independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Sexualizing of Children...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 07/13/21 6:51am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Sexualizing of Children...

There has probably always been some degree of sexual exposure to children...

But overall children don't tend to know how to process sex/sexuality

There are increased pushes exposing children to things with the idea of 'normalizing' or diverting them early on from what adults say are issues later in life.
There are a few things I'm seeing/friends-family have experienced/seen that are a bit off lol

My biethnic friend who is a teacher and Army veteran in NYC took her kids to the library earlier this year and walked in on Drag Queen story telling time lol idk

so anyway London England had a reading challenge for kids at a local library

WATCH: Rainbow Monkey Dildo Story Hour at London Library ‘Reading Challenge’ for Kids

rainbow-monkey-640x480.png

A London library sparked intense backlash after it hired a self-described anti-racist carnival troupe with a performer dressed up as a monkey with a large dildo hanging between his legs for a children’s reading event.

On Saturday, the Redbridge Central Library hosted a performance from the Mandinga Arts carnival group. Video footage shared on social media showed a rainbow coloured money running out of the library, with the mock genitalia flopping at motorists.

The event was part of a “Summer Reading Challenge” in partnership with the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) for a “very special nature-themed Challenge that will inspire you to stand up for the planet.”

The library said that the purpose of the event was to provide “caregivers [with] fun, family-friendly activities, maintain literacy levels and create a safe space for children to connect with their peers.”

Following widespread condemnation for hosting such lewd content at a children’s event, Redbridge Libraries said in a statement: “During an event put on at the library today there was a performance by a Carnival Arts Company. Unfortunately one of the animal costumes was inappropriate which we were not aware of at the time of booking.

“We deeply apologise for the offence caused. This is being investigated and a further statement will be made.”

The library claimed that the event was organised by the local charity Vision, and not Redbridge Council itself, however the charity does work in partnership with the council and is overseen by three councillors.

The Redbridge Library features a slew of woke content on its YouTube page, including regular drag queen story hour-style videos from the controversial ‘Mama G’ drag performer, who has previously come under criticism for teaching young children how to “twerk”.

...

WATCH: Rainbow Monkey Dil...tbart.com)

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 07/13/21 6:54am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

The so-called Monkey Mayhem performance is described thusly: “Escaped from the circus these trio of acrobatic Monkey’s are causing havoc across town [sic]. They climb, they roll they tumble, but nothing makes them go bananas like being mischievous and having a good laugh.

“First created in 2008 these monkeys have been entertaining audiences across Europe and the UK. They are highly engaging and love audience interaction, Ideal for all kind or family outdoor festivals.”

E6Fd_-NUUAAzzdO?format=jpg&name=900x900

E6FeYrAVgAc4BcY?format=jpg&name=medium

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 07/13/21 7:03am

jaawwnn

avatar

a) Drag is not sexualisation.

b) Kids love toilet jokes. That's not sexual.

c) Find me a person who says they are pro sexualizing children.



"I think people ought to know that we're anti-fascist, we're anti-violence, we're anti-racist and we're pro-creative. We're against ignorance."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 07/13/21 7:33am

Strive

Slippery slope is real. Satan is real.

.

To the people that say this can't possibly happen, just look to children being able to "consent" to hormone theory and radical body alternation surgery without parent approval. It's not that far of a jump to children being able to "consent" to sexual encounters.

Pedophiles are trying to get under the LBGTQ umbrella by renaming themselves MAPs. But pedophila has always been a dark cloud looming over the LBGTQ community that gays knew they had to (publicly) dissociate with. Not so much today.

We have a gay choir, with a number of confirmed sex offenders as members, singing about how they are coming for your children. We have the reboot of Blues Clues with a literal demon singing about pride parades where there is a MAPs flag hidden on the skirt of one of the floats.

Don't bury your head in the sand about what's going on and connect the dots regarding this evil.



"When you deny people the option to not pick a side, you may not like the side they'll pick."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 07/13/21 7:37am

JorisE73

lol

This year my daughter (8 years of age) was watching a new children's program call 'Gewoon. Bloot.' (Just.Naked.) with naked adult people standing there and informing children about there bodies and letting the children ask them anything they wanted to know.
I guess Americans would get a heart attacking if they saw this program and thnk it was 'Sexualizing' children. (Kind of like how we in Netherlands would react if a bunch of adults would be standing there with AK-47's, glocks, 12 gauge shotguns etc. and informing kids how to use them on others)
It was a great and informative program and I highly recommend it to anyone with children.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 07/13/21 7:55am

Strive

JorisE73 said:

lol

This year my daughter (8 years of age) was watching a new children's program call 'Gewoon. Bloot.' (Just.Naked.) with naked adult people standing there and informing children about there bodies and letting the children ask them anything they wanted to know.
I guess Americans would get a heart attacking if they saw this program and thnk it was 'Sexualizing' children. (Kind of like how we in Netherlands would react if a bunch of adults would be standing there with AK-47's, glocks, 12 gauge shotguns etc. and informing kids how to use them on others)
It was a great and informative program and I highly recommend it to anyone with children.


Teaching children that their bodies aren't special and can be shared with the world, same as the random strangers exposing their bodies to children. Yeah, nothing wrong with that. You are a great parent.


Yes sir, no satanic agenda going on with the state producing "diverse" programming like that for the children of their society.

[Edited 7/13/21 7:59am]

"When you deny people the option to not pick a side, you may not like the side they'll pick."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 07/13/21 8:19am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

jaawwnn said:

a) Drag is not sexualisation.

b) Kids love toilet jokes. That's not sexual.

c) Find me a person who says they are pro sexualizing children.



a. that can be discussed, but it is about sex and gender...

b. toilet jokes? Is that an Ireland expression? like crack-A-fat? I'm not understanding

c. The Redbridge Library features a slew of woke content on its YouTube page, including regular drag queen story hour-style videos from the controversial ‘Mama G’ drag performer, who has previously come under criticism for teaching young children how to “twerk”.
.
people are sexualizing children all the time. When you are are at a gathering and people are dancing. And kids are dancing, immitating adults, and there is a 13yr old girl doing a full body shake dance ala stripper, and a 9yr old is humping his 10yr old female cousin... that is sexualizing. When you see the Latin channel program dances where 7yr old girls are dressed in almost nothing and doing dances there are extremely sensual, or beauty pageants where 8yr old girls are made up to look like 30 yr old women...

d. did you even see the photos...

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 07/13/21 8:35am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

JorisE73 said:

lol

This year my daughter (8 years of age) was watching a new children's program call 'Gewoon. Bloot.' (Just.Naked.) with naked adult people standing there and informing children about there bodies and letting the children ask them anything they wanted to know.
I guess Americans would get a heart attacking if they saw this program and thnk it was 'Sexualizing' children. (Kind of like how we in Netherlands would react if a bunch of adults would be standing there with AK-47's, glocks, 12 gauge shotguns etc. and informing kids how to use them on others)
It was a great and informative program and I highly recommend it to anyone with children.

So people in the UK are just open to all of this? Naw of course they are not. There really is no reason to go all 'anti America' up in here. Because we have a whole lot of Americans that love this stuff, we have names for them

.

Is that Switzerland where people carry guns everywhere?

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 07/13/21 8:44am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Transgender Crafter Offers 'Trans and Non-Binary' Children 'Bitty Bug Soft Packer' Crochet Penis Product

A knitted penis for extremely small girls to wear in their pants if their parents believe them to be transgender. It is intended for girls so young, they demonstrate the product in a diaper.

Image

Image

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 07/13/21 9:53am

JorisE73

Strive said:


Teaching children that their bodies aren't special and can be shared with the world, same as the random strangers exposing their bodies to children. Yeah, nothing wrong with that.


Obviously you've never seen the program and how informative it is regarding the human body and how it should be respected and understood instead of ridiculed OR that you should be scared or ashamed of it. The fact that you think it's automatically something perverse says a lot about you and your upbringing

You are a great parent.


I know. Thanks for noticing thumbs up!

Yes sir, no satanic agenda going on with the state producing "diverse" programming like that for the children of their society.


Most of us in the Netherlands don't do superstition and try to teach 'understanding'.

Back in the 80s and 90s when I was growing up we had similar programs and we are all the wiser for it. At least we don't have unrealistic ideas regarding procreation or what the human body should look like.
[Edited 7/13/21 9:53am]
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 07/13/21 9:55am

JorisE73

OldFriends4Sale said:



JorisE73 said:


lol

This year my daughter (8 years of age) was watching a new children's program call 'Gewoon. Bloot.' (Just.Naked.) with naked adult people standing there and informing children about there bodies and letting the children ask them anything they wanted to know.
I guess Americans would get a heart attacking if they saw this program and thnk it was 'Sexualizing' children. (Kind of like how we in Netherlands would react if a bunch of adults would be standing there with AK-47's, glocks, 12 gauge shotguns etc. and informing kids how to use them on others)
It was a great and informative program and I highly recommend it to anyone with children.





So people in the UK are just open to all of this? Naw of course they are not. There really is no reason to go all 'anti America' up in here. Because we have a whole lot of Americans that love this stuff, we have names for them


.


Is that Switzerland where people carry guns everywhere?



I used America as an example. No need to be all defensive.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 07/13/21 9:58am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

JorisE73 said:

OldFriends4Sale said:

So people in the UK are just open to all of this? Naw of course they are not. There really is no reason to go all 'anti America' up in here. Because we have a whole lot of Americans that love this stuff, we have names for them

.

Is that Switzerland where people carry guns everywhere?

I used America as an example. No need to be all defensive.

that is just a response, don't be tender

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 07/13/21 10:52am

JorisE73

OldFriends4Sale said:



JorisE73 said:


OldFriends4Sale said:




So people in the UK are just open to all of this? Naw of course they are not. There really is no reason to go all 'anti America' up in here. Because we have a whole lot of Americans that love this stuff, we have names for them


.


Is that Switzerland where people carry guns everywhere?



I used America as an example. No need to be all defensive.


that is just a response, don't be tender



There there pat
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 07/13/21 11:29am

Strive

JorisE73 said:

Strive said:
Teaching children that their bodies aren't special and can be shared with the world, same as the random strangers exposing their bodies to children. Yeah, nothing wrong with that.
Obviously you've never seen the program and how informative it is regarding the human body and how it should be respected and understood instead of ridiculed OR that you should be scared or ashamed of it. The fact that you think it's automatically something perverse says a lot about you and your upbringing I know. Thanks for noticing thumbs up!
Yes sir, no satanic agenda going on with the state producing "diverse" programming like that for the children of their society.
Most of us in the Netherlands don't do superstition and try to teach 'understanding'. Back in the 80s and 90s when I was growing up we had similar programs and we are all the wiser for it. At least we don't have unrealistic ideas regarding procreation or what the human body should look like. [Edited 7/13/21 9:53am]

Actually I looked it up after you mentioned it. Obviously, I can't understand whatever moon language you guys speak but I did see a black host, a bunch of children and reaction shots to adults undressing. 2 old guys, 1 fat guy, 1 gay guy and 1 guy with a cock ring. All of them with their foreskins pulled back. Then the children look very uncomfortable as the host talks then the adults talk. And I'm guessing all the kids are actors with lines written for them.

The body should be respected and only shown in appreciate settings. Televison is not the approriate setting to expose your body. Those facts about the body should be taught by the parent, at a time the parent sees fit to teach it, not a bunch of globalist perverts being paid by the state.

You talking about how enlighted you are reminds me of this passage in a book I read, where they talk about how they held a party in a church and dressed up a beautiful woman as the "Goddess Of Reason". Why was she that? Because a bunch of men made her that. But they were so much more enlighted than the ones with reverance and superstition.

Yeah, mankind stays in its fallen state and can never learn the lesson that man can not be God. It's a story that repeats itself endlessly.

Keep owning the backwards Christians by yielding your power as the parent to the state. Maybe in 10 years time, your daughter will be selling pictures of her butthole for $5 on Onlyfans. That would really stick it to all the religious people of the world lol

"When you deny people the option to not pick a side, you may not like the side they'll pick."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 07/13/21 11:57am

TrivialPursuit

avatar

jaawwnn said:

a) Drag is not sexualisation.

b) Kids love toilet jokes. That's not sexual.

c) Find me a person who says they are pro sexualizing children.


Agree on all these points. Pulling drag into this is like pulling LGBTQ folks into an argument about pedophilia or bestiality. Just fucking stop lumping all the shit y'all don't understand into one pile of mental vomit. A drag queen telling a story isn't the same as a seven year old being shown pornography or something.

Jumping off that point, there is also a sexualization of children by having a boy on TV be gaga over girls, and the girl has no interest. I recently rewatched The Nanny (I'd missed the last 2 seasons). It's one of the best sitcoms ever, I think. But Brighton always being concerned about girls felt really off, especially since he was so young. The same with Maggie always worried about boys, and she was barley a teenager at the beginning. It was always about Maggie's clothes and not looking slutty, not Brighton's 11 year old boy-boner. It sexualized both of them. Granted, different time, but it didn't make it right.

That's just an example of the same schtick we see over and over and somehow just accept it. Even on Saved By The Bell, you can Zack and Slater being the two don juans wooing all the girls and being heartthrobs. Granted, they were a tad older, but where is the line?

Child pagents are the worst lot of them all.

I have no issue with a naked body. And nudity isn't sexualization. I do have issues with portraying children as overtly sexual predators when they're not even a teenager. There's age appropriate content, and that stuff just isn't for the ultra young demographic.

"eye don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 07/13/21 12:16pm

Strive

To be a little less blunt. Let me ask you this Joris.

.

If your daughter came up to you and asked some sort of question regarding the penis. Your reaction (I hope) wouldn't be to take off your pants and demonstrate how your anatomy looks/works. That would be inapproriate. We both know that.

.

So why is it ok for strangers to do that on TV? What's the purpose of that? Why would you allow your child to watch that?

.

If you want a perfect example of the slippery slope being real, it's sex education in western countries. It went from we have to talk about puberty/reproduction to we have to show it with illustrations to we have to cover a wide spectrum of sexuality and we have to show it with models. How much further are we going to go? When will enough be enough?

.

When does it cross the line from education about the facts of life into encouraging children to engage in sexual activities? Or worse, misleading children and encouraging them to explore potentially harmful lifestyle choices because it's trendy.

.

[Edited 7/13/21 12:26pm]

"When you deny people the option to not pick a side, you may not like the side they'll pick."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 07/14/21 2:21am

JorisE73

Strive said:

To be a little less blunt. Let me ask you this Joris.

.

If your daughter came up to you and asked some sort of question regarding the penis. Your reaction (I hope) wouldn't be to take off your pants and demonstrate how your anatomy looks/works. That would be inapproriate. We both know that.

.

So why is it ok for strangers to do that on TV? What's the purpose of that? Why would you allow your child to watch that?

.

If you want a perfect example of the slippery slope being real, it's sex education in western countries. It went from we have to talk about puberty/reproduction to we have to show it with illustrations to we have to cover a wide spectrum of sexuality and we have to show it with models. How much further are we going to go? When will enough be enough?

.

When does it cross the line from education about the facts of life into encouraging children to engage in sexual activities? Or worse, misleading children and encouraging them to explore potentially harmful lifestyle choices because it's trendy.

.

[Edited 7/13/21 12:26pm]



Again, this is your mind automatically seeing a naked body as something perverse.
In Netherlands children are exposed to naked parents (when getting out of the shower, changing clothes etc.) and this is considered quite normal and doesn't have anything to do with sex.
Teh program is about education nothing more and sure it can be uncomfortable for a kid to see a stranger naked, but that passes in a minute when these people just inform and educate.
My daughter has seen me and my wife naked many times and she's wasn't taught to be traumatized by a human body and she had questions about it even when she was 4 years old becuase she doesn't have a penis and wanted to know the why's and hows (which is quite normal)
After watching the program my daughter had questions and we were happy to answer them.
Your leap in logic regarding seeing a naked body and a child immediatly being traumatised and hoeing themsleves on Tik-Tok or whatever is pretty strange, but again, that;s probably just your upbringing. A naked body and (biological) education about it isn't porn.
I'd rather have my daughter learn about the body and sex in a safe environment with normal people willing to educate instead of through porn like most kids do that have been sheltered away from and 'protected' from the scary evil naked body when they were kids or taught the naked body is something perverse or wrong. Guess which kid has the most unrealistic idea of there bodies and sexual interactions. My guess is that it's the latter kid that will hoe themselves online not the kid who had a proper education and understanding of it.


The only people here in Netherlands who had a problem with this program were, of course, the church. Can't have people educating children about biology and life and there bodies without the pedo's and perverts in the church getting all scared that there followers won;t send them there kids anymore so they can't "teach" them about there bodies or why they have "strange" feelings between there legs and all the sick shit that then follows with too many of these holy people.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 07/14/21 5:33am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

It's funny who most posting just totally ignore the post lol

and bring up everything else lol

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 07/14/21 7:00am

TruthBomb

Strive said:

Slippery slope is real. Satan is real.


.


To the people that say this can't possibly happen, just look to children being able to "consent" to hormone theory and radical body alternation surgery without parent approval. It's not that far of a jump to children being able to "consent" to sexual encounters.

Pedophiles are trying to get under the LBGTQ umbrella by renaming themselves MAPs. But pedophila has always been a dark cloud looming over the LBGTQ community that gays knew they had to (publicly) dissociate with. Not so much today.

We have a gay choir, with a number of confirmed sex offenders as members, singing about how they are coming for your children. We have the reboot of Blues Clues with a literal demon singing about pride parades where there is a MAPs flag hidden on the skirt of one of the floats.

Don't bury your head in the sand about what's going on and connect the dots regarding this evil.





YES Satan is real and YES this is all happening and pushed by the sick twisted and EVIL liberals. They’re are some seriously twisted and sick people on this site
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 07/14/21 7:58am

JorisE73

OldFriends4Sale said:

It's funny who most posting just totally ignore the post lol

and bring up everything else lol


I think I answered it good enough.
I'm not the one who takes a leap from education to childporn.

But especially for you I'll do it simpler:


Strive said:

To be a little less blunt. Let me ask you this Joris.

.

If your daughter came up to you and asked some sort of question regarding the penis. Your reaction (I hope) wouldn't be to take off your pants and demonstrate how your anatomy looks/works. That would be inapproriate. We both know that.


This is not needed because she already knows what a penis looks like and already was explained what she wanted to know. I still don't see what's inappropriate of parents teaching or showing there child how a body functions (and I'm not talking about sexual acts because apparently that's what your mind only sees when looking at a naked human body) I just answer her questions (she was 4 years old and didn't have a clue about sex and all so she didn't ask anything regarding that so I didn't feel the need to bring that up to her, quite a simple concept)

So why is it ok for strangers to do that on TV? What's the purpose of that? Why would you allow your child to watch that?


Because it's educational in a safe and controlled environment. In Netherlands people can be naked without it immediatly being assumed a sexual thing. It's not like these people were naked for the hell of it, they were to explain and educate.

If you want a perfect example of the slippery slope being real, it's sex education in western countries. It went from we have to talk about puberty/reproduction to we have to show it with illustrations to we have to cover a wide spectrum of sexuality and we have to show it with models. How much further are we going to go? When will enough be enough?


We went from words to illustrations (which was more clear and easy to understand, that's why I guess we have books on biology) to people educating them about the human body in a new and interesting ways. Again nothing sexual, just a naked body, nothing more, nothing special.
With regards to Sex, well sometimes it's just easier to understand when you see something instead of just being told.

When does it cross the line from education about the facts of life into encouraging children to engage in sexual activities? Or worse, misleading children and encouraging them to explore potentially harmful lifestyle choices because it's trendy.


That's a giant leap that has nothing to do with the program or teaching kids about there bodies. Nobody invited kids into sexual activities or misled them in any way. That's just how you think. In Netherland we also have another program for 16+ kids called "Spuiten en Slikken" (its a double entendre name : "Spuiten" as shooting up drug or shooting cum and "Slikken" as in popping pills or swallowing whatever sexual) which teaches 16+ kids about the dangers of drugs and sex but also about the pleasures of drugs and sex without forcing anything on anyone but just to inform and lay it out in the open and make it easier for people to talk about. I guess it's just a different approach to educating and informing people. And because it's on TV nobody is forcing anyone to watch it (on/off switch on TV, change channel)

Clear enough now OldFriends4Sale? or do you now also have a "name" for me (I know, you're probably American and then love to stamp a derogatory label on anything or anyone that thinks, acts or even looks different from you -> Black people : The N word, Gay men : the F word etc.) so label me whatever you want, just understand that education in the Netherlands is still top tier compared to in the US. Not to mention teen pregnanies in the US in insanely high where it's almost non existent in the Netherlands.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 07/19/21 4:48am

jaawwnn

avatar

Christ yeah, child pageants. When are you gonna ban them America? The creepiest thing I have ever seen.

"I think people ought to know that we're anti-fascist, we're anti-violence, we're anti-racist and we're pro-creative. We're against ignorance."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 07/19/21 2:27pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

jaawwnn said:

Christ yeah, child pageants. When are you gonna ban them America? The creepiest thing I have ever seen.


And those fucking portraits they do of the kids, where their face is airbrushed to hell, the child looks dead behind the eyes, and it looks like some creepy doll that was even too creepy for a Chuckie or Annabelle movie.

Even Karen Black would've looked at it with her good eye and said, "nope, give me my Zuni doll back."

"eye don’t really care so much what people say about me because it is a reflection of who they r."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 07/20/21 8:27am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 07/20/21 6:47pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

New York man found dead with ‘I touch little girls’ written on chest

Mike Brest 5 hrs ago

A New York man was found dead Monday with the phrase “I touch little girls” scribbled across his body.

a car parked on a city street© Provided by Washington Examiner

The unidentified 80-year-old man’s body was discovered just after 9:30 a.m. Monday morning inside 256 Corson Ave., according to police. He was found shirtless on his back, had cuts to his forehead, and had two black eyes.

“Upon arrival, officers observed an unidentified adult male lying inside the hallway of the residence, unconscious and unresponsive. EMS responded to the location and pronounced the aided male deceased at the scene,” a New York Police Department spokesperson told the Washington Examiner in a statement.

The victim also had “I take dolls in my room for girls age 1-5” written on his stomach and “I touch” on his right foot, the New York Post reported, citing anonymous sources. He has been arrested two dozen times, though records do not indicate a history of pedophilia.

New York man found dead w... (msn.com)

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
That's what U want, TRANSCENDENCE. When that happens, O Boy -Prince 2015
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
“Strong people define themselves; weak people allow others to define them.” ― Ken Poirot
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Sexualizing of Children...