independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Social Media discussion (sorta part II)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/08/21 6:50am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Social Media discussion (sorta part II)

It's a very interesting discussion, that people are having, that many of us go back in forth about.

al·go·rithm
/ˈalɡəˌriT͟Həm/
noun
  1. a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer.

.

Big Tech that governs our government...
.
Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now
Ten Arguments for Deletin...rince.org)

118850501_2662528920651820_5956443252718319769_n.png?_nc_cat=108&ccb=2&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=suncyhi5Y-wAX-KQPR6&_nc_ht=scontent-bos3-1.xx&oh=88c3e39b4cd23743860c37ca27c818d2&oe=601BCEFC

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/08/21 6:51am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator





Has Social Media Harmed These Teens? | Middle Ground




Has Social Media Harmed T... - YouTube

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 01/08/21 8:02am

domainator2010

Read the "Facebook office in early years" part on this page:

https://www.indiatoday.in...2018-10-26

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 01/08/21 11:58am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator


This was refered to in the 2nd post I posted



What is Sign Off Log Off? (computerhope.com)

Sign off

Updated: 08/02/2020 by Computer Hope

Sign off may refer to any of the following:

log off

1. Alternatively referred to as log, log off, and sign out, sign off is disconnecting from a network or account voluntarily. For example, to check your credit card balance, you log into your account. When you are done reviewing the information, you log out, which is the same as signing off.

How do I log off or sign off?

The steps to log off vary depending on the program or service you're using. For many online services, you'll find an option to log off in the user menu or at the bottom of the page.

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 01/08/21 5:22pm

v10letblues

avatar

what a prescient thread.

Trump's ban from everything but Instacart is sure to have long lasting repercussions.

And of course Ben Shapiro make comparisons to the Arab Spring

[Edited 1/8/21 17:23pm]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 01/11/21 6:17am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Tik Tok allows a whole new level of 'WTF?'

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 01/11/21 9:15am

Margot

Angela Merkel has crticiized Twitter for refusing to allow Trump to Tweet. (Financial Times 1/11/21)




" Ms Merkel’s criticism of the ban was echoed by France’s finance minister Bruno Le Maire. Mr Le Maire told France Inter on Monday that he was “shocked” by Twitter’s move. He added: “Digital regulation should not be done by the digital oligarchy itself . . . Regulation of the digital arena is a matter for the sovereign people, governments and the judiciary.”

[Edited 1/11/21 9:19am]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 01/11/21 9:29am

v10letblues

avatar

Margot said:

Angela Merkel has crticiized Twitter for refusing to allow Trump to Tweet. (Financial Times 1/11/21)









" Ms Merkel’s criticism of the ban was echoed by France’s finance minister Bruno Le Maire. Mr Le Maire told France Inter on Monday that he was “shocked” by Twitter’s move. He added: “Digital regulation should not be done by the digital oligarchy itself . . . Regulation of the digital arena is a matter for the sovereign people, governments and the judiciary.”

[Edited 1/11/21 9:19am]


Why should Trump get special treatment? A private commercial business should enjoy its terms of service equally. Especially if the tweets provoke violence.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 01/11/21 9:57am

Margot

v10letblues said:

Margot said:

Angela Merkel has crticiized Twitter for refusing to allow Trump to Tweet. (Financial Times 1/11/21)

" Ms Merkel’s criticism of the ban was echoed by France’s finance minister Bruno Le Maire. Mr Le Maire told France Inter on Monday that he was “shocked” by Twitter’s move. He added: “Digital regulation should not be done by the digital oligarchy itself . . . Regulation of the digital arena is a matter for the sovereign people, governments and the judiciary.”

[Edited 1/11/21 9:19am]

Why should Trump get special treatment? A private commercial business should enjoy its terms of service equally. Especially if the tweets provoke violence.

It is not about Trump's rights, it's about an 'oligarchy' such as Twitter making those types of decisions.

The article specifically states the decisions such as these should be made by

"governments, the judiciary and sovereign people."

Amazon suppressed a documentary bt Shelby Steele last year as his politics were not' in alignment'

We need to realize that Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Google have enormous power and often over-reach. This is why we have anti-trust laws.

The Europeans are more willing to challenge these entities than we are.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 01/11/21 12:29pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Phobia.jpeg

Social Media Anxiety Disorder

Social Media Anxiety Disorder

Social Media Anxiety Disorder is a syndrome that relates to generalized Social Anxiety, and is acquired when the participation of social media affects the mental and physical well-being of an individual. Individuals who engage in social media discussion fear that interaction with people will bring feelings of self-consciousness,judgement, evaluation and inferiority. Often it leads to feelings of inadequacy, embarrassment and depression. In the US, Social Anxiety Disorder is the third largest psychological disorder, after alcoholism and depression at 13-14 % of the population. As an emerging trend in a technologically depended society, SMAD (Social Media Anxiety for short) can include may of the symptoms apparent in Social Anxiety Disorder; some of these include:

  • Fear to speak in front of groups
  • Anxiousness, nervousness and discomfort in social situations (online)
  • Intense fear, racing heart, redness, excessive sweating
  • Trembling, swallowing with difficulty, and muscle twitching

Symptoms of Social Media Anxiety Disorder


There are many symptoms of this disorder, and may be identified with the some of the following characteristics:

  • Being with a group of friends and interrupting the conversation to inform them that someone has commented on their latest Facebook page
  • Excusing yourself in a social situation with family or friends to check what has been happening on Twitter
  • Checking your Facebook or Twitter account while concentration or insistently being distracted for fear that individuals may be commenting on your Facebook or Twitter account
  • Randomly adding strangers to your Facebook or Twitter accounts
  • Spending 8 or more hours a day on a social networking site
  • Feeling a sense of attachment to your phone or computer, as if nothing else matters more
  • Built up anxiety when comments are not made and pictures are not posted/tagged correctly
  • Checking the number of followers on Twitter and constantly finding opportunities to increase these numbers


The symptoms of SMAD are variable, but all involve an social obsession to maintaining a reputation or online persona, while ensuring that popularity and communication between parties is consistently active at all time; at a certain level this behavior is acceptable and healthy, but when it begins to interfere with daily functioning in face-to-face social activity, intervention is required.

Social Media Anxiety related effects on health and well-being


Anxiety increases as individuals begin to engage in unhealthy activity online; usually the social networking sites are not responsible for the anxiety buildup directly, but indirectly when individuals who are prone to anxious situation may start directing their focus to the online world. Some of these individuals may exhibit the following triggers:

  • Clingy behaviour always seeking to please people
  • Extreme loneliness (but often causing more isolation when individuals turn to these sites)
  • Mistaking the virtual world for the real world
  • Low self-esteem
  • Body image issues
  • Dysfunctional families

As individuals turn to social media networking sites to fulfill their needs, they mistakenly assume that their problems will be resolved. Unfortunately, the networking sites cause these vulnerable individuals to compare their lives in contrast with other friends, and inadvertently fall victim. As a result, this comparison causes blows to self-esteem, negative effects on the individual's life, flame wars, hate crimes, increase in blood pressure, and missing out on life's important moments.

Social Media Anxiety Disorder can result in OCD, and chronic depression; according to Clinical psychologist Seema Hingorrany – SMAD is a “SMAD starts when a person is obsessively hooked to the internet and his or her moods and thoughts are dependent on the responses they get from the virtual world. The anxiety builds up to such an extent that the behaviour pattern becomes totally maladaptive."

...

Social Media Anxiety Diso...0 (ubc.ca)

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 01/11/21 1:48pm

IanRG

Margot said:

v10letblues said:

Margot said: Why should Trump get special treatment? A private commercial business should enjoy its terms of service equally. Especially if the tweets provoke violence.

It is not about Trump's rights, it's about an 'oligarchy' such as Twitter making those types of decisions.

The article specifically states the decisions such as these should be made by

"governments, the judiciary and sovereign people."

Amazon suppressed a documentary bt Shelby Steele last year as his politics were not' in alignment'

We need to realize that Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Google have enormous power and often over-reach. This is why we have anti-trust laws.

The Europeans are more willing to challenge these entities than we are.

.

IMDB states "What Killed Michael Brown" was streamed by Amazon 16 October 2020. The controversy abour whether they should stream it probably increased its audience.

.

Free speech arguments are normally about keeping the governments out of decisions about who is allowed to publish in a media outlet. The oligarchy of media is a problem much older than Amazon, Twitter, Facebook and Google. As these organisation were required to front the Senate and address issues that included when their platforms being used to promote lies, propaganda and political violence, it is hard to blame them for stopping their platforms being used to promote lies, propaganda and political violence.

.

Merkel said SM was right to add warnings to the coup leader's posts but the permanent ban was problematic. The discussion in Germany was to put this back on governments to provide regulations in how these businesses can make these decisions: "We need to to come up with regulation. And we need to be careful about what power these platforms have. I think it's no surprise that Twitter came up with that solution, with 12 days to go until Donald Trump leaves office. And the same applies to Facebook," Zimmermann (Member of the German Parliament's Committee on the Digital Agend) said." They were less concerned about banning the coup leader after the failed coup attempt and more concerned about if this was done to a future elected leader.

.

The highlighted quote is from the French.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 01/11/21 2:15pm

v10letblues

avatar

Margot said:

v10letblues said:

Margot said: Why should Trump get special treatment? A private commercial business should enjoy its terms of service equally. Especially if the tweets provoke violence.

It is not about Trump's rights, it's about an 'oligarchy' such as Twitter making those types of decisions.

The article specifically states the decisions such as these should be made by

"governments, the judiciary and sovereign people."

Amazon suppressed a documentary bt Shelby Steele last year as his politics were not' in alignment'

We need to realize that Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Google have enormous power and often over-reach. This is why we have anti-trust laws.

The Europeans are more willing to challenge these entities than we are.

No it's not an ogliachy, it's the same as Prince.org and the moderators can ban whomever they see as a problem. There are many many many platforms just like Twitter, Facebook and Prince.org, people just have to behave and not cause deadly riots and partake in hate speech so as not to be banned.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 01/11/21 4:21pm

SoulAlive

If Trump and other conservatives don’t like the rules,aren’t they free to create their own social media platforms? Why don’t they create their own Twitter,their own Facebook,etc? No one is stopping them from doing so.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 01/11/21 4:23pm

SoulAlive

v10letblues said:



Margot said:




v10letblues said:


Margot said: Why should Trump get special treatment? A private commercial business should enjoy its terms of service equally. Especially if the tweets provoke violence.


It is not about Trump's rights, it's about an 'oligarchy' such as Twitter making those types of decisions.


The article specifically states the decisions such as these should be made by


"governments, the judiciary and sovereign people."



Amazon suppressed a documentary bt Shelby Steele last year as his politics were not' in alignment'


We need to realize that Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Google have enormous power and often over-reach. This is why we have anti-trust laws.


The Europeans are more willing to challenge these entities than we are.



No it's not an ogliachy, it's the same as Prince.org and the moderators can ban whomever they see as a problem. There are many many many platforms just like Twitter, Facebook and Prince.org, people just have to behave and not cause deadly riots and partake in hate speech so as not to be banned.



Exactly! Follow the rules or get banned.It’s really that simple.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 01/11/21 6:06pm

Margot

SoulAlive said:

v10letblues said:

No it's not an ogliachy, it's the same as Prince.org and the moderators can ban whomever they see as a problem. There are many many many platforms just like Twitter, Facebook and Prince.org, people just have to behave and not cause deadly riots and partake in hate speech so as not to be banned.

Exactly! Follow the rules or get banned.It’s really that simple.

Financial Times again. 1/11

Try to look a little deeper. These companies are often self-interested.

See below:



"Nevertheless, some believe the technology companies are simply acting in their own self-interest, seeking to stave off criticism from the Democrats and possible regulatory action from an incoming Biden administration. Mr Biden has previously called for the repeal of Section 230, the part of US law that protects social media companies from being sued for content posted on their platforms. His administration will also now take on antitrust cases against Google and Facebook, while members of Congress continue to push for much stricter federal privacy laws."



“It’s very cynical . . . The reason why these guys are doing it is because Democrats are about to take power and they view this as a way to get on their good side to avoid any restrictions or any sort of laws being passed that hurt them."

This situation is much more complex than Prince.org rules.

These companies know Donald Trump has no power now. They are trying to 'make nice'

with the Democrats by doing things like blocking Trump from Twitter etc. It's only symbolic.

It's a power move. See the bolded above.

These companies are far more dangerous.

[Edited 1/11/21 18:20pm]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 01/11/21 6:32pm

v10letblues

avatar

Margot said:

SoulAlive said:

v10letblues said: Exactly! Follow the rules or get banned.It’s really that simple.

Financial Times again. 1/11

Try to look a little deeper. These companies are often self-interested.

See below:



"Nevertheless, some believe the technology companies are simply acting in their own self-interest, seeking to stave off criticism from the Democrats and possible regulatory action from an incoming Biden administration. Mr Biden has previously called for the repeal of Section 230, the part of US law that protects social media companies from being sued for content posted on their platforms. His administration will also now take on antitrust cases against Google and Facebook, while members of Congress continue to push for much stricter federal privacy laws."



“It’s very cynical . . . The reason why these guys are doing it is because Democrats are about to take power and they view this as a way to get on their good side to avoid any restrictions or any sort of laws being passed that hurt them."

This situation is much more complex than Prince.org rules.

These companies know Donald Trump has no power now. They are trying to 'make nice'

with the Democrats by doing things like blocking Trump from Twitter etc. It's only symbolic.

It's a power move. See the bolded above.

These companies are far more dangerous.

[Edited 1/11/21 18:20pm]

Section 230 PROTECTS free speech. Biden is free to say whatever he thinks, bit 230 is not going anywhere. If 230 were to be repealed, it will drive most social media oulets out of bussinss. Small forums like this will shut down for fear of lawsuits and ony the ones with deep pockets like Facebook who have the money for lawyers will stay in bussiness. It is a short sighted idea tht Biden will eventually do a 180 on

[Edited 1/11/21 18:33pm]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 01/11/21 7:09pm

Margot

v10letblues said:

Margot said:

Financial Times again. 1/11

Try to look a little deeper. These companies are often self-interested.

See below:



"Nevertheless, some believe the technology companies are simply acting in their own self-interest, seeking to stave off criticism from the Democrats and possible regulatory action from an incoming Biden administration. Mr Biden has previously called for the repeal of Section 230, the part of US law that protects social media companies from being sued for content posted on their platforms. His administration will also now take on antitrust cases against Google and Facebook, while members of Congress continue to push for much stricter federal privacy laws."



“It’s very cynical . . . The reason why these guys are doing it is because Democrats are about to take power and they view this as a way to get on their good side to avoid any restrictions or any sort of laws being passed that hurt them."

This situation is much more complex than Prince.org rules.

These companies know Donald Trump has no power now. They are trying to 'make nice'

with the Democrats by doing things like blocking Trump from Twitter etc. It's only symbolic.

It's a power move. See the bolded above.

These companies are far more dangerous.

[Edited 1/11/21 18:20pm]

Section 230 PROTECTS free speech. Biden is free to say whatever he thinks, bit 230 is not going anywhere. If 230 were to be repealed, it will drive most social media oulets out of bussinss. Small forums like this will shut down for fear of lawsuits and ony the ones with deep pockets like Facebook who have the money for lawyers will stay in bussiness. It is a short sighted idea tht Biden will eventually do a 180 on

[Edited 1/11/21 18:33pm]

It will be interesting to watch. I think this topic is inportant.

Europe is tougher w/these companies.

IMO, Jeff Bezos is exceptionally power-hungry. He controls more than Trump could have dreamed.

Mark Zuckerburg is from the same breed as is Sergey Brinn (Google).

We are tracked, controlled,

and dependent on them; we love our Prime memberships, our next-day deliveries, our search engine which collects information on our every move. And since we are 'asleep' and dependent on these

'services' they continue to invade our privacy, selling our information, watching our every move, etc.

1984 is here. The Democrats need to man-up and break up these companies (anti-trust) and

bring back more of our privacy. We'll see.

Most Americans are asleep.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 01/11/21 10:50pm

v10letblues

avatar

Yeah no. And the problem is the old people in congress do not know or understand tech. They held hearings last year and it was comical how ignorant they are in tech matters.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 01/12/21 12:51pm

SoulAlive

..

[Edited 1/12/21 12:51pm]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 01/12/21 2:32pm

Margot

v10letblues said:

Yeah no. And the problem is the old people in congress do not know or understand tech. They held hearings last year and it was comical how ignorant they are in tech matters.

"Old people" understand the problems that come from over-sized, over-influential, monopolies such as Google, Facebook, Amazon & Twitter.

-This is an Anti-trust matter.

-And, a privacy (People's info) matter.

Those are the core issues.

One does not have to be an ace in technology to get to the real problem.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 01/12/21 3:01pm

v10letblues

avatar

Margot said:



v10letblues said:


Yeah no. And the problem is the old people in congress do not know or understand tech. They held hearings last year and it was comical how ignorant they are in tech matters.



"Old people" understand the problems that come from over-sized, over-influential, monopolies such as Google, Facebook, Amazon & Twitter.


-This is an Anti-trust matter.


-And, a privacy (People's info) matter.


Those are the core issues.


One does not have to be an ace in technology to get to the real problem.


Yes some people, but not our congressmen and women. They were sadly ignorant on even the basics. They were reading off cards that someone, their aids provided them and it was obvious they had no idea what they were talking about and just regurgitating what was in front of them.
For one Facebook is irrelevant and why it works cannot be regulated.
It’s a popularity contest. You can’t regulate what people gravitate towards and what service will become popular. Same with Twitter. There are so many services exactly like it.
Besides these are not railroads or commodities like oil or gas or essential utilities. It’s bonkers to and misplaced what congress believes it’s doing.
[Edited 1/13/21 0:20am]
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 01/13/21 11:51am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Social Media Purge, Big Tech & Special Announcement | Tulsi Gabbard | DIRECT MESSAGE | Rubin Report - YouTube

https://youtu.be/VCGp-zYjUKA


Social Media Purge, Big Tech & Special Announcement | Tulsi Gabbard | DIRECT MESSAGE | Rubin Report

Government outsourcing decisions to big tech companies

.

Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report talks to Tulsi Gabbard (former Congresswoman) about the Big Tech social media purge, Trump being banned from Twitter, the censorship of Parler by Google, Apple and Amazon and shares an exclusive announcement with Rubin Report viewers. Tulsi Gabbard shares her concerns with the amount of power that tech corporations hold over our ability to communicate with each other. She discusses the ramping up of social media censorship on the major tech platforms and how she is using Locals.com to protect her ability to communicate with her followers. Join Tulsi Gabbard at http://tulsi.locals.com/ to fight big tech by supporting independent creators at Locals.

www.Locals.com

Control
your Destiny

Locals is for independent creators.

Publish your content, engage with your supporters and make money from subscriptions.

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 01/13/21 11:59am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

Margot said:

v10letblues said:

Section 230 PROTECTS free speech. Biden is free to say whatever he thinks, bit 230 is not going anywhere. If 230 were to be repealed, it will drive most social media oulets out of bussinss. Small forums like this will shut down for fear of lawsuits and ony the ones with deep pockets like Facebook who have the money for lawyers will stay in bussiness. It is a short sighted idea tht Biden will eventually do a 180 on

[Edited 1/11/21 18:33pm]

It will be interesting to watch. I think this topic is inportant.

Europe is tougher w/these companies.

IMO, Jeff Bezos is exceptionally power-hungry. He controls more than Trump could have dreamed.

Mark Zuckerburg is from the same breed as is Sergey Brinn (Google).

We are tracked, controlled,

and dependent on them; we love our Prime memberships, our next-day deliveries, our search engine which collects information on our every move. And since we are 'asleep' and dependent on these

'services' they continue to invade our privacy, selling our information, watching our every move, etc.

1984 is here. The Democrats need to man-up and break up these companies (anti-trust) and

bring back more of our privacy. We'll see.

Most Americans are asleep.

This post is emotionally on point.
People have been asleep with sleep aids for a while and don't see it


"you have to be asleep to believe it" - George Carlin

The Sad Reality Of This World - You Have No Choice ft George Carlin

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 01/13/21 12:10pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator




PROFESSOR Explains Why & How You Should QUIT SOCIAL MEDIA | Cal Newport & Lewis Howes

https://youtu.be/qlBV_CDvuYs


Thank you for watching this powerful interview with Cal Newport! Check out the show notes here: https://www.lewishowes.com/770 Cal Newport is a computer science professor at Georgetown University. In addition to academic research, he writes about the intersection of technology and society. He’s particularly interested in the impact of new technologies on our ability to perform productive work or lead satisfying lives. Cal recommends building “fences” around our phones so that we’re not using them mindlessly all day. So get ready to learn more tools to be more focused, present and creative on Episode 770. In This Episode, You Will Learn: How to train your focus
(
2:00) The three benefits from being alone
(
8:00) Why you need “analog” hobbies
(
30:00) Why anxiety has risen in younger generations
(
32:00) The reason Cal recommends 30 days away from technology
(
43:00) Plus much more…

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 01/14/21 6:27am

domainator2010

I've never been on social media (well, cept this one! smile ), so I don't really understand all this, but - I hope people are not confusing giving up social media with giving up SOCIALISING? THAT'S still the same as it ever was (I hope! smile ). Why don't we just replace all this FB, Twitter stuff with Jitsi? www.jitsi.org

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 01/14/21 11:12am

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

this is wild

THE 50Cent ARMY

https://fb.watch/30k5xbq76V/



The 50 Cent Party or 50 Cent Army (Chinese: 五毛党; pinyin: wǔmáo dǎng; lit. 'five-jiao party'; often shortened to 五毛; wǔmáo) is a term for Internet commentators (网络评论员; wǎngluò pínglùn yuán) who are reportedly hired by authorities of the People's Republic of China in an attempt to manipulate public opinion to the benefit of the Chinese Communist Party. It was created during the early phases of the Internet's rollout to the wider public in China. The name derives from the allegation that commentators are said to be paid ¥0.50 for every post, though some speculate that they are probably not paid anything for the posts, instead being required to do so as a part of their official Party duties. They create favourable comments or articles on popular Chinese social media networks that are intended to derail discussions that are unhelpful to the Communist Party and that promote narratives that serve the government's interests, together with disparaging comments and misinformation about political opponents and critics of the Chinese government, both domestic and abroad. Its Chinese equivalent, "wumao", has been used as an insult by English speakers against people with perceived support for the government of China; the term has also been cited in reports relating to Sinophobia.

A 2016 Harvard University paper found that in contrast to common assumptions, the 50 Cent Army consists mostly of paid bureaucrats who respond to government directives and rarely defend their government from criticism or engage in direct arguments. Around 80% of the analysed posts involve pro-China cheerleading with inspirational slogans, and 13% involve general praise and suggestions on governmental policies.


Research indicated a "massive secretive operation" to fill China's Internet with propaganda has resulted in some 488 million posts carried out by fake social media accounts, representing about 0.6% of the 80 billion posts generated on Chinese social media. To maximize their influence, such pro-government comments are made largely during times of intense online debate, and when online protests have a possibility of transforming into real life actions.

50 Cent Party - Wikipedia

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
What's the matter with your life...?
https://www.youtube.com/w...nm2Qq6QTFs
#IDEFINEME
https://www.youtube.com/w...7Xc21b6BYE
Keep Looking
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 01/14/21 12:30pm

jjhunsecker

avatar

Most social media is bullshit
You’re better off reading a book, or a reputable news source
#SOCIETYDEFINESU
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 01/14/21 1:11pm

IanRG

jjhunsecker said:

Most social media is bullshit You’re better off reading a book, or a reputable news source

.

Just be social and don't seek to use it as a source of media and it is fine.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Social Media discussion (sorta part II)