, anyway, so I would be surprised if he demanded a clause - it has never stopped him before.
Part C - again, highly unlikely. He's played festivals before, even in the UK and has never suffered this problem (well, not since 1980 and the infamous Rolling Stones support slot).
Chances are he will play Glastonbury and I fully expect we'll see him there next year. I'm pretty sure it was Emily Eavis who had said about the cancellation clause and, if the gig organisers told HIM to forget it, that would explain is annual moan about his name being used P-p-e-n-g-u-i-n......the P is silent | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I would say the festival wants him, but are likely tired of dealing with the broadcast and cancellation clause issues. Prince is difficult to work with, but I'm sure they have extended him an open invitation provided he clearly agree to their CON-tract. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Your first hand experience isn't with Prince though is it? Well done that you've played there. You don't know for certain however that your contract is the same as Princes. I suspect you don't get paid the same for a start. As I said, the festival website says they retain all broadcast rights.
I think Prince knows that tickets for Glastonbury don't go on sale a week before the event yes. He's worked in the industry for 40 odd years. I suspect he knows tickets for festivals go on sale months in advance... He's experimented with his own mini-festivals a la the celebrations.
I agree with you there. However his recording career could do with this kind of media attention. With a decent TV set he would be practically guaranteed a top 10 album/single.
I'm pleased you're pleased, but don't try and make out thats what you were saying. You didn't suggest he pulled out because the surprise was blown - you claimed it was his fear of Glasto trading on the name "Prince" - after all the tickets had been sold and the festival couldnt possibly benefit from the name "Prince" - because Prince apparently isn't aware the tickets go on sale more than a few days in advance (i.e. 6 months ago when they likely first asked him to play the 2014 Festival) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Noodled24 said:
Your first hand experience isn't with Prince though is it? Well done that you've played there. You don't know for certain however that your contract is the same as Princes. I suspect you don't get paid the same for a start. As I said, the festival website says they retain all broadcast rights.
I think Prince knows that tickets for Glastonbury don't go on sale a week before the event yes. He's worked in the industry for 40 odd years. I suspect he knows tickets for festivals go on sale months in advance... He's experimented with his own mini-festivals a la the celebrations.
I agree with you there. However his recording career could do with this kind of media attention. With a decent TV set he would be practically guaranteed a top 10 album/single.
I'm pleased you're pleased, but don't try and make out thats what you were saying. You didn't suggest he pulled out because the surprise was blown - you claimed it was his fear of Glasto trading on the name "Prince" - after all the tickets had been sold and the festival couldnt possibly benefit from the name "Prince" - because Prince apparently isn't aware the tickets go on sale more than a few days in advance (i.e. 6 months ago when they likely first asked him to play the 2014 Festival) This is becoming an exercise in tedium and now your just presenting straw man arguments, which are pretty poor and don't substantiate your previous assertions which were largely centered on Prince taking issue with the televising of his performance. No, my experience isn't in dealing with Prince, but it doesn't need to be (and, regardless, my experience is still way beyond yours!). Of course my contract (and pay - not that this has any relevance) are different, but one of the common, universally applicable clauses is that the artist gets to choose what is broadcast, at the behest of Glastonbury Festival. The reason they can do this is because, as you say (though you are trying to emphasise the meaning of this in a different way - i.e. that they will just broadcast without the artist's permission) they own the broadcast rights. You can assume what you like about what you think Prince knows. However, the rumours about him appearing this year started much earlier than a week before the event, so your point is moot (he was directly asked to confirm the rumours back in February, when he did his PR stunt at La Havas' house to announce the hit and run tour!). As is your suggestion that he would be guaranteed a top-10 album for performing a televised set - that's not a given by any means. He's getting plenty of media attention lately without having played this one festival. Finally, I'm not trying to make out anything different to what I originally said - I quoted what Michael Eavis said was the reason for him pulling out, which was that Prince was upset that word appeared to have got out. I speculated that it might be because "surprise was blown" because Glasto does also have surprise, unannounced gigs each year - so that could be a reason, given it seems obvious to most that tickets are all sold out prior to the event and line-up announcements anyway. But, we have no way of knowing for sure, which is why I still stuck with the official line from the festival. ...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...
My dance project; www.zubzub.co.uk Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here; www.zubzub.bandcamp.com Go and glisten | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He'll play in about 15 years in the Sunday afternoon legends slot, lots of muddy people drunk on Cider singing along to Kiss..... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wonder if it's the BBC / Glastonbury deal which means his entire set would be broadcast. We know P controls his music. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
andymacfunky said: I wonder if it's the BBC / Glastonbury deal which means his entire set would be broadcast. We know P controls his music. Nice that you bothered to read the thread ...we have only scratched the surface of what the mind can do...
My dance project; www.zubzub.co.uk Listen to any of my tracks in full, for free, here; www.zubzub.bandcamp.com Go and glisten | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mindflux said: DaveT said: Just for the record, when the Rolling Stones played they only allowed the BBC to broadcast about 15mins of their set (the rubbish, slow, middle 15mins!)... I'm sure they could come to a similar arrangement for Prince. Actually, it's crazy not to take the "risk"! It is the finest music and performing arts event in the world and with over 1200 acts to choose from, do you really think you would go and not see anything you liked?! Even apart from the music, there is so much else going on plus the quite unique vibe and atmosphere that Glastonbury has, it is really something you shoukd go and experience. It is a music-lovers festival and people go for the event itself -which is why 150,000 people every year don't mind taking the 'risk' you suggest The most amazing festival on the planet. Getting very commercial these days but still has the magic missing from many modern festivals. The headliners are 5% of the festival, and what I saw this year was pretty bland and predictable. The quality of Princes recent sets would have stood way above the majority of acts. love is touching souls | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |