independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Supreme Court hearings must see television.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 10/12/20 8:25am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Supreme Court hearings must see television.

Forget the lies about Catholic bigotry, Amy Conehead Barrett's problem is she is a right wing nut who thinks moderate Obummercare is marxism.

She is a dangerous shit head. Forget Roe, what she supports is helping corporate America run us into actual fascism. You think we have gun nuts now just you wait.

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 10/12/20 8:26am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Her biggest critic: The National Catholic Reporter! Whoops.

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 10/12/20 9:51am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

There is nothing in her record that disqualifies her. Under a normal time line she should get 80+ votes. This shows how dishonest both sides are...not liking how she might rule is not a reason to attack her. But politics ruins everything.
[Edited 10/12/20 10:14am]
I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 10/15/20 9:30am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

Seems I was wrong and this is going to happen...I hope in the next few days they will all get over their own egos and pass something for covid.

Edit and there is no legit objection to her... Those that wanted Garland. I do not like the timing with the election so soon and covid...but she is a solid pick.
[Edited 10/15/20 9:35am]
I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 10/15/20 12:09pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

avatar

moderator

she was asked if she ever committed a sexual assault on someone confused

#ALBUMSSTILLMATTER
don't follow me if you're easily triggered...
https://prince.org/msg/7/464433 9.24.2020
if you ever try the lotus position
Try it while you're being strangled
Do U understand what I'm saying?
#IDEFINEME
For the mystery of iniquit
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 10/15/20 2:29pm

TruthBomb

OldFriends4Sale said:



she was asked if she ever committed a sexual assault on someone confused


Asked by whack job Mazie Dohdoh - talk about a worthless pos
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 10/15/20 3:44pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

OldFriends4Sale said:

she was asked if she ever committed a sexual assault on someone confused

that joke was told a 1000 times befor her name was even announced. they did that with the last one too... oh someone said something happened but when or where she had no idea... that person that asked made a mockery of sexual assault.

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 10/15/20 4:04pm

djThunderfunk

avatar

My favorite part is how they took the opportunity to change the definition of "sexual preference" to include the word "offensive" because she said it. falloff

Good thing it wasn't offensive when Biden said it in May, or when Ruth Bader Ginsburg used the term in 2017. It's all about the timing!

So transparent... lol lol lol


[Edited 10/15/20 16:04pm]

Bernie Grundman on MASTERING:
https://prince.org/msg/15/464719
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 10/15/20 4:08pm

benni

2freaky4church1 said:

Forget the lies about Catholic bigotry, Amy Conehead Barrett's problem is she is a right wing nut who thinks moderate Obummercare is marxism.

She is a dangerous shit head. Forget Roe, what she supports is helping corporate America run us into actual fascism. You think we have gun nuts now just you wait.


I have a serious problem with the Republicans pushing this through. She does not have enough experience as a judge.

Her undergraduate degree was in English Lit (major) and her minor was in French.

She graduated from Notre Dame law school in 1997.

She spent two years as a judicial law clerk after law school, first for Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1997 to 1998, then for Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1998 to 1999.

From 1999 to 2002, Barrett practiced law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a boutique law firm for litigation in Washington, D.C., that merged with the Houston, Texas-based law firm Baker Botts in 2001. (A boutique law firm is a collection of attorneys typically organized in a limited liability partnership or professional corporation specializing in a niche area of law practice.) While at Baker Botts, she worked on Bush v. Gore, the lawsuit that grew out of the 2000 United States presidential election, providing research and briefing assistance for Baker Botts's representation of George W. Bush.

Then she served as a visiting associate profressor and Fellow at George Washington University Law School for a year before returning to Notre Dame to be a teacher again. In 2007, she was a visiting professor at the University of Virginia School of Law. From 2011 to 2016, she spoke on constitutional law at Blackstone Legal Fellowship, a summer training program for Christian law school students that the Alliance Defending Freedom established for the stated purpose of inspiring "distinctly Christian worldview in every area of law."


In 2010, Chief Justice John Roberts appointed Barrett to serve on the Advisory Committee for the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In 2017, Trump appointed her to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. So she has only been a judge for 3 years. That's it. She has spent the majority of her career teaching, with a few odd lawyer jobs thrown in here and there.

There is an old saying, "Those who can't, teach."

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 10/15/20 6:35pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

2 years ago, I did sorta predict that trump might get to replace that woman... Ms ginsburg in 2020... wow...I HOPE I will be proven wrong...

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 10/15/20 6:41pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

benni said:

2freaky4church1 said:

Forget the lies about Catholic bigotry, Amy Conehead Barrett's problem is she is a right wing nut who thinks moderate Obummercare is marxism.

She is a dangerous shit head. Forget Roe, what she supports is helping corporate America run us into actual fascism. You think we have gun nuts now just you wait.


I have a serious problem with the Republicans pushing this through. She does not have enough experience as a judge.

Her undergraduate degree was in English Lit (major) and her minor was in French.

She graduated from Notre Dame law school in 1997.

She spent two years as a judicial law clerk after law school, first for Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit from 1997 to 1998, then for Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1998 to 1999.

From 1999 to 2002, Barrett practiced law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a boutique law firm for litigation in Washington, D.C., that merged with the Houston, Texas-based law firm Baker Botts in 2001. (A boutique law firm is a collection of attorneys typically organized in a limited liability partnership or professional corporation specializing in a niche area of law practice.) While at Baker Botts, she worked on Bush v. Gore, the lawsuit that grew out of the 2000 United States presidential election, providing research and briefing assistance for Baker Botts's representation of George W. Bush.

Then she served as a visiting associate profressor and Fellow at George Washington University Law School for a year before returning to Notre Dame to be a teacher again. In 2007, she was a visiting professor at the University of Virginia School of Law. From 2011 to 2016, she spoke on constitutional law at Blackstone Legal Fellowship, a summer training program for Christian law school students that the Alliance Defending Freedom established for the stated purpose of inspiring "distinctly Christian worldview in every area of law."


In 2010, Chief Justice John Roberts appointed Barrett to serve on the Advisory Committee for the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In 2017, Trump appointed her to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. So she has only been a judge for 3 years. That's it. She has spent the majority of her career teaching, with a few odd lawyer jobs thrown in here and there.

There is an old saying, "Those who can't, teach."

so how many years as a judge should one have? what undergrad degrees are acceptable--dispite a doctorate level in law? Must they have earned a law degree and passed a state Bar?

is teaching that bad? didn't barack teach?

I stand with Ben and the Moderators!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Supreme Court hearings must see television.