independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Concerts > celebration vs. tours
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 07/10/02 11:42am

subyduby

celebration vs. tours

what's the difference in them?
which is more dramtic or more entertaining?
which costed more:ticket prices?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 07/10/02 12:13pm

BLACKMF

subyduby said:

what's the difference in them?
which is more dramtic or more entertaining?
which costed more:ticket prices?

The oturs obviously cost more on a per ticket basis. YOu pay over $100 in major cities to get a NPGMC ticket; only averaged out to be about $35 at Xenophobia. Of coursem the cost of lodging, food, and travel have to be factored into the celoeb ration if you dont live near Mpls.

There is more availbe for you money at the celebration to offset those travel expenses in the form of workshops and hguest speakers and the tour of Paisley (if they allow it next year)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 07/11/02 12:09am

Boob

avatar

Diarrhea Vaccine Being Tested

By LAURAN NEERGAARD
.c The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (July 8) - From Missouri to Mexico, Virginia to Venezuela, doctors are giving thousands of babies two experimental vaccines hoping to stop a type of diarrhea that kills more than 600,000 children worldwide each year.

It's a difficult quest: The first rotavirus vaccine was pulled off the market in 1999 after a lifethreatening side effect struck some U.S. babies, making American parents cautious about testing new, hopefully safer, versions. But doctors in developing countries, where rotavirus hits hardest, are telling public health experts they're desperate for protection.

``This is a disease that's democratic. Every kid in the world gets it. Every kid in the world could benefit from a vaccine that's safe and effective,'' says Dr. Roger Glass of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Drug giants Merck & Co. and GlaxoSmithKline now are testing two rotavirus vaccine candidates in a total of 12 countries; Merck's testing includes U.S. babies. In addition, the CDC is working with scientists in India on their own version.

Rotavirus, an intestinal infection, is the leading cause of severe diarrhea in young children. It can rapidly kill, as the sickest children become dehydrated from 10 to 20 episodes of diarrhea in a single day.

Each year, 3 million U.S. children, mostly babies and preschoolers, get rotavirus. Good medical care here means few deaths - roughly 40 a year - but 65,000 are hospitalized. Rotavirus costs the nation more than $1 billion annually in medical bills and parents' lost productivity.

The death toll is much worse in developing countries - about one child in every 250 dies of rotavirus, Glass says. ``They're so dehydrated they wither up like a flower, their eyes sink,'' he recalls of his days treating rotavirus in Bangladesh.

The last attempt at a vaccine ended in 1999, when American Home Products pulled its RotaShield off the market after a year of sales left 20 U.S. infants with a lifethreatening bowel obstruction. It was a very rare side effect - hitting one in 10,000 vaccine recipients - but deemed too great for Americans because so few babies here die of rotavirus. Many developing countries complained that RotaShield could have saved at least 100 of their children's lives for every case of bowel obstruction.

Now scientists are developing vaccines they hope will prove safer. Each is made from a live strain of rotavirus, but not the monkey strain used in RotaShield - the theory, still unproven, is that that may be a key safety difference.

Merck's version is a mix of cow and human strains, the types thought to cause most of the world's rotavirus illnesses. Merck says in early studies, babies had none of the fever and very little of the viral spread in the intestines that often accompanied RotaShield - promising safety signs. Now final Phase 3 testing has begun here and in Finland, Belgium, Germany, Puerto Rico and Jamaica, aiming to enroll at least 60,000 babies, hopefully enough to rule out the side effect.

Merck won't say how many have been vaccinated so far, but ``enrollment has not been as enthusiastic as for RotaShield'' because U.S. parents and pediatricians remember the frightening bowel problem, says Dr. David Matson of Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Va., a lead investigator.

Glaxo's version is a single human-only strain culled from an American baby who never had symptoms, suggesting the immune system is spurred enough by this mild infection to protect. Glaxo notes the human strain has never been linked to bowel obstruction, but studies must prove that safety.

Glaxo now is completing Phase 2 trials in Singapore, Mexico, Brazil and Venezuela, and plans final testing in tens of thousands of babies mostly in Latin America, because it hopes to sell first in developing countries.

The CDC culled yet another strain from babies in India who never became seriously ill, and is working with an Indian biotechnology company to test a resulting vaccine there.

The competition should speed a vaccine to market and eventually force down prices, crucial if developing countries are to benefit, says CDC's Glass.
==========================
lick LICK MY MAJIK NIPPLE!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 07/11/02 5:13am

subyduby

Boob said:

Diarrhea Vaccine Being Tested

By LAURAN NEERGAARD
.c The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (July 8) - From Missouri to Mexico, Virginia to Venezuela, doctors are giving thousands of babies two experimental vaccines hoping to stop a type of diarrhea that kills more than 600,000 children worldwide each year.

It's a difficult quest: The first rotavirus vaccine was pulled off the market in 1999 after a lifethreatening side effect struck some U.S. babies, making American parents cautious about testing new, hopefully safer, versions. But doctors in developing countries, where rotavirus hits hardest, are telling public health experts they're desperate for protection.

``This is a disease that's democratic. Every kid in the world gets it. Every kid in the world could benefit from a vaccine that's safe and effective,'' says Dr. Roger Glass of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Drug giants Merck & Co. and GlaxoSmithKline now are testing two rotavirus vaccine candidates in a total of 12 countries; Merck's testing includes U.S. babies. In addition, the CDC is working with scientists in India on their own version.

Rotavirus, an intestinal infection, is the leading cause of severe diarrhea in young children. It can rapidly kill, as the sickest children become dehydrated from 10 to 20 episodes of diarrhea in a single day.

Each year, 3 million U.S. children, mostly babies and preschoolers, get rotavirus. Good medical care here means few deaths - roughly 40 a year - but 65,000 are hospitalized. Rotavirus costs the nation more than $1 billion annually in medical bills and parents' lost productivity.

The death toll is much worse in developing countries - about one child in every 250 dies of rotavirus, Glass says. ``They're so dehydrated they wither up like a flower, their eyes sink,'' he recalls of his days treating rotavirus in Bangladesh.

The last attempt at a vaccine ended in 1999, when American Home Products pulled its RotaShield off the market after a year of sales left 20 U.S. infants with a lifethreatening bowel obstruction. It was a very rare side effect - hitting one in 10,000 vaccine recipients - but deemed too great for Americans because so few babies here die of rotavirus. Many developing countries complained that RotaShield could have saved at least 100 of their children's lives for every case of bowel obstruction.

Now scientists are developing vaccines they hope will prove safer. Each is made from a live strain of rotavirus, but not the monkey strain used in RotaShield - the theory, still unproven, is that that may be a key safety difference.

Merck's version is a mix of cow and human strains, the types thought to cause most of the world's rotavirus illnesses. Merck says in early studies, babies had none of the fever and very little of the viral spread in the intestines that often accompanied RotaShield - promising safety signs. Now final Phase 3 testing has begun here and in Finland, Belgium, Germany, Puerto Rico and Jamaica, aiming to enroll at least 60,000 babies, hopefully enough to rule out the side effect.

Merck won't say how many have been vaccinated so far, but ``enrollment has not been as enthusiastic as for RotaShield'' because U.S. parents and pediatricians remember the frightening bowel problem, says Dr. David Matson of Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Va., a lead investigator.

Glaxo's version is a single human-only strain culled from an American baby who never had symptoms, suggesting the immune system is spurred enough by this mild infection to protect. Glaxo notes the human strain has never been linked to bowel obstruction, but studies must prove that safety.

Glaxo now is completing Phase 2 trials in Singapore, Mexico, Brazil and Venezuela, and plans final testing in tens of thousands of babies mostly in Latin America, because it hopes to sell first in developing countries.

The CDC culled yet another strain from babies in India who never became seriously ill, and is working with an Indian biotechnology company to test a resulting vaccine there.

The competition should speed a vaccine to market and eventually force down prices, crucial if developing countries are to benefit, says CDC's Glass.



now, now don't neglect your cucumber. hurry.go. go.go! u might want to thrown in a banana, zucchini,pumpkin. try anything love. after all, if u can't love urself, who will? might as well, turn to unrespectable, dirty things. have fun!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 07/11/02 1:20pm

Boob

avatar

subyduby said:



now, now don't neglect your cucumber. hurry.go. go.go! u might want to thrown in a banana, zucchini,pumpkin!

I can't have these things, they give me diarrhea! razz
==========================
lick LICK MY MAJIK NIPPLE!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 07/13/02 5:13pm

Paisley

Boob said:

subyduby said:



now, now don't neglect your cucumber. hurry.go. go.go! u might want to thrown in a banana, zucchini,pumpkin!

I can't have these things, they give me diarrhea! razz

U mean the hershey squirts?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Concerts > celebration vs. tours